From 1f72beecc8eab1b9cdab63d6b1cd5ce623132122 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: teastep Shorewall consists of the following components: You may use the file /etc/shorewall/params file to set shell variables
- that you can then use in some of the other
+
+ You may use the file /etc/shorewall/params file to set shell variables
+ that you can then use in some of the other
configuration files. It is suggested that variable names begin with an upper case letter to distinguish them from variables used internally
- within the Shorewall programs
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
- Shorewall 1.4 Reference
- This documentation is intended primarily for reference.
- Step-by-step instructions for configuring
- Shorewall in common setups may be found in
+
+
This documentation is intended primarily for reference.
+ Step-by-step instructions for configuring
+ Shorewall in common setups may be found in
the QuickStart Guides.
-
+
Components
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
+ /etc/shorewall/params
-
-
Example:
- +NET_IF=eth0- +
NET_BCAST=130.252.100.255
NET_OPTIONS=blacklist,norfc1918
Example (/etc/shorewall/interfaces record):
- +net $NET_IF $NET_BCAST $NET_OPTIONS- +
The result will be the same as if the record had been written
- +net eth0 130.252.100.255 blacklist,norfc1918- -
Variables may be used anywhere in the other configuration - files.
- + +Variables may be used anywhere in the other configuration + files.
+This file is used to define the network zones. There is one entry - in /etc/shorewall/zones for each zone; Columns - in an entry are:
- + +This file is used to define the network zones. There is one entry + in /etc/shorewall/zones for each zone; Columns + in an entry are:
+The /etc/shorewall/zones file released with Shorewall is as follows:
- +- ZONE | -- DISPLAY | -- COMMENTS | -
+ ZONE | ++ DISPLAY | ++ COMMENTS | +
net | -Net | -Internet | -
loc | -Local | -Local - networks | -
dmz | -DMZ | -Demilitarized - zone | -
net | +Net | +Internet | +
loc | +Local | +Local + networks | +
dmz | +DMZ | +Demilitarized + zone | +
You may add, delete and modify entries in the /etc/shorewall/zones file - as desired so long as you have at least one -zone defined.
- + +You may add, delete and modify entries in the /etc/shorewall/zones file + as desired so long as you have at least one + zone defined.
+Warning 1: If you rename or delete a zone, you should perform "shorewall - stop; shorewall start" to install the change - rather than "shorewall restart".
- + color="#ff0000"> If you rename or delete a zone, you should perform "shorewall + stop; shorewall start" to install the change + rather than "shorewall restart". +Warning 2: The order of entries in the /etc/shorewall/zones file is - significant in some cases.
- + color="#ff0000">The order of entries in the /etc/shorewall/zones file is + significant in some cases. +This file is used to tell the firewall which of your firewall's network - interfaces are connected to which zone. There - will be one entry in /etc/shorewall/interfaces for + +
This file is used to tell the firewall which of your firewall's network + interfaces are connected to which zone. There + will be one entry in /etc/shorewall/interfaces for each of your interfaces. Columns in an entry are:
- + tcpflags (added in version 1.3.11) - This option causes Shorewall
-to make sanity checks on the header flags in TCP packets arriving on this
-interface. Checks include Null flags, SYN+FIN, SYN+RST and FIN+URG+PSH; these
-flag combinations are typically used for "silent" port scans. Packets failing
-these checks are logged according to the TCP_FLAGS_LOG_LEVEL option in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf and are disposed of according
- to the TCP_FLAGS_DISPOSITION option.
-
- blacklist - This option
- causes incoming packets on this interface
- to be checked against the blacklist.
-
- dhcp - The interface
- is assigned an IP address via DHCP or is used
-by a DHCP server running on the firewall. The firewall
- will be configured to allow DHCP traffic to and from the
- interface even when the firewall is stopped. You may
-also wish to use this option if you have a static IP but you
-are on a LAN segment that has a lot of Laptops that use DHCP and
-you select the norfc1918 option (see below).
tcpflags (added in version 1.3.11) - This option causes
+Shorewall to make sanity checks on the header flags in TCP packets arriving
+on this interface. Checks include Null flags, SYN+FIN, SYN+RST and FIN+URG+PSH;
+these flag combinations are typically used for "silent" port scans. Packets
+ failing these checks are logged according to the TCP_FLAGS_LOG_LEVEL option
+ in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf and are disposed of
+according to the TCP_FLAGS_DISPOSITION option.
+
+ blacklist - This option
+ causes incoming packets on this interface
+ to be checked against the blacklist.
+
+ dhcp - The
+ interface is assigned an IP address via DHCP or is
+ used by a DHCP server running on the firewall. The
+ firewall will be configured to allow DHCP traffic to and
+ from the interface even when the firewall is stopped.
+ You may also wish to use this option if you have a static IP
+but you are on a LAN segment that has a lot of Laptops that
+use DHCP and you select the norfc1918 option (see
+ below).
norfc1918 - Packets arriving on this interface and that
- have a source address that is reserved in RFC 1918 or in other
- RFCs will be dropped after being optionally logged.
- If packet mangling is enabled in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
- , then packets arriving on this interface
-that have a destination address that is reserved by
-one of these RFCs will also be logged and dropped. norfc1918 - Packets arriving on this interface and that
+ have a source address that is reserved in RFC 1918 or in other
+ RFCs will be dropped after being optionally logged.
+ If packet mangling is enabled in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
+ , then packets arriving on this interface
+ that have a destination address that is reserved by
+ one of these RFCs will also be logged and dropped. Beware that as IPv4 addresses become in increasingly short supply,
- ISPs are beginning to use RFC 1918 addresses
- within their own infrastructure. Also, many cable
- and DSL "modems" have an RFC 1918 address that can be used
- through a web browser for management and monitoring functions.
- If you want to specify norfc1918 on your external
- interface but need to allow access to certain addresses
- from the above list, see FAQ 14. routefilter - Invoke the Kernel's route filtering
- (anti-spoofing) facility on this interface. The
- kernel will reject any packets incoming on this interface
- that have a source address that would be routed
+
+ Beware that as IPv4 addresses become in increasingly short supply,
+ ISPs are beginning to use RFC 1918 addresses
+ within their own infrastructure. Also, many cable
+ and DSL "modems" have an RFC 1918 address that can be used
+ through a web browser for management and monitoring functions.
+ If you want to specify norfc1918 on your external
+ interface but need to allow access to certain addresses
+ from the above list, see FAQ 14. routefilter - Invoke the Kernel's route filtering
+ (anti-spoofing) facility on this interface. The
+ kernel will reject any packets incoming on this interface
+ that have a source address that would be routed
outbound through another interface on the firewall.
Warning: If you specify
this option for an interface then the interface must be up
prior to starting the firewall. dropunclean - Packets from this interface that
-are selected by the 'unclean' match target in iptables will
- be optionally logged and then dropped.
- Warning: This feature requires
- that UNCLEAN match support be configured in your
- kernel, either in the kernel itself or as a module. UNCLEAN
- support is broken in some versions of the kernel
-but appears to work ok in 2.4.17-rc1. dropunclean - Packets from this interface that
+ are selected by the 'unclean' match target in iptables will
+ be optionally logged and then dropped.
+ Warning: This feature requires
+ that UNCLEAN match support be configured in your
+ kernel, either in the kernel itself or as a module. UNCLEAN
+ support is broken in some versions of the kernel
+ but appears to work ok in 2.4.17-rc1. Update 12/20/2001: I've
- seen a number of tcp connection
- requests with OPT (020405B40000080A...)
- being dropped in the badpkt chain.
-This appears to be a bug in the remote TCP stack whereby
- it is 8-byte aligning a timestamp (TCP option
- 8) but rather than padding with 0x01 it is padding
- with 0x00. It's a tough call whether to deny people
- access to your servers because of this rather minor
- bug in their networking software. If you wish to disable
+
+
+ Update 12/20/2001: I've
+ seen a number of tcp connection
+ requests with OPT (020405B40000080A...)
+ being dropped in the badpkt chain. This
+ appears to be a bug in the remote TCP stack whereby
+ it is 8-byte aligning a timestamp (TCP option
+ 8) but rather than padding with 0x01 it is padding
+ with 0x00. It's a tough call whether to deny people
+ access to your servers because of this rather minor
+ bug in their networking software. If you wish to disable
the check that causes these connections to
be dropped, here's
- a kernel patch against 2.4.17-rc2.
-
- Addresses blocked
- by the standard rfc1918
+
+
+
+
+ Addresses blocked
+ by the standard rfc1918
file include those addresses reserved
-by RFC1918 plus other ranges reserved by the IANA or
+by RFC1918 plus other ranges reserved by the IANA or
by other RFCs.
-
+
+
- Update 12/17/2001: The unclean match
- patch from 2.4.17-rc1 is available
- for download. I am currently
- running this patch applied to
+
+
+ Update 12/17/2001:
logunclean - This option works like dropunclean - with the exception that packets - selected by the 'unclean' match - target in iptables are logged but not dropped. - The level at which the packets are logged - is determined by the setting of LOGUNCLEAN and if LOGUNCLEAN - has not been set, "info" is assumed.
- -proxyarp (Added in version 1.3.5) - This option causes
- Shorewall to set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/<interface>/proxy_arp
- and is used when implementing
- Proxy ARP Sub-netting as described
- at
- http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/. Do
- not set this option if you are implementing
- Proxy ARP through entries in
- /etc/shorewall/proxyarp.
-
- maclist (Added
- in version 1.3.10) - If this option is specified, all
- connection requests from this interface are subject to
- MAC Verification. May only be
- specified for ethernet interfaces.
logunclean - This option works like dropunclean + with the exception that packets + selected by the 'unclean' match + target in iptables are logged but not dropped. + The level at which the packets are logged + is determined by the setting of LOGUNCLEAN and if LOGUNCLEAN + has not been set, "info" is assumed.
+ + + +proxyarp (Added in version 1.3.5) - This option causes
+ Shorewall to set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/<interface>/proxy_arp
+ and is used when implementing
+ Proxy ARP Sub-netting as described
+ at
+ http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/. Do
+ not set this option if you are implementing
+Proxy ARP through entries in
+ /etc/shorewall/proxyarp.
+
+ maclist (Added
+ in version 1.3.10) - If this option is specified,
+ all connection requests from this interface are subject
+to MAC Verification. May
+only be specified for ethernet interfaces.
My recommendations concerning options:
-
- -
Example 1: You have a conventional firewall setup in which eth0 connects - to a Cable or DSL modem and eth1 connects to - your local network and eth0 gets its IP address via - DHCP. You want to check all packets entering from the internet - against the black list. Your /etc/shorewall/interfaces - file would be as follows:
- -- + ++ +Example 1: You have a conventional firewall setup in which eth0 connects + to a Cable or DSL modem and eth1 connects to + your local network and eth0 gets its IP address via + DHCP. You want to check all packets entering from the +internet against the black list. Your +/etc/shorewall/interfaces file would be as follows:
+ ++- -- + + +
-+ ++ ZONE ++ INTERFACE ++ BROADCAST ++ OPTIONS ++ +net +eth0 +detect +dhcp,norfc1918,blacklist ++ -loc +eth1 +detect ++
+- -- ZONE -- INTERFACE -- BROADCAST -- OPTIONS -- -net -eth0 -detect -dhcp,norfc1918,blacklist -- - - + +loc -eth1 -detect --
-Example 2: You have a standalone dialup GNU/Linux System. Your /etc/shorewall/interfaces - file would be:
- -- ++ +Example 2: You have a standalone dialup GNU/Linux System. Your /etc/shorewall/interfaces + file would be:
+ ++- -- + + +
-+ ++ ZONE ++ INTERFACE ++ BROADCAST ++ OPTIONS ++ -net +ppp0 ++
++
+- -- ZONE -- INTERFACE -- BROADCAST -- OPTIONS -- - - + +net -ppp0 --
--
-Example 3: You have local interface eth1 with two IP addresses - - 192.168.1.1/24 and 192.168.12.1/24
- -- ++ +Example 3: You have local interface eth1 with two IP addresses - + 192.168.1.1/24 and 192.168.12.1/24
+ ++- -- -
-- -- ZONE -- INTERFACE -- BROADCAST -- OPTIONS -- + +loc -eth1 -192.168.1.255,192.168.12.255 --
-+ ++ ZONE ++ INTERFACE ++ BROADCAST ++ OPTIONS ++ - - - + + + +loc +eth1 +192.168.1.255,192.168.12.255 ++
+/etc/shorewall/hosts - Configuration
- -For most applications, specifying zones entirely in terms of network - interfaces is sufficient. There may be times though where you need to -define a zone to be a more general collection of hosts. This is the purpose -of the /etc/shorewall/hosts file.
- -WARNING: The only times that you need -entries in /etc/shorewall/hosts are:
- +
-
For most applications, specifying zones entirely in terms of network + interfaces is sufficient. There may be times though where you need to define +a zone to be a more general collection of hosts. This is the purpose of +the /etc/shorewall/hosts file.
+ +WARNING: The only times that you need entries
+in /etc/shorewall/hosts are:
+
Columns in this file are:
- +- + ++ ++- --
- +- An IP address (example - eth1:192.168.1.3)
+- An IP address (example - eth1:192.168.1.3)
-- A subnet in CIDR notation - (example - eth2:192.168.2.0/24)
+- A subnet in CIDR notation + (example - eth2:192.168.2.0/24)
- +The interface name much match an entry in /etc/shorewall/interfaces.
- -
-Warning: If you are running a -version of Shorewall earlier than 1.4.6, only a single host/subnet address -may be specified in an entry in /etc/shorewall/hosts.
-
--
- -- OPTIONS - - A comma-separated list of option
- -- -- -routeback (Added in version 1.4.2) - This option causes Shorewall - to set up handling for routing packets sent by this host group back - back to the same group.
-
-
- maclist - Added in version 1.3.10. If specified, - connection requests from the hosts specified in this entry - are subject to MAC Verification. - This option is only valid for ethernet interfaces.
-If you don't define any hosts for a zone, the hosts in the zone default - to i0:0.0.0.0/0 , i1:0.0.0.0/0, ... where i0, - i1, ... are the interfaces to the zone.
- -Note: You probably DON'T - want to specify any hosts for your internet zone since the - hosts that you specify will be the only ones that you will be -able to access without adding additional rules.
- -Example 1:
- -Your local interface is eth1 and you have two groups of local hosts that - you want to make into separate zones:
- --
- -- 192.168.1.0/25 -
-- 192.168.1.128/
- -Your /etc/shorewall/interfaces file might look like:
- -- -- -- - -
-- -- ZONE -- INTERFACE -- BROADCAST -- OPTIONS -- -net -eth0 -detect -dhcp,norfc1918 -- - - - - -- -eth1 -192.168.1.127,192.168.1.255 -
--
-The '-' in the ZONE column for eth1 tells Shorewall that eth1 interfaces - to multiple zones.
- -Your /etc/shorewall/hosts file might look like:
- -- + -- -- - -
-- -- ZONE -- HOST(S) -- OPTIONS -- -loc1 -eth1:192.168.1.0/25 --
-- - - - - -loc2 -eth1:192.168.1.128/25 --
-Example 2:
- -Your local interface is eth1 and you have two groups of local hosts that - you want to consider as one zone and you want Shorewall to route - between them:
- --
- -- 192.168.1.0/25
-- 192.168.1.128/25
- -Your /etc/shorewall/interfaces file might look like:
- -- -- -- - -
-- -- ZONE -- INTERFACE -- BROADCAST -- OPTIONS -- -net -eth0 -detect -dhcp,norfc1918 -- - - - - -loc -
-eth1 -192.168.1.127,192.168.1.255 -
--
-Your /etc/shorewall/hosts file might look like:
- -- - -- If you are running Shorewall -1.4.6 or later, your hosts file may look like:- - -
-- -- ZONE -- HOST(S) -- OPTIONS -- -loc -eth1:192.168.1.0/25 --
-- - - - - -loc -eth1:192.168.1.128/25 --
-
- --- -- - -
-- -- ZONE -- HOST(S) -- OPTIONS -- - - +loc -eth1:192.168.1.0/25,192.168.1.128/25 --
-Warning: If you are running a + version of Shorewall earlier than 1.4.6, only a single host/subnet address + may be specified in an entry in /etc/shorewall/hosts.
+ - - -
+
-Nested and Overlapping -Zones
- -The /etc/shorewall/interfaces and /etc/shorewall/hosts file allow you - to define nested or overlapping zones. Such overlapping/nested zones - are allowed and Shorewall processes zones in the order that - they appear in the /etc/shorewall/zones file. So if you have - nested zones, you want the sub-zone to appear before the -super-zone and in the case of overlapping zones, the rules - that will apply to hosts that belong to both zones is - determined by which zone appears first in /etc/shorewall/zones.
- -Hosts that belong to more than one zone may be managed by the rules - of all of those zones. This is done through use - of the special CONTINUE policy described - below.
- -/etc/shorewall/policy - Configuration.
- -This file is used to describe the firewall policy regarding establishment - of connections. Connection establishment is described - in terms of clients who initiate connections - and servers who receive those connection -requests. Policies defined in /etc/shorewall/policy describe - which zones are allowed to establish connections with other - zones.
- -Policies established in /etc/shorewall/policy can be viewed as default - policies. If no rule in /etc/shorewall/rules -applies to a particular connection request then the -policy from /etc/shorewall/policy is applied.
- -Four policies are defined:
--
- -- ACCEPT - - The connection is allowed.
-- DROP - - The connection request is ignored.
-- REJECT - - The connection request is rejected with an RST -(TCP) or an ICMP destination-unreachable packet being - returned to the client.
-- CONTINUE - - The connection is neither ACCEPTed, DROPped - nor REJECTed. CONTINUE may be used when one or both of - the zones named in the entry are sub-zones of or intersect - with another zone. For more information, see below.
-- NONE - (Added in version 1.4.1) - Shorewall - should not set up any infrastructure for handling traffic from -the SOURCE zone to the DEST zone. When this policy is specified, -the LOG LEVEL and BURST:LIMIT columns -must be left blank.
- +
-- OPTIONS + - A comma-separated list of option
+For each policy specified in /etc/shorewall/policy, you can indicate - that you want a message sent to your system -log each time that the policy is applied.
- + ++ ++ +routeback (Added in version 1.4.2) - This option causes Shorewall + to set up handling for routing packets sent by this host group + back back to the same group.
+
+
+ maclist - Added in version 1.3.10. If specified, + connection requests from the hosts specified in this entry + are subject to MAC Verification. + This option is only valid for ethernet interfaces.
+If you don't define any hosts for a zone, the hosts in the zone default + to i0:0.0.0.0/0 , i1:0.0.0.0/0, ... where i0, + i1, ... are the interfaces to the zone.
+ +Note: You probably DON'T + want to specify any hosts for your internet zone since the + hosts that you specify will be the only ones that you will be + able to access without adding additional rules.
+ +Example 1:
+ +Your local interface is eth1 and you have two groups of local hosts that + you want to make into separate zones:
+ ++
+ +- 192.168.1.0/25 +
+- 192.168.1.128/
+ +Your /etc/shorewall/interfaces file might look like:
+ ++ ++ ++ + +
++ ++ ZONE ++ INTERFACE ++ BROADCAST ++ OPTIONS ++ +net +eth0 +detect +dhcp,norfc1918 ++ + + + + + +- +eth1 +192.168.1.127,192.168.1.255 +
++
+The '-' in the ZONE column for eth1 tells Shorewall that eth1 interfaces + to multiple zones.
+ +Your /etc/shorewall/hosts file might look like:
+ ++ + ++ ++ + +
++ ++ ZONE ++ HOST(S) ++ OPTIONS ++ +loc1 +eth1:192.168.1.0/25 ++
++ + + + + + +loc2 +eth1:192.168.1.128/25 ++
+Example 2:
+ +Your local interface is eth1 and you have two groups of local hosts that + you want to consider as one zone and you want Shorewall to route + between them:
+ ++
+ +- 192.168.1.0/25
+- 192.168.1.128/25
+ +Your /etc/shorewall/interfaces file might look like:
+ ++ ++ ++ + +
++ ++ ZONE ++ INTERFACE ++ BROADCAST ++ OPTIONS ++ +net +eth0 +detect +dhcp,norfc1918 ++ + + + + + +loc +
+eth1 +192.168.1.127,192.168.1.255 +
++
+Your /etc/shorewall/hosts file might look like:
+ ++ + ++ If you are running Shorewall + 1.4.6 or later, your hosts file may look like:+ + +
++ ++ ZONE ++ HOST(S) ++ OPTIONS ++ +loc +eth1:192.168.1.0/25 ++
++ + + + + + +loc +eth1:192.168.1.128/25 ++
+
+ +++ ++ + +
++ ++ ZONE ++ HOST(S) ++ OPTIONS ++ + + + + + +loc +eth1:192.168.1.0/25,192.168.1.128/25 ++
+
+Nested and Overlapping Zones
+ +The /etc/shorewall/interfaces and /etc/shorewall/hosts file allow +you to define nested or overlapping zones. Such overlapping/nested zones + are allowed and Shorewall processes zones in the order +that they appear in the /etc/shorewall/zones file. So if +you have nested zones, you want the sub-zone to appear before +the super-zone and in the case of overlapping zones, the rules + that will apply to hosts that belong to both zones is + determined by which zone appears first in /etc/shorewall/zones.
+ +Hosts that belong to more than one zone may be managed by the rules + of all of those zones. This is done through use + of the special CONTINUE policy +described below.
+ +/etc/shorewall/policy + Configuration.
+ +This file is used to describe the firewall policy regarding establishment + of connections. Connection establishment is described + in terms of clients who initiate connections + and servers who receive those connection + requests. Policies defined in /etc/shorewall/policy +describe which zones are allowed to establish connections with + other zones.
+ +Policies established in /etc/shorewall/policy can be viewed as default + policies. If no rule in /etc/shorewall/rules + applies to a particular connection request then the + policy from /etc/shorewall/policy is applied.
+ +Four policies are defined:
+ ++
+ +- ACCEPT + - The connection is allowed.
+- DROP + - The connection request is ignored.
+- REJECT + - The connection request is rejected with an RST +(TCP) or an ICMP destination-unreachable packet being + returned to the client.
+- CONTINUE + - The connection is neither ACCEPTed, DROPped + nor REJECTed. CONTINUE may be used when one or both of + the zones named in the entry are sub-zones of or intersect + with another zone. For more information, see below.
+- NONE - (Added in version 1.4.1) - Shorewall + should not set up any infrastructure for handling traffic from +the SOURCE zone to the DEST zone. When this policy is specified, the + LOG LEVEL and BURST:LIMIT columns + must be left blank.
+ +
+For each policy specified in /etc/shorewall/policy, you can indicate + that you want a message sent to your system + log each time that the policy is applied.
+Entries in /etc/shorewall/policy have four columns as follows:
- +-
- -- SOURCE - The name of a client - zone (a zone defined in the /etc/shorewall/zones - file , the name of the firewall - zone or "all").
+- SOURCE - The name of a client + zone (a zone defined in the /etc/shorewall/zones + file , the name of the firewall + zone or "all").
-- DEST - The name of a destination - zone (a zone defined in the /etc/shorewall/zones - file , the name of the firewall - zone or "all"). Shorewall automatically allows all traffic - from the firewall to itself so the name of the - firewall zone cannot appear in both the SOURCE and DEST +
- DEST - The name of a destination + zone (a zone defined in the /etc/shorewall/zones + file , the name of the firewall + zone or "all"). Shorewall automatically allows all traffic + from the firewall to itself so the name of the + firewall zone cannot appear in both the SOURCE and DEST columns.
-- POLICY - The default policy - for connection requests from the SOURCE zone to the DESTINATION - zone.
+- POLICY - The default policy + for connection requests from the SOURCE zone to the DESTINATION + zone.
-- LOG LEVEL - Optional. If -left empty, no log message is generated when the policy -is applied. Otherwise, this column should contain an integer - or name indicating a syslog -level.
+- LOG LEVEL - Optional. If + left empty, no log message is generated when the policy + is applied. Otherwise, this column should contain an integer + or name indicating a syslog + level.
-- LIMIT:BURST - Optional. - If left empty, TCP connection requests from the SOURCE - zone to the DEST zone will not be rate-limited. - Otherwise, this column specifies the maximum rate at - which TCP connection requests will be accepted followed by -a colon (":") followed by the maximum burst size that will be - tolerated. Example: 10/sec:40 specifies that the - maximum rate of TCP connection requests allowed will be 10 per - second and a burst of 40 connections will be tolerated. Connection - requests in excess of these limits will be dropped.
- +- LIMIT:BURST - Optional. + If left empty, TCP connection requests from the SOURCE + zone to the DEST zone will not be rate-limited. + Otherwise, this column specifies the maximum rate at + which TCP connection requests will be accepted followed +by a colon (":") followed by the maximum burst size that will + be tolerated. Example: 10/sec:40 specifies that + the maximum rate of TCP connection requests allowed will be +10 per second and a burst of 40 connections will be tolerated. + Connection requests in excess of these limits will be dropped.
+In the SOURCE and DEST columns, you can enter "all" to indicate all - zones.
- + +In the SOURCE and DEST columns, you can enter "all" to indicate all + zones.
+The policy file installed by default is as follows:
- +- - + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> + +- -- + -
-- -SOURCE -DEST -- POLICY -- LOG LEVEL -LIMIT:BURST -- -loc -net -ACCEPT --
--
-- -net -all -DROP -info --
-- - - - - -all -all -REJECT -info --
-This table may be interpreted as follows:
- --
- -- All connection - requests from the local network to hosts on the - internet are accepted.
-- All connection - requests originating from the internet are ignored - and logged at level KERNEL.INFO.
-- All other connection - requests are rejected and logged.
- -WARNING:
- -The firewall script processes the - /etc/shorewall/policy file from top to bottom -and uses the first applicable policy that it finds. - For example, in the following policy file, the policy - for (loc, loc) connections would be ACCEPT as specified - in the first entry even though the third entry in the file specifies - REJECT.
- -- -- +-
-- -SOURCE -DEST -POLICY -LOG - LEVEL -LIMIT:BURST -- -loc -all -ACCEPT --
--
-- -net -all -DROP -info --
-- +loc -loc -REJECT -info --
-SOURCE +DEST ++ POLICY ++ LOG LEVEL +LIMIT:BURST + ++ +loc +net +ACCEPT ++
++
++ +net +all +DROP +info ++
++ - - - + + + +all +all +REJECT +info ++
+
This table may be interpreted as follows:
+ +WARNING:
+ +The firewall script processes the + /etc/shorewall/policy file from top to bottom + and uses the first applicable policy that it finds. + For example, in the following policy file, the policy + for (loc, loc) connections would be ACCEPT as specified + in the first entry even though the third entry in the file specifies + REJECT.
