2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
< !DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd">
<article >
<!-- $Id$ -->
<articleinfo >
<title > Xen and Shorewall</title>
<authorgroup >
<author >
<firstname > Tom</firstname>
<surname > Eastep</surname>
</author>
</authorgroup>
2006-03-11 00:03:07 +01:00
<pubdate > 2006-03-10</pubdate>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<copyright >
<year > 2006</year>
<holder > Thomas M. Eastep</holder>
</copyright>
<legalnotice >
<para > Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version
1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with
no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover, and with no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
<quote > <ulink url= "GnuCopyright.htm" > GNU Free Documentation
License</ulink> </quote> .</para>
</legalnotice>
</articleinfo>
<section >
<title > Xen Network Environment</title>
<para > <ulink
url="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/">Xen</ulink> is a
<firstterm > paravirtualization</firstterm> tool that allows you to run
multiple virtual machines on one physical machine. It is available on a
wide number of platforms and is included in recent
<trademark > SuSE</trademark> distributions.</para>
<para > Xen refers to the virtual machines as
2005-12-30 23:31:08 +01:00
<firstterm > Domains</firstterm> . Domains are numbered with the first domain
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
being domain 0, the second domain 1, and so on. Domain 0
(<firstterm > Dom0</firstterm> ) is special because that is the domain
created when to machine is booted. Additional domains (called
<firstterm > DomU</firstterm> 's) are created using the <command > xm
create</command> command from within Domain 0. Additional domains can also
be created automatically at boot time by using the
<command > xendomains</command> service.</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<para > Xen virtualizes a network interface named <filename
2006-01-03 16:56:46 +01:00
class="devicefile">eth0</filename> <footnote >
<para > This assumes the default Xen configuration created by
<command > xend </command> and assumes that the host system has a single
ethernet interface named <filename
class="devicefile">eth0</filename> .</para>
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
</footnote> in each domain. In Dom0, Xen also creates a bridge
2006-01-03 16:56:46 +01:00
(<filename class= "devicefile" > xenbr0</filename> ) and a number of virtual
interfaces as shown in the following diagram.</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<graphic align= "center" fileref= "images/Xen1.png" />
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
<para > I use the term <firstterm > Extended Dom0</firstterm> to distinguish
the bridge and virtual interfaces from Dom0 itself. That distinction is
important when we try to apply Shorewall in this environment.</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<para > The bridge has a number of ports:</para>
<itemizedlist >
<listitem >
<para > peth0 — This is the port that connects to the physical network
interface in your system.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem >
<para > vif0.0 — This is the bridge port that is used by traffic to/from
Domain 0.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem >
<para > vifX.0 — This is the bridge port that is used by traffic to/from
Domain X.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section >
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
<title > Configuring Shorewall in Dom0</title>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<para > As I state in the answer to <ulink url= "FAQ.htm#faq2" > Shorewall FAQ
2</ulink> , I object to running servers in a local zone because if the
server becomes compromised then there is no protection between that
2006-01-03 16:56:46 +01:00
compromised server and the other local systems. Xen allows me to safely
run Internet-accessible servers in my local zone by creating a firewall in
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
(the Extended) Dom0 to isolate the server(s) from the other local systems
(including Dom0).</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
2006-03-11 00:03:07 +01:00
<caution >
<para > I find Xen Domain 0 to be an arcane environment in which to try to
use Netfilter (and hence Shorewall). As the number of interfaces and
bridges increase, complexity increases geometrically. I recommend
following this guide only if you really need to place a public server in
your local network. Otherwise, the <ulink url= "XenMyWay.html" > way that I
use Xen</ulink> is much more straight-forward.</para>
</caution>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<para > Here is an example. In this example, we will assume that the system
is behind a second firewall that restricts incoming traffic so that we
2006-03-11 00:03:07 +01:00
only have to worry about protecting the local LAN from the systems running
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
in the DomU's.</para>
2006-01-03 16:56:46 +01:00
2006-02-12 17:11:41 +01:00
<section >
<title > /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf</title>
<para > Because Xen uses normal Linux bridging, you must enable bridge
support in shorewall.conf</para>
<blockquote >
<programlisting > BRIDGING=Yes</programlisting>
</blockquote>
</section>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<section >
<title > /etc/shorewall/zones</title>
<para > One thing strange about configuring Shorewall in this environment
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
is that Dom0 is defined as two different zones. It is defined as the
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
firewall zone and it is also defined as "all systems connected to
2006-01-03 16:56:46 +01:00
<filename class= "devicefile" > xenbr0:vif0.0</filename> . In this case, I
call this second zone <emphasis role= "bold" > ursa</emphasis> (which is
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
the name given to the virtual system running in Dom0); that zone
corresponds to Dom0 as seen from the outside in the diagram above (see
more <link linkend= "zones" > below</link> ).</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<blockquote >
<programlisting > # OPTIONS OPTIONS
fw firewall #Domain 0
ursa ipv4 #Domain 0 on the bridge
dmz ipv4 #Server(s) running in Domains other than 0
net ipv4 #The local LAN and beyond
#LAST LINE - ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS ONE - DO NOT REMOVE</programlisting>
</blockquote>
</section>
<section >
<title > /etc/shorewall/interfaces</title>
<para > We must deal with two network interfaces. We must deal with the
(virtualized) eth0 and we must also deal with the bridge (xenbr0)
created by Xen.</para>
<blockquote >
<programlisting > #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS
- xenbr0 - dhcp
net eth0 detect dhcp
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS ONE -- DO NOT REMOVE</programlisting>
</blockquote>
</section>
<section >
<title > /etc/shorewall/hosts</title>
<para > Here we define the zones <emphasis role= "bold" > ursa</emphasis> and
<emphasis role= "bold" > dmz</emphasis> and we extend the definition of the
zone <emphasis role= "bold" > net</emphasis> .<blockquote >
<programlisting > #ZONE HOST(S) OPTIONS
ursa xenbr0:vif0.0
2006-01-03 16:56:46 +01:00
dmz xenbr0:vif+<footnote >
<para > There is a bug in Shorewall versions prior to 3.0.4 that treats all bridge ports as if they had routeback specified. I recommend that you run a Shorewall verison > 3.0.3 if you run Xen.</para>
</footnote>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
net xenbr0:peth0
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES BEFORE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE</programlisting>
</blockquote> </para>
<para > Note that the <emphasis role= "bold" > net</emphasis> zone has two
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
different interfaces. From the point of view of Dom0 (which is where
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
Shorewall runs), the <emphasis role= "bold" > net</emphasis> zone comprises
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
everything except Dom0. From the point of view of the Extended Domain 0,
the <emphasis role= "bold" > net</emphasis> zone is everything connected
(directly or indirectly) to the <filename
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
class="devicefile">peth0</filename> port on the bridge.</para>
</section>
<section >
<title > /etc/shorewall/policy</title>
<para > The policies shown here effectively isolate Domains 1...N.</para>
<blockquote >
<programlisting > #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LIMIT:BURST
# LEVEL
all fw ACCEPT
fw all ACCEPT
ursa all ACCEPT
net ursa ACCEPT
net net NONE
all all REJECT info
#LAST LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
</programlisting>
</blockquote>
</section>
<section >
<title > /etc/shorewall/rules</title>
<para > These rules determine the traffic allowed into and out of the
<emphasis role= "bold" > dmz</emphasis> zone.</para>
<blockquote >
<programlisting > #
# "Net' to DMZ
#
ACCEPT net dmz udp domain
ACCEPT net dmz tcp www,smtp,smtps,domain,ssh,imap,rsync,https,imaps,ftp,10023,pop3,3128
Trcrt/ACCEPT net dmz
#
# DMZ to 'Net'
#
ACCEPT dmz net:!192.168.0.0/22 udp domain,ntp
ACCEPT dmz net:!192.168.0.0/22 tcp echo,ftp,ssh,smtp,whois,domain,www,81,https,rsync,cvspserver,2702,2703,8080
ACCEPT dmz net:$POPSERVERS tcp pop3
Ping/ACCEPT dmz net
Ping/ACCEPT dmz ursa</programlisting>
</blockquote>
2006-01-03 16:56:46 +01:00
<para > Here, 192.168.0.0/22 comprises my local network.</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
2006-02-12 17:11:41 +01:00
<para id= "zones" > From the point of view of Shorewall, the zone diagram
is as shown in the following diagram.</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
<graphic align= "center" fileref= "images/Xen2.png" />
2006-02-12 17:11:41 +01:00
<para > Note that the <emphasis role= "bold" > ursa</emphasis> zone subsumes
the <emphasis role= "bold" > fw</emphasis> zone because the <emphasis
role="bold">ursa</emphasis> zone is defined to be all systems that
interface to xenbr0's vif0.0 port — it is the rules governing traffic
to/from the <emphasis role= "bold" > ursa</emphasis> zone that protect the
firewall in this configuration.</para>
2006-02-19 18:33:42 +01:00
<para > More elaborate configurations are possible as described in my
<ulink url= "XenMyWay.html" > Xen and the Art of Consolidation</ulink>
article.</para>
2005-12-30 20:58:22 +01:00
</section>
</section>
</article>