# Description
This change fixes the bug associated with an incorrect span in
`type_mismatch` error message as described in #7288
The `span` argument in the method `into_value` was not being used to
convert a `PipelineData::Value` type so when called in
[eval_expression](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/blob/main/crates/nu-engine/src/eval.rs#L514-L515),
the original expression's span was not being used to overwrite the
result of `eval_subexpression`.
# User-Facing Changes
Using the example described in the issue, the whole bracketed
subexpression is correctly underlined.
Behavior before change:
```
let val = 10
($val | into string) + $val
Error: nu:🐚:type_mismatch
× Type mismatch during operation.
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ ($val | into string) + $val
· ─────┬───── ┬ ──┬─
· │ │ ╰── int
· │ ╰── type mismatch for operator
· ╰── string
╰────
```
Behavior after change:
```
let val = 10
($val | into string) + $val
Error: nu:🐚:type_mismatch
× Type mismatch during operation.
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ ($val | into string) + $val
· ──────────┬───────── ┬ ──┬─
· │ │ ╰── int
· │ ╰── type mismatch for operator
· ╰── string
╰────
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR adds an alternative alias implementation. Old aliases still work
but you need to use `old-alias` instead of `alias`.
Instead of replacing spans in the original code and re-parsing, which
proved to be extremely error-prone and a constant source of panics, the
new implementation creates a new command that references the old
command. Consider the new alias defined as `alias ll = ls -l`. The
parser creates a new command called `ll` and remembers that it is
actually a `ls` command called with the `-l` flag. Then, when the parser
sees the `ll` command, it will translate it to `ls -l` and passes to it
any parameters that were passed to the call to `ll`. It works quite
similar to how known externals defined with `extern` are implemented.
The new alias implementation should work the same way as the old
aliases, including exporting from modules, referencing both known and
unknown externals. It seems to preserve custom completions and pipeline
metadata. It is quite robust in most cases but there are some rough
edges (see later).
Fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7648,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8026,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7512,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/5780,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7754
No effect: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8122 (we might
revisit the completions code after this PR)
Should use custom command instead:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6048
# User-Facing Changes
Since aliases are now basically commands, it has some new implications:
1. `alias spam = "spam"` (requires command call)
* **workaround**: use `alias spam = echo "spam"`
2. `def foo [] { 'foo' }; alias foo = ls -l` (foo defined more than
once)
* **workaround**: use different name (commands also have this
limitation)
4. `alias ls = (ls | sort-by type name -i)`
* **workaround**: Use custom command. _The common issue with this is
that it is currently not easy to pass flags through custom commands and
command referencing itself will lead to stack overflow. Both of these
issues are meant to be addressed._
5. TODO: Help messages, `which` command, `$nu.scope.aliases`, etc.
* Should we treat the aliases as commands or should they be separated
from regular commands?
6. Needs better error message and syntax highlight for recursed alias
(`alias f = f`)
7. Can't create alias with the same name as existing command (`alias ls
= ls -a`)
* Might be possible to add support for it (not 100% sure)
8. Standalone `alias` doesn't list aliases anymore
9. Can't alias parser keywords (e.g., stuff like `alias ou = overlay
use` won't work)
* TODO: Needs a better error message when attempting to do so
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR addresses issue #2047 in order to enable autocomplete
functionality when using sudo for executing commands. I'e done a couple
of auxiliary checks such as ignoring whitespace and the last pipe in
order to determine the last command.
# User-Facing Changes
The only user facing change should be the autocomplete working.
# Tests + Formatting
All tests and formatting pass.
# Screenshots
<img width="454" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4399118/219404037-6cce4358-68a9-42bb-a09b-2986b10fa6cc.png">
# Suggestions welcome
I still don't know the in's and out's if nushell very well, any
suggestions for improvements are welcome.
# Description
Fixes#8002, which expands ranges `1..3` to expand to array-like when
saving and converting to json. Now,
```
> 1..3 | save foo.json
# foo.json
[
1,
2,
3
]
> 1..3 | to json
[
1,
2,
3
]
```
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
issue #8167
Remove the `(link)` to the docs for `ShellError` and `ParseError`. As
per discussion on the issue, the nu-parser version didn't update on the
docs causing deadlinks for those errors, which brought the usefullness
of these links into question and it was decided to remove all of them
that `derive(diagnostic)`.
# User-Facing Changes
Before:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell〉ls | get name}
Error: nu::parser::unbalanced_delimiter (link)
× Unbalanced delimiter.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ ls | get name}
· ▲
· ╰── unbalanced { and }
╰────
```
After:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell〉ls | get name}
Error: nu::parser::unbalanced_delimiter
× Unbalanced delimiter.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ ls | get name}
· ▲
· ╰── unbalanced { and }
╰────
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR fixes a bug where a default list in a custom command parameter
wasn't being accepted. The reason was because it was comparing specific
types of list like `list<any>` != `list<string>`. So, this PR attempts
to fix that.
### Before
```
> def f [param: list = [one]] { echo $param }
Error: nu::parser::assignment_mismatch (link)
× Default value wrong type
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ def f [param: list = [one]] { echo $param }
· ──┬──
· ╰── default value not list<any>
╰────
```
### After
```
> def f [param: list = [one]] {echo $param}
> f
╭───┬─────╮
│ 0 │ one │
╰───┴─────╯
```
closes#8092
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Before landing:
- [x] `reedline 0.16.0` is out and pinned.
- [x] all fixes and features necessary are landed.
In the meantime:
- [ ] feed the release notes with relevant features and breaking changes
# Description
As title, I found this feature is useful to me too :)
Closes: #8039
# User-Facing Changes
```
❯ 3 * "ab"
ababab
❯ 3 * [1 2 3]
╭───┬───╮
│ 0 │ 1 │
│ 1 │ 2 │
│ 2 │ 3 │
│ 3 │ 1 │
│ 4 │ 2 │
│ 5 │ 3 │
│ 6 │ 1 │
│ 7 │ 2 │
│ 8 │ 3 │
╰───┴───╯
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This one fixes env not being hidden inside closure, reported in the
conversation under https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6593https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6593https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7937 still persist. These
seems a bit more involved and might need hidden env tracking also in the
engine state... I'm not yet sure what's causing it.
Also re-enables some env-related tests and removes unused Value clone.
# User-Facing Changes
Just a bugfix
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Improve error when `str replace <pattern>` detects a problem with
<pattern>.
# User-Facing Changes
New "Incorrect value" error:
```
〉 'C:\Users\kubouch' | str replace 'C:\Users' 'foo'
Error: nu:🐚:incorrect_value (link)
× Incorrect value.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ 'C:\Users\kubouch' | str replace 'C:\Users' 'foo'
· ─────┬────
· ╰── Regex error: Parsing error at position 4: Invalid hex escape
╰────
```
We could fruitfully replace some of the current uses of
`ShellError::UnsupportedInput` with this error. 'Incorrect value' is
different from 'wrong type'
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
* none added / changed.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Adds a `profile` command that profiles each pipeline element of a block
and can also recursively step into child blocks.
# Limitations
* It is implemented using pipeline metadata which currently get lost in
some circumstances (e.g.,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/4501). This means that the
profiler will lose data coming from subexpressions. This issue will
hopefully be solved in the future.
* It also does not step into individual loop iteration which I'm not
sure why but maybe that's a good thing.
# User-Facing Changes
Shouldn't change any existing behavior.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
I noticed that `open some_big_file | into binary` cannot be cancelled
with `ctrl+c`.
This small PR fixes that by checking `ctrl+c` in
`RawStream::into_bytes()`, and does the same in
`RawStream::into_string()` for good measure.
This PR makes `++` (the append operator) work with strings and binary
values. Can now do things like:
```bash
〉"a" ++ "b"
ab
〉0x[01 02] ++ 0x[03]
Length: 3 (0x3) bytes | printable whitespace ascii_other non_ascii
00000000: 01 02 03 •••
```
Closes#8015.
# Description
This PR does the following:
1. Adds a new command called `view span` - which shows what is at the
location of the span parameters
2. Adds a new command called `view` - which just lists all the `view`
commands.
3. Renames `view-source` to `view source`.
4. Adds a new command called `view files` - which shows you what files
are loaded into nushell's EngineState memory.
5. Added a `Category::Debug` and put these commands (and others) into
it. (`inspect` needs to be added to it, but it's not landed yet)
Spans are important to nushell. One of their uses is to show where
errors are. For instance, in this example, the leader lines pointing to
parts of the command line are able to point to `10`, `/`, and `"bob"`
because each of those items have a span.
```
> 10 / "bob"
Error: nu::parser::unsupported_operation (link)
× Types mismatched for operation.
╭─[entry #8:1:1]
1 │ 10 / "bob"
· ─┬ ┬ ──┬──
· │ │ ╰── string
· │ ╰── doesn't support these values.
· ╰── int
╰────
help: Change int or string to be the right types and try again.
```
# Examples
## view span
Example:
```
> $env.config | get keybindings | first | debug -r
... bunch of stuff
span: Span {
start: 68065,
end: 68090,
},
},
],
span: Span {
start: 68050,
end: 68101,
},
},
],
span: Span {
start: 67927,
end: 68108,
},
}
```
To view the last span:
```
> view span 67927 68108
{
name: clear_everything
modifier: control
keycode: char_l
mode: emacs
event: [
{ send: clearscrollback }
]
}
```
> To view the 2nd to last span:
```
view span 68065 68090
{ send: clearscrollback }
```
> To view the 3rd to last span:
```
view span 68050 68101
[
{ send: clearscrollback }
]
```
## view files
```
> view files
╭────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬────────┬────────┬───────╮
│ # │ filename │ start │ end │ size │
├────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼────────┼───────┤
│ 0 │ source │ 0 │ 2 │ 2 │
│ 1 │ Host Environment Variables │ 2 │ 6034 │ 6032 │
│ 2 │ C:\Users\a_username\AppData\Roaming\nushell\plugin.nu │ 6034 │ 31236 │ 25202 │
│ 3 │ C:\Users\a_username\AppData\Roaming\nushell\env.nu │ 31236 │ 44961 │ 13725 │
│ 4 │ C:\Users\a_username\AppData\Roaming\nushell\config.nu │ 44961 │ 76134 │ 31173 │
│ 5 │ defs.nu │ 76134 │ 91944 │ 15810 │
│ 6 │ prompt\oh-my.nu │ 91944 │ 111523 │ 19579 │
│ 7 │ weather\get-weather.nu │ 111523 │ 125556 │ 14033 │
│ 8 │ .zoxide.nu │ 125556 │ 127504 │ 1948 │
│ 9 │ source │ 127504 │ 127561 │ 57 │
│ 10 │ entry #1 │ 127561 │ 127585 │ 24 │
│ 11 │ entry #2 │ 127585 │ 127595 │ 10 │
╰────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴────────┴────────┴───────╯
```
`entry #x` will be each command you type in the repl (i think). so, it
may be good to filter those out sometimes.
```
> view files | where filename !~ entry
╭───┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬────────┬────────┬───────╮
│ # │ filename │ start │ end │ size │
├───┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼────────┼───────┤
│ 0 │ source │ 0 │ 2 │ 2 │
│ 1 │ Host Environment Variables │ 2 │ 6034 │ 6032 │
│ 2 │ C:\Users\a_username\AppData\Roaming\nushell\plugin.nu │ 6034 │ 31236 │ 25202 │
│ 3 │ C:\Users\a_username\AppData\Roaming\nushell\env.nu │ 31236 │ 44961 │ 13725 │
│ 4 │ C:\Users\a_username\AppData\Roaming\nushell\config.nu │ 44961 │ 76134 │ 31173 │
│ 5 │ defs.nu │ 76134 │ 91944 │ 15810 │
│ 6 │ prompt\oh-my.nu │ 91944 │ 111523 │ 19579 │
│ 7 │ weather\get-weather.nu │ 111523 │ 125556 │ 14033 │
│ 8 │ .zoxide.nu │ 125556 │ 127504 │ 1948 │
│ 9 │ source │ 127504 │ 127561 │ 57 │
╰───┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴────────┴────────┴───────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
I renamed `view-source` to `view source` just to make a group of
commands. No functionality has changed in `view source`.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR attempts to fix the completions issue where, on Windows,
completions wouldn't get generated from items in your path environment
variable. This seemed to be down to `PATH` vs `Path`. So, I tried to add
a new function that we can use anywhere to avoid this problem.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
As title, we can't provide examples for plugin commands, this pr would
make it possible
# User-Facing Changes
Take plugin `nu-example-1` as example:
```
❯ nu-example-1 -h
PluginSignature test 1 for plugin. Returns Value::Nothing
Usage:
> nu-example-1 {flags} <a> <b> (opt) ...(rest)
Flags:
-h, --help - Display the help message for this command
-f, --flag - a flag for the signature
-n, --named <String> - named string
Parameters:
a <int>: required integer value
b <string>: required string value
(optional) opt <int>: Optional number
...rest <string>: rest value string
Examples:
running example with an int value and string value
> nu-example-1 3 bb
```
The examples session is newly added.
## Basic idea behind these changes
when nushell query plugin signatures, plugin just returns it's signature
without any examples, so nushell have no idea about the examples of
plugin commands.
To adding the feature, we just making plugin returns it's signature with
examples.
Before:
```
1. get signature
---------------->
Nushell ------------------ Plugin
<-----------------
2. returns Vec<Signature>
```
After:
```
1. get signature
---------------->
Nushell ------------------ Plugin
<-----------------
2. returns Vec<PluginSignature>
```
When writing plugin signature to $nu.plugin-path:
Serialize `<PluginSignature>` rather than `<Signature>`, which would
enable us to serialize examples to `$nu.plugin-path`
## Shortcoming
It's a breaking changes because `Plugin::signature` is changed, and it
requires plugin authors to change their code for new signatures.
Fortunally it should be easy to change, for rust based plugin, we just
need to make a global replace from word `Signature` to word
`PluginSignature` in their plugin project.
Our content of plugin-path is really large, if one plugin have many
examples, it'd results to larger body of $nu.plugin-path, which is not
really scale. A solution would be save register information in other
binary formats rather than `json`. But I think it'd be another story.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR will help report a bad date that can't be converted where the
error message says `* Unable to parse datetime`. This is helpful when
you're converting a big table and it fails somewhere that you really
can't see. I put it in `[]` so that when it's null, you can see that
there should be something there.
Before:
```
> 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
Error: nu:🐚:datetime_parse_error (link)
× Unable to parse datetime
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
· ────┬────
· ╰── datetime parsing failed
╰────
help: Examples of supported inputs:
* "5 pm"
* "2020/12/4"
* "2020.12.04 22:10 +2"
* "2020-04-12 22:10:57 +02:00"
* "2020-04-12T22:10:57.213231+02:00"
* "Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:52:37 +0200"
```
After:
```
> 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
Error: nu:🐚:datetime_parse_error (link)
× Unable to parse datetime: [Tue 1 0].
╭─[entry #4:1:1]
1 │ 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
· ────┬────
· ╰── datetime parsing failed
╰────
help: Examples of supported inputs:
* "5 pm"
* "2020/12/4"
* "2020.12.04 22:10 +2"
* "2020-04-12 22:10:57 +02:00"
* "2020-04-12T22:10:57.213231+02:00"
* "Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:52:37 +0200"
```
# User-Facing Changes
New format for the error message.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Closes#6768.
BEFORE:
```
〉{ foo: [{a:1, b:2},2,3,4,5] }
╭─────┬────────────────╮
│ foo │ [table 5 rows] │
╰─────┴────────────────╯
```
AFTER:
```
〉{ foo: [{a:1, b:2},2,3,4,5] }
╭─────┬────────────────╮
│ foo │ [list 5 items] │
╰─────┴────────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
See above.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Lint: `clippy::uninlined_format_args`
More readable in most situations.
(May be slightly confusing for modifier format strings
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-parameters)
Alternative to #7865
# User-Facing Changes
None intended
# Tests + Formatting
(Ran `cargo +stable clippy --fix --workspace -- -A clippy::all -D
clippy::uninlined_format_args` to achieve this. Depends on Rust `1.67`)
I noticed that [it's pretty easy to name threads in
Rust](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/thread/#naming-threads). We might as
well do this; it's a nice quality of life improvement when you're
profiling something and the developers took the time to give threads
names.
Also added/cleaned up some comments while I was in the area.
# Description
This PR bumps the required rust version to 1.66.1.
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Small fix. Related: #7699.
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This adds the `SyntaxShape::Decimal` so you can create custom commands
with `decimal` types such as:
```shell
def cmd [x:decimal] { echo $x }
```
/cc @kurokirasama
Internally this is a little messy since we have `Type::Float` and
`SyntaxShape::Decimal`. I originally named it `float` and
`SyntaxShape::Float` but since we have `into decimal` and `1.1 |
describe` reports `decimal`, I decided to change the SyntaxShape.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This is an attempt to implement a new `Value::LazyRecord` variant for
performance reasons.
`LazyRecord` is like a regular `Record`, but it's possible to access
individual columns without evaluating other columns. I've implemented
`LazyRecord` for the special `$nu` variable; accessing `$nu` is
relatively slow because of all the information in `scope`, and [`$nu`
accounts for about 2/3 of Nu's startup time on
Linux](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6677#issuecomment-1364618122).
### Benchmarks
I ran some benchmarks on my desktop (Linux, 12900K) and the results are
very pleasing.
Nu's time to start up and run a command (`cargo build --release;
hyperfine 'target/release/nu -c "echo \"Hello, world!\""' --shell=none
--warmup 10`) goes from **8.8ms to 3.2ms, about 2.8x faster**.
Tests are also much faster! Running `cargo nextest` (with our very slow
`proptest` tests disabled) goes from **7.2s to 4.4s (1.6x faster)**,
because most tests involve launching a new instance of Nu.
### Design (updated)
I've added a new `LazyRecord` trait and added a `Value` variant wrapping
those trait objects, much like `CustomValue`. `LazyRecord`
implementations must implement these 2 functions:
```rust
// All column names
fn column_names(&self) -> Vec<&'static str>;
// Get 1 specific column value
fn get_column_value(&self, column: &str) -> Result<Value, ShellError>;
```
### Serializability
`Value` variants must implement `Serializable` and `Deserializable`, which poses some problems because I want to use unserializable things like `EngineState` in `LazyRecord`s. To work around this, I basically lie to the type system:
1. Add `#[typetag::serde(tag = "type")]` to `LazyRecord` to make it serializable
2. Any unserializable fields in `LazyRecord` implementations get marked with `#[serde(skip)]`
3. At the point where a `LazyRecord` normally would get serialized and sent to a plugin, I instead collect it into a regular `Value::Record` (which can be serialized)
# Description
Nothing changed, just fix some typos
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
I have changed `assert!(a == b)` calls to `assert_eq!(a, b)`, which give
better error messages. Similarly for `assert!(a != b)` and
`assert_ne!(a, b)`. Basically all instances were comparing primitives
(string slices or integers), so there is no loss of generality from
special-case macros,
I have also fixed a number of typos in comments, variable names, and a
few user-facing messages.
# Description
This PR allows the configuration of cursor shapes in nushell for each
edit mode. This is the change that is in the default_config.nu file.
```
cursor_shape: {
emacs: line # block, underscore, line (line is the default)
vi_insert: block # block, underscore, line (block is the default)
vi_normal: underscore # block, underscore, line (underscore is the default)
}
```
# User-Facing Changes
See above. If you'd prefer a different default, please speak up and let
us know.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
_(Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.)_
I implemented the status bar we talk about yesterday. The idea was
inspired by the progress bar of `wget`.
I decided to go for the second suggestion by `@Reilly`
> 2. add an Option<usize> or whatever to RawStream (and ListStream?) for
situations where you do know the length ahead of time
For now only works with the command `save` but after the approve of this
PR we can see how we can implement it on commands like `cp` and `mv`
When using `fetch` nushell will check if there is any `content-length`
attribute in the request header. If so, then `fetch` will send it
through the new `Option` variable in the `RawStream` to the `save`.
If we know the total size we show the progress bar
but if we don't then we just show the stats like: data already saved,
bytes per second, and time lapse.
Please let me know If I need to make any changes and I will be happy to
do it.
# User-Facing Changes
A new flag (`--progress` `-p`) was added to the `save` command
Examples:
```nu
fetch https://github.com/torvalds/linux/archive/refs/heads/master.zip | save --progress -f main.zip
fetch https://releases.ubuntu.com/22.04.1/ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso | save --progress -f main.zip
open main.zip --raw | save --progress main.copy
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
-
I am getting some errors and its weird because the errors are showing up
in files i haven't touch. Is this normal?
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Reilly Wood <reilly.wood@icloud.com>
# Description
Currently the implementation is different for Windows and Unix.
Thus certain operations will fail if the platform foreign line ending is
used:
example failing under windows
```
git show (git merge-base main HEAD)
```
Temporary cheat is to strip all `\r` and `\n` from the end. Proper
solution should trim them as correct patterns.
Also needed: test of behavior with both platform newline and
platform-foreign line endings
cc @WindSoilder
# User-Facing Changes
Line endings should be trimmed no matter the source and no matter the
platform
# Tests + Formatting
Still missing
src/main.rs has a dependency on BufferedReader
which is currently located in nu_command.
I am moving BufferedReader to a more relevant
location (crate) which will allow / eliminate main's dependency
on nu_command in a benchmark / testing environment...
now that @rgwood has landed benches I want
to start experimenting with benchmarks related
to the parser.
For benchmark purposes when dealing with parsing
you need a very simple set of commands that show
how well the parser is doing, in other words
just the core commands... Not all of nu_command...
Having a smaller nu binary when running the benchmark CI
would enable building nushell quickly, yet still show us
how well the parser is performing...
Once this PR lands the only dependency main will have
on nu_command is create_default_context ---
meaning for benchmark purposes we can swap in a tiny
crate of commands instead of the gigantic nu_command
which has its "own" create_default_context...
It will also enable other crates going forward to
use BufferedReader. Right now it is not accessible
to other lower level crates because it is located in a
"top of the stack crate".