+ ++ +++ +
++ +SOURCE +DEST +POLICY +LOG + LEVEL +LIMIT:BURST ++ +loc +all +ACCEPT ++
++
++ +net +all +DROP +info ++
++ + + + + + +loc +loc +REJECT +info ++
+
Any time that you have multiple interfaces associated with a single zone,
- you should ask yourself if you really want traffic routed between
- those interfaces. Cases where you might not want that behavior are:
-
Any time that you have multiple interfaces associated with a single zone,
+ you should ask yourself if you really want traffic routed between
+ those interfaces. Cases where you might not want that behavior are:
+
Where zones are nested or overlapping , the - CONTINUE policy allows hosts that are within multiple - zones to be managed under the rules of all of these - zones. Let's look at an example:
- + +Where zones are nested or overlapping , the + CONTINUE policy allows hosts that are within multiple + zones to be managed under the rules of all of these + zones. Let's look at an example:
+/etc/shorewall/zones:
- -- + +++- +- -
-- -- ZONE -- DISPLAY -- COMMENTS -- -sam -Sam -Sam's - system at home -- -net -Internet -The -Internet -- + +loc -Loc -Local - Network -+ ++ ZONE ++ DISPLAY ++ COMMENTS ++ +sam +Sam +Sam's + system at home ++ +net +Internet +The + Internet ++ - - - + + + +loc +Loc +Local + Network +
/etc/shorewall/interfaces:
- -- + +++- +- -
-- -- ZONE -- INTERFACE -- BROADCAST -- OPTIONS -- -- -eth0 -detect -dhcp,norfc1918 -- + +loc -eth1 -detect --
-+ ++ ZONE ++ INTERFACE ++ BROADCAST ++ OPTIONS ++ +- +eth0 +detect +dhcp,norfc1918 ++ - - - + + + +loc +eth1 +detect ++
+
/etc/shorewall/hosts:
- +- + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> +- -- -
-- -- ZONE -- HOST(S) -- OPTIONS -- -net -eth0:0.0.0.0/0 --
-- + +sam -eth0:206.191.149.197 --
-+ ++ ZONE ++ HOST(S) ++ OPTIONS ++ +net +eth0:0.0.0.0/0 ++
++ - - - + + + +sam +eth0:206.191.149.197 ++
+
Note that Sam's home system is a member of both the sam zone - and the - net zone and as described -above , that means that sam must be listed before + + +
Note that Sam's home system is a member of both the sam zone + and the + net zone and as described +above , that means that sam must be listed before net in /etc/shorewall/zones.
- +/etc/shorewall/policy:
- +- + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> +- -- -
-- -- SOURCE -- DEST -- POLICY -- LOG LEVEL -- -loc -net -ACCEPT --
-- -sam -all -CONTINUE --
-- -net -all -DROP -info -- + +all -all -REJECT -info -+ ++ SOURCE ++ DEST ++ POLICY ++ LOG LEVEL ++ +loc +net +ACCEPT ++
++ +sam +all +CONTINUE ++
++ +net +all +DROP +info ++ - - - + + + +all +all +REJECT +info +
The second entry above says that when Sam is the client, connection - requests should first be process under rules -where the source zone is sam and if there is -no match then the connection request should be treated under - rules where the source zone is net. It is important - that this policy be listed BEFORE the next policy (net -to all).
- + + +The second entry above says that when Sam is the client, connection + requests should first be process under rules + where the source zone is sam and if there is +no match then the connection request should be treated under + rules where the source zone is net. It is important + that this policy be listed BEFORE the next policy (net + to all).
+Partial /etc/shorewall/rules:
- +- + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> +- -- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -- PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- -... --
--
--
--
--
--
-- -DNAT -sam -loc:192.168.1.3 -tcp -ssh -- --
-- -DNAT -net -loc:192.168.1.5 -tcp -www -- --
-- - - - - -... --
--
--
--
--
--
-
Given these two rules, Sam can connect to the firewall's internet interface - with ssh and the connection request will be -forwarded to 192.168.1.3. Like all hosts in the -net zone, Sam can connect to the firewall's internet - interface on TCP port 80 and the connection request will - be forwarded to 192.168.1.5. The order of the rules is not -significant.
- -Sometimes it is necessary to suppress port forwarding - for a sub-zone. For example, suppose that all - hosts can SSH to the firewall and be forwarded to -192.168.1.5 EXCEPT Sam. When Sam connects to the firewall's -external IP, he should be connected to the firewall itself. - Because of the way that Netfilter is constructed, this requires - two rules as follows:
- -- -- -- - -
- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -- PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- --
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- +... --
--
--
--
--
-+
-+ -ACTION +SOURCE +DEST ++ PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL
+ DEST- -DNAT -sam -fw -tcp -ssh -- --
-- -DNAT -net!sam -loc:192.168.1.3 -tcp -ssh -- --
-- +... --
--
--
--
--
--
-+ +... ++
++
++
++
++
++
++ +DNAT +sam +loc:192.168.1.3 +tcp +ssh +- ++
++ +DNAT +net +loc:192.168.1.5 +tcp +www +- ++
++ - + + - +... ++
++
++
++
++
++
+
The first rule allows Sam SSH access to the firewall. The second - rule says that any clients from the net zone - with the exception of those in the -'sam' zone should have their -connection port forwarded to - 192.168.1.3. If you need to exclude - more than one zone in this way, you - can list the zones separated - by commas (e.g., net!sam,joe,fred). - This technique also may be used when - the ACTION is REDIRECT.
- + + +Given these two rules, Sam can connect to the firewall's internet interface + with ssh and the connection request will be +forwarded to 192.168.1.3. Like all hosts in the net +zone, Sam can connect to the firewall's internet interface + on TCP port 80 and the connection request will be forwarded + to 192.168.1.5. The order of the rules is not significant.
+ +Sometimes it is necessary to suppress port forwarding + for a sub-zone. For example, suppose that all + hosts can SSH to the firewall and be forwarded to + 192.168.1.5 EXCEPT Sam. When Sam connects to the firewall's + external IP, he should be connected to the firewall itself. + Because of the way that Netfilter is constructed, this requires + two rules as follows:
+ ++ ++ ++ + +
+ +
++ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST ++ PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ ++
++
++
++
++
++
++
++ +... ++
++
++
++
++
++
++ +DNAT +sam +fw +tcp +ssh +- ++
++ +DNAT +net!sam +loc:192.168.1.3 +tcp +ssh +- ++
++ + + + + + +... ++
++
++
++
++
++
+
The first rule allows Sam SSH access to the firewall. The second + rule says that any clients from the net zone + with the exception of those in the + 'sam' zone should have their + connection port forwarded to + 192.168.1.3. If you need to exclude + more than one zone in this way, you + can list the zones +separated by commas (e.g., net!sam,joe,fred). + This technique also may be used when + the ACTION is REDIRECT.
+The /etc/shorewall/rules file defines exceptions to the policies established
- in the /etc/shorewall/policy file. There is one
- entry in /etc/shorewall/rules for each of these rules.
-
-
Shorewall automatically enables firewall->firewall traffic over the - loopback interface (lo) -- that traffic cannot be -regulated using rules and any rule that tries to regulate + +
The /etc/shorewall/rules file defines exceptions to the policies established
+ in the /etc/shorewall/policy file. There is one
+ entry in /etc/shorewall/rules for each of these rules.
+
+
Shorewall automatically enables firewall->firewall traffic over the
+ loopback interface (lo) -- that traffic cannot be
+regulated using rules and any rule that tries to regulate
such traffic will generate a warning and will be ignored.
-
Entries in the file have the following columns:
- +The ACTION may optionally be followed by ":" and a syslog level (example: REJECT:info).
-This causes the packet to be logged at the specified level prior
-to being processed according to the specified ACTION. Note: if the
-ACTION is LOG then you MUST specify a syslog level.
-
- The use of DNAT
-or REDIRECT requires that you have syslog level (example: REJECT:info). This
+causes the packet to be logged at the specified level prior to being
+processed according to the specified ACTION. Note: if the ACTION
+is LOG then you MUST specify a syslog level.
+
+ The use of DNAT
+ or REDIRECT requires that you have NAT enabled.
-
Example 1. You wish to forward all - ssh connection requests from the internet to - local system 192.168.1.3.
- + name="PortForward"> Example 1. You wish to forward all + ssh connection requests from the internet to + local system 192.168.1.3. +- + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> +- -- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -- PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- + +DNAT -net -loc:192.168.1.3 -tcp -ssh --
--
-+ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST ++ PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ - - - + + + +DNAT +net +loc:192.168.1.3 +tcp +ssh ++
++
+
Example 2. You want to redirect all local www connection requests - EXCEPT - those to your own http server (206.124.146.177) - to a Squid transparent proxy - running on the firewall and listening on port 3128. Squid - will of course require access to remote web servers. This -example shows yet another use for the ORIGINAL - DEST column; here, connection - requests that were NOT - (notice -the "!") originally destined to 206.124.146.177 -are redirected to local port 3128.
- + + +Example 2. You want to redirect all local www connection requests + EXCEPT + those to your own http server (206.124.146.177) + to a Squid transparent proxy + running on the firewall and listening on port 3128. Squid + will of course require access to remote web servers. This +example shows yet another use for the ORIGINAL + DEST column; here, connection + requests that were NOT + (notice +the "!") originally destined to 206.124.146.177 are + redirected to local port 3128.
+- + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> +- -- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -- PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- -REDIRECT -loc -3128 -tcp -www -- -
-!206.124.146.177 -- + +ACCEPT -fw -net -tcp -www --
--
-+ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST ++ PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ +REDIRECT +loc +3128 +tcp +www +- +
+!206.124.146.177 ++ - - - + + + +ACCEPT +fw +net +tcp +www ++
++
+
Example 3. You want to run a web server at 155.186.235.222 in -your DMZ and have it accessible remotely and locally. the DMZ is managed - by Proxy ARP or by classical sub-netting.
- + + +Example 3. You want to run a web server at 155.186.235.222 in your + DMZ and have it accessible remotely and locally. the DMZ is managed + by Proxy ARP or by classical sub-netting.
+- + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> +- -- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -- PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- -ACCEPT -net -dmz:155.186.235.222 -tcp -www -- --
-- + +ACCEPT -loc -dmz:155.186.235.222 -tcp -www --
--
-+ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST ++ PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ +ACCEPT +net +dmz:155.186.235.222 +tcp +www +- ++
++ - - - + + + +ACCEPT +loc +dmz:155.186.235.222 +tcp +www ++
++
+
Example 4. You want to run wu-ftpd on 192.168.2.2 in your masqueraded - DMZ. Your internet interface address is 155.186.235.151 - and you want the FTP server to be accessible from - the internet in addition to the local 192.168.1.0/24 -and dmz 192.168.2.0/24 subnetworks. Note that since the - server is in the 192.168.2.0/24 subnetwork, we can assume - that access to the server from that subnet will not involve - the firewall (but see FAQ 2). Note that - unless you have more than one external + + +
Example 4. You want to run wu-ftpd on 192.168.2.2 in your masqueraded + DMZ. Your internet interface address is 155.186.235.151 + and you want the FTP server to be accessible from + the internet in addition to the local 192.168.1.0/24 + and dmz 192.168.2.0/24 subnetworks. Note that since the + server is in the 192.168.2.0/24 subnetwork, we can assume + that access to the server from that subnet will not involve +the firewall (but see FAQ 2). Note that + unless you have more than one external IP address, you can leave - the ORIGINAL DEST column blank -in the first rule. You + the ORIGINAL DEST column blank + in the first rule. You cannot leave it blank in the second rule though because then all ftp connections originating in -the local subnet 192.168.1.0/24 would be -sent to 192.168.2.2 regardless of - the site that the user -was trying to connect - to. That is clearly + the local subnet 192.168.1.0/24 would +be sent to 192.168.2.2 regardless +of the site that the user + was trying to connect + to. That is clearly not what you want - .
- + . +- + face="Century Gothic, Arial, Helvetica"> +- -- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -- PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- -DNAT -net -dmz:192.168.2.2 -tcp -ftp --
--
-- +DNAT -loc:192.168.1.0/24 -dmz:192.168.2.2 -tcp -ftp -- ++ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST ++ PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ +DNAT +net +dmz:192.168.2.2 +tcp +ftp ++
++
++ +DNAT +loc:192.168.1.0/24 +dmz:192.168.2.2 +tcp +ftp +- -155.186.235.151 -155.186.235.151 + - - - + + + +
If you are running wu-ftpd, you should restrict the range of passive - in your /etc/ftpaccess file. I only need a few simultaneous FTP sessions - so I use port range 65500-65535. In /etc/ftpaccess, - this entry is appropriate:
- -- ++ +
If you are running wu-ftpd, you should restrict the range of passive + in your /etc/ftpaccess file. I only need a few simultaneous FTP sessions + so I use port range 65500-65535. In /etc/ftpaccess, + this entry is appropriate:
+ ++- -passive ports 0.0.0.0/0 65500 65534
-
If you are running pure-ftpd, you would include "-p 65500:65534" on - the pure-ftpd runline.
- -The important point here is to ensure that the port range used for FTP - passive connections is unique and will not overlap - with any usage on the firewall system.
- -Example 5. You wish to allow unlimited - DMZ access to the host with MAC address - 02:00:08:E3:FA:55.
- -++
If you are running pure-ftpd, you would include "-p 65500:65534" on + the pure-ftpd runline.
+ +The important point here is to ensure that the port range used for FTP + passive connections is unique and will not overlap + with any usage on the firewall system.
+ +Example 5. You wish to allow unlimited + DMZ access to the host with MAC address + 02:00:08:E3:FA:55.
+ +++ - Example 6. You wish to allow access - to the SMTP server in your DMZ from all zones.- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -- PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- + +ACCEPT -loc:~02-00-08-E3-FA-55 -dmz -all --
--
--
-+ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST ++ PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ - - - + + + +ACCEPT +loc:~02-00-08-E3-FA-55 +dmz +all ++
++
++
+
- + Example 6. You wish to allow access + to the SMTP server in your DMZ from all zones.+ Example 8 (For advanced users running Shorewall version + 1.3.13 or later). From the internet, you with to forward + tcp port 25 directed to 192.0.2.178 and 192.0.2.179 to host + 192.0.2.177 in your DMZ. You also want to allow access from the internet directly to tcp port 25 on 192.0.2.177.
+ ++- Example 7. Your firewall's - external interface has several IP addresses but you only want to accept - SSH connections on address 206.124.146.176.- -
-- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DEST -
-PROTO -
-DEST -
- PORT(S)
-SOURCE -
- PORT(S)
-ORIGINAL -
- DEST
-- + +ACCEPT -
-all -
-dmz -
-tcp -
-25 -
--
--
-+ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DEST +
+PROTO +
+DEST +
+ PORT(S)
+SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)
+ORIGINAL +
+ DEST
++ + - - + +ACCEPT +
+all +
+dmz +
+tcp +
+25 +
++
++
+
- Note: When 'all' is used as - a source or destination, intra-zone traffic is not affected. - In this example, if there were two DMZ interfaces then the - above rule would NOT enable SMTP traffic between hosts on these - interfaces.
-
- -- ++ Example 7. Your firewall's + external interface has several IP addresses but you only want to accept + SSH connections on address 206.124.146.176.
+ Note: When 'all' is used + as a source or destination, intra-zone traffic is not + affected. In this example, if there were two DMZ interfaces + then the above rule would NOT enable SMTP traffic between +hosts on these interfaces.
+
+ ++- Example 8 (For advanced users running Shorewall version - 1.3.13 or later). From the internet, you with to forward - tcp port 25 directed to 192.0.2.178 and 192.0.2.179 to host - 192.0.2.177 in your DMZ. You also want to allow access from +- -
-- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DEST -
-PROTO -
-DEST -
- PORT(S)
-SOURCE -
- PORT(S)
-ORIGINAL -
- DEST
-- + +ACCEPT -
-net -
-fw:206.124.146.176 -
-tcp -
-22 -
--
--
-+ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DEST +
+PROTO +
+DEST +
+ PORT(S)
+SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)
+ORIGINAL +
+ DEST
++ + - - + +ACCEPT +
+net +
+fw:206.124.146.176 +
+tcp +
+22 +
++
++
+
- + ++ ++- Using "DNAT-" rather than "DNAT" - avoids two extra copies of the third rule from being generated.- -
-- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DEST -
-PROTO -
-DEST -
- PORT(S)
-SOURCE -
- PORT(S)
-ORIGINAL -
- DEST
-- -DNAT- -
-net -
-dmz:192.0.2.177 -
-tcp -
-25 -
-0 -
-192.0.2.178 -
-- -DNAT- -
-net -
-dmz:192.0.2.177 -
-tcp -
-25 -
-0 -
-192.0.2.179 -
-- + +ACCEPT -
-net -
-dmz:192.0.2.177 -
-tcp -
-25 -
--
--
-+ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DEST +
+PROTO +
+DEST +
+ PORT(S)
+SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)
+ORIGINAL +
+ DEST
++ +DNAT- +
+net +
+dmz:192.0.2.177 +
+tcp +
+25 +
+0 +
+192.0.2.178 +
++ +DNAT- +
+net +
+dmz:192.0.2.177 +
+tcp +
+25 +
+0 +
+192.0.2.179 +
++ - - - + + + +ACCEPT +
+net +
+dmz:192.0.2.177 +
+tcp +
+25 +
++
++
+
-
- Example 9 (Shorewall version 1.4.6 or later). You have 9 http - servers behind a Shorewall firewall and you want connection requests to - be distributed among your servers. The servers are 192.168.1.101-192.168.1.109.
-
- -- ++ Using "DNAT-" rather than "DNAT" + avoids two extra copies of the third rule from being generated.
+
+ Example 9 (Shorewall version 1.4.6 or later). You have 9 +http servers behind a Shorewall firewall and you want connection requests +to be distributed among your servers. The servers are 192.168.1.101-192.168.1.109.
+
+ ++- - - +- -
-- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DEST -
-PROTO -
-DEST -
- PORT(S)
-SOURCE -
- PORT(S)
-ORIGINAL -
- DEST
-- + +DNAT -
-net -
-loc:192.168.1.101-192.168.1.109 -
-tcp -
-80 -
--
--
-+ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DEST +
+PROTO +
+DEST +
+ PORT(S)
+SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)
+ORIGINAL +
+ DEST
++ + - - + +DNAT +
+net +
+loc:192.168.1.101-192.168.1.109 +
+tcp +
+80 +
++
++
+
Look here for information on other services. +
+Shorewall allows definition of rules that apply between - all zones. By default, these rules - are defined in the file - /etc/shorewall/common.def - but may be modified to - suit individual - requirements. Rather than modify /etc/shorewall/common.def, - you should copy that - file to + +
Shorewall allows definition of rules that apply between + all zones. By default, these rules + are defined in the file + /etc/shorewall/common.def + but may be modified to + suit individual + requirements. Rather than modify /etc/shorewall/common.def, + you should copy that + file to /etc/shorewall/common and modify that file.
- -The /etc/shorewall/common - file is expected to contain - iptables commands; rather than - running iptables - directly, you should run - it indirectly using the - Shorewall function - 'run_iptables'. That way, if iptables - encounters an error, the - firewall will be safely - stopped.
- + +The /etc/shorewall/common + file is expected to contain + iptables commands; rather than + running iptables + directly, you should run + it indirectly using the + Shorewall function + 'run_iptables'. That way, if iptables + encounters an error, the + firewall will be safely + stopped.
+The /etc/shorewall/masq file is used to define classical IP Masquerading - and Source Network Address Translation (SNAT). - There is one entry in the file for each subnet that - you want to masquerade. In order to make use of this -feature, you must have NAT enabled - .
- + +The /etc/shorewall/masq file is used to define classical IP Masquerading + and Source Network Address Translation (SNAT). + There is one entry in the file for each subnet that + you want to masquerade. In order to make use of this feature, + you must have NAT enabled .
+Columns are:
- +Example 1: You have eth0 connected to a cable modem and eth1 - connected to your local subnetwork 192.168.9.0/24. - Your /etc/shorewall/masq file would look like: -
- -- + ++ +Example 1: You have eth0 connected to a cable modem and eth1 + connected to your local subnetwork 192.168.9.0/24. + Your /etc/shorewall/masq file would look like: +
+ +++ +- -
+- -- INTERFACE -- SUBNET -ADDRESS -- + +eth0 -192.168.9.0/24 --
-+ ++ INTERFACE ++ SUBNET +ADDRESS ++ - + + + + +eth0 +192.168.9.0/24 ++
+Example 2: You have a number of IPSEC tunnels through ipsec0 + and you want to masquerade traffic from your + 192.168.9.0/24 subnet to the remote subnet 10.1.0.0/16 + only.
+ ++ ++ ++ +
++ ++ INTERFACE ++ SUBNET +ADDRESS ++ + + + + + +ipsec0:10.1.0.0/16 +192.168.9.0/24 ++
+Example 3: You have a DSL line connected on eth0 and a local + network (192.168.10.0/24) + connected to eth1. You want + all local->net connections + to use source address + 206.124.146.176.
+ ++ +- -+ +
-+ ++ INTERFACE ++ SUBNET +ADDRESS ++ + + + - +eth0 +192.168.10.0/24 +206.124.146.176 +Example 2: You have a number of IPSEC tunnels through ipsec0 - and you want to masquerade traffic from your - 192.168.9.0/24 subnet to the remote subnet 10.1.0.0/16 - only.
- -- ++ +Example 4: Same as example 3 except that + you wish to exclude + 192.168.10.44 and 192.168.10.45 +from the SNAT rule.
+ ++- -- -
-- -- INTERFACE -- SUBNET -ADDRESS -- + +ipsec0:10.1.0.0/16 -192.168.9.0/24 --
-+ ++ INTERFACE ++ SUBNET +ADDRESS ++ - + + - +eth0 +192.168.10.0/24!192.168.10.44,192.168.10.45 +206.124.146.176 +Example 3: You have a DSL line connected on eth0 and a local - network (192.168.10.0/24) - connected to eth1. You want - all local->net connections - to use source address - 206.124.146.176.
- -- ++ Example 5 (Shorewall version >= 1.3.14): + You have a second IP address (206.124.146.177) assigned + to you and wish to use it for SNAT of the subnet 192.168.12.0/24. + You want to give that address the name eth0:0. You must have ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes + in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf.
+ ++- -- -
-- -- INTERFACE -- SUBNET -ADDRESS -- + +eth0 -192.168.10.0/24 -206.124.146.176 -+ ++ INTERFACE ++ SUBNET +ADDRESS ++ - - - -eth0:0 +192.168.12.0/24 +206.124.146.177 +Example 4: Same as example 3 except that - you wish to exclude - 192.168.10.44 and 192.168.10.45 from - the SNAT rule.
- -- -- Example 5 (Shorewall version >= 1.3.14): - You have a second IP address (206.124.146.177) assigned - to you and wish to use it for SNAT of the subnet 192.168.12.0/24. - You want to give that address the name eth0:0. You must have ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes - in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf.- -
-- -- INTERFACE -- SUBNET -ADDRESS -- - - - + + +eth0 -192.168.10.0/24!192.168.10.44,192.168.10.45 -206.124.146.176 -
- -- -- -- -
-- -- INTERFACE -- SUBNET -ADDRESS -- - - - - -eth0:0 -192.168.12.0/24 -206.124.146.177 -- /etc/shorewall/proxyarp
- -If you want to use proxy ARP on an entire sub-network, - I suggest that you +
If you want to use proxy ARP on an entire sub-network, + I suggest that you look at - http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/. - If you decide to use the - technique described in that + href="http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/"> + http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/. + If you decide to use the + technique described in that HOWTO, you can set the proxy_arp flag for an interface - (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/<interface>/proxy_arp) - by including the proxyarp - option in the interface's - record in + (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/<interface>/proxy_arp) + by including the proxyarp + option in the interface's + record in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. - When using Proxy - ARP sub-netting, you do NOT include - any entries in + When using Proxy + ARP sub-netting, you do NOT include + any entries in /etc/shorewall/proxyarp.
- +The /etc/shorewall/proxyarp file is used to define Proxy ARP. The file is - typically used for enabling -Proxy ARP on a small set -of systems since -you need one -entry in this file for each - system using proxy ARP. Columns - are:
- + href="ProxyARP.htm">Proxy ARP. The file is + typically used for +enabling Proxy ARP on a +small set of systems +since you need +one entry in this file for each + system using proxy ARP. Columns + are: +Note: After you have made a change to the /etc/shorewall/proxyarp
- file, you may need to flush the ARP cache of all
- routers on the LAN segment connected to the interface
- specified in the EXTERNAL column of the change/added entry(s).
- If you are having problems communicating between an individual
- host (A) on that segment and a system whose entry has
+
+ Note: After you have made a change to the /etc/shorewall/proxyarp
+ file, you may need to flush the ARP cache of all
+ routers on the LAN segment connected to the interface
+ specified in the EXTERNAL column of the change/added entry(s).
+ If you are having problems communicating between an individual
+ host (A) on that segment and a system whose entry has
changed, you may need to flush the ARP cache on host A as well. ISPs typically have ARP configured with long
-TTL (hours!) so if your ISPs router has a stale cache entry (as seen using
-"tcpdump -nei <external interface> host <IP addr>"), it may
-take a long while to time out. I personally have had to contact my ISP
-and ask them to delete a stale entry in order to restore a system to working
-order after changing my proxy ARP settings. Example: You have public IP addresses 155.182.235.0/28. You
- configure your firewall as follows: ISPs typically have ARP configured with long TTL
+ (hours!) so if your ISPs router has a stale cache entry (as seen using "tcpdump
+ -nei <external interface> host <IP addr>"), it may take a long
+while to time out. I personally have had to contact my ISP and ask them
+to delete a stale entry in order to restore a system to working order after
+changing my proxy ARP settings. Example: You have public IP addresses 155.182.235.0/28. You
+ configure your firewall as follows: In your DMZ, you want to install a Web/FTP server with public address
- 155.186.235.4. On the Web server, you subnet
-just like the firewall's eth0 and you configure
-155.186.235.1 as the default gateway. In your /etc/shorewall/proxyarp
- file, you will have: In your DMZ, you want to install a Web/FTP server with public address
+ 155.186.235.4. On the Web server, you subnet
+ just like the firewall's eth0 and you configure
+155.186.235.1 as the default gateway. In your /etc/shorewall/proxyarp
+ file, you will have: Note: You may want to configure the servers in your DMZ with a subnet
- that is smaller than the subnet of your internet
- interface. See the Proxy ARP Subnet Mini HOWTO (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/)
- for details. In this case you will want to place
- "Yes" in the HAVEROUTE column. Warning: Do not use Proxy ARP and
-FreeS/Wan on the same system unless you are prepared to suffer the consequences.
- If you start or restart Shorewall with an IPSEC tunnel active,
- the proxied IP addresses are mistakenly assigned
-to the IPSEC tunnel device (ipsecX) rather than to
-the interface that you specify in the INTERFACE column of
- /etc/shorewall/proxyarp. I haven't had the time to debug this
- problem so I can't say if it is a bug in the Kernel or in FreeS/Wan.
+ Note: You may want to configure the servers in your DMZ with a subnet
+ that is smaller than the subnet of your internet
+ interface. See the Proxy ARP Subnet Mini HOWTO (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Proxy-ARP-Subnet/)
+ for details. In this case you will want to place
+ "Yes" in the HAVEROUTE column. Warning: Do not use Proxy ARP and FreeS/Wan
+on the same system unless you are prepared to suffer the consequences.
+ If you start or restart Shorewall with an IPSEC tunnel active,
+ the proxied IP addresses are mistakenly assigned
+ to the IPSEC tunnel device (ipsecX) rather than to
+the interface that you specify in the INTERFACE column of
+ /etc/shorewall/proxyarp. I haven't had the time to debug this
+ problem so I can't say if it is a bug in the Kernel or in FreeS/Wan.
You might be able to work around this problem using the following
- (I haven't tried it): You might be able to work around this problem using the following
+ (I haven't tried it): In /etc/shorewall/init, include: qt service ipsec stop In /etc/shorewall/start, include: qt service ipsec start The /etc/shorewall/nat file is used to define static NAT. There is one
- entry in the file for each static NAT relationship
- that you wish to define. In order to make use of
- this feature, you must have NAT enabled
- . The /etc/shorewall/nat file is used to define static NAT. There is one
+ entry in the file for each static NAT relationship
+ that you wish to define. In order to make use of
+ this feature, you must have NAT enabled
+ . IMPORTANT: If all you want to do
- is forward ports
- to servers behind your firewall,
- you do NOT want to use
- static NAT. Port
- forwarding
- can be
-accomplished with simple entries
-in the
- rules file. Also, in
-most cases
- Proxy ARP
- provides a
- superior solution
- to static NAT
- because the
- internal systems
- are accessed using the same IP
- address internally and externally.
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ADDRESS
-
- INTERFACE
-
- EXTERNAL
- HAVEROUTE
-
-
+
+ 155.186.235.4
- eth2
- eth0
- No
-
+
+
+ ADDRESS
+
+ INTERFACE
+
+ EXTERNAL
+ HAVEROUTE
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
155.186.235.4
+ eth2
+ eth0
+ No
+
- /etc/shorewall/nat
-
-
+ /etc/shorewall/nat
+
+
Columns in an entry are:
- +Look here for additional information and an example. -
- -The /etc/shorewall/tunnels file allows you to define IPSec, GRE, IPIP, - OpenVPN, PPTP - and 6to4.tunnels with end-points on your firewall. To use ipsec, - you must install version 1.9, 1.91 or the current FreeS/WAN development -snapshot.
- -Note: For kernels 2.4.4 and above, you will need to use version 1.91 - or a development snapshot as patching with + +
Look here for additional information and an example. +
+ +The /etc/shorewall/tunnels file allows you to define IPSec, GRE, IPIP, + OpenVPN, PPTP + and 6to4.tunnels with end-points on your firewall. To use ipsec, + you must install version 1.9, 1.91 or the current FreeS/WAN development snapshot. +
+ +Note: For kernels 2.4.4 and above, you will need to use version 1.91 + or a development snapshot as patching with version 1.9 results in kernel compilation errors.
- -Instructions for setting up IPSEC tunnels may - be found here, instructions for IPIP and GRE tunnels -are here, instructions for OpenVPN tunnels -are here, instructions for PPTP -tunnels are here and instructions for 6to4 -tunnels are here.
- + +Instructions for setting up IPSEC tunnels may + be found here, instructions for IPIP and GRE tunnels + are here, instructions for OpenVPN tunnels + are here, instructions for PPTP + tunnels are here and instructions for 6to4 + tunnels are here.
+This file is used to set the following firewall parameters:
- +Rules not meeting those criteria will continue to generate an individual - rule for each listed port or port range. + + +
Rules not meeting those criteria will continue to generate an individual + rule for each listed port or port range.
-The file /etc/shorewall/modules contains commands for loading the kernel - modules required by Shorewall-defined firewall - rules. Shorewall will source this file during start/restart - provided that it exists and that the directory specified - by the MODULESDIR parameter exists (see /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf - above).
- -The file that is released with Shorewall calls the Shorewall function - "loadmodule" for the set of modules that I load.
- + +The file /etc/shorewall/modules contains commands for loading the kernel + modules required by Shorewall-defined firewall + rules. Shorewall will source this file during start/restart + provided that it exists and that the directory specified + by the MODULESDIR parameter exists (see /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf above).
+ +The file that is released with Shorewall calls the Shorewall function + "loadmodule" for the set of modules that I load.
+The loadmodule function is called as follows:
- -- -- + +loadmodule <modulename> [ - <module parameters> ]
-
+ ++loadmodule <modulename> [ + <module parameters> ]
+
where
- -- + ++ +++<modulename>
- -- -+ +is the name of the modules without the trailing ".o" (example ip_conntrack).
-+ +- +is the name of the modules without the trailing ".o" (example +ip_conntrack).
+<module parameters>
- -- + +- -+-Optional parameters to the insmod utility.
-The function determines if the module named by <modulename> - is already loaded and if not then the -function determines if the ".o" file corresponding -to the module exists in the moduledirectory; +
The function determines if the module named by <modulename> + is already loaded and if not then the + function determines if the ".o" file corresponding + to the module exists in the moduledirectory; if so, then the following command is executed:
- -- -+insmod moduledirectory/<modulename>.o <module + +
+ ++ +insmod moduledirectory/<modulename>.o <module + parameters>
+If the file doesn't exist, the function determines of the ".o.gz" +file corresponding to the module exists in the moduledirectory. If +it does, the function assumes that the running configuration supports compressed + modules and execute the following command:
+ ++ +- -insmod moduledirectory/<modulename>.o.gz <module parameters>
-If the file doesn't exist, the function determines of the ".o.gz" file - corresponding to the module exists in the moduledirectory. If it - does, the function assumes that the running configuration supports compressed - modules and execute the following command:
- -- -- +insmod moduledirectory/<modulename>.o.gz <module - parameters>
-
The /etc/shorewall/tos file allows you to set the Type of Service field
- in packet headers based on packet source,
-packet destination, protocol, source port and
-destination port. In order for this file to be processed
- by Shorewall, you must have mangle
+
+ The /etc/shorewall/tos file allows you to set the Type of Service field
+ in packet headers based on packet source,
+packet destination, protocol, source port and
+destination port. In order for this file to be processed
+ by Shorewall, you must have mangle
support enabled . Entries in the file have the following columns:
-
or the
+ name of an interface. This column may also contain
the name of
the firewall
- zone to indicate packets
-originating on the firewall itself or "all" to indicate any
+ zone to indicate packets
+ originating on the firewall itself or "all" to indicate any
source.
-
- -+ +- + ++ ++ +- -+-Minimize-Delay (16)
-
- Maximize-Throughput - (8)
- Maximize-Reliability - (4)
- Minimize-Cost - (2)
- Normal-Service - (0)The /etc/shorewall/tos file that is included with Shorewall contains - the following entries.
- -- + Maximize-Throughput + (8)+
+ Maximize-Reliability + (4)
+ Minimize-Cost + (2)
+ Normal-Service + (0) +The /etc/shorewall/tos file that is included with Shorewall contains + the following entries.
+ ++- -- -
-- -SOURCE -DEST -PROTOCOL -SOURCE -
- PORT(S)DEST - PORT(S) -TOS -- -all -all -tcp -- -ssh -16 -- -all -all -tcp -ssh -- -16 -- -all -all -tcp -- -ftp -16 -- -all -all -tcp -ftp -- -16 -- -all -all -tcp -- -ftp-data -8 -- + +all -all -tcp -ftp-data -- -8 -+ +SOURCE +DEST +PROTOCOL +SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)DEST + PORT(S) +TOS ++ +all +all +tcp +- +ssh +16 ++ +all +all +tcp +ssh +- +16 ++ +all +all +tcp +- +ftp +16 ++ +all +all +tcp +ftp +- +16 ++ +all +all +tcp +- +ftp-data +8 ++ - - - + + + +all +all +tcp +ftp-data +- +8 +WARNING: Users have reported that odd routing problems result from - adding the ESP and AH protocols to the /etc/shorewall/tos - file.
- +
WARNING: Users have reported that odd routing problems result from + adding the ESP and AH protocols to the /etc/shorewall/tos + file.
+Each line in - /etc/shorewall/blacklist - contains - an IP - address, a MAC address in Shorewall Format - or - subnet - address. Example:
- + +Each line in + /etc/shorewall/blacklist + contains + an IP + address, a MAC address in Shorewall Format + or + subnet + address. Example:
+130.252.100.69- -
206.124.146.0/24
Packets from
- hosts
- listed
- in the
- blacklist file
- will be
- disposed of
- according
- to
- the value assigned
- to
- the BLACKLIST_DISPOSITION
- and BLACKLIST_LOGLEVEL variables in
- /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf.
- Only
- packets arriving
- on interfaces
- that
- have the
- 'blacklist'
- option in
- /etc/shorewall/interfaces
- are
- checked against the
- blacklist. The black list is designed to prevent listed
- hosts/subnets from accessing services on your
- network.
-
Packets from
+ hosts
+ listed
+ in the
+ blacklist file
+ will be
+ disposed of
+ according
+ to
+ the value assigned
+ to
+ the BLACKLIST_DISPOSITION
+ and BLACKLIST_LOGLEVEL variables in
+ /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf.
+ Only
+ packets arriving
+ on interfaces
+ that
+ have the
+ 'blacklist'
+ option in
+ /etc/shorewall/interfaces
+ are
+ checked against the
+ blacklist. The black list is designed to prevent listed
+ hosts/subnets from accessing services on your
+ network.
+
Beginning with Shorewall 1.3.8, the blacklist file has three columns:
-
Shorewall also has a dynamic blacklist - capability.
- -IMPORTANT: The Shorewall blacklist file is NOT - designed to police your users' web browsing -- -to do that, I suggest that you install and configure -Squid (http://www.squid-cache.org). -
- + +Shorewall also has a dynamic blacklist + capability.
+ +IMPORTANT: The Shorewall blacklist file is NOT + designed to police your users' web browsing -- + to do that, I suggest that you install and configure + Squid (http://www.squid-cache.org). +
+This file lists the subnets affected by the norfc1918 - interface option. Columns in the file are:
- + +This file lists the subnets affected by the norfc1918 + interface option. Columns in the file are:
+This file defines the hosts that are accessible from the firewall when - the firewall is stopped. Columns in the file -are:
- -Example: When your firewall is stopped, you want firewall accessibility - from local hosts 192.168.1.0/24 and from your -DMZ. Your DMZ interfaces through eth1 and your local -hosts through eth2.
- -+ + + + + ++/etc/shorewall/routestopped (Added in Version + 1.3.4)
+ +This file defines the hosts that are accessible from the firewall when + the firewall is stopped. Columns in the file +are:
+ ++
+ +- INTERFACE + - The firewall interface through which +the host(s) comminicate with the firewall.
+- HOST(S) + - (Optional) - A comma-separated list of + IP/Subnet addresses. If not supplied or supplied as "-" then + 0.0.0.0/0 is assumed.
+ +Example: When your firewall is stopped, you want firewall accessibility + from local hosts 192.168.1.0/24 and from your +DMZ. Your DMZ interfaces through eth1 and your local +hosts through eth2.
+ ++- +- -
-- -INTERFACE -HOST(S) -- -eth2 -192.168.1.0/24 -- + +eth1 -- -+ +INTERFACE +HOST(S) ++ +eth2 +192.168.1.0/24 ++ - - - + + + +eth1 +- +
Updated 6/28/2003 - Tom Eastep -
- + This file is described + in the ECN Control Documentation.Updated 7/31/2003 - Tom Eastep +
+Copyright © 2001, 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
-
- + |
+
+
Shorewall FAQs- |
-
1a. Ok -- I followed those instructions
- but it doesn't work.
-
1b. I'm still having problems with - port forwarding
- + port forwarding + - + +3. I want to use Netmeeting - or MSN Instant Messenger with Shorewall. - What do I do?
- + or MSN Instant Messenger with Shorewall. + What do I do? +4a. I just ran an nmap UDP scan
- of my firewall and it showed 100s of ports
- as open!!!!
-
5. I've installed Shorewall and now
- I can't ping through the firewall
-
- 15. My local systems can't see
- out to the net
6. Where are the log messages - written and how do I change the destination?
- + written and how do I change the destination? +6a. Are there any log parsers - that work with Shorewall?
- + that work with Shorewall? +6b. DROP messages on port 10619 are flooding the logs with their connect
- requests. Can i exclude these error messages for this port
- temporarily from logging in Shorewall?
-
16. Shorewall is writing log messages
- all over my console making it unusable!
-
8. When I try to start Shorewall
- on RedHat I get messages about insmod
-failing -- what's wrong?
-
8a. When I try to start Shorewall
- on RedHat I get a message referring me to FAQ #8
-
9. Why can't Shorewall detect - my interfaces properly at startup?
- 22. properly at startup? + 22. I have some iptables commands that I - want to run when Shorewall starts. Which file do I put -them in?10. What distributions does - it work with?
- + it work with? +11. What features does it support?
- +12. Is there a GUI?
- +13. Why do you call it "Shorewall"?
- 23. Why -do you use such ugly fonts on your web site?Answer: The first example in the rules file documentation shows how to - do port forwarding under Shorewall. The format - of a port-forwarding rule to a local system is as - follows:
- -+ do port forwarding under Shorewall. The +format of a port-forwarding rule to a local system +is as follows: + ++- +- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DESTINATION -PROTOCOL -PORT -SOURCE - PORT -ORIG. - DEST. -- - - + + +DNAT -net -loc:<local - IP address>[:<local port>] -<protocol> -<port - #> -- -
-- -
-+ + + +ACTION + +SOURCE + +DESTINATION + +PROTOCOL + +PORT + +SOURCE PORT + +ORIG. DEST. + ++ + + + +DNAT + +net + +loc:<local IP address>[:<local + port>] + +<protocol> + +<port #> + ++ +
+ ++ +
+ +
So to forward UDP port 7777 to internal system 192.168.1.5, - the rule is:
- -+ the rule is: + ++- +- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DESTINATION -PROTOCOL -PORT -SOURCE - PORT -ORIG. - DEST. -- - - + + +DNAT -net -loc:192.168.1.5 -udp -7777 -- -
-- -
-+ + + +ACTION + +SOURCE + +DESTINATION + +PROTOCOL + +PORT + +SOURCE PORT + +ORIG. DEST. + ++ + + + +DNAT + +net + +loc:192.168.1.5 + +udp + +7777 + ++ +
+ ++ +
+ +
+ you want to forward requests directed to a particular + address ( <external IP> ) on your firewall + to an internal system: + ++ Finally, if you need to forward a range +of ports, in the PORT column specify the range as low-port:high-port.- Finally, if you need to forward a range of -ports, in the PORT column specify the range as low-port:high-port.- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DESTINATION -PROTOCOL -PORT -SOURCE - PORT -ORIG. - DEST. -- - - + + +DNAT -net -loc:<local - IP address>[:<local port>] -<protocol> -<port - #> -- -<external - IP> -+ + + +ACTION + +SOURCE + +DESTINATION + +PROTOCOL + +PORT + +SOURCE PORT + +ORIG. DEST. + ++ + + + +DNAT + +net + +loc:<local IP address>[:<local + port>] + +<protocol> + +<port #> + +- + +<external IP> + +
- +
Answer: That is usually the result of one of three - things:
- + things: ++ to connect to port 1022 on my firewall and have the firewall forward + the connection to port 22 on local system 192.168.1.3. How do I do + that? + +++- +-- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DESTINATION -PROTOCOL -PORT -SOURCE - PORT -ORIG. - DEST. -- - - + + +DNAT -net -
-loc:192.168.1.3:22 -tcp -1022 -
--
--
-+ + + +ACTION + +SOURCE + +DESTINATION + +PROTOCOL + +PORT + +SOURCE PORT + +ORIG. DEST. + ++ + + + +DNAT + +net + +
+loc:192.168.1.3:22 + +tcp + +1022 + +
++ +
++ +
+
Answer: I have two objections to this setup.
- +If you insist on an IP solution to the accessibility problem
- rather than a DNS solution, then assuming
- that your external interface is eth0 and your
-internal interface is eth1 and that eth1 has IP address
- 192.168.1.254 with subnet 192.168.1.0/24.
-
If you are running Shorewall 1.4.0 or earlier see the 1.3 FAQ for instructions suitable for
those releases.
-
If you are running Shorewall 1.4.1 or Shorewall 1.4.1a, please
- upgrade to Shorewall 1.4.2 or later.
-
Otherwise:
-
+ ++- +- -
-- -ZONE -
-INTERFACE -
-BROADCAST -
-OPTIONS -
-- + +loc -
-eth1 -
-detect -
-routeback -
-+ +ZONE +
+INTERFACE +
+BROADCAST +
+OPTIONS +
++ - - + +loc +
+eth1 +
+detect +
+routeback +
+
+ ++- -- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- + +DNAT -
-loc -web:192.168.1.5 -
-tcp -www -- -
-130.151.100.69:192.168.1.254 -
-+ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST +PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ - - + + +DNAT +
+loc +web:192.168.1.5 +
+tcp +www +- +
+130.151.100.69:192.168.1.254 +
++ + + ++- -That rule only works of course if you have a static external - IP address. If you have a dynamic IP address - and are running Shorewall 1.3.4 or later then -include this in /etc/shorewall/init:
-+ IP address. If you have a dynamic IP +address and are running Shorewall 1.3.4 or later +then include this in /etc/shorewall/init: ++ +- -ETH0_IP=`find_interface_address eth0`-++ +- -and make your DNAT rule:
--+ +++- --- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DESTINATION -PROTOCOL -PORT -SOURCE - PORT -ORIG. - DEST. -- - - + + +DNAT -loc -web:192.168.1.5 -tcp -www -- -$ETH0_IP:192.168.1.254 -+ + + +ACTION + +SOURCE + +DESTINATION + +PROTOCOL + +PORT + +SOURCE PORT + +ORIG. DEST. + ++ + + + +DNAT + +loc + +web:192.168.1.5 + +tcp + +www + +- + +$ETH0_IP:192.168.1.254 + ++ ++ +- + client to automatically restart Shorewall + each time that you get a new IP address. +Using this technique, you will want to configure your DHCP/PPPoE - client to automatically restart Shorewall - each time that you get a new IP address.
-2a. I have a zone "Z" with an RFC1918 - subnet and I use static NAT to assign non-RFC1918 - addresses to hosts in Z. Hosts in Z cannot communicate - with each other using their external (non-RFC1918 - addresses) so they can't access each other using their - DNS names.
- + subnet and I use static NAT to assign non-RFC1918 + addresses to hosts in Z. Hosts in Z cannot communicate + with each other using their external (non-RFC1918 + addresses) so they can't access each other using their + DNS names. +Answer: This is another problem that is best solved - using Bind Version 9 "views". It allows both - external and internal clients to access a NATed - host using the host's DNS name.
- + using Bind Version 9 "views". It allows +both external and internal clients to access +a NATed host using the host's DNS name. +Another good way to approach this problem is to switch from - static NAT to Proxy ARP. That way, the hosts - in Z have non-RFC1918 addresses and can be accessed - externally and internally using the same address.
- + static NAT to Proxy ARP. That way, the +hosts in Z have non-RFC1918 addresses and can +be accessed externally and internally using the same + address. +If you don't like those solutions and prefer routing all Z->Z traffic through your firewall then:
- +a) Set the Z->Z policy to ACCEPT.
- + b) +Masquerade Z to itself.
- b) Masquerade - Z to itself.
-
- Example:
+
+ Example: +Zone: dmz
- + Interface: + eth2
- Interface: - eth2
- Subnet: -192.168.2.0/24
+ Subnet: + 192.168.2.0/24 +In /etc/shorewall/interfaces:
- -+ ++- +- -
-- -ZONE -INTERFACE -BROADCAST -OPTIONS -- - - + + +dmz -eth2 -192.168.2.255 --
-+ + + +ZONE + +INTERFACE + +BROADCAST + +OPTIONS + ++ + + + +dmz + +eth2 + +192.168.2.255 + ++ +
+In /etc/shorewall/policy:
- -+ ++- +- -
-- -SOURCE - -DESTINATION -POLICY -LIMIT:BURST -- - - + + +dmz -dmz -ACCEPT -- -
-+ + + +SOURCE + +DESTINATION + +POLICY + +LIMIT:BURST + ++ + + + +dmz + +dmz + +ACCEPT + ++ +
+ +In /etc/shorewall/masq:
- -+ ++- +- -
-- -INTERFACE -SUBNET -ADDRESS -- - - + + +eth2 -192.168.2.0/24 --
-+ + + +INTERFACE + +SUBNET + +ADDRESS + ++ + + + +eth2 + +192.168.2.0/24 + ++ +
+ +3. I want to use Netmeeting or MSN Instant - Messenger with Shorewall. What do I do?
- + Messenger with Shorewall. What do I do? +Answer: There is an H.323 connection - tracking/NAT module that may help with + tracking/NAT module that helps with Netmeeting. Look here for a solution for MSN IM but be aware that there are significant security risks involved with this solution. Also check the Netfilter mailing list archives at http://www.netfilter.org. -
- + +4. I just used an online port scanner - to check my firewall and it shows some -ports as 'closed' rather than 'blocked'. Why?
- + to check my firewall and it shows some + ports as 'closed' rather than 'blocked'. Why? +Answer: The common.def included with version 1.3.x - always rejects connection requests on -TCP port 113 rather than dropping them. This is - necessary to prevent outgoing connection problems to - services that use the 'Auth' mechanism for identifying - requesting users. Shorewall also rejects TCP ports + always rejects connection requests on + TCP port 113 rather than dropping them. This +is necessary to prevent outgoing connection problems +to services that use the 'Auth' mechanism for identifying + requesting users. Shorewall also rejects TCP ports 135, 137 and 139 as well as UDP ports 137-139. These are ports that are used by Windows (Windows can be configured to use the DCE cell locator on port 135). Rejecting these connection - requests rather than dropping them cuts down slightly on the amount - of Windows chatter on LAN segments connected to the Firewall. -
- + requests rather than dropping them cuts down slightly on the +amount of Windows chatter on LAN segments connected to the +Firewall. +If you are seeing port 80 being 'closed', that's probably - your ISP preventing you from running a -web server in violation of your Service Agreement.
- + your ISP preventing you from running +a web server in violation of your Service Agreement. +4a. I just ran an nmap UDP scan of my - firewall and it showed 100s of ports as - open!!!!
- + firewall and it showed 100s of ports +as open!!!! +Answer: Take a deep breath and read the nmap man page - section about UDP scans. If nmap gets -nothing back from your firewall then it -reports the port as open. If you want to see which - UDP ports are really open, temporarily change your net->all - policy to REJECT, restart Shorewall and do the nmap -UDP scan again.
- + section about UDP scans. If nmap gets + nothing back from your firewall then +it reports the port as open. If you want to see which + UDP ports are really open, temporarily change your net->all + policy to REJECT, restart Shorewall and do the nmap + UDP scan again.
-
+ +4b. I have a port that I can't close no matter how - I change my rules.
- I had a rule that allowed telnet from my local network to my firewall; - I removed that rule and restarted Shorewall but my telnet session still - works!!!
-
- Answer: Rules only govern the establishment of new connections. - Once a connection is established through the firewall it will be usable - until disconnected (tcp) or until it times out (other protocols). If you - stop telnet and try to establish a new session your firerwall will block - that attempt.
- + I change my rules. + I had a rule that allowed telnet from my local network to my + firewall; I removed that rule and restarted Shorewall but my telnet + session still works!!!
+
+ Answer: Rules only govern the establishment of new +connections. Once a connection is established through the firewall +it will be usable until disconnected (tcp) or until it times out (other +protocols). If you stop telnet and try to establish a new session your +firerwall will block that attempt.
+4c. How to I use Shorewall with -PortSentry?
- + Here's -a writeup on a nice integration of Shorewall and PortSentry.
- + a writeup on a nice integration of Shorewall and PortSentry.
+5. I've installed Shorewall and now I - can't ping through the firewall
- + can't ping through the firewall +Answer: If you want your firewall to be totally open - for "ping",
- + for "ping", +a) Create /etc/shorewall/common if it doesn't already exist. -
- -
- b) Be sure - that the first command in the file is ". /etc/shorewall/common.def"
- c) Add -the following to /etc/shorewall/common++ For a complete description +of Shorewall 'ping' management, see this + page.
+ b) +Be sure that the first command in the file is ". /etc/shorewall/common.def"
+ c) +Add the following to /etc/shorewall/common + +- For a complete description of -Shorewall 'ping' management, see this -page. + -j ACCEPTrun_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type echo-request - -j ACCEPT
-
-
+ +6. Where are the log messages written - and how do I change the destination?
- + and how do I change the destination? +Answer: NetFilter uses the kernel's equivalent of syslog (see "man syslog") to log messages. It always uses the LOG_KERN (kern) facility (see "man openlog") and you get to choose the log level (again, see "man syslog") in your policies and rules. The destination for messaged logged by syslog is controlled by /etc/syslog.conf (see "man syslog.conf"). - When you have changed /etc/syslog.conf, be sure - to restart syslogd (on a RedHat system, "service syslog - restart").
- + When you have changed /etc/syslog.conf, be + sure to restart syslogd (on a RedHat system, "service + syslog restart"). +By default, older versions of Shorewall ratelimited log messages - through settings - in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf -- If you -want to log all messages, set:
- -+ through settings in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf + -- If you want to log all messages, set: + ++- + to a separate file.LOGLIMIT=""- Beginning with Shorewall version 1.3.12, you can set up Shorewall to log all of its messages - to a separate file.
LOGBURST=""
-
+6a. Are there any log parsers that work - with Shorewall?
- + with Shorewall? +Answer: Here are several links that may be helpful: -
- -+ + ++ I personnaly use Logwatch. + It emails me a report each day from my various systems + with each report summarizing the logged activity on the corresponding + system.- I personnaly use Logwatch. -It emails me a report each day from my various systems -with each report summarizing the logged activity on the corresponding - system. + http://www.logwatch.orghttp://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/parsefw/
-
- http://www.fireparse.com
- http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/projects/fwlogwatch
- http://www.logwatch.org
- http://gege.org/iptables
-
+ http://gege.org/iptables
+ http://home.regit.org/ulogd-php.html
+ +6b. DROP messages on port 10619 - are flooding the logs with their connect requests. - Can i exclude these error messages for this port temporarily -from logging in Shorewall?
- Temporarily add the following rule:
- + are flooding the logs with their connect requests. + Can i exclude these error messages for this port temporarily + from logging in Shorewall? + Temporarily add the following rule:
+DROP net fw udp 10619- +6c. All day long I get a steady flow - of these DROP messages from port 53 to some high numbered - port. They get dropped, but what the heck are they?
- + of these DROP messages from port 53 to some high numbered + port. They get dropped, but what the heck are they? +Jan 8 15:50:48 norcomix kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:40:c7:2e:09:c0:00:01:64:4a:70:00:08:00- Answer: There are two possibilities:
SRC=208.138.130.16 DST=24.237.22.45 LEN=53 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00
TTL=251 ID=8288 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=53 DPT=40275 LEN=33
- + Answer: There are two possibilities:
+-
- You can distinguish the difference by setting - the logunclean option (logunclean option (/etc/shorewall/interfaces) on your external interface (eth0 in the above example). If they get - logged twice, they are corrupted. I solve this problem by using - an /etc/shorewall/common file like this:- They are late-arriving replies to -DNS queries.
-- They are corrupted reply packets.
- +- They are late-arriving replies + to DNS queries.
+- They are corrupted reply packets.
+
- -+ logged twice, they are corrupted. I solve this problem by using + an /etc/shorewall/common file like this:+ New Features:
+ +- The above file is also include in all of - my sample configurations available in the + The above file is also include in all + of my sample configurations available in the Quick Start Guides and in - the common.def file in Shorewall 1.4.0 and later.#-
# Include the standard common.def file
#
. /etc/shorewall/common.def
#
# The following rule is non-standard and compensates for tardy
# DNS replies
#
run_iptables -A common -p udp --sport 53 -mstate --state NEW -j DROP
- + the common.def file in Shorewall 1.4.0 and later.
+6d. Why is the MAC address in - Shorewall log messages so long? I thought MAC addresses were - only 6 bytes in length.
- What is labeled as the MAC address in a Shorewall log - message is actually the Ethernet frame header. IT contains:
- + Shorewall log messages so long? I thought MAC addresses were + only 6 bytes in length. + What is labeled as the MAC address in a Shorewall + log message is actually the Ethernet frame header. IT contains:
+-
- Example:- the destination MAC address (6 bytes)
-- the source MAC address (6 bytes)
-- the ethernet frame type (2 bytes)
- +- the destination MAC address (6 bytes)
+- the source MAC address (6 bytes)
+- the ethernet frame type (2 bytes)
+
-
- MAC=00:04:4c:dc:e2:28:00:b0:8e:cf:3c:4c:08:00
- + Example:
+
+ MAC=00:04:4c:dc:e2:28:00:b0:8e:cf:3c:4c:08:00
+-
- +- Destination MAC address = 00:04:4c:dc:e2:28
-- Source MAC address = 00:b0:8e:cf:3c:4c
-- Ethernet Frame Type = 08:00 (IP Version -4)
- +- Destination MAC address = 00:04:4c:dc:e2:28
+- Source MAC address = 00:b0:8e:cf:3c:4c
+- Ethernet Frame Type = 08:00 (IP Version + 4)
+7. When I stop Shorewall using 'shorewall - stop', I can't connect to anything. Why -doesn't that command work?
- + stop', I can't connect to anything. Why + doesn't that command work? +The 'stop' command is intended to place your firewall into - a safe state whereby only those hosts listed - in /etc/shorewall/routestopped' are activated. - If you want to totally open up your firewall, you must - use the 'shorewall clear' command.
- + a safe state whereby only those hosts listed + in /etc/shorewall/routestopped' are activated. + If you want to totally open up your firewall, you must + use the 'shorewall clear' command. +8. When I try to start Shorewall on RedHat, - I get messages about insmod failing -- what's wrong?
- + I get messages about insmod failing -- what's wrong? +Answer: The output you will see looks something like - this:
- + this: +/lib/modules/2.4.17/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: init_module: Device or resource busy- +
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters
/lib/modules/2.4.17/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: insmod
/lib/modules/2.4.17/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o failed
/lib/modules/2.4.17/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: insmod ip_tables failed
iptables v1.2.3: can't initialize iptables table `nat': iptables who? (do you need to insmod?)
Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.This is usually cured by the following sequence of commands: -
- -+ + ++- -service ipchains stop-
chkconfig --delete ipchains
rmmod ipchains++ +- + I get a message referring me to FAQ #8 + Answer: This is usually cured by the sequence + of commands shown above in FAQ #8 +Also, be sure to check the errata - for problems concerning the version of iptables - (v1.2.3) shipped with RH7.2.
- + for problems concerning the version of +iptables (v1.2.3) shipped with RH7.2.
-
+ +8a. When I try to start Shorewall on RedHat - I get a message referring me to FAQ #8
- Answer: This is usually cured by the sequence of - commands shown above in FAQ #8 -9. Why can't Shorewall detect my interfaces - properly at startup?
- + properly at startup? +I just installed Shorewall and when I issue the start command, - I see the following:
- -+ I see the following: + ++- -Processing /etc/shorewall/params ...-
Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf ...
Starting Shorewall...
Loading Modules...
Initializing...
Determining Zones...
Zones: net loc
Validating interfaces file...
Validating hosts file...
Determining Hosts in Zones...
Net Zone: eth0:0.0.0.0/0
Local Zone: eth1:0.0.0.0/0
Deleting user chains...
Creating input Chains...
...++ +- -Why can't Shorewall detect my interfaces properly?
-++ +- +Answer: The above output is perfectly normal. The Net zone is defined as all hosts that are connected through eth0 and the local zone is defined as all hosts connected through eth1
-10. What Distributions does it work with?
- +Shorewall works with any GNU/Linux distribution that includes - the proper prerequisites.
- +11. What Features does it have?
- +Answer: See the Shorewall - Feature List.
- + Feature List. +12. Is there a GUI?
- +Answer: Yes. Shorewall support is included in Webmin - 1.060 and later versions. See http://www.webmin.com
- +13. Why do you call it "Shorewall"?
- +Answer: Shorewall is a concatenation of "Shoreline" - (the city where I live) - and "Firewall". The full name of the product - is actually "Shoreline Firewall" but "Shorewall" is must more -commonly used.
- + and "Firewall". The full name of the product + is actually "Shoreline Firewall" but "Shorewall" is must more + commonly used. +14. I'm connected via a cable modem - and it has an internal web server that allows - me to configure/monitor it but as expected if -I enable rfc1918 blocking for my eth0 interface (the - internet one), it also blocks the cable modems web server.
- + and it has an internal web server that +allows me to configure/monitor it but as expected +if I enable rfc1918 blocking for my eth0 interface + (the internet one), it also blocks the cable modems web server. +Is there any way it can add a rule before the rfc1918 blocking - that will let all traffic to and from the -192.168.100.1 address of the modem in/out but -still block all other rfc1918 addresses?
- + that will let all traffic to and from the + 192.168.100.1 address of the modem in/out but + still block all other rfc1918 addresses? +Answer: If you are running a version of Shorewall earlier than 1.3.1, create /etc/shorewall/start and in it, place the following:
- -+ ++- -run_iptables -I rfc1918 -s 192.168.100.1 -j ACCEPT-++ +- -If you are running version 1.3.1 or later, simply add the - following to /etc/shorewall/rfc1918:
--+ +++- --- -
-- -SUBNET +TARGET - -+ - +192.168.100.1 +SUBNET -RETURN -TARGET - - + + ++ + + + +192.168.100.1 + +RETURN + ++ ++ +- -Be sure that you add the entry ABOVE the entry for 192.168.0.0/16.
- + +
-Note: If you add a second IP address to your external firewall - interface to correspond to the modem address, - you must also make an entry in /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 - for that address. For example, if you configure the -address 192.168.100.2 on your firewall, then you would add -two entries to /etc/shorewall/rfc1918:
- -
-+ interface to correspond to the modem address, + you must also make an entry in /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 + for that address. For example, if you configure the + address 192.168.100.2 on your firewall, then you would add + two entries to /etc/shorewall/rfc1918:
+ + +-- -
-- -SUBNET -
-TARGET -
-- -192.168.100.1 -
-RETURN -
-- + - - +192.168.100.2 -
-RETURN -
-+ + + +SUBNET + +
+ +TARGET + +
+ ++ + + +192.168.100.1 + +
+ +RETURN + +
+ ++ + + + +192.168.100.2 + +
+ +RETURN + +
+ ++ ++ +- -14a. Even though it assigns public IP addresses, my ISP's DHCP server has an RFC 1918 address. If I enable RFC 1918 filtering on my external interface, my DHCP client cannot renew its lease.
-++ +- + the IP address of your ISPs DHCP server. +The solution is the same as FAQ 14 above. Simply substitute - the IP address of your ISPs DHCP server.
-15. My local systems can't see out to - the net
- + the net +Answer: Every time I read "systems can't see out to - the net", I wonder where the poster bought - computers with eyes and what those computers will - "see" when things are working properly. That aside, - the most common causes of this problem are:
- + the net", I wonder where the poster bought + computers with eyes and what those computers +will "see" when things are working properly. That + aside, the most common causes of this problem are: +-
- +- +
- +
-The default gateway on each local system isn't set to - the IP address of the local firewall interface.
-- + the IP address of the local firewall +interface. +
+- + +
-The entry for the local network in the /etc/shorewall/masq - file is wrong or missing.
-- + file is wrong or missing. +
+- + +
- + user is running a DNS server on the +firewall and hasn't enabled UDP and TCP port +53 from the firewall to the internet. + + +The DNS settings on the local systems are wrong or the - user is running a DNS server on the firewall - and hasn't enabled UDP and TCP port 53 from -the firewall to the internet.
-16. Shorewall is writing log messages - all over my console making it unusable!
- + all over my console making it unusable! +Answer: If you are running Shorewall version 1.4.4 - or 1.4.4a then check the errata. Otherwise, see - the 'dmesg' man page ("man dmesg"). You must add a suitable 'dmesg' command - to your startup scripts or place it in /etc/shorewall/start. - Under RedHat, the max log level that is sent - to the console is specified in /etc/sysconfig/init - in the LOGLEVEL variable.
- + or 1.4.4a then check the errata. Otherwise, +see the 'dmesg' man page ("man dmesg"). You must add a suitable 'dmesg' +command to your startup scripts or place +it in /etc/shorewall/start. Under RedHat, the +max log level that is sent to the console is specified + in /etc/sysconfig/init in the LOGLEVEL variable.
-
+ +17. How do I find out why this traffic is getting - logged?
- Answer: Logging - occurs out of a number of chains (as indicated in - the log message) in Shorewall:
- + logged? + Answer: + Logging occurs out of a number of chains (as indicated + in the log message) in Shorewall:
+-
- +- man1918 - or logdrop - The destination address is - listed in /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 with a logdrop target - -- see /etc/shorewall/rfc1918.
-- rfc1918 - or logdrop - The source address is listed in /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 - with a logdrop target -- see man1918 + or logdrop - The destination address +is listed in /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 with a logdrop + target -- see /etc/shorewall/rfc1918.
+- rfc1918 + or logdrop - The source address is listed in /etc/shorewall/rfc1918 + with a logdrop target -- see /etc/shorewall/rfc1918.
-- all2<zone>, - <zone>2all or all2all - - You have a policy - that specifies a log level and this packet is being - logged under that policy. If you intend to ACCEPT this - traffic then you need a rule to -that effect.
-
-- <zone1>2<zone2> - - Either you have aall2<zone>, + <zone>2all or all2all + - You have a policy + that specifies a log level and this packet is +being logged under that policy. If you intend to ACCEPT +this traffic then you need a rule + to that effect.
+
+- <zone1>2<zone2> + - Either you have a policy for <zone1> to <zone2> that specifies a log level and - this packet is being logged under that policy or this - packet matches a rule - that includes a log level.
-- <interface>_mac - - The packet is being logged under the maclist - interface option.
-
-- logpkt - - The packet is being logged under the logunclean - interface option.
-- badpkt - - The packet is being logged under the - dropunclean rule + that includes a log level.
+- <interface>_mac + - The packet is being logged under the maclist + interface option.
+
+- logpkt + - The packet is being logged under the logunclean + interface option.
+- badpkt + - The packet is being logged under the + dropunclean interface option as specified - in the LOGUNCLEAN setting in LOGUNCLEAN setting in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf.
-- blacklst - - The packet is being logged because the source - IP is blacklisted in the +
+- blacklst + - The packet is being logged because the source + IP is blacklisted in the /etc/shorewall/blacklist file.
-- newnotsyn - - The packet is being logged because it is -a TCP packet that is not part of any current connection -yet it is not a syn packet. Options affecting the logging - of such packets include NEWNOTSYN and - LOGNEWNOTSYN in newnotsyn + - The packet is being logged because it is + a TCP packet that is not part of any current connection + yet it is not a syn packet. Options affecting the logging + of such packets include NEWNOTSYN and + LOGNEWNOTSYN in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf.
-- INPUT - or FORWARD - The packet has a source IP - address that isn't in any of your defined zones ("shorewall - check" and look at the printed zone definitions) or the - chain is FORWARD and the destination IP isn't in any of your - defined zones.
-- logflags - - The packet is being logged because it failed the checks - implemented by the tcpflags INPUT + or FORWARD - The packet has a source +IP address that isn't in any of your defined zones ("shorewall + check" and look at the printed zone definitions) or + the chain is FORWARD and the destination IP isn't in any of +your defined zones.
+- logflags + - The packet is being logged because it failed + the checks implemented by the tcpflags interface option.
- +
-18. Is there any way to use aliased ip addresses - with Shorewall, and maintain separate rulesets - for different IPs?
- Answer: Yes. - See Shorewall and Aliased - Interfaces. + with Shorewall, and maintain separate rulesets + for different IPs? + Answer: Yes. + See Shorewall and Aliased + Interfaces.19. I have added entries to /etc/shorewall/tcrules - but they don't seem to do anything. Why?
- You probably haven't -set TC_ENABLED=Yes in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf - so the contents of the tcrules file are simply being ignored.
- + but they don't seem to do anything. Why? + You probably haven't + set TC_ENABLED=Yes in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf + so the contents of the tcrules file are simply being ignored.
+20. I have just set up a server. Do I have - to change Shorewall to allow access to my server - from the internet?
- Yes. Consult the QuickStart guide that + to change Shorewall to allow access to my server + from the internet?
-
+ + Yes. Consult the +QuickStart guide that you used during your initial setup for information about how to set up rules for your server.
- +21. I see these strange log entries occasionally; - what are they?
- -
-+ what are they?+ 192.0.2.3 is external + on my firewall... 172.16.0.0/24 is my internal LAN
+ + +- 192.0.2.3 is external on - my firewall... 172.16.0.0/24 is my internal LANNov 25 18:58:52 linux kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth1 OUT= MAC=00:60:1d:f0:a6:f9:00:60:1d:f6:35:50:08:00-
SRC=206.124.146.179 DST=192.0.2.3 LEN=56 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=110 ID=18558 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=3
[SRC=192.0.2.3 DST=172.16.1.10 LEN=128 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=47 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=53 DPT=2857 LEN=108 ]
-
- Answer: While most - people associate the Internet Control Message Protocol - (ICMP) with 'ping', ICMP is a key piece of the internet. - ICMP is used to report problems back to the sender of a packet; - this is what is happening here. Unfortunately, where NAT is involved - (including SNAT, DNAT and Masquerade), there are a lot of broken - implementations. That is what you are seeing with these messages.
-
- Here is my interpretation - of what is happening -- to confirm this analysis, one -would have to have packet sniffers placed a both ends of the -connection.
-
- Host 172.16.1.10 behind -NAT gateway 206.124.146.179 sent a UDP DNS query -to 192.0.2.3 and your DNS server tried to send a response (the -response information is in the brackets -- note source port 53 -which marks this as a DNS reply). When the response was returned - to to 206.124.146.179, it rewrote the destination IP TO 172.16.1.10 - and forwarded the packet to 172.16.1.10 who no longer had a connection - on UDP port 2857. This causes a port unreachable (type 3, code - 3) to be generated back to 192.0.2.3. As this packet is sent back -through 206.124.146.179, that box correctly changes the source address - in the packet to 206.124.146.179 but doesn't reset the DST IP -in the original DNS response similarly. When the ICMP reaches -your firewall (192.0.2.3), your firewall has no record of having - sent a DNS reply to 172.16.1.10 so this ICMP doesn't appear to -be related to anything that was sent. The final result is that the -packet gets logged and dropped in the all2all chain. I have also seen -cases where the source IP in the ICMP itself isn't set back to the external -IP of the remote NAT gateway; that causes your firewall to log and -drop the packet out of the rfc1918 chain because the source IP is -reserved by RFC 1918.
- +
+
+ Answer: While + most people associate the Internet Control Message + Protocol (ICMP) with 'ping', ICMP is a key piece of the +internet. ICMP is used to report problems back to the sender + of a packet; this is what is happening here. Unfortunately, + where NAT is involved (including SNAT, DNAT and Masquerade), + there are a lot of broken implementations. That is what you are +seeing with these messages.
+
+ Here is my interpretation + of what is happening -- to confirm this analysis, one + would have to have packet sniffers placed a both ends of the + connection.
+
+ Host 172.16.1.10 behind + NAT gateway 206.124.146.179 sent a UDP DNS query + to 192.0.2.3 and your DNS server tried to send a response + (the response information is in the brackets -- note source + port 53 which marks this as a DNS reply). When the response was + returned to to 206.124.146.179, it rewrote the destination IP + TO 172.16.1.10 and forwarded the packet to 172.16.1.10 who no longer + had a connection on UDP port 2857. This causes a port unreachable + (type 3, code 3) to be generated back to 192.0.2.3. As this packet + is sent back through 206.124.146.179, that box correctly changes +the source address in the packet to 206.124.146.179 but doesn't + reset the DST IP in the original DNS response similarly. When +the ICMP reaches your firewall (192.0.2.3), your firewall has no +record of having sent a DNS reply to 172.16.1.10 so this ICMP doesn't + appear to be related to anything that was sent. The final result + is that the packet gets logged and dropped in the all2all chain. I + have also seen cases where the source IP in the ICMP itself isn't set +back to the external IP of the remote NAT gateway; that causes your +firewall to log and drop the packet out of the rfc1918 chain because + the source IP is reserved by RFC 1918.
+22. I have some iptables commands that - I want to run when Shorewall starts. Which file - do I put them in?
- You can place these commands - in one of the Shorewall - Extension Scripts. Be sure that you look at the contents of the - chain(s) that you will be modifying with your commands to - be sure that the commands will do what they are intended. Many - iptables commands published in HOWTOs and other instructional material - use the -A command which adds the rules to the end of the chain. - Most chains that Shorewall constructs end with an unconditional DROP, - ACCEPT or REJECT rule and any rules that you add after that will -be ignored. Check "man iptables" and look at the -I (--insert) command.
- + I want to run when Shorewall starts. Which +file do I put them in? + You can place these +commands in one of the Shorewall Extension Scripts. + Be sure that you look at the contents of the chain(s) that you will +be modifying with your commands to be sure that the commands +will do what they are intended. Many iptables commands published +in HOWTOs and other instructional material use the -A command +which adds the rules to the end of the chain. Most chains that Shorewall +constructs end with an unconditional DROP, ACCEPT or REJECT rule +and any rules that you add after that will be ignored. Check "man iptables" + and look at the -I (--insert) command.
+23. Why do you use such ugly fonts on your - web site?
- The Shorewall web site is almost -font neutral (it doesn't explicitly specify fonts except -on a few pages) so the fonts you see are largely the default fonts -configured in your browser. If you don't like them then reconfigure - your browser.
- + web site? + The Shorewall web site is almost + font neutral (it doesn't explicitly specify fonts except + on a few pages) so the fonts you see are largely the default +fonts configured in your browser. If you don't like them then +reconfigure your browser.
+24. How can I allow conections to let's say - the ssh port only from specific IP Addresses on -the internet?
- In the SOURCE column of the rule, follow - "net" by a colon and a list of the host/subnet addresses as - a comma-separated list.
- + the ssh port only from specific IP Addresses on + the internet? + In the SOURCE column of the rule, + follow "net" by a colon and a list of the host/subnet addresses + as a comma-separated list.
+net:<ip1>,<ip2>,...- Example:
- + Example:
+ACCEPT net:192.0.2.16/28,192.0.2.44 fw tcp 22- +- +25. How to I tell which version of Shorewall - I am running?
- At the shell prompt, type:
-
-
- /sbin/shorewall version
- + I am running?
+ + At the shell prompt, type:
+
+ /sbin/shorewall +version
+26. When I try to use any of the SYN options - in nmap on or behind the firewall, I get "operation not permitted". How - can I use nmap with Shorewall?"
- Edit /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf and change "NEWNOTSYN=No" to "NEWNOTSYN=Yes" - then restart Shorewall.
- + in nmap on or behind the firewall, I get "operation not permitted". +How can I use nmap with Shorewall?" + Edit /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf and change "NEWNOTSYN=No" to +"NEWNOTSYN=Yes" then restart Shorewall.
+27. I'm compiling a new kernel for my firewall. What should I look out for?
- First take a look at the Shorewall kernel configuration - page. You probably also want to be sure that you have selected the -"NAT of local connections (READ HELP)" on the Netfilter Configuration -menu. Otherwise, DNAT rules with your firewall as the source zone won't -work with your new kernel.
- + First take a look at the Shorewall kernel configuration + page. You probably also want to be sure that you have selected the + "NAT of local connections (READ HELP)" on the Netfilter Configuration + menu. Otherwise, DNAT rules with your firewall as the source zone won't + work with your new kernel.
+28. How do I use Shorewall as a Bridging Firewall?
- Basically, you don't. While there are kernel patches that allow you to - route bridge traffic through Netfilter, the environment is so different -from the Layer 3 firewalling environment that very little of Shorewall works. -In fact, so much of Shorewall doesn't work that my official position is that - "Shorewall doesn't work with Layer 2 Bridging".
-
-
- Last updated 7/9/2003 - Tom Eastep + + Basically, you don't. While there are kernel patches that allow you + to route bridge traffic through Netfilter, the environment is so different + from the Layer 3 firewalling environment that very little of Shorewall +works. In fact, so much of Shorewall doesn't work that my official position +is that "Shorewall doesn't work with Layer 2 Bridging".
+ +29. FTP Doesn't Work
+ See the Shorewall and FTP page.
+
+
+ Last updated 7/30/2003 - Tom EastepCopyright © 2001, 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+ diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/News.htm b/STABLE/documentation/News.htm index 24995aeb4..584928ceb 100644 --- a/STABLE/documentation/News.htm +++ b/STABLE/documentation/News.htm @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ - +Shorewall News @@ -16,28 +16,28 @@ - + - + - +- + -
- -+ - + - + - ++ @@ -45,1007 +45,1218 @@ + + -Shorewall News Archive
-7/22/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6a
-Problems Corrected:
-
- + +8/5/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6b
+ Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6:
+
+-
-- Previously, if TC_ENABLED is set to yes in shorewall.conf then Shorewall -would fail to start with the error "ERROR: Traffic Control requires Mangle"; +
- Previously, if TC_ENABLED is set to yes in shorewall.conf then Shorewall +would fail to start with the error "ERROR: Traffic Control requires Mangle"; that problem has been corrected.
+- Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules +file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command.
+- The "shorewall stop" command is now disabled when /etc/shorewall/startup_disabled +exists. This prevents people from shooting themselves in the foot prior to +having configured Shorewall.
+- A change introduced in version 1.4.6 caused error messages during "shorewall +[re]start" when ADD_IP_ALIASES=Yes and ip addresses were being added to a +PPP interface; the addresses were successfully added in spite of the messages.
+
+ The firewall script has been modified to eliminate the error messages.
+7/20/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6
- - -
-- -Problems Corrected:
- - +
-7/31/2003 - Snapshot 1.4.6_20030731
+ +++ +http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots/
+
+ ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots/Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6:
+
+-
- - -- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered start - errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked around.
-
-
-- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column of a DNAT[-] - rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules in the nat table -(one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly creates a -single DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
-
-
-- Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a "-" - were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule.
-
-
-- A number of problems with rule parsing have been corrected. Corrections -involve the handling of "z1!z2" in the SOURCE column as well as lists in -the ORIGINAL DESTINATION column.
-
-
-- The message "Adding rules for DHCP" is now suppressed if there are -no DHCP rules to add.
- -
-Migration Issues:
- - -
--
- - -- In earlier versions, an undocumented feature allowed entries in -the host file as follows:
-
-
- z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
-
- This capability was never documented and has been removed in 1.4.6 - to allow entries of the following format:
-
- z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
-
-- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have been - removed from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. These capabilities are now -automatically detected by Shorewall (see below).
- -
-New Features:
- - -
--
- -- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option may - be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting NEWNOTSYN=No - for packets arriving on the associated interface.
-
-
-- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq - to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled -for address ranges.
-
-
-- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than the first - one on an interface.
-
-
-- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) over -a set of servers. Servers may be specified in a range of addresses given -as <first address>-<last address>.
-
-
- Example:
-
- DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
-
-- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration options - have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects whether -these capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output of the - start, restart and check commands have been enhanced to report the outcome:
-
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
-- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has been added. - This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases and allows - for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection tracking - table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of this extension - and reports its availability in the output of the start, restart and check - commands.
- -
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Connection Tracking Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
- If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by Shorewall - is changed in the following ways:-
-- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create chains - in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering in the -filter table (rfc1918 chain).
-- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter rules; - one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection Tracking - Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is extended -to check that the original destination address was the same as specified - (or defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
- -
-
-- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) - may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
-
-
-- An 'ipcalc' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
-
-
- ipcalc [ <address> <netmask> | <address>/<vlsm> - ]
-
- Examples:
-
- [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0/24
- CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
- NETMASK=255.255.255.0
- NETWORK=192.168.1.0
- BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
- [root@wookie root]#
-
- [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
- CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
- NETMASK=255.255.255.0
- NETWORK=192.168.1.0
- BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
- [root@wookie root]#
-
- Warning:
-
- If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmatic (ash or dash), - then the ipcalc command produces incorrect information for IP addresses - 128.0.0.0-1 and for /1 networks. Bash should produce correct information - for all valid IP addresses.
-
-- An 'iprange' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall. -
-
-
- iprange <address>-<address>
-
- This command decomposes a range of IP addressses into a list of - network and host addresses. The command can be useful if you need to -construct an efficient set of rules that accept connections from a range -of network addresses.
-
- Note: If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmetic (ash - or dash) then the range may not span 128.0.0.0.
-
- Example:
-
- [root@gateway root]# shorewall iprange 192.168.1.4-192.168.12.9
- 192.168.1.4/30
- 192.168.1.8/29
- 192.168.1.16/28
- 192.168.1.32/27
- 192.168.1.64/26
- 192.168.1.128/25
- 192.168.2.0/23
- 192.168.4.0/22
- 192.168.8.0/22
- 192.168.12.0/29
- 192.168.12.8/31
- [root@gateway root]#
-
-- A list of host/net addresses is now allowed in an entry in /etc/shorewall/hosts.
-
-
- Example:
-
- foo eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
-
-- The "shorewall check" command now includes the chain name when printing -the applicable policy for each pair of zones.
-
-
- Example:
-
- Policy for dmz to net is REJECT using chain all2all
-
- This means that the policy for connections from the dmz to the internet -is REJECT and the applicable entry in the /etc/shorewall/policy was the all->all - policy.
-
-- Support for the 2.6 Kernel series has been added.
- -
-7/15/2003 - New Mirror in Brazil
- Thanks to the folks at securityopensource.org.br, there is now a Shorewall - mirror in Brazil. -
-7/15/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6 RC 1
- -
-Problems Corrected:
- -
--
- -- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered start - errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked around.
-
-
-- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column of a DNAT[-] - rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules in the nat table - (one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly creates a single - DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
-
-
-- Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a "-" -were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule.
-
-
-- A number of problems with rule parsing have been corrected. Corrections - involve the handling of "z1!z2" in the SOURCE column as well as lists in - the ORIGINAL DESTINATION column.
+- Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was +being tested before it was set.
+- Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules +file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command.
- +
Migration Issues:
- -
--
- -- In earlier versions, an undocumented feature allowed entries in -the host file as follows:
-
-
- z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
-
- This capability was never documented and has been removed in 1.4.6 -to allow entries of the following format:
-
- z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
-
-- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have been -removed from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. These capabilities are now automatically - detected by Shorewall (see below).
- -
-New Features:
- -
--
- -- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option may -be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting NEWNOTSYN=No - for packets arriving on the associated interface.
-
-
-- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq - to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled for -address ranges.
-
-
-- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than the first - one on an interface.
-
-
-- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) over - a set of servers. Servers may be specified in a range of addresses given - as <first address>-<last address>.
-
-
- Example:
-
- DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
-
-- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration options - have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects whether these - capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output of the start, - restart and check commands have been enhanced to report the outcome:
-
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
-- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has been added. - This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases and allows - for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection tracking - table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of this extension - and reports its availability in the output of the start, restart and check - commands.
- -
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Connection Tracking Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
- If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by Shorewall -is changed in the following ways:-
-- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create chains - in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering in the - filter table (rfc1918 chain).
-- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter rules; - one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection Tracking - Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is extended to - check that the original destination address was the same as specified (or - defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
- -
-
-- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) - may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
-
-
-- An 'ipcalc' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
-
-
- ipcalc [ <address> <netmask> | <address>/<vlsm> - ]
-
- Examples:
-
- [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0/24
- CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
- NETMASK=255.255.255.0
- NETWORK=192.168.1.0
- BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
- [root@wookie root]#
-
- [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
- CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
- NETMASK=255.255.255.0
- NETWORK=192.168.1.0
- BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
- [root@wookie root]#
-
- Warning:
-
- If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmatic (ash or dash), -then the ipcalc command produces incorrect information for IP addresses -128.0.0.0-1 and for /1 networks. Bash should produce correct information -for all valid IP addresses.
-
-- An 'iprange' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
-
-
- iprange <address>-<address>
-
- This command decomposes a range of IP addressses into a list of network - and host addresses. The command can be useful if you need to construct an - efficient set of rules that accept connections from a range of network addresses.
-
- Note: If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmetic (ash or -dash) then the range may not span 128.0.0.0.
-
- Example:
-
- [root@gateway root]# shorewall iprange 192.168.1.4-192.168.12.9
- 192.168.1.4/30
- 192.168.1.8/29
- 192.168.1.16/28
- 192.168.1.32/27
- 192.168.1.64/26
- 192.168.1.128/25
- 192.168.2.0/23
- 192.168.4.0/22
- 192.168.8.0/22
- 192.168.12.0/29
- 192.168.12.8/31
- [root@gateway root]#
-
-- A list of host/net addresses is now allowed in an entry in /etc/shorewall/hosts.
- -
-
- Example:
-
- foo eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/247/7/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6 Beta 2
- -Problems Corrected:
- -
--
- +- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered start - errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked around.
-
-
-- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column of a DNAT[-] - rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules in the nat table - (one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly creates a single - DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
-
-
-- Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a "-" -were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule.
- -
-Migration Issues:
- +
-
- -- In earlier versions, an undocumented feature allowed entries in - the host file as follows:
-
-
- z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
-
- This capability was never documented and has been removed in 1.4.6 to - allow entries of the following format:
-
- z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
-
-- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have been - removed from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. These capabilities are now -automatically detected by Shorewall (see below).
- +
-- Once you have installed this version of Shorewall, you must restart +Shorewall before you may use the 'drop', 'reject', 'allow' or 'save' commands.
+- To maintain strict compatibility with previous versions, current +uses of "shorewall drop" and "shorewall reject" should be replaced with "shorewall + dropall" and "shorewall rejectall"
+New Features:
- + +
-New Features:
+
+-
+ +- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option may -be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting NEWNOTSYN=No - for packets arriving on the associated interface.
-
-
-- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq - to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled for -address ranges.
-
-
-- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than the first - one on an interface.
-
-
-- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) over - a set of servers. Servers may be specified in a range of addresses given - as <first address>-<last address>.
-
-
- Example:
-
- DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
-
-- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration options - have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects whether these - capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output of the start, - restart and check commands have been enhanced to report the outcome:
-
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
-- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has been added. - This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases and allows - for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection tracking - table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of this extension - and reports its availability in the output of the start, restart and check - commands.
- -
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Connection Tracking Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
- If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by Shorewall -is changed in the following ways:-
-- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create chains - in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering in the - filter table (rfc1918 chain).
-- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter rules; - one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection Tracking - Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is extended to - check that the original destination address was the same as specified (or - defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
+- Shorewall now creates a dynamic blacklisting chain for each interface +defined in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. The 'drop' and 'reject' commands use +the routing table to determine which of these chains is to be used for blacklisting +the specified IP address(es).
- -
-- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) - may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
-
-
-- An 'ipcalc' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
-
-
- ipcalc [ <address> <netmask> | <address>/<vlsm> - ]
-
- Examples:
-
- [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0/24
- CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
- NETMASK=255.255.255.0
- NETWORK=192.168.1.0
- BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
- [root@wookie root]#
-
- [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
- CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
- NETMASK=255.255.255.0
- NETWORK=192.168.1.0
- BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
- [root@wookie root]#
-
- Warning:
-
- If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmatic (ash or dash), -then the ipcalc command produces incorrect information for IP addresses -128.0.0.0-1 and for /1 networks. Bash should produce correct information -for all valid IP addresses.
-
-- An 'iprange' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
-
-
- iprange <address>-<address>
-
- This command decomposes a range of IP addressses into a list of network - and host addresses. The command can be useful if you need to construct -an efficient set of rules that accept connections from a range of network -addresses.
-
- Note: If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmetic (ash or dash) - then the range may not span 128.0.0.0.
-
- Example:
-
- [root@gateway root]# shorewall iprange 192.168.1.4-192.168.12.9
- 192.168.1.4/30
- 192.168.1.8/29
- 192.168.1.16/28
- 192.168.1.32/27
- 192.168.1.64/26
- 192.168.1.128/25
- 192.168.2.0/23
- 192.168.4.0/22
- 192.168.8.0/22
- 192.168.12.0/29
- 192.168.12.8/31
- [root@gateway root]#
-
-- A list of host/net addresses is now allowed in an entry in /etc/shorewall/hosts.
- + Two new commands ('dropall' and 'rejectall') have been introduced that +do what 'drop' and 'reject' used to do; namely, when an address is blacklisted + using these new commands, it will be blacklisted on all of your firewall's + interfaces. +
-
- Example:
-
- foo eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
-
-- Thanks to Steve Herber, the 'help' command can now give command-specific + help (e.g., shorewall help <command>).
+- A new option "ADMINISABSENTMINDED" has been added to /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. + This option has a default value of "No" for existing users which causes +Shorewall's 'stopped' state to continue as it has been; namely, in the +stopped state only traffic to/from hosts listed in /etc/shorewall/routestopped +is accepted.
+
+
+ With ADMINISABSENTMINDED=Yes (the default for new installs), in addition + to traffic to/from the hosts listed in /etc/shorewall/routestopped, Shorewall + will allow:
+
+ a) All traffic originating from the firewall itself; and
+ b) All traffic that is part of or related to an already-existing connection.
+
+ In particular, with ADMINISABSENTMINDED=Yes, a "shorewall stop" entered +through an ssh session will not kill the session.
+
+ Note though that even with ADMINISABSENTMINDED=Yes, it is still possible +for people to shoot themselves in the foot.
+
+ Example:
+
+ /etc/shorewall/nat:
+
+ 206.124.146.178 eth0:0 192.168.1.5
+
+ /etc/shorewall/rules:
+
+ ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.5 tcp 22
+ ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22
+
+ From a remote system, I ssh to 206.124.146.178 which establishes an SSH +connection with local system 192.168.1.5. I then create a second SSH connection +from that computer to the firewall and confidently type "shorewall stop". +As part of its stop processing, Shorewall removes eth0:0 which kills my SSH +connection to 192.168.1.5!!!7/27/2003 - Snapshot 1.4.6_20030727
+ +++ Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots/
+
+ ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots/
+ ++
+ Migration Issues:- Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was +being tested before it was set.
+- Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules + file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command.
+ +
+
+ ++
+ New Features:- Once you have installed this version of Shorewall, you must restart + Shorewall before you may use the 'drop', 'reject', 'allow' or 'save' commands.
+- To maintain strict compatibility with previous versions, current +uses of "shorewall drop" and "shorewall reject" should be replaced with +"shorewall dropall" and "shorewall rejectall"
+ +
+ ++
+ +- Shorewall now creates a dynamic blacklisting chain for each interface + defined in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. The 'drop' and 'reject' commands use + the routing table to determine which of these chains is to be used for blacklisting + the specified IP address(es).
+
+
+ Two new commands ('dropall' and 'rejectall') have been introduced that +do what 'drop' and 'reject' used to do; namely, when an address is blacklisted + using these new commands, it will be blacklisted on all of your firewall's + interfaces.- Thanks to Steve Herber, the 'help' command can now give command-specific + help (e.g., shorewall help <command>).
+ +
+7/26/2003 - Snapshot 1.4.6_20030726
+ +++ +http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots/
+
+ ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots/Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6:
+ +
++
+ +- Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was +being tested before it was set.
+- Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the +tcrules file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables +command.
+ +
+Migration Issues:
+ +
++
+ +- Once you have installed this version of Shorewall, you must restart + Shorewall before you may use the 'drop', 'reject', 'allow' or 'save' commands.
+- To maintain strict compatibility with previous versions, current +uses of "shorewall drop" and "shorewall reject" should be replaced with "shorewall + dropall" and "shorewall rejectall"
+ +New Features:
+ Shorewall now creates a dynamic blacklisting chain for each interface +defined in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. The 'drop' and 'reject' commands use +the routing table to determine which of these chains is to be used for blacklisting +the specified IP address(es).
+
+
+ Two new commands ('dropall' and 'rejectall') have been introduced that + do what 'drop' and 'reject' used to do; namely, when an address is blacklisted + using these new commands, it will be blacklisted on all of your firewall's + interfaces. +7/22/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6a
+ Problems Corrected:
+
-7/4/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6 Beta 1
- ++
+ +- Previously, if TC_ENABLED is set to yes in shorewall.conf then +Shorewall would fail to start with the error "ERROR: Traffic Control requires +Mangle"; that problem has been corrected.
+ +7/20/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6
+ + +
++ +Problems Corrected:
+ +
--
+ +- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered -start errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked -around.
-
-
-- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column of a -DNAT[-] rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules in the -nat table (one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly creates -a single DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
- +
-- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered + start errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked + around.
+
+
+- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column of +a DNAT[-] rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules in + the nat table (one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly + creates a single DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
+
+
+- Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a +"-" were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule.
+
+
+- A number of problems with rule parsing have been corrected. + Corrections involve the handling of "z1!z2" in the SOURCE column as well + as lists in the ORIGINAL DESTINATION column.
+
+
+- The message "Adding rules for DHCP" is now suppressed if there +are no DHCP rules to add.
+
+Migration Issues:
+ + +
++
+ +- In earlier versions, an undocumented feature allowed entries + in the host file as follows:
+
+
+ z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
+
+ This capability was never documented and has been removed +in 1.4.6 to allow entries of the following format:
+
+ z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
+
+- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have +been removed from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. These capabilities are + now automatically detected by Shorewall (see below).
+ +
+New Features:
+ +
--
- -- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option may - be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting NEWNOTSYN=No - for packets arriving on the associated interface.
-
-
-- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq - to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled for -address ranges.
-
-
-- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than the -first one on an interface.
-
-
-- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) -over a set of servers. Up to 256 servers may be specified in a range of -addresses given as <first address>-<last address>.
-
-
- Example:
-
- DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
-
- Note that this capability has previously been available using a combination - of a DNAT- rule and one or more ACCEPT rules. That technique is still preferable - for load-balancing over a large number of servers (> 16) since specifying - a range in the DNAT rule causes one filter table ACCEPT rule to be generated - for each IP address in the range.
-
-- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration -options have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects -whether these capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output -of the start, restart and check commands have been enhanced to report the -outcome:
-
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
-- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has been -added. This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases and -allows for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection -tracking table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of this -extension and reports its availability in the output of the start, restart -and check commands.
- -
-
- Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
- NAT: Available
- Packet Mangling: Available
- Multi-port Match: Available
- Connection Tracking Match: Available
- Verifying Configuration...
-
- If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by Shorewall -is changed in the following ways:- -
- +- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option +may be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting + NEWNOTSYN=No for packets arriving on the associated interface.
+
+
+- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq + to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled + for address ranges.
+
+
+- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than the + first one on an interface.
+
+
+- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) + over a set of servers. Servers may be specified in a range of addresses + given as <first address>-<last address>.
+
+
+ Example:
+
+ DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
+
+- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration + options have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects + whether these capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output + of the start, restart and check commands have been enhanced to report +the outcome:
+
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has been + added. This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases + and allows for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection + tracking table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of +this extension and reports its availability in the output of the start, +restart and check commands.
+
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Connection Tracking Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+ If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by +Shorewall is changed in the following ways:-
-- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create -chains in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering -in the filter table (rfc1918 chain).
-- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter rules; - one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection Tracking - Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is extended to - check that the original destination address was the same as specified (or - defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
- +
-
-- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create + chains in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering + in the filter table (rfc1918 chain).
+- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter rules; + one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection + Tracking Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is +extended to check that the original destination address was the same as + specified (or defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
+
+
+- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) - may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
- +
-- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) + may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
+
+
+- An 'ipcalc' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
+
+
+ ipcalc [ <address> <netmask> | <address>/<vlsm> + ]
+
+ Examples:
+
+ [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0/24
+ CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
+ NETMASK=255.255.255.0
+ NETWORK=192.168.1.0
+ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
+ [root@wookie root]#
+
+ [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
+ CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
+ NETMASK=255.255.255.0
+ NETWORK=192.168.1.0
+ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
+ [root@wookie root]#
+
+ Warning:
+
+ If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmatic (ash +or dash), then the ipcalc command produces incorrect information for +IP addresses 128.0.0.0-1 and for /1 networks. Bash should produce correct + information for all valid IP addresses.
+
+- An 'iprange' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall. +
+
+
+ iprange <address>-<address>
+
+ This command decomposes a range of IP addressses into a list + of network and host addresses. The command can be useful if you need + to construct an efficient set of rules that accept connections from a +range of network addresses.
+
+ Note: If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmetic +(ash or dash) then the range may not span 128.0.0.0.
+
+ Example:
+
+ [root@gateway root]# shorewall iprange 192.168.1.4-192.168.12.9
+ 192.168.1.4/30
+ 192.168.1.8/29
+ 192.168.1.16/28
+ 192.168.1.32/27
+ 192.168.1.64/26
+ 192.168.1.128/25
+ 192.168.2.0/23
+ 192.168.4.0/22
+ 192.168.8.0/22
+ 192.168.12.0/29
+ 192.168.12.8/31
+ [root@gateway root]#
+
+- A list of host/net addresses is now allowed in an entry in +/etc/shorewall/hosts.
+
+
+ Example:
+
+ foo eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
+
+- The "shorewall check" command now includes the chain name when +printing the applicable policy for each pair of zones.
+
+
+ Example:
+
+ Policy for dmz to net is REJECT using chain all2all
+
+ This means that the policy for connections from the dmz to the internet + is REJECT and the applicable entry in the /etc/shorewall/policy was the +all->all policy.
+
+- Support for the 2.6 Kernel series has been added.
+
+6/17/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.5
- -Problems Corrected:
- + +
-7/15/2003 - New Mirror in Brazil
+ Thanks to the folks at securityopensource.org.br, there is now a Shorewall + mirror in Brazil. +
+7/15/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6 RC 1
+ +
+Problems Corrected:
+
+-
- -- The command "shorewall debug try <directory>" now correctly - traces the attempt.
-- The INCLUDE directive now works properly in the zones file; -previously, INCLUDE in that file was ignored.
-- /etc/shorewall/routestopped records with an empty second column - are no longer ignored.
+- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered +start errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked +around.
+
+
+- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column of +a DNAT[-] rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules in +the nat table (one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly +creates a single DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
+
+
- Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a +"-" were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule.
+
+
+- A number of problems with rule parsing have been corrected. +Corrections involve the handling of "z1!z2" in the SOURCE column as well +as lists in the ORIGINAL DESTINATION column.
+New Features:
- + +
-Migration Issues:
+
+-
+ +- The ORIGINAL DEST column in a DNAT[-] or REDIRECT[-] rule may - now contain a list of addresses. If the list begins with "!' then the rule - will take effect only if the original destination address in the connection - request does not match any of the addresses listed.
+- In earlier versions, an undocumented feature allowed entries + in the host file as follows:
+
+
+ z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
+
+ This capability was never documented and has been removed in 1.4.6 + to allow entries of the following format:
+
+ z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
+
+- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have +been removed from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. These capabilities are +now automatically detected by Shorewall (see below).
+ +
+New Features:
+ +
++
-- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option +may be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting +NEWNOTSYN=No for packets arriving on the associated interface.
+
+
+- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq + to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled for + address ranges.
+
+
+- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than the + first one on an interface.
+
+
+- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) +over a set of servers. Servers may be specified in a range of addresses + given as <first address>-<last address>.
+
+
+ Example:
+
+ DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
+
+- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration +options have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects +whether these capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output +of the start, restart and check commands have been enhanced to report the +outcome:
+
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has been + added. This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases + and allows for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection + tracking table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of +this extension and reports its availability in the output of the start, +restart and check commands.
+ +
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Connection Tracking Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+ If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by Shorewall + is changed in the following ways:+
+- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create + chains in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering + in the filter table (rfc1918 chain).
+- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter rules; + one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection +Tracking Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is +extended to check that the original destination address was the same as +specified (or defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
+ +
+
+- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) + may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
+
+
+- An 'ipcalc' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
+
+
+ ipcalc [ <address> <netmask> | <address>/<vlsm> + ]
+
+ Examples:
+
+ [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0/24
+ CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
+ NETMASK=255.255.255.0
+ NETWORK=192.168.1.0
+ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
+ [root@wookie root]#
+
+ [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
+ CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
+ NETMASK=255.255.255.0
+ NETWORK=192.168.1.0
+ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
+ [root@wookie root]#
+
+ Warning:
+
+ If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmatic (ash or dash), + then the ipcalc command produces incorrect information for IP addresses + 128.0.0.0-1 and for /1 networks. Bash should produce correct information + for all valid IP addresses.
+
+- An 'iprange' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
+
+
+ iprange <address>-<address>
+
+ This command decomposes a range of IP addressses into a list of +network and host addresses. The command can be useful if you need to construct + an efficient set of rules that accept connections from a range of network + addresses.
+
+ Note: If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmetic (ash +or dash) then the range may not span 128.0.0.0.
+
+ Example:
+
+ [root@gateway root]# shorewall iprange 192.168.1.4-192.168.12.9
+ 192.168.1.4/30
+ 192.168.1.8/29
+ 192.168.1.16/28
+ 192.168.1.32/27
+ 192.168.1.64/26
+ 192.168.1.128/25
+ 192.168.2.0/23
+ 192.168.4.0/22
+ 192.168.8.0/22
+ 192.168.12.0/29
+ 192.168.12.8/31
+ [root@gateway root]#
+
+- A list of host/net addresses is now allowed in an entry in +/etc/shorewall/hosts.
+
+ Example:
+
+ foo eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/246/15/2003 - Shorewall, Kernel 2.4.21 and iptables 1.2.8
- -The firewall at shorewall.net has been upgraded to the 2.4.21 kernel and - iptables 1.2.8 (using the "official" RPM from netfilter.org). No problems - have been encountered with this set of software. The Shorewall version - is 1.4.4b plus the accumulated changes for 1.4.5.
- -
-6/8/2003 - Updated Samples
- -Thanks to Francesca Smith, the samples have been updated to Shorewall -version 1.4.4.
- -5/29/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.4b
+7/7/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6 Beta 2
-Groan -- This version corrects a problem whereby the --log-level was not - being set when logging via syslog. The most commonly reported symptom - was that Shorewall messages were being written to the console even though - console logging was correctly configured per FAQ 16.
+Problems Corrected:
-
5/27/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.4a
- The Fireparse --log-prefix fiasco continues. Tuomo Soini has - pointed out that the code in 1.4.4 restricts the length of short zone - names to 4 characters. I've produced version 1.4.4a that restores the - previous 5-character limit by conditionally omitting the log rule number - when the LOGFORMAT doesn't contain '%d'.
- -5/23/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.4
- I apologize for the rapid-fire releases but since there is -a potential configuration change required to go from 1.4.3a to 1.4.4, - I decided to make it a full release rather than just a bug-fix release. -
++
+ +- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered + start errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked + around.
+
- Problems corrected:
+- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column of +a DNAT[-] rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules in +the nat table (one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly +creates a single DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
+
+
+- Corrected a problem in Beta 1 where DNS names containing a +"-" were mis-handled when they appeared in the DEST column of a rule.
+ +
+Migration Issues:
+ +
++
+ +- In earlier versions, an undocumented feature allowed entries + in the host file as follows:
+
+
+ z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
+
+ This capability was never documented and has been removed in 1.4.6 + to allow entries of the following format:
+
+ z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
+
+- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have +been removed from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. These capabilities are +now automatically detected by Shorewall (see below).
+ +
+New Features:
+ +
++
+ +- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option +may be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting +NEWNOTSYN=No for packets arriving on the associated interface.
+
+
+- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq + to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled for + address ranges.
+
+
+- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than the + first one on an interface.
+
+
+- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) + over a set of servers. Servers may be specified in a range of addresses + given as <first address>-<last address>.
+
+
+ Example:
+
+ DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
+
+- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration + options have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects + whether these capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output + of the start, restart and check commands have been enhanced to report +the outcome:
+
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has been + added. This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases + and allows for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection + tracking table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of this + extension and reports its availability in the output of the start, restart + and check commands.
+ +
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Connection Tracking Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+ If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by Shorewall + is changed in the following ways:+
+- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create + chains in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering + in the filter table (rfc1918 chain).
+- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter +rules; one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection +Tracking Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is +extended to check that the original destination address was the same as +specified (or defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
+ +
+
+- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) + may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
+
+
+- An 'ipcalc' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
+
+
+ ipcalc [ <address> <netmask> | <address>/<vlsm> + ]
+
+ Examples:
+
+ [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0/24
+ CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
+ NETMASK=255.255.255.0
+ NETWORK=192.168.1.0
+ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
+ [root@wookie root]#
+
+ [root@wookie root]# shorewall ipcalc 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
+ CIDR=192.168.1.0/24
+ NETMASK=255.255.255.0
+ NETWORK=192.168.1.0
+ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
+ [root@wookie root]#
+
+ Warning:
+
+ If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmatic (ash or dash), + then the ipcalc command produces incorrect information for IP addresses + 128.0.0.0-1 and for /1 networks. Bash should produce correct information + for all valid IP addresses.
+
+- An 'iprange' command has been added to /sbin/shorewall.
+
+
+ iprange <address>-<address>
+
+ This command decomposes a range of IP addressses into a list of +network and host addresses. The command can be useful if you need to +construct an efficient set of rules that accept connections from a range +of network addresses.
+
+ Note: If your shell only supports 32-bit signed arithmetic (ash +or dash) then the range may not span 128.0.0.0.
+
+ Example:
+
+ [root@gateway root]# shorewall iprange 192.168.1.4-192.168.12.9
+ 192.168.1.4/30
+ 192.168.1.8/29
+ 192.168.1.16/28
+ 192.168.1.32/27
+ 192.168.1.64/26
+ 192.168.1.128/25
+ 192.168.2.0/23
+ 192.168.4.0/22
+ 192.168.8.0/22
+ 192.168.12.0/29
+ 192.168.12.8/31
+ [root@gateway root]#
+
+- A list of host/net addresses is now allowed in an entry in +/etc/shorewall/hosts.
+ +
+
+ Example:
+
+ foo eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
+
+7/4/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.6 Beta 1
+ +Problems Corrected:
+ +
++
+ +- A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered + start errors when started using the "service" mechanism has been worked + around.
+
+
+- Where a list of IP addresses appears in the DEST column +of a DNAT[-] rule, Shorewall incorrectly created multiple DNAT rules +in the nat table (one for each element in the list). Shorewall now correctly +creates a single DNAT rule with multiple "--to-destination" clauses.
+ +
+New Features:
+ +
++
+ +- A 'newnotsyn' interface option has been added. This option + may be specified in /etc/shorewall/interfaces and overrides the setting + NEWNOTSYN=No for packets arriving on the associated interface.
+
+
+- The means for specifying a range of IP addresses in /etc/shorewall/masq + to use for SNAT is now documented. ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes is enabled for + address ranges.
+
+
+- Shorewall can now add IP addresses to subnets other than +the first one on an interface.
+
+
+- DNAT[-] rules may now be used to load balance (round-robin) + over a set of servers. Up to 256 servers may be specified in a range +of addresses given as <first address>-<last address>.
+
+
+ Example:
+
+ DNAT net loc:192.168.10.2-192.168.10.5 tcp 80
+
+ Note that this capability has previously been available using +a combination of a DNAT- rule and one or more ACCEPT rules. That technique + is still preferable for load-balancing over a large number of servers +(> 16) since specifying a range in the DNAT rule causes one filter +table ACCEPT rule to be generated for each IP address in the range.
+
+- The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration + options have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects + whether these capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output + of the start, restart and check commands have been enhanced to report +the outcome:
+
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+- Support for the Connection Tracking Match Extension has +been added. This extension is available in recent kernel/iptables releases + and allows for rules which match against elements in netfilter's connection + tracking table. Shorewall automatically detects the availability of this + extension and reports its availability in the output of the start, restart + and check commands.
+ +
+
+ Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities:
+ NAT: Available
+ Packet Mangling: Available
+ Multi-port Match: Available
+ Connection Tracking Match: Available
+ Verifying Configuration...
+
+ If this extension is available, the ruleset generated by Shorewall + is changed in the following ways:+ +
+ ++
+- To handle 'norfc1918' filtering, Shorewall will not create + chains in the mangle table but will rather do all 'norfc1918' filtering + in the filter table (rfc1918 chain).
+- Recall that Shorewall DNAT rules generate two netfilter + rules; one in the nat table and one in the filter table. If the Connection + Tracking Match Extension is available, the rule in the filter table is + extended to check that the original destination address was the same as + specified (or defaulted to) in the DNAT rule.
+ +
+
+- The shell used to interpret the firewall script (/usr/share/shorewall/firewall) + may now be specified using the SHOREWALL_SHELL parameter in shorewall.conf.
+ +
+6/17/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.5
+ +Problems Corrected:
+ +
++
+ +- The command "shorewall debug try <directory>" now +correctly traces the attempt.
+- The INCLUDE directive now works properly in the zones file; + previously, INCLUDE in that file was ignored.
+- /etc/shorewall/routestopped records with an empty second + column are no longer ignored.
+ +
+New Features:
+ +
++
+ +- The ORIGINAL DEST column in a DNAT[-] or REDIRECT[-] rule + may now contain a list of addresses. If the list begins with "!' then + the rule will take effect only if the original destination address in +the connection request does not match any of the addresses listed.
+ +6/15/2003 - Shorewall, Kernel 2.4.21 and iptables 1.2.8
+ +The firewall at shorewall.net has been upgraded to the 2.4.21 kernel and + iptables 1.2.8 (using the "official" RPM from netfilter.org). No problems + have been encountered with this set of software. The Shorewall version + is 1.4.4b plus the accumulated changes for 1.4.5.
+ +
+6/8/2003 - Updated Samples
+ +Thanks to Francesca Smith, the samples have been updated to Shorewall +version 1.4.4.
+ +5/29/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.4b
+Groan -- This version corrects a problem whereby the --log-level was not + being set when logging via syslog. The most commonly reported symptom + was that Shorewall messages were being written to the console even though + console logging was correctly configured per FAQ 16.
+ +
+5/27/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.4a
+ The Fireparse --log-prefix fiasco continues. Tuomo Soini + has pointed out that the code in 1.4.4 restricts the length of short + zone names to 4 characters. I've produced version 1.4.4a that restores + the previous 5-character limit by conditionally omitting the log +rule number when the LOGFORMAT doesn't contain '%d'.
+ +5/23/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.4
+ I apologize for the rapid-fire releases but since there + is a potential configuration change required to go from 1.4.3a to + 1.4.4, I decided to make it a full release rather than just a bug-fix + release.
+
+ Problems corrected:
+None.- New Features:
-
- +
+-
- +- A REDIRECT- rule target has been added. This target -behaves for REDIRECT in the same way as DNAT- does for DNAT in that -the Netfilter nat table REDIRECT rule is added but not the companion -filter table ACCEPT rule.
-
-
-- The LOGMARKER variable has been renamed LOGFORMAT and - has been changed to a 'printf' formatting template which accepts three - arguments (the chain name, logging rule number and the disposition). - To use LOGFORMAT with fireparse (A REDIRECT- rule target has been added. This target + behaves for REDIRECT in the same way as DNAT- does for DNAT in that + the Netfilter nat table REDIRECT rule is added but not the companion + filter table ACCEPT rule.
+
+
+- The LOGMARKER variable has been renamed LOGFORMAT + and has been changed to a 'printf' formatting template which accepts + three arguments (the chain name, logging rule number and the disposition). + To use LOGFORMAT with fireparse (http://www.fireparse.com), set it - as:
-
-
- LOGFORMAT="fp=%s:%d a=%s "
-
- CAUTION: /sbin/shorewall uses the leading part -of the LOGFORMAT string (up to but not including the first '%') to -find log messages in the 'show log', 'status' and 'hits' commands. This -part should not be omitted (the LOGFORMAT should not begin with "%") -and the leading part should be sufficiently unique for /sbin/shorewall -to identify Shorewall messages.
-
-- When logging is specified on a DNAT[-] or REDIRECT[-] - rule, the logging now takes place in the nat table rather than in -the filter table. This way, only those connections that actually undergo - DNAT or redirection will be logged.
- + as:
-
+
+ LOGFORMAT="fp=%s:%d a=%s "
+
+ CAUTION: /sbin/shorewall uses the leading part + of the LOGFORMAT string (up to but not including the first '%') +to find log messages in the 'show log', 'status' and 'hits' commands. +This part should not be omitted (the LOGFORMAT should not begin with +"%") and the leading part should be sufficiently unique for /sbin/shorewall + to identify Shorewall messages.
+
+ +- When logging is specified on a DNAT[-] or REDIRECT[-] + rule, the logging now takes place in the nat table rather than in + the filter table. This way, only those connections that actually +undergo DNAT or redirection will be logged.
+
+5/20/2003 - Shorewall-1.4.3a
- This version primarily corrects the documentation included - in the .tgz and in the .rpm. In addition:
-
- + + This version primarily corrects the documentation included + in the .tgz and in the .rpm. In addition:
+-
- -- (This change is in 1.4.3 but is not documented) If -you are running iptables 1.2.7a and kernel 2.4.20, then Shorewall will -return reject replies as follows:
-
- a) tcp - RST
- b) udp - ICMP port unreachable
- c) icmp - ICMP host unreachable
- d) Otherwise - ICMP host prohibited
- If you are running earlier software, Shorewall will follow - it's traditional convention:
- a) tcp - RST
- b) Otherwise - ICMP port unreachable- UDP port 135 is now silently dropped in the common.def - chain. Remember that this chain is traversed just before a DROP or - REJECT policy is enforced.
- -
-5/18/2003 - Shorewall 1.4.3
- Problems Corrected:
-
- --
- New Features:- There were several cases where Shorewall would fail - to remove a temporary directory from /tmp. These cases have been corrected.
-- The rules for allowing all traffic via the loopback - interface have been moved to before the rule that drops status=INVALID - packets. This insures that all loopback traffic is allowed even if -Netfilter connection tracking is confused.
- -
- --
- -- IPV6-IPV4 (6to4) tunnels are now supported in the - /etc/shorewall/tunnels file.
-- You may now change the leading portion -of the --log-prefix used by Shorewall using the LOGMARKER variable -in shorewall.conf. By default, "Shorewall:" is used.
- -
-5/10/2003 - Shorewall Mirror in Asia
- -
-Ed Greshko has established a mirror in Taiwan -- Thanks Ed!
- -
-5/8/2003 - Shorewall Mirror in Chile
- Thanks to Darcy Ganga, there is now an HTTP mirror - in Santiago Chile. -4/21/2003 - Samples updated for Shorewall version 1.4.2
+(This change is in 1.4.3 but is not documented) + If you are running iptables 1.2.7a and kernel 2.4.20, then Shorewall + will return reject replies as follows: +
+ a) tcp - RST
+ b) udp - ICMP port unreachable
+ c) icmp - ICMP host unreachable
+ d) Otherwise - ICMP host prohibited
+ If you are running earlier software, Shorewall will +follow it's traditional convention:
+ a) tcp - RST
+ b) Otherwise - ICMP port unreachableUDP port 135 is now silently dropped in the common.def + chain. Remember that this chain is traversed just before a DROP +or REJECT policy is enforced. + + +
+5/18/2003 - Shorewall 1.4.3
+ Problems Corrected:
+
+ ++
+ New Features:- There were several cases where Shorewall would + fail to remove a temporary directory from /tmp. These cases have +been corrected.
+- The rules for allowing all traffic via the loopback + interface have been moved to before the rule that drops status=INVALID + packets. This insures that all loopback traffic is allowed even if + Netfilter connection tracking is confused.
+ +
+ ++
+ +- IPV6-IPV4 (6to4) tunnels are now supported in + the /etc/shorewall/tunnels file.
+- You may now change the leading portion + of the --log-prefix used by Shorewall using the LOGMARKER variable + in shorewall.conf. By default, "Shorewall:" is used.
+ +
+5/10/2003 - Shorewall Mirror in Asia
+ +
+Ed Greshko has established a mirror in Taiwan -- Thanks Ed!
+ +
+5/8/2003 - Shorewall Mirror in Chile
+ Thanks to Darcy Ganga, there is now an HTTP + mirror in Santiago Chile. +4/21/2003 - Samples updated for Shorewall version 1.4.2
+Thanks to Francesca Smith, the sample configurations are now upgraded to Shorewall version 1.4.2.
- +4/9/2003 - Shorewall 1.4.2
- + +
-Problems Corrected:
- +- +- +-
-- TCP connection requests rejected out of the - common chain are now properly rejected with TCP RST; - previously, some of these requests were rejected with an ICMP port-unreachable - response.
-- 'traceroute -I' from behind the firewall previously - timed out on the first hop (e.g., to the firewall). This has been - worked around.
+- TCP connection requests rejected out of + the common chain are now properly rejected with +TCP RST; previously, some of these requests were rejected with +an ICMP port-unreachable response.
+- 'traceroute -I' from behind the firewall + previously timed out on the first hop (e.g., to the firewall). + This has been worked around.
- +
New Features:
- + +3/24/2003 - Shorewall 1.4.1
- + @@ -1065,1068 +1276,974 @@ pass traffic from (zone,interface,address) tuples back to themselves - +This release follows up on 1.4.0. It corrects a problem introduced in
1.4.0 and removes additional warts.
-
- Problems Corrected:
-
Note: In the list that follows, the term group refers to a particular network or subnetwork (which may be 0.0.0.0/0 or it may be a host address) accessed through a particular interface. Examples:- + eth2:192.168.1.0/24
- +eth0:0.0.0.0/0- You can use the "shorewall check" command to see -the groups associated with each of your zones.
- eth2:192.168.1.0/24
- eth3:192.0.2.123
-
-
3/17/2003 - Shorewall 1.4.0
- Shorewall 1.4 represents the next step in the evolution of -Shorewall. The main thrust of the initial release is simply to -remove the cruft that has accumulated in Shorewall over time.3/10/2003 - Shoreall 1.3.14a
- -A roleup of the following bug fixes and other updates:
- -2/8/2003 - Shoreawall 1.3.14
- -New features include
- -[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq- - - - -
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2- - - - -
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]# shorewall start-
...
Masqueraded Subnets and Hosts:
To 0.0.0.0/0 from 192.168.1.0/24 through eth0 using 206.124.146.176
To 0.0.0.0/0 from 192.168.10.0/24 through eth0 using 206.124.146.176
Processing /etc/shorewall/tos...
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq- - - - -
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
eth0 192.168.10.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2-
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq- - - - -
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2-
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS-
eth0 192.168.1.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
- 2/5/2003 - Shorewall Support included
- in Webmin 1.060
Webmin version 1.060 now has Shorewall support included as standard. See
- http://www.webmin.com.
-
- 2/4/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.14-RC1
Includes the Beta 2 content plus support for OpenVPN tunnels.
- - -1/28/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.14-Beta2
- - -Includes the Beta 1 content plus restores VLAN device names of the form - $dev.$vid (e.g., eth0.1)
- - -1/25/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.14-Beta1
-
The Beta includes the following changes:
-
3/10/2003 - Shoreall 1.3.14a
+ +A roleup of the following bug fixes and other updates:
+ +2/8/2003 - Shoreawall 1.3.14
+ + +New features include
+ + +[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq- +
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2- +
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]# shorewall start-
...
Masqueraded Subnets and Hosts:
To 0.0.0.0/0 from 192.168.1.0/24 through eth0 using 206.124.146.176
To 0.0.0.0/0 from 192.168.10.0/24 through eth0 using 206.124.146.176
Processing /etc/shorewall/tos...
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq- +
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
eth0 192.168.10.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2-
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq- +
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2-
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS-
eth0 192.168.1.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
+ 2/5/2003 - Shorewall Support
+included in Webmin 1.060
1/18/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.13 Documentation in PDF Format
+Webmin version 1.060 now has Shorewall support included as standard. See
+ http://www.webmin.com.
+
+ 2/4/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.14-RC1
Juraj Ontkanin has produced a PDF containing the Shorewall 1.3.13 documenation. - the PDF may be downloaded from
+ +Includes the Beta 2 content plus support for OpenVPN tunnels.
- ftp://slovakia.shorewall.net/mirror/shorewall/pdf/1/17/2003 - shorewall.net has MOVED
+ +1/28/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.14-Beta2
+ + +Includes the Beta 1 content plus restores VLAN device names of the form + $dev.$vid (e.g., eth0.1)
+ + +1/25/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.14-Beta1
+
The Beta includes the following changes:
+
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq+ + + + +
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2+ + + + +
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]# shorewall start+
...
Masqueraded Subnets and Hosts:
To 0.0.0.0/0 from 192.168.1.0/24 through eth0 using 206.124.146.176
To 0.0.0.0/0 from 192.168.10.0/24 through eth0 using 206.124.146.176
Processing /etc/shorewall/tos...
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq+ + + + +
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
eth0 192.168.10.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2+
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq+ + + + +
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2+
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS+
eth0 192.168.1.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
1/18/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.13 Documentation in PDF Format
+ + +Juraj Ontkanin has produced a PDF containing the Shorewall 1.3.13 documenation. + the PDF may be downloaded from
+ + ftp://slovakia.shorewall.net/mirror/shorewall/pdf/1/17/2003 - shorewall.net has MOVED
+ +Thanks to the generosity of Alex Martin and Rett Consulting, www.shorewall.net and ftp.shorewall.net
are now hosted on a system in Bellevue, Washington. A big thanks to Alex
for making this happen.
-
1/13/2003 - Shorewall 1.3.13
-
Just includes a few things that I had on the burner:
-
1/6/2003 - BURNOUT
- +Until further notice, I will not be involved in either Shorewall Development - or Shorewall Support
+ or Shorewall Support - +-Tom Eastep
-
12/30/2002 - Shorewall Documentation in PDF Format
- +Juraj Ontkanin has produced a PDF containing the Shorewall 1.3.12 documenation. - the PDF may be downloaded from
+ the PDF may be downloaded from - + ftp://slovakia.shorewall.net/mirror/shorewall/pdf/
- http://slovakia.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/pdf/
-
12/27/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.12 Released
- + Features include:
-
12/20/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.12 Beta 3
-
12/20/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.12 Beta 2
- +The first public Beta version of Shorewall 1.3.12 is now available (Beta
- 1 was made available only to a limited audience).
-
http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta+ - +
- ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta
-
12/12/2002 - Mandrake Multi Network Firewall -
- Shorewall is at -the center of MandrakeSoft's recently-announced + Shorewall is +at the center of MandrakeSoft's recently-announced +Multi - Network Firewall (MNF) product. Here is the - product. Here is +the press - release.12/7/2002 - Shorewall Support for Mandrake 9.0
- +Two months and 3 days after I ordered Mandrake 9.0, it was finally delivered. - I have installed 9.0 on one of my systems and - I am now in a position to support Shorewall users who - run Mandrake 9.0.
+ I have installed 9.0 on one of my systems +and I am now in a position to support Shorewall users +who run Mandrake 9.0. - +12/6/2002 - Debian 1.3.11a Packages Available
-
Apt-get sources listed at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- +12/3/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.11a
- +This is a bug-fix roll up which includes Roger Aich's fix for DNAT with - excluded subnets (e.g., "DNAT foo!bar ..."). - Current 1.3.11 users who don't need rules of this - type need not upgrade to 1.3.11.
+ excluded subnets (e.g., "DNAT foo!bar ..."). + Current 1.3.11 users who don't need rules of this + type need not upgrade to 1.3.11. - +11/24/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.11
- +In this version:
- +11/14/2002 - Shorewall Documentation in PDF Format
- +Juraj Ontkanin has produced a PDF containing the Shorewall 1.3.10 documenation. - the PDF may be downloaded from
+ the PDF may be downloaded from - + ftp://slovakia.shorewall.net/mirror/shorewall/pdf/
- http://slovakia.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/pdf/
-
11/09/2002 - Shorewall is Back at SourceForge
- +The main Shorewall 1.3 web site is now back at SourceForge at http://shorewall.sf.net.
-
11/09/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.10
- +In this version:
- +10/24/2002 - Shorewall is now in Gentoo Linux
-
10/23/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.10 Beta 1
- In this - version:10/10/2002 - Debian 1.3.9b Packages Available
-
-
Apt-get sources listed at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- - -10/9/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.9b
- This release - rolls up fixes to the installer and to the firewall - script.10/6/2002 - Shorewall.net now running on RH8.0
-
- The
-firewall and server here at shorewall.net are now
-running RedHat release 8.0.
-
-
- 9/30/2002
- - Shorewall 1.3.9a
9/30/2002 - TUNNELS Broken in 1.3.9!!!
- There - is an updated firewall script at ftp://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.3.9/firewall - -- copy that file to /usr/lib/shorewall/firewall.10/10/2002 - Debian 1.3.9b Packages Available
-
-
9/28/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.9
+ - -In this version:
-
-
9/23/2002 - Full Shorewall Site/Mailing List Archive Search Capability
- Restored
-
-
- - - -- - Hopefully these problems are now corrected. - -- -
- -- Mailing List Archive Search was not available.
- -- The Site Search index was incomplete
- -- Only one page of matches was presented.
- - - - - -
9/23/2002 - Full Shorewall Site/Mailing List Archive Search Capability
- Restored
-
-
9/18/2002 - Debian 1.3.8 Packages Available
-
-
Apt-get sources listed at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
+ +10/9/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.9b
+ This + release rolls up fixes to the installer and to the + firewall script.9/16/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.8
+ +10/6/2002 - Shorewall.net now running on RH8.0
+
+
+
+The firewall and server here at shorewall.net are
+now running RedHat release 8.0.
+
+
+ 9/30/2002
+ - Shorewall 1.3.9a
9/30/2002 - TUNNELS Broken in 1.3.9!!!
+ +There is an updated firewall script at ftp://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.3.9/firewall + -- copy that file to /usr/lib/shorewall/firewall.9/28/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.9
@@ -2138,758 +2255,879 @@ at Debian.9/23/2002 - Full Shorewall Site/Mailing List Archive Search Capability
+ Restored
+
+
+ + + ++ + Hopefully these problems are now corrected. + + ++ +
+ +- Mailing List Archive Search was not available.
+ +- The Site Search index was incomplete
+ +- Only one page of matches was presented.
+
9/23/2002 - Full Shorewall Site/Mailing List Archive Search Capability
+ Restored
+
+
9/18/2002 - Debian 1.3.8 Packages Available
+
+
Apt-get sources listed at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
+ + + +9/16/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.8
+ + + +In this version:
+
+
9/11/2002 - Debian 1.3.7c Packages Available
- +Apt-get sources listed at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- +9/2/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.7c
- +This is a role up of a fix for "DNAT" rules where the source zone is $FW - (fw).
+ (fw). - +8/31/2002 - I'm not available
- +I'm currently on vacation -- please respect my need for a couple of weeks free of Shorewall problem reports.
- +-Tom
- +8/26/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.7b
- +This is a role up of the "shorewall refresh" bug fix and the change which - reverses the order of "dhcp" and -"norfc1918" checking.
+ reverses the order of "dhcp" and + "norfc1918" checking. - +8/26/2002 - French FTP Mirror is Operational
- +ftp://france.shorewall.net/pub/mirrors/shorewall - is now available.
+ is now available. - +8/25/2002 - Shorewall Mirror in France
- +Thanks to a Shorewall user in Paris, the Shorewall web site is now mirrored - at http://france.shorewall.net.
- +8/25/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.7a Debian Packages Available
- +Lorenzo Martignoni reports that the packages for version 1.3.7a are available - at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- +8/22/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.7 Wins a Brown Paper Bag Award for its Author - -- Shorewall 1.3.7a released -
+ - +1.3.7a corrects problems occurring in rules file processing when starting - Shorewall 1.3.7.
+ Shorewall 1.3.7. - +8/22/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.7 Released 8/13/2002
- +Features in this release include:
- +I would like to thank John Distler for his valuable input regarding TCP - SYN and ICMP treatment in Shorewall. - That input has led to marked improvement -in Shorewall in the last two releases.
+ SYN and ICMP treatment in Shorewall. + That input has led to marked improvement + in Shorewall in the last two releases. - +8/13/2002 - Documentation in the CVS Repository
- +The Shorewall-docs project now contains just the HTML and image files - the Frontpage files have been removed.
- +8/7/2002 - STABLE branch added to CVS Repository
- +This branch will only be updated after I release a new version of Shorewall - so you can always update from this - branch to get the latest stable tree.
+ so you can always update from +this branch to get the latest stable tree. - +8/7/2002 - Upgrade Issues section added to the Errata Page
- +Now there is one place to go to look for issues involved with upgrading - to recent versions of Shorewall.
+ to recent versions of Shorewall. - +8/7/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.6
- +This is primarily a bug-fix rollup with a couple of new features:
- +7/30/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.5b Released
- +This interim release:
- +7/29/2002 - New Shorewall Setup Guide Available
- +The first draft of this guide is available at http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm. - The guide is intended for use by -people who are setting up Shorewall to manage -multiple public IP addresses and by people who want -to learn more about Shorewall than is described in the - single-address guides. Feedback on the new guide is -welcome.
+ The guide is intended for use +by people who are setting up Shorewall to + manage multiple public IP addresses and by people + who want to learn more about Shorewall than is described + in the single-address guides. Feedback on the new + guide is welcome. - +7/28/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.5 Debian Package Available
- +Lorenzo Martignoni reports that the packages are version 1.3.5a and are - available at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- +7/27/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.5a Released
- +This interim release restores correct handling of REDIRECT rules.
- +7/26/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.5 Released
- +This will be the last Shorewall release for a while. I'm going to be focusing on rewriting a lot of the documentation.
- +In this version:
- +7/16/2002 - New Mirror in Argentina
- +Thanks to Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman, there is now a Shorewall mirror in - Argentina. Thanks Buanzo!!!
+ Argentina. Thanks Buanzo!!! - +7/16/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.4 Released
- +In this version:
- +7/8/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.3 Debian Package Available
- +Lorenzo Marignoni reports that the packages are available at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- +7/6/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.3 Released
- +In this version:
- +6/25/2002 - Samples Updated for 1.3.2
- +The comments in the sample configuration files have been updated to reflect - new features introduced in Shorewall - 1.3.2.
+ new features introduced in Shorewall + 1.3.2. - +6/25/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.1 Debian Package Available
- +Lorenzo Marignoni reports that the package is available at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- +6/19/2002 - Documentation Available in PDF Format
- +Thanks to Mike Martinez, the Shorewall Documentation is now available for download in Adobe PDF format.
- +6/16/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.2 Released
- +In this version:
- +6/6/2002 - Why CVS Web access is Password Protected
- +Last weekend, I installed the CVS Web package to provide brower-based access to the Shorewall CVS repository. Since then, I have had several instances where my server was almost unusable due to the high load generated by website copying tools like HTTrack and WebStripper. These mindless tools:
- +These tools/weapons are particularly damaging when combined with CVS Web - because they doggedly follow every - link in the cgi-generated HTML resulting - in 1000s of executions of the cvsweb.cgi script. - Yesterday, I spend several hours implementing measures - to block these tools but unfortunately, these measures - resulted in my server OOM-ing under even moderate -load.
+ because they doggedly follow every + link in the cgi-generated HTML resulting + in 1000s of executions of the cvsweb.cgi script. + Yesterday, I spend several hours implementing measures + to block these tools but unfortunately, these measures + resulted in my server OOM-ing under even moderate + load. - +Until I have the time to understand the cause of the OOM (or until I buy - more RAM if that is what is required), - CVS Web access will remain Password Protected. -
+ more RAM if that is what is required), + CVS Web access will remain Password +Protected. - +6/5/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.1 Debian Package Available
- +Lorenzo Marignoni reports that the package is available at http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html.
- +6/2/2002 - Samples Corrected
- +The 1.3.0 samples configurations had several serious problems that prevented - DNS and SSH from working properly. - These problems have been corrected in the - 1.3.1 samples.
+ DNS and SSH from working properly. + These problems have been corrected in +the 1.3.1 samples. - +6/1/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.1 Released
- +Hot on the heels of 1.3.0, this release:
- +5/29/2002 - Shorewall 1.3.0 Released
- +In addition to the changes in Beta 1, Beta 2 and RC1, Shorewall 1.3.0 includes:
- +5/23/2002 - Shorewall 1.3 RC1 Available
- +In addition to the changes in Beta 1 and Beta 2, RC1 (Version 1.2.92) incorporates the following:
- +5/19/2002 - Shorewall 1.3 Beta 2 Available
- +In addition to the changes in Beta 1, this release which carries the designation 1.2.91 adds:
- +5/17/2002 - Shorewall 1.3 Beta 1 Available
- +Beta 1 carries the version designation 1.2.90 and implements the following - features:
+ features: - +5/4/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.13 is Available
- +In this version:
- +4/30/2002 - Shorewall Debian News
- +Lorenzo Marignoni reports that Shorewall 1.2.12 is now in both the Debian Testing Branch and the .
- +4/20/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.12 is Available
- +4/17/2002 - Shorewall Debian News
- +Lorenzo Marignoni reports that:
- +Thanks, Lorenzo!
- +4/16/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.11 RPM Available for SuSE
- +Thanks to Stefan Mohr, there - is now a Shorewall 1.2.11 - SuSE RPM available.
+ SuSE RPM available. - +4/13/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.11 Available
- +In this version:
- +4/13/2002 - Hamburg Mirror now has FTP
- +Stefan now has an FTP mirror at ftp://germany.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall. - Thanks Stefan!
+ Thanks Stefan! - +4/12/2002 - New Mirror in Hamburg
- +Thanks to Stefan Mohr, there - is now a mirror of the Shorewall -website at http://germany.shorewall.net.
- +4/10/2002 - Shorewall QuickStart Guide Version 1.1 Available
- +Version 1.1 of the QuickStart - Guide is now available. Thanks - to those who have read version 1.0 and offered - their suggestions. Corrections have also been made - to the sample scripts.
+ Guide is now available. Thanks + to those who have read version 1.0 and offered + their suggestions. Corrections have also been made + to the sample scripts. - +4/9/2002 - Shorewall QuickStart Guide Version 1.0 Available
- +Version 1.0 of the QuickStart - Guide is now available. This -Guide and its accompanying sample configurations - are expected to provide a replacement for the recently - withdrawn parameterized samples.
+ Guide is now available. This + Guide and its accompanying sample configurations + are expected to provide a replacement for the +recently withdrawn parameterized samples. - +4/8/2002 - Parameterized Samples Withdrawn
- +Although the parameterized - samples have allowed people -to get a firewall up and running quickly, - they have unfortunately set the wrong level of expectation - among those who have used them. I am therefore - withdrawing support for the samples and I am recommending - that they not be used in new Shorewall installations.
+ samples have allowed people + to get a firewall up and running quickly, + they have unfortunately set the wrong level of expectation + among those who have used them. I am therefore + withdrawing support for the samples and I am recommending + that they not be used in new Shorewall installations. - +4/2/2002 - Updated Log Parser
- +John Lodge has provided an updated - version of his CGI-based log parser with corrected date handling.
- +3/30/2002 - Shorewall Website Search Improvements
- +The quick search on the home page now excludes the mailing list archives. - The Extended - Search allows excluding the archives - or restricting the search to just the archives. An archive - search form is also available on the Extended Search allows + excluding the archives or restricting the search + to just the archives. An archive search form is + also available on the mailing list information - page.
+ page. - +3/28/2002 - Debian Shorewall News (From Lorenzo Martignoni)
- +3/25/2002 - Log Parser Available
- +John Lodge has provided a CGI-based log parser for Shorewall. Thanks - John.
+ John. - +3/20/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.10 Released
- +In this version:
- +3/11/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.9 Released
- +In this version:
- +3/1/2002 - 1.2.8 Debian Package is Available
- +See http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html
- +2/25/2002 - New Two-interface Sample
- +I've enhanced the two interface sample to allow access from the firewall - to servers in the local zone - - http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/LATEST.samples/two-interfaces.tgz
+ http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/LATEST.samples/two-interfaces.tgz - +2/23/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.8 Released
- +Do to a serious problem with 1.2.7, I am releasing 1.2.8. It corrects problems associated with the lock file used to prevent multiple state-changing - operations from occuring simultaneously. - My apologies for any inconvenience my - carelessness may have caused.
+ operations from occuring simultaneously. + My apologies for any inconvenience my + carelessness may have caused. - +2/22/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.7 Released
- +In this version:
- +2/18/2002 - 1.2.6 Debian Package is Available
- +See http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html
- +2/8/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.6 Released
- +In this version:
- +2/4/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.5 Debian Package Available
- +see http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html
- +2/1/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.5 Released
- +Due to installation problems with Shorewall 1.2.4, I have released Shorewall - 1.2.5. Sorry for the rapid-fire development.
+ 1.2.5. Sorry for the rapid-fire +development. - +In version 1.2.5:
- +1/28/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.4 Released
- +1/27/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.3 Debian Package Available -- see http://security.dsi.unimi.it/~lorenzo/debian.html
- +1/20/2002 - Corrected firewall script available
- +Corrects a problem with BLACKLIST_LOGLEVEL. See the - errata for details.
+ errata for details. - +1/19/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.3 Released
- +This is a minor feature and bugfix release. The single new feature is:
- +The following problems were corrected:
- +1/18/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.2 packaged with new LEAF release
- +Jacques Nilo and Eric Wolzak have released a kernel 2.4.16 LEAF distribution - that includes Shorewall 1.2.2. See -http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo - for details.
+ that includes Shorewall 1.2.2. See + http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo + for details. - +1/11/2002 - Debian Package (.deb) Now Available - Thanks to Lorenzo Martignoni, a 1.2.2 - Shorewall Debian package is now available. - There is a link to Lorenzo's site from the - Shorewall download page.
+ Shorewall Debian package is now +available. There is a link to Lorenzo's +site from the Shorewall download page. - +1/9/2002 - Updated 1.2.2 /sbin/shorewall available - This corrected version restores - the "shorewall status" command to -health.
+ the "shorewall status" command to + health. - +1/8/2002 - Shorewall 1.2.2 Released
- +In version 1.2.2
- +1/5/2002 - New Parameterized Samples (version 1.2.0) released. These are minor updates - to the previously-released samples. - There are two new rules added:
+ to the previously-released samples. + There are two new rules added: - +See the README file for upgrade instructions.
- +1/1/2002 - Shorewall Mailing List Moving
- +The Shorewall mailing list hosted at - Sourceforge is moving to Shorewall.net. - If you are a current subscriber to the list - at Sourceforge, please is moving to Shorewall.net. + If you are a current subscriber to the +list at Sourceforge, please see these instructions. - If you would like to subscribe to the - new list, visit http://www.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users.
- +12/31/2001 - Shorewall 1.2.1 Released
- +In version 1.2.1:
- +12/21/2001 - Shorewall 1.2.0 Released! - I couldn't resist releasing 1.2 on 12/21/2001
- +Version 1.2 contains the following new features:
- +For the next month or so, I will continue to provide corrections to version - 1.1.18 as necessary so that current - version 1.1.x users will not be forced into - a quick upgrade to 1.2.0 just to have access to bug fixes.
+ 1.1.18 as necessary so that current + version 1.1.x users will not be forced into + a quick upgrade to 1.2.0 just to have access to bug + fixes. - +For those of you who have installed one of the Beta RPMS, you will need - to use the "--oldpackage" option -when upgrading to 1.2.0:
+ to use the "--oldpackage" option + when upgrading to 1.2.0: - +- ++ - +rpm -Uvh --oldpackage shorewall-1.2-0.noarch.rpm
-
12/19/2001 - Thanks to Steve - Cowles, there is now a Shorewall - mirror in Texas. This web site is mirrored - at http://www.infohiiway.com/shorewall - and the ftp site is at , there is now a Shorewall + mirror in Texas. This web site is mirrored + at http://www.infohiiway.com/shorewall + and the ftp site is at ftp://ftp.infohiiway.com/pub/mirrors/shorewall.
- +11/30/2001 - A new set of the parameterized Sample Configurations has been released. In this version:
- +11/20/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.18.
- +In this version:
- +11/19/2001 - Thanks to Juraj - Ontkanin, there is now a -Shorewall mirror in the Slovak Republic. - The website is now mirrored at , there is now +a Shorewall mirror in the Slovak Republic. + The website is now mirrored at http://www.nrg.sk/mirror/shorewall - and the FTP site is mirrored at ftp://ftp.nrg.sk/mirror/shorewall.
- +11/2/2001 - Announcing Shorewall Parameter-driven Sample Configurations. - There are three sample configurations:
- - - -Samples may be downloaded from ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/samples-1.1.17 - . See the README file for instructions.
+ . See the README file for instructions. - +11/1/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.17. I intend - this to be the last of the -1.1 Shorewall releases.
+ this to be the last of the + 1.1 Shorewall releases. - +In this version:
- +10/22/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.16. In this - version:
+ version: - +10/15/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.15. In this - version:
+ version: - +10/4/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.14. In this - version
+ version - +9/12/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.13. In this - version
+ version - +8/28/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.12. In this - version
+ version - +7/28/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.11. In this - version
+ version - +7/6/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.10. In this version
- +6/23/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.9. In this version
- +6/18/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.8. In this version
- +6/2/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.7. In this version
- +5/25/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.6. In this version
- +5/20/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.5. In this version
- +5/10/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.4. In this version
- +4/28/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.3. In this version
- +4/12/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.2. In this version
- +4/8/2001 - Shorewall is now affiliated with the Leaf Project -
+ - +4/5/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.1. In this version:
- +3/25/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.1.0. In this version:
- +3/19/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.0.4. This version:
- +3/13/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.0.3. This is a bug-fix - release with no new features.
+ release with no new features. - +3/8/2001 - The current version of Shorewall is 1.0.2. It supports an - additional "gw" (gateway) zone for - tunnels and it supports IPSEC tunnels with - end-points on the firewall. There is also a .lrp available - now.
+ additional "gw" (gateway) zone +for tunnels and it supports IPSEC tunnels + with end-points on the firewall. There is also a .lrp available + now. - -Updated 7/22/2003 - Tom Eastep -
+ +Updated 8/5/2003 - Tom Eastep +
- + Copyright © 2001, 2002 Thomas M. Eastep.
- - |
-
- Using Shorewall with Squid- -- |
-
- - |
-
-- There may be a requirement to exclude additional destination hosts - or networks from being redirected. For example, you might also want requests - destined for 130.252.100.0/24 to not be routed to Squid. In that case, you - must add a manual rule in /etc/shorewall/start:- -
-- -ACTION -SOURCE -DEST -PROTO -DEST -
- PORT(S)SOURCE -
- PORT(S)ORIGINAL -
- DEST- -REDIRECT -loc -3128 -tcp -www -- -
-!206.124.146.177 -- - - -ACCEPT -fw -net -tcp -www --
--
-
-
-- To exclude additional hosts or networks, just add additional similar - rules.run_iptables -t nat -I loc_dnat -p tcp --dport www -d 130.252.100.0/24 -j RETURN-
WARNING: This setup may conflict with
- other aspects of your gateway including but not limited to traffic
- shaping and route redirection. For that reason, I don't recommend
- it.
-
-- -echo 202 www.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables-
-- -if [ -z "`ip rule list | grep www.out`" ] ; then-
ip rule add fwmark 202 table www.out
ip route add default via 192.168.1.3 dev eth1 table www.out
ip route flush cache
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/send_redirects
fi
ZONE + |
+ |
- INTERFACE - |
- BROADCAST - |
- OPTIONS + |
+ Using Shorewall with Squid+ ++ |
+
+ |
loc - |
- eth1 - |
- detect - |
- routeback - |
-
++ There may be a requirement to exclude additional destination +hosts or networks from being redirected. For example, you might also want +requests destined for 130.252.100.0/24 to not be routed to Squid. In that +case, you must add a manual rule in /etc/shorewall/start:+ +
++ +ACTION +SOURCE +DEST +PROTO +DEST +
+ PORT(S)SOURCE +
+ PORT(S)ORIGINAL +
+ DEST+ +REDIRECT +loc +3128 +tcp +www +- +
+!206.124.146.177 ++ + + +ACCEPT +fw +net +tcp +www ++
++
+
+
++ To exclude additional hosts or networks, just add additional +similar rules.run_iptables -t nat -I loc_dnat -p tcp --dport www -d 130.252.100.0/24 -j RETURN+
WARNING: This setup may conflict with
+ other aspects of your gateway including but not limited to traffic
+ shaping and route redirection. For that reason, I don't recommend
+ it.
+
++ +echo 202 www.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables+
++ +if [ -z "`ip rule list | grep www.out`" ] ; then+
ip rule add fwmark 202 table www.out
ip route add default via 192.168.1.3 dev eth1 table www.out
ip route flush cache
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth1/send_redirects
fi
ZONE + |
+ INTERFACE + |
+ BROADCAST + |
+ OPTIONS + |
+
loc + |
+ eth1 + |
+ detect + |
+ routeback + |
+
ACTION | -SOURCE | -DEST | -PROTO | -DEST - PORT(S) |
- SOURCE - PORT(S) |
- ORIGINAL - DEST |
-
ACCEPT - |
- loc | -loc - |
- tcp | -www | - - |
- - |
-
ACTION | +SOURCE | +DEST | +PROTO | +DEST + PORT(S) |
+ SOURCE + PORT(S) |
+ ORIGINAL + DEST |
+
ACCEPT + |
+ loc | +loc + |
+ tcp | +www | + + |
+ + |
+
SOURCE + |
+ DESTINATION + |
+ POLICY + |
+ LOG LEVEL + |
+ BURST PARAMETERS + |
+
loc + |
+ loc + |
+ ACCEPT + |
+ + |
+ + |
+
SOURCE - |
- DESTINATION - |
- POLICY - |
- LOG LEVEL - |
- BURST PARAMETERS - |
-
loc - |
- loc - |
- ACCEPT - |
- - |
- - |
-
+ ++- +iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -s ! 192.168.1.3 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 202-
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d ! 192.168.1.3 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 3128-
If you are running RedHat on the server, you can simply execute - the following commands after you have typed the iptables command -above:- -
-
+ ++If you are running RedHat on the server, you can simply execute + the following commands after you have typed the iptables command above:+ +
+- +- +iptables-save > /etc/sysconfig/iptables-
chkconfig --level 35 iptables on
- +
+ ++- +echo 202 www.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables-
+ ++- +if [ -z "`ip rule list | grep www.out`" ] ; then-
ip rule add fwmark 202 table www.out
ip route add default via 192.0.2.177 dev eth1 table www.out
ip route flush cache
fi
+ +- -iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 202-B) Set MARK_IN_FORWARD_CHAIN=No in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf ++ +B) Set MARK_IN_FORWARD_CHAIN=No in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf and add the following entry in /etc/shorewall/tcrules:- -
--- --- C) Run Shorewall 1.3.14 or later and add the following entry in - /etc/shorewall/tcrules:- -
-- -MARK -
-SOURCE -
-DESTINATION -
-PROTOCOL -
-PORT -
-CLIENT PORT -
-- - - -202 -
-eth2 -
-0.0.0.0/0 -
-tcp -
-80 -
-- -
-
--+ +++ ++- + C) Run Shorewall 1.3.14 or later and add the following entry +in /etc/shorewall/tcrules:-
@@ -425,7 +386,7 @@ above:
- - - + +202:P
+202
eth2 @@ -438,107 +399,143 @@ above:
-
++++++ +
++ +MARK +
+SOURCE +
+DESTINATION +
+PROTOCOL +
+PORT +
+CLIENT PORT +
++ + + +202:P +
+eth2 +
+0.0.0.0/0 +
+tcp +
+80 +
+- +
+-
- -- In /etc/shorewall/rules, you will need:
- +- In /etc/shorewall/rules, you will need:
++ +- -- -
-- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DEST -
-PROTO -
-DEST -
- PORT(S)
-CLIENT -
- PORT(2)
-ORIGINAL -
- DEST
-- -ACCEPT -
-loc -
-dmz -
-tcp -
-80 -
--
--
-- - - + +ACCEPT -
-dmz -
-net -
-tcp -
-80 -
--
--
-+ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DEST +
+PROTO +
+DEST +
+ PORT(S)
+CLIENT +
+ PORT(2)
+ORIGINAL +
+ DEST
++ +ACCEPT +
+loc +
+dmz +
+tcp +
+80 +
++
++
++ + +ACCEPT +
+dmz +
+net +
+tcp +
+80 +
++
++
+
--
- -- On 192.0.2.177 (your Web/Squid server), arrange for -the following command to be executed after networking has come up
- -
- -iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d ! 192.0.2.177 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 3128-If you are running RedHat on the server, you can simply execute - the following commands after you have typed the iptables command -above:- -
+
+ +++
+ +- On 192.0.2.177 (your Web/Squid server), arrange for + the following command to be executed after networking has come up
+ +
+ +iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d ! 192.0.2.177 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 3128+If you are running RedHat on the server, you can simply execute + the following commands after you have typed the iptables command above:+ +
+- +- +iptables-save > /etc/sysconfig/iptables-
chkconfig --level 35 iptables on- -Updated 7/18/2003 - Tom Eastep + +
+Updated 8/4/2003 - Tom Eastep
- Copyright - © 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
-
-
-
+ Copyright + © 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_and_Aliased_Interfaces.html b/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_and_Aliased_Interfaces.html index c4716d30d..0a0cd3529 100755 --- a/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_and_Aliased_Interfaces.html +++ b/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_and_Aliased_Interfaces.html @@ -2,651 +2,669 @@Shorewall and Aliased Interfaces - + - + - +- -
-- +- + + - - + + + ++ -Shorewall and Aliased Interfaces
-
- +
+Background
- The traditional net-tools contain a program called ifconfig - which is used to configure network devices. ifconfig introduced the concept - of aliased or virtial interfaces. These virtual interfaces - have names of the form interface:integer (e.g., eth0:0) -and ifconfig treats them more or less like real interfaces.
-
- Example:
- + The traditional net-tools contain a program called ifconfig + which is used to configure network devices. ifconfig introduced the +concept of aliased or virtual interfaces. These virtual +interfaces have names of the form interface:integer (e.g., +eth0:0) and ifconfig treats them more or less like real interfaces.
+
+ Example:
+[root@gateway root]# ifconfig eth0:0- The ifconfig utility is being gradually phased out in favor of the -ip utility which is part of the iproute package. The ip utility -does not use the concept of aliases or virtual interfaces but rather treats -additional addresses on an interface as objects. The ip utility does provide -for interaction with ifconfig in that it allows addresses to be labeled -and labels may take the form of ipconfig virtual interfaces.
eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:08:3:FA:55
inet addr:206.124.146.178 Bcast:206.124.146.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x2000
[root@gateway root]#
-
- Example:
-
- + The ifconfig utility is being gradually phased out in favor of the + ip utility which is part of the iproute package. The ip +utility does not use the concept of aliases or virtual interfaces but rather +treats additional addresses on an interface as objects in their own right. +The ip utility does provide for interaction with ifconfig in that it allows +addresses to be labeled where these labels take the form of ipconfig +virtual interfaces.
+
+ Example:
+
+[root@gateway root]# ip addr show dev eth0- Note that one cannot type "ip addr show dev eth0:0" because - "eth0:0" is a label for a particular address rather than a device name.
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100
link/ether 02:00:08:e3:fa:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 206.124.146.176/24 brd 206.124.146.255 scope global eth0
inet 206.124.146.178/24 brd 206.124.146.255 scope global secondary eth0:0
[root@gateway root]#
- + Note that one cannot type "ip addr show dev eth0:0" because + "eth0:0" is a label for a particular address rather than a device name.
+[root@gateway root]# ip addr show dev eth0:0- The iptables program doesn't support virtual interfaces in either -it's "-i" or "-o" command options; as a consequence, Shorewall does not -allow them to be used in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces file.
Device "eth0:0" does not exist.
[root@gateway root]#
-
- + The iptables program doesn't support virtual interfaces in either + it's "-i" or "-o" command options; as a consequence, Shorewall does not + allow them to be used in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces file or anywhere +else except as described in the discussion below.
+
+ +Adding Addresses to Interfaces
+Shorewall provides facilities for automatically adding addresses to interfaces +as described in the following section. It is also easy to add them yourself +using the ip utility. The above alias was added using:
+ip addr add 206.124.146.178/24 brd 206.124.146.255 +dev eth0 label eth0:0+You probably want to arrange to add these addresses when the device is started +rather than placing commands like the above in one of the Shorewall extension +scripts. For example, on RedHat systems, you can place the commands in /sbin/ifup-local:
+
+
+++RedHat systems also allow adding such aliases from the network administration +GUI (which works well if you have a graphical environment on your firewall).#!/bin/sh+
case $1 in
eth0)
/sbin/ip addr add 206.124.146.177 dev eth0 label eth0:0
;;
esac
So how do I handle more than one address on an interface?
- The answer depends on what you are trying to do with the interfaces. - In the sub-sections that follow, we'll take a look at common scenarios.
- + The answer depends on what you are trying to do with the interfaces. + In the sub-sections that follow, we'll take a look at common scenarios.
+Separate Rules
- If you need to make a rule for traffic to/from the firewall itself -that only applies to a particular IP address, simply qualify the $FW zone -with the IP address.
-
- Example (allow SSH from net to eth0:0 above):
-
- --- -- -
+ If you need to make a rule for traffic to/from the firewall itself + that only applies to a particular IP address, simply qualify the $FW zone + with the IP address.- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DESTINATION -
-PROTOCOL -
-PORT(S) -
-SOURCE PORT(S) -
-ORIGINAL DESTINATION -
-- - - -ACCEPT -
-net -
-fw:206.124.146.178 -
-tcp -
-22 -
--
--
-
-DNAT
- Suppose that I had set up eth0:0 as above and I wanted to port forward - from that virtual interface to a web server running in my local zone -at 192.168.1.3. That is accomplised by a single rule in the /etc/shorewall/rules - file:
-
- -+ Example (allow SSH from net to eth0:0 above):- + +
+
+ ++ +- -
+- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DESTINATION -
-PROTOCOL -
-PORT(S) -
-SOURCE PORT(S) -
-ORIGINAL DESTINATION -
-- - - + +DNAT -
-net -
-loc:192.168.1.3 -
-tcp -
-80 -
-- -
-206.124.146.178 -
-+ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DESTINATION +
+PROTOCOL +
+PORT(S) +
+SOURCE PORT(S) +
+ORIGINAL DESTINATION +
++ + +ACCEPT +
+net +
+$FW:206.124.146.178 +
+tcp +
+22 +
++
++
+
+DNAT
+ Suppose that I had set up eth0:0 as above and I wanted to port +forward from that virtual interface to a web server running in my local +zone at 192.168.1.3. That is accomplised by a single rule in the /etc/shorewall/rules + file:
-+++ +
++ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DESTINATION +
+PROTOCOL +
+PORT(S) +
+SOURCE PORT(S) +
+ORIGINAL DESTINATION +
++ + + +DNAT +
+net +
+loc:192.168.1.3 +
+tcp +
+80 +
+- +
+206.124.146.178 +
+
+SNAT
- If you wanted to use eth0:0 as the IP address for outbound connections - from your local zone (eth1), then in /etc/shorewall/masq:
-
- --- Shorewall can create the alias (additional address) for you if you - set ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. Beginning + +- -
+ If you wanted to use eth0:0 as the IP address for outbound connections + from your local zone (eth1), then in /etc/shorewall/masq:- -INTERFACE -
-SUBNET -
-ADDRESS -
-- - - -eth0 -
-eth1 -
-206.124.146.178 -
-
-++ Shorewall can create the alias (additional address) for you if +you set ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. Beginning with Shorewall 1.3.14, Shorewall can actually create the "label" (virtual interface) so that you can see the created address using ifconfig. In addition to setting ADD_SNAT_ALIASES=Yes, you specify the virtual interface name in the INTERFACE column as follows:+ +
++ +INTERFACE +
+SUBNET +
+ADDRESS +
++ + + +eth0 +
+eth1 +
+206.124.146.178 +
+
+
- -+ ++ The above would create three IP addresses:- Shorewall can also set up SNAT to round-robin over a range of IP addresses. -Do do that, you specify a range of IP addresses in the ADDRESS column. If -you specify a label in the INTERFACE column, Shorewall will use that label -for the first address of the range and will increment the label by one for -each subsequent label.- -
-- -INTERFACE -
-SUBNET -
-ADDRESS -
-- - - + +eth0:0 -
-eth1 -
-206.124.146.178 -
-+ +INTERFACE +
+SUBNET +
+ADDRESS +
++ + +eth0:0 +
+eth1 +
+206.124.146.178 +
+
-
- -++ Shorewall can also set up SNAT to round-robin over a range of IP addresses. + Do do that, you specify a range of IP addresses in the ADDRESS column. If + you specify a label in the INTERFACE column, Shorewall will use that label + for the first address of the range and will increment the label by one for + each subsequent label.
+
+ +- The above would create three IP addresses:- -
-- -INTERFACE -
-SUBNET -
-ADDRESS -
-- - - + +eth0:0 -
-eth1 -
-206.124.146.178-206.124.146.180 -
-+ +INTERFACE +
+SUBNET +
+ADDRESS +
++ + +eth0:0 +
+eth1 +
+206.124.146.178-206.124.146.180 +
+
-
- eth0:0 = 206.124.146.178
- eth0:1 = 206.124.146.179
- eth0:2 = 206.124.146.180
- +
+
+ eth0:0 = 206.124.146.178
+ eth0:1 = 206.124.146.179
+ eth0:2 = 206.124.146.180
+STATIC NAT
- If you wanted to use static NAT to link eth0:0 with local address -192.168.1.3, you would have the following in /etc/shorewall/nat:
-
- --- Shorewall can create the alias (additional address) for you if you - set ADD_IP_ALIASES=Yes in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. Beginning with - Shorewall 1.3.14, Shorewall can actually create the "label" (virtual + +- -
+ If you wanted to use static NAT to link eth0:0 with local address + 192.168.1.3, you would have the following in /etc/shorewall/nat:- -EXTERNAL -
-INTERFACE -
-INTERNAL -
-ALL INTERFACES -
-LOCAL -
-- - - -206.124.146.178 -
-eth0 -
-192.168.1.3 -
-no -
-no -
-
-++ Shorewall can create the alias (additional address) for you if +you set ADD_IP_ALIASES=Yes in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. Beginning +with Shorewall 1.3.14, Shorewall can actually create the "label" (virtual interface) so that you can see the created address using ifconfig. In addition to setting ADD_IP_ALIASES=Yes, you specify the virtual interface name in the INTERFACE column as follows:+ +
++ +EXTERNAL +
+INTERFACE +
+INTERNAL +
+ALL INTERFACES +
+LOCAL +
++ + + +206.124.146.178 +
+eth0 +
+192.168.1.3 +
+no +
+no +
+
+
-
- -++
+ ++ In either case, to create rules that pertain only to this NAT pair, + you simply qualify the local zone with the internal IP address.- -
+- -EXTERNAL -
-INTERFACE -
-INTERNAL -
-ALL INTERFACES -
-LOCAL -
-- +206.124.146.178
++ +EXTERNAL +
+INTERFACE +
+INTERNAL +
+ALL INTERFACES +
+LOCAL +
++ + + +206.124.146.178 +
+eth0:0 +
+192.168.1.3 +
+no +
+no +
+
+
+
+ Example: You want to allow SSH from the net to 206.124.146.178 a.k.a. + 192.168.1.3.
+
+ ++- In either case, to create rules that pertain only to this NAT pair, - you simply qualify the local zone with the internal IP address.+ +
+ +ACTION +
+SOURCE +
+DESTINATION +
+PROTOCOL +
+PORT(S) +
+SOURCE PORT(S) +
+ORIGINAL DESTINATION +
++ - - + + +ACCEPT +
+net +
+loc:192.168.1.3 +
+tcp +
+22 +
+-
eth0:0
+-
192.168.1.3 -
-no -
-no -
-
-
-
- Example: You want to allow SSH from the net to 206.124.146.178 a.k.a. - 192.168.1.3.
-
- --- +- -
-- -ACTION -
-SOURCE -
-DESTINATION -
-PROTOCOL -
-PORT(S) -
-SOURCE PORT(S) -
-ORIGINAL DESTINATION -
-- - - -ACCEPT -
-net -
-loc:192.168.1.3 -
-tcp -
-22 -
--
--
-
-MULTIPLE SUBNETS
- Sometimes multiple IP addresses are used because there are multiple - subnetworks configured on a LAN segment. This technique does not provide - for any security between the subnetworks if the users of the systems have - administrative privileges because in that case, the users can simply manipulate - their system's routing table to bypass your firewall/router. Nevertheless, - there are cases where you simply want to consider the LAN segment itself - as a zone and allow your firewall/router to route between the two subnetworks.
-
- Example 1: Local interface eth1 interfaces to 192.168.1.0/24 - and 192.168.20.0/24. The primary IP address of eth1 is 192.168.1.254 + Sometimes multiple IP addresses are used because there are multiple + subnetworks configured on a LAN segment. This technique does not provide + for any security between the subnetworks if the users of the systems have + administrative privileges because in that case, the users can simply manipulate + their system's routing table to bypass your firewall/router. Nevertheless, + there are cases where you simply want to consider the LAN segment itself + as a zone and allow your firewall/router to route between the two subnetworks.
+
+ Example 1: Local interface eth1 interfaces to 192.168.1.0/24 + and 192.168.20.0/24. The primary IP address of eth1 is 192.168.1.254 and eth1:0 is 192.168.20.254. You want to simply route all requests between - the two subnetworks.
- + the two subnetworks.
+If you are running Shorewall 1.4.1 or Later
- In /etc/shorewall/interfaces:
- -+ In /etc/shorewall/interfaces:+ Note that you do NOT need any entry in /etc/shorewall/policy as Shorewall + 1.4.1 and later releases default to allowing intra-zone traffic.
+ +- In /etc/shorewall/hosts:- -
-- -ZONE -
-INTERFACE -
-BROADCAST -
-OPTIONS -
-- - - + +- -
-eth1 -
-192.168.1.255,192.168.20.255 -
--
-+ +ZONE +
+INTERFACE +
+BROADCAST +
+OPTIONS +
++ + +- +
+eth1 +
+192.168.1.255,192.168.20.255 +
++
+
-
- -++ In /etc/shorewall/hosts:
+
+ +- Note that you do NOT need any entry in /etc/shorewall/policy as Shorewall - 1.4.1 and later releases default to allowing intra-zone traffic.- -
-- -ZONE -
-HOSTS -
-OPTIONS -
-- -loc -
-eth1:192.168.1.0/24 -
--
-- - - + +loc -
-eth1:192.168.20.0/24 -
--
-+ +ZONE +
+HOSTS +
+OPTIONS +
++ +loc +
+eth1:192.168.1.0/24 +
++
++ + +loc +
+eth1:192.168.20.0/24 +
++
+
-
- +
+
+If you are running Shorewall 1.4.0 or earlier
- In /etc/shorewall/interfaces:
-
-
- --- Note 1: If you are running Shorewall 1.3.10 or earlier then you must - specify the multi option.- -
+ + In /etc/shorewall/interfaces:- -ZONE -
-INTERFACE -
-BROADCAST -
-OPTIONS -
-- - - -loc -
-eth1 -
-192.168.1.255,192.168.20.255 -
-Note 1: -
-
-
-
- In /etc/shorewall/policy:
-
- -+ +- Example 2: Local interface eth1 interfaces to 192.168.1.0/24 and -192.168.20.0/24. The primary IP address of eth1 is 192.168.1.254 and + In /etc/shorewall/policy:+ Note 1: If you are running Shorewall 1.3.10 or earlier then you +must specify the multi option.- -
+- -SOURCE -
-DESTINATION -
-POLICY -
-LOG LEVEL -
-BURST:LIMIT -
-- - - + +loc -
-loc -
-ACCEPT -
--
--
-+ +ZONE +
+INTERFACE +
+BROADCAST +
+OPTIONS +
++ + +loc +
+eth1 +
+192.168.1.255,192.168.20.255 +
+Note 1: +
+
+
-
+
+ +++ Example 2: Local interface eth1 interfaces to 192.168.1.0/24 and + 192.168.20.0/24. The primary IP address of eth1 is 192.168.1.254 and eth1:0 is 192.168.20.254. You want to make these subnetworks into separate zones and control the access between them (the users of the systems do not have administrative privileges).+ +
++ +SOURCE +
+DESTINATION +
+POLICY +
+LOG LEVEL +
+BURST:LIMIT +
++ + + +loc +
+loc +
+ACCEPT +
++
++
+
+
-
- In /etc/shorewall/zones:
-
- --- In /etc/shorewall/interfaces:- -
- -ZONE -
-DISPLAY -
-DESCRIPTION -
-- -loc -
-Local -
-Local Zone 1 -
-- - - -loc2 -
-Local2 -
-Local Zone 2 -
-
-
-
- -+ In /etc/shorewall/zones:+ Note 1: If you are running Shorewall 1.3.10 or earlier then you +must specify the multi option.
+
+ +- Note 1: If you are running Shorewall 1.3.10 or earlier then you must - specify the multi option.- -
-- -ZONE -
-INTERFACE -
-BROADCAST -
-OPTIONS -
-- - - + +- -
-eth1 -
-192.168.1.255,192.168.20.255 -
-Note 1: -
-+ +ZONE +
+DISPLAY +
+DESCRIPTION +
++ +loc +
+Local +
+Local Zone 1 +
++ + +loc2 +
+Local2 +
+Local Zone 2 +
+
-
-
- In /etc/shorewall/hosts:
- -++ In /etc/shorewall/interfaces:
+
+
+ +- In /etc/shorewall/rules, simply specify ACCEPT rules for the traffic - that you want to permit.- -
-- -ZONE -
-HOSTS -
-OPTIONS -
-- -loc -
-eth1:192.168.1.0/24 -
--
-- - - + +loc2 -
-eth1:192.168.20.0/24 -
--
-+ +ZONE +
+INTERFACE +
+BROADCAST +
+OPTIONS +
++ + +- +
+eth1 +
+192.168.1.255,192.168.20.255 +
+Note 1: +
+
-
-
- -Last Updated 6/22/2003 A - +
+
+ In /etc/shorewall/hosts:
+ +++ In /etc/shorewall/rules, simply specify ACCEPT rules for the traffic + that you want to permit.+ +
++ +ZONE +
+HOSTS +
+OPTIONS +
++ +loc +
+eth1:192.168.1.0/24 +
++
++ + + +loc2 +
+eth1:192.168.20.0/24 +
++
+
+
+
+ +Last Updated 7/29/2003 A - Tom Eastep
- +Copyright © - 2001, 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
+ 2001, 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_index_frame.htm b/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_index_frame.htm index 397a2515f..87a4f6357 100644 --- a/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_index_frame.htm +++ b/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_index_frame.htm @@ -2,146 +2,137 @@ + + + +Shorewall Index -+ + + - +
+
diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_sfindex_frame.htm b/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_sfindex_frame.htm index 11f6fbfe3..49bf2dd7e 100644 --- a/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_sfindex_frame.htm +++ b/STABLE/documentation/Shorewall_sfindex_frame.htm @@ -1,144 +1,120 @@ - + - + - + - +Shorewall Index -+ - + Copyright © 2001-2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
+ +
-
diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/blacklisting_support.htm b/STABLE/documentation/blacklisting_support.htm index c92e034b0..e8e955e64 100644 --- a/STABLE/documentation/blacklisting_support.htm +++ b/STABLE/documentation/blacklisting_support.htm @@ -1,97 +1,100 @@ - + - + - + - +Blacklisting Support - +- -
- +- ++ + - - + + + +- Blacklisting Support
-Shorewall supports two different forms of blacklisting; static and dynamic.
- +Static Blacklisting
- -Shorewall static blacklisting support has the following configuration parameters:
- + +Shorewall static blacklisting support has the following configuration +parameters:
+-
- +- You specify whether you want packets from blacklisted hosts dropped - or rejected using the BLACKLIST_DISPOSITION - setting in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
-- You specify whether you want packets from blacklisted hosts logged - and at what syslog level using the BLACKLIST_LOGLEVEL setting in - /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
-- You list the IP addresses/subnets that you wish to blacklist in - /etc/shorewall/blacklist. Beginning - with Shorewall version 1.3.8, you may also specify PROTOCOL and Port numbers/Service - names in the blacklist file.
-
-- You specify the interfaces whose incoming packets you want checked - against the blacklist using the "You specify whether you want packets from blacklisted hosts dropped + or rejected using the BLACKLIST_DISPOSITION + setting in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
+- You specify whether you want packets from blacklisted hosts logged + and at what syslog level using the BLACKLIST_LOGLEVEL setting in + /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf
+- You list the IP addresses/subnets that you wish to blacklist in + /etc/shorewall/blacklist. +Beginning with Shorewall version 1.3.8, you may also specify PROTOCOL and +Port numbers/Service names in the blacklist file.
+
+- You specify the interfaces whose incoming packets you want checked + against the blacklist using the "blacklist" option in /etc/shorewall/interfaces.
-- The black list is refreshed from /etc/shorewall/blacklist by the -"shorewall refresh" command.
- +- The black list is refreshed from /etc/shorewall/blacklist by the + "shorewall refresh" command.
+Dynamic Blacklisting
- -Dynamic blacklisting support was added in version 1.3.2. Dynamic blacklisting - doesn't use any configuration parameters but is rather controlled using - /sbin/shorewall commands:
- + +Dynamic blacklisting support was added in version 1.3.2. Dynamic blacklisting + doesn't use any configuration parameters but is rather controlled using + /sbin/shorewall commands:
+-
- Dynamic blacklisting is not dependent on the "blacklist" option in -/etc/shorewall/interfaces.- drop <ip address list> - causes packets from the listed - IP addresses to be silently dropped by the firewall.
-- reject <ip address list> - causes packets from the -listed IP addresses to be rejected by the firewall.
-- allow <ip address list> - re-enables receipt of packets - from hosts previously blacklisted by a deny or reject command.
-- save - save the dynamic blacklisting configuration so that it will - be automatically restored the next time that the firewall is restarted.
-- show dynamic - displays the dynamic blacklisting configuration.
- +- drop <ip address list> - causes packets from the +listed IP addresses to be silently dropped by the firewall.
+- reject <ip address list> - causes packets from the + listed IP addresses to be rejected by the firewall.
+- allow <ip address list> - re-enables receipt of packets + from hosts previously blacklisted by a drop or reject +command.
+- save - save the dynamic blacklisting configuration so that it +will be automatically restored the next time that the firewall is restarted.
+- show dynamic - displays the dynamic blacklisting configuration.
+
- + Dynamic blacklisting is not dependent on the "blacklist" option +in /etc/shorewall/interfaces.
+Example 1:
- +shorewall drop 192.0.2.124 192.0.2.125- +Drops packets from hosts 192.0.2.124 and 192.0.2.125
- +Example 2:
- +shorewall allow 192.0.2.125- +Reenables access from 192.0.2.125.
- -Last updated 2/7/2003 - Tom Eastep
- -Copyright - © 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
-
+ +Last updated 7/27/2003 - Tom Eastep
+ +Copyright + © 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
+
+
diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/download.htm b/STABLE/documentation/download.htm index 617297ab7..7990f8eac 100644 --- a/STABLE/documentation/download.htm +++ b/STABLE/documentation/download.htm @@ -1,227 +1,227 @@ - + - + - + - +Download - +- -
- +- +- + + - - + + + ++ -Shorewall Download
-I strongly urge you to read and print a copy of the Shorewall QuickStart Guide -for the configuration that most closely matches your own.
- + href="shorewall_quickstart_guide.htm">Shorewall QuickStart Guide + for the configuration that most closely matches your own.
-
+ +The entire set of Shorewall documentation is available in PDF format at:
- +ftp://slovakia.shorewall.net/mirror/shorewall/pdf/
- -
- http://slovakia.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/pdf/
- rsync://slovakia.shorewall.net/shorewall/pdf/ + rsync://slovakia.shorewall.net/shorewall/pdf/The documentation in HTML format is included in the .rpm and in the -.tgz packages below.
- -Once you've printed the appropriate QuickStart Guide, download - one of the modules:
- + +The documentation in HTML format is included in the .rpm and in the .tgz +packages below.
+ +Once you've printed the appropriate QuickStart Guide, download + one of the modules:
+-
- -- If you run a RedHat, SuSE, Mandrake, - Linux PPC or TurboLinux distribution - with a 2.4 kernel, you can use the RPM version (note: the - RPM should also work with other distributions that store - init scripts in /etc/init.d and that include chkconfig -or insserv). If you find that it works in other cases, let me know so that - I can mention them here. See the Installation +
- If you run a RedHat, SuSE, Mandrake, + Linux PPC or TurboLinux distribution + with a 2.4 kernel, you can use the RPM version (note: the + RPM should also work with other distributions that store + init scripts in /etc/init.d and that include chkconfig + or insserv). If you find that it works in other cases, let me know so that + I can mention them here. See the Installation Instructions if you have problems installing the RPM.
-- If you are running LRP, download the .lrp - file (you might also want to download the .tgz so you will +
- If you are running LRP, download the .lrp + file (you might also want to download the .tgz so you will have a copy of the documentation).
-- If you run Debian and would - like a .deb package, Shorewall is included in both the Debian - Testing Branch and the Debian Unstable - Branch.
-- Otherwise, download the shorewall - module (.tgz)
- +- If you run Debian and would +like a .deb package, Shorewall is included in both the Debian + Testing Branch and the Debian Unstable + Branch.
+- Otherwise, download the shorewall + module (.tgz)
+The documentation in HTML format is included in the .tgz and .rpm files - and there is an documentation .deb that also contains the documentation. The - .rpm will install the documentation in your default document directory + +
The documentation in HTML format is included in the .tgz and .rpm files + and there is an documentation .deb that also contains the documentation. The + .rpm will install the documentation in your default document directory which can be obtained using the following command:
- -
-+ + ++ +- -rpm --eval '%{defaultdocdir}'
-Please check the errata - to see if there are updates that apply to the version - that you have downloaded.
- -WARNING - YOU CAN NOT SIMPLY INSTALL - THE RPM AND ISSUE A "shorewall start" COMMAND. SOME CONFIGURATION - IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE FIREWALL WILL START. Once you have completed -configuration of your firewall, you can enable startup by removing -the file /etc/shorewall/startup_disabled.
- +Please check the errata + to see if there are updates that apply to the version + that you have downloaded.
+ +WARNING - YOU CAN NOT SIMPLY INSTALL + THE RPM AND ISSUE A "shorewall start" COMMAND. SOME CONFIGURATION + IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE FIREWALL WILL START. Once you have completed configuration + of your firewall, you can enable startup by removing the file /etc/shorewall/startup_disabled.
+- +
Download Sites:
- -+ ++- +- -
-- -SERVER LOCATION -DOMAIN -HTTP -FTP -- +SourceForge -
-sf.net -Browse -N/A ++ -SERVER LOCATION +DOMAIN +HTTP +FTP - -Slovak Republic -Shorewall.net -Browse -Browse -- -Texas, USA -Infohiiway.com -Browse -Browse -- -Hamburg, Germany -Shorewall.net -Browse -Browse -- +France -Shorewall.net -Browse -Browse -+ SourceForge +
+sf.net +Browse +N/A +- +Taiwan -
-Greshko.com -
-Slovak Republic +Shorewall.net +Browse +Browse ++ +Texas, USA +Infohiiway.com +Browse +Browse (Temporarily Unavailable) ++ +Hamburg, Germany +Shorewall.net +Browse +Browse ++ +France +Shorewall.net +Browse +Browse ++ -Taiwan +
+Greshko.com +
+Browse -
-+ Browse -
-- +Argentina +
++ +Argentina +
+Shorewall.net +
+Browse +
+N/A +
++ Brazil -
Shorewall.net
+securityopensource.org.br
Browse
+ href="http://shorewall.securityopensource.org.br/pub/shorewall/">Browse
N/A
- -Brazil -
-securityopensource.org.br -
-Browse -
-N/A -
-- - - + + +Washington State, USA -Shorewall.net -Washington State, USA +Shorewall.net +Browse -Browse -CVS:
- -+ ++- + href="http://cvs.shorewall.net/Shorewall_CVS_Access.html">CVS repository + at cvs.shorewall.net contains the latest snapshots of the +each Shorewall component. There's no guarantee that what you find +there will work at all.The CVS repository - at cvs.shorewall.net contains the latest snapshots of the -each Shorewall component. There's no guarantee that what you -find there will work at all.
-
-
+ +Shapshots:
- -
-+ + ++ +- -Periodic snapshots from CVS may be found at http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots - (FTP). - These snapshots have undergone initial testing and will have been installed - and run at shorewall.net.
-
-Last Updated 7/15/2003 - http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots + (FTP). + These snapshots have undergone initial testing and will have been installed + and run at shorewall.net.
+
+Last Updated 8/4/2003 - Tom Eastep
- +Copyright © 2001, 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
+ +
-
diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/errata.htm b/STABLE/documentation/errata.htm index b9f583a18..ab1b1488d 100644 --- a/STABLE/documentation/errata.htm +++ b/STABLE/documentation/errata.htm @@ -1,355 +1,391 @@ - +Shorewall 1.4 Errata - + - + - + - + - +- -
- +- +- + + - - + + + ++ + -Shorewall Errata/Upgrade Issues
-IMPORTANT
- +-
- +- - -
-If you use a Windows system to download - a corrected script, be sure to run the script through - + +
If you use a Windows system to download + a corrected script, be sure to run the script through + dos2unix after you have moved - it to your Linux system.
-- - -
-If you are installing Shorewall for the -first time and plan to use the .tgz and install.sh script, you can -untar the archive, replace the 'firewall' script in the untarred directory - with the one you downloaded below, and then run install.sh.
-- - -
-When the instructions say to install a corrected - firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall, you - may rename the existing file before copying in the new file.
-- - -
- + style="text-decoration: none;"> dos2unix after you have moved + it to your Linux system. + +DO NOT INSTALL CORRECTED COMPONENTS - ON A RELEASE EARLIER THAN THE ONE THAT THEY ARE LISTED UNDER BELOW. - For example, do NOT install the 1.3.9a firewall script if you are - running 1.3.7c.
-
-- + +
+If you are installing Shorewall for the first +time and plan to use the .tgz and install.sh script, you can untar +the archive, replace the 'firewall' script in the untarred directory + with the one you downloaded below, and then run install.sh.
+- + +
+When the instructions say to install a corrected + firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall, +you may rename the existing file before copying in the new file.
+- + +
+DO NOT INSTALL CORRECTED COMPONENTS + ON A RELEASE EARLIER THAN THE ONE THAT THEY ARE LISTED UNDER + BELOW. For example, do NOT install the 1.3.9a firewall script +if you are running 1.3.7c.
+
+-
- -- Upgrade - Issues
-- Problems in Version 1.4
-
-- Upgrade Issues
+- Problems in Version 1.4
+
+- Problems in Version 1.3
-- Problems in Version 1.2
-- Problems in Version 1.1
-- Problem with iptables version 1.2.3 - on RH7.2
-- Problems with kernels >= 2.4.18 and -RedHat iptables
-- Problems installing/upgrading - RPM on SuSE
-- Problems -with iptables version 1.2.7 and MULTIPORT=Yes
-- Problems with RH Kernel - 2.4.18-10 and NAT
-- Problems with RH Kernels after 2.4.20-9 and -REJECT (also applies to 2.4.21-RC1) Problem with iptables version 1.2.3 + on RH7.2
+- Problems with kernels >= 2.4.18 and RedHat +iptables
+- Problems installing/upgrading + RPM on SuSE
+- Problems + with iptables version 1.2.7 and MULTIPORT=Yes
+- Problems with RH Kernel + 2.4.18-10 and NAT
+- Problems with RH Kernels after 2.4.20-9 and + REJECT (also applies to 2.4.21-RC1) -
- +
-
+ +
+ +
Problems in Version 1.4
- + - -1.4.4b
- + +1.4.6
+-
+ +- Shorewall is ignoring records in /etc/shorewall/routestopped that - have an empty second column (HOSTS). This problem may be corrected by installing - If TC_ENABLED is set to yes in shorewall.conf then Shorewall would + fail to start with the error "ERROR: Traffic Control requires Mangle"; +that problem has been corrected in this firewall + script which may be installed in /var/share/shorewall/firewall as described + above. This problem is also corrected in bugfix release 1.4.6a.
+- This problem occurs in all versions supporting traffic control. If +a MAC address is used in the SOURCE column, an error occurs as follows:
+ +
+
+ iptables v1.2.8: Bad mac adress `00:08:B5:35:52:E7-d`
+
+ For Shorewall 1.4.6 and 1.4.6a users, this problem has been corrected in + this +firewall script which may be installed in /var/share/shorewall/firewall +as described above. For all other versions, you will have to edit your 'firewall' +script (in versions 1.4.*, it is located in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall). +Locate the function add_tcrule_() and in that function, replace this line:
+
+ r=`mac_match $source`
+
+ with
+
+ r="`mac_match $source` "
+
+ Note that there must be a space before the ending quote!
+1.4.4b
+ ++
- -- Shorewall is ignoring records in /etc/shorewall/routestopped +that have an empty second column (HOSTS). This problem may be corrected +by installing this firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall -as described above.
-- The INCLUDE directive doesn't work when placed in the /etc/shorewall/zones -file. This problem may be corrected by installing this firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall as +described above.
+- The INCLUDE directive doesn't work when placed in the /etc/shorewall/zones + file. This problem may be corrected by installing this functions script in /usr/share/shorewall/functions.
- -
-1.4.4-1.4.4a
- --
- + +- Log messages are being displayed on the system console even though - the log level for the console is set properly according to FAQ 16. This problem may be corrected by installing - this firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall -as described above.
- +
1.4.4-1.4.4a
+ ++
+- Log messages are being displayed on the system console even +though the log level for the console is set properly according to FAQ 16. This problem may be corrected by installing + this firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall as +described above.
+ +
+1.4.4
- + +
--
- +- If you have zone names that are 5 characters long, you may experience - problems starting Shorewall because the --log-prefix in a logging rule is - too long. Upgrade to Version 1.4.4a to fix this problem..
- +- If you have zone names that are 5 characters long, you may +experience problems starting Shorewall because the --log-prefix in a logging +rule is too long. Upgrade to Version 1.4.4a to fix this problem..
+1.4.3
- --
- -- The LOGMARKER variable introduced in version 1.4.3 was intended - to allow integration of Shorewall with Fireparse (http://www.firewparse.com). - Unfortunately, LOGMARKER only solved part of the integration problem. -I have implimented a new LOGFORMAT variable which will replace LOGMARKER -which has completely solved this problem and is currently in production -with fireparse here at shorewall.net. The updated files may be found at - ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.4.3/fireparse/. - See the 0README.txt file for details.
- -
-1.4.2
- --
- -- When an 'add' or 'delete' command is executed, a temporary -directory created in /tmp is not being removed. This problem may be corrected -by installing this firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall -as described above.
- -
-1.4.1a, 1.4.1 and 1.4.0
-
-- Some TCP requests are rejected in the 'common' chain with -an ICMP port-unreachable response rather than the more appropriate TCP -RST response. This problem is corrected in this updated common.def file which may be installed in - /etc/shorewall/common.def.
+- The LOGMARKER variable introduced in version 1.4.3 was intended + to allow integration of Shorewall with Fireparse (http://www.firewparse.com). + Unfortunately, LOGMARKER only solved part of the integration problem. +I have implimented a new LOGFORMAT variable which will replace LOGMARKER +which has completely solved this problem and is currently in production +with fireparse here at shorewall.net. The updated files may be found at + ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/1.4.3/fireparse/. + See the 0README.txt file for details.
1.4.1
- --
- -- When a "shorewall check" command is executed, each "rule" -produces the harmless additional message:
- -
-
- /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2174: [: =: unary operator - expected
-
- You may correct the problem by installing this corrected script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall - as described above.
-1.4.0
+1.4.2
-
-- When running under certain shells Shorewall will attempt -to create ECN rules even when /etc/shorewall/ecn is empty. You may either - just remove /etc/shorewall/ecn or you can install this - correct script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall as described above.
+- When an 'add' or 'delete' command is executed, a temporary + directory created in /tmp is not being removed. This problem may be corrected + by installing this firewall script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall as +described above.
-Upgrade Issues
- -The upgrade issues have moved to a separate page.
- -
-Problem with - iptables version 1.2.3
- --- -There are a couple of serious bugs in iptables 1.2.3 that - prevent it from working with Shorewall. Regrettably, - RedHat released this buggy iptables in RedHat 7.2.
- -I have built a - corrected 1.2.3 rpm which you can download here and -I have also built an -iptables-1.2.4 rpm which you can download here. If you are currently - running RedHat 7.1, you can install either of these RPMs - before you upgrade to RedHat 7.2.
- -Update 11/9/2001: RedHat - has released an iptables-1.2.4 RPM of their own which you - can download from http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-144.html. - I have installed this RPM on my firewall and it - works fine.
- -If you would like to patch iptables 1.2.3 yourself, - the patches are available for download. This patch - which corrects a problem with parsing of the --log-level - specification while this patch - corrects a problem in handling the TOS target.
- -To install one of the above patches:
- --
-- cd iptables-1.2.3/extensions
-- patch -p0 < the-patch-file
- -Problems with kernels >= 2.4.18 -and RedHat iptables
- --- -Users who use RedHat iptables RPMs and who upgrade to kernel 2.4.18/19 - may experience the following:
- --- -# shorewall start-
Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf ...
Processing /etc/shorewall/params ...
Starting Shorewall...
Loading Modules...
Initializing...
Determining Zones...
Zones: net
Validating interfaces file...
Validating hosts file...
Determining Hosts in Zones...
Net Zone: eth0:0.0.0.0/0
iptables: libiptc/libip4tc.c:380: do_check: Assertion
`h->info.valid_hooks == (1 << 0 | 1 << 3)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
iptables: libiptc/libip4tc.c:380: do_check: Assertion
`h->info.valid_hooks == (1 << 0 | 1 << 3)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)The RedHat iptables RPM is compiled with debugging enabled but the - user-space debugging code was not updated to reflect recent changes in - the Netfilter 'mangle' table. You can correct the problem by - installing - this iptables RPM. If you are already running a 1.2.5 - version of iptables, you will need to specify the --oldpackage - option to rpm (e.g., "iptables -Uvh --oldpackage iptables-1.2.5-1.i386.rpm").
-Problems installing/upgrading - RPM on SuSE
- -If you find that rpm complains about a conflict with kernel <= - 2.2 yet you have a 2.4 kernel installed, simply use the - "--nodeps" option to rpm.
- -Installing: rpm -ivh --nodeps <shorewall rpm>
- -Upgrading: rpm -Uvh --nodeps <shorewall rpm>
- -Problems with iptables version 1.2.7 and - MULTIPORT=Yes
- -The iptables 1.2.7 release of iptables has made an incompatible - change to the syntax used to specify multiport match rules; - as a consequence, if you install iptables 1.2.7 you -must be running Shorewall 1.3.7a or later or:
+1.4.1a, 1.4.1 and 1.4.0
-
- + +- set -MULTIPORT=No in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf; -or
-- if you - are running Shorewall 1.3.6 you may - install - this firewall script in /var/lib/shorewall/firewall - as described above.
- +- Some TCP requests are rejected in the 'common' chain with + an ICMP port-unreachable response rather than the more appropriate TCP + RST response. This problem is corrected in this updated common.def file which may be installed in + /etc/shorewall/common.def.
+
+1.4.1
+ ++
+ +- When a "shorewall check" command is executed, each "rule" + produces the harmless additional message:
+ +
+
+ /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2174: [: =: unary operator + expected
+
+ You may correct the problem by installing this corrected script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall + as described above.
+1.4.0
+ ++
+ +- When running under certain shells Shorewall will attempt + to create ECN rules even when /etc/shorewall/ecn is empty. You may +either just remove /etc/shorewall/ecn or you can install this + correct script in /usr/share/shorewall/firewall as described above.
+ +
+
+Upgrade Issues
+ +The upgrade issues have moved to a separate page.
+ +
+Problem with + iptables version 1.2.3
+ +++ +There are a couple of serious bugs in iptables 1.2.3 that + prevent it from working with Shorewall. Regrettably, + RedHat released this buggy iptables in RedHat 7.2.
+ +I have built a + corrected 1.2.3 rpm which you can download here and + I have also built an + iptables-1.2.4 rpm which you can download here. If you are currently + running RedHat 7.1, you can install either of these RPMs + before you upgrade to RedHat 7.2.
+ +Update 11/9/2001: RedHat + has released an iptables-1.2.4 RPM of their own which +you can download from http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-144.html. + I have installed this RPM on my firewall and +it works fine.
+ +If you would like to patch iptables 1.2.3 yourself, + the patches are available for download. This patch + which corrects a problem with parsing of the --log-level + specification while this patch + corrects a problem in handling the TOS target.
+ +To install one of the above patches:
+ ++
+- cd iptables-1.2.3/extensions
+- patch -p0 < the-patch-file
+ +Problems with kernels >= 2.4.18 and +RedHat iptables
+ +++ +Users who use RedHat iptables RPMs and who upgrade to kernel 2.4.18/19 + may experience the following:
+ ++ ++ +# shorewall start+
Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf ...
Processing /etc/shorewall/params ...
Starting Shorewall...
Loading Modules...
Initializing...
Determining Zones...
Zones: net
Validating interfaces file...
Validating hosts file...
Determining Hosts in Zones...
Net Zone: eth0:0.0.0.0/0
iptables: libiptc/libip4tc.c:380: do_check: Assertion
`h->info.valid_hooks == (1 << 0 | 1 << 3)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
iptables: libiptc/libip4tc.c:380: do_check: Assertion
`h->info.valid_hooks == (1 << 0 | 1 << 3)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)The RedHat iptables RPM is compiled with debugging enabled but the + user-space debugging code was not updated to reflect recent changes in + the Netfilter 'mangle' table. You can correct the problem by + installing + this iptables RPM. If you are already running a +1.2.5 version of iptables, you will need to specify the +--oldpackage option to rpm (e.g., "iptables -Uvh --oldpackage +iptables-1.2.5-1.i386.rpm").
+Problems installing/upgrading + RPM on SuSE
+ +If you find that rpm complains about a conflict with kernel <= + 2.2 yet you have a 2.4 kernel installed, simply use the + "--nodeps" option to rpm.
+ +Installing: rpm -ivh --nodeps <shorewall rpm>
+ +Upgrading: rpm -Uvh --nodeps <shorewall rpm>
+ +Problems with iptables version 1.2.7 and + MULTIPORT=Yes
+ +The iptables 1.2.7 release of iptables has made an incompatible + change to the syntax used to specify multiport match rules; + as a consequence, if you install iptables 1.2.7 you + must be running Shorewall 1.3.7a or later or:
+ ++
+- set + MULTIPORT=No in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf; + or
+- if + you are running Shorewall 1.3.6 you may + install + this firewall script in /var/lib/shorewall/firewall + as described above.
+ +Problems with RH Kernel 2.4.18-10 and NAT
- /etc/shorewall/nat entries of the following form - will result in Shorewall being unable to start:
-
-
- + + /etc/shorewall/nat entries of the following + form will result in Shorewall being unable to start:
+
+#EXTERNAL INTERFACE INTERNAL ALL INTERFACES LOCAL- Error message is:
192.0.2.22 eth0 192.168.9.22 yes yes
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
- + Error message is:
+Setting up NAT...- The solution is to put "no" in the LOCAL column. - Kernel support for LOCAL=yes has never worked properly and 2.4.18-10 - has disabled it. The 2.4.19 kernel contains corrected support under - a new kernel configuraiton option; see http://www.shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#NAT
iptables: Invalid argument
Terminated
-
- -Problems with RH Kernels after 2.4.20-9 and -REJECT (also applies to 2.4.21-RC1)
- Beginning with errata kernel 2.4.20-13.9, "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset" - is broken. The symptom most commonly seen is that REJECT rules act just -like DROP rules when dealing with TCP. A kernel patch and precompiled modules -to fix this problem are available at + +Problems with RH Kernels after 2.4.20-9 and REJECT +(also applies to 2.4.21-RC1)
+ Beginning with errata kernel 2.4.20-13.9, "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset" + is broken. The symptom most commonly seen is that REJECT rules act just +like DROP rules when dealing with TCP. A kernel patch and precompiled modules + to fix this problem are available at ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata/kernel.
- -
-Last updated 6/13/2003 - Tom -Eastep
- + +
+Last updated 7/23/2003 - Tom Eastep +
+Copyright © 2001, 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep.
+ +
-
diff --git a/STABLE/documentation/images/network.png b/STABLE/documentation/images/network.png index fa5f207c6a1574940698619ae2394ddd09e78054..7c5747753381c711dcb97482abb7d34757ecf82d 100644 GIT binary patch literal 71154 zcmeEuWmuG3*zV9Wcp)taNRH$n-O@ee&;!y+NJ$7HB8a4bFu)KZIfHabNGaVpgoGd> zh#)OU!+Dv#_qW~O?{l4B=ZDTU@UFF<^~C+;OO(E@I`{?{1OkCIHB{gr5WzLzpT`w^ z;3qU%4`+c7Ja4$V5~ys5X%+ZF=%}cp2m)2UB0IGu0=~1_Yru6tpnzK-Q1A;7=ot7> z@DC8kR}chRvjKsmQ$e8Xo*4}WvLMh!oTiGRk-yb?Gie6xMB2f#9L9#}bkranA%e(R z6@7P%JzO^?`UY)`L9UvNdn5h51VhzdZ!Go41+E9gX2lGfADg&^93 zGKH|B=xN3665tE40SFw7GO=Y{&?PER@FmiKtwV7?4>Jj_R)M4O#b{Zfv<)dsy@q(a z3c#<$)U|G9 4<;Z<3qa0McOjRgWRC#5L;|1r_-KsM0aEty $idWwW*hK~SGz50Yd7_yqi(^E!kvG}_pH~54XR3L5aqen>%v|8Yg}@FY z&769fmx~n;MN)8KJb<3cVl<9@2!Kq3VDLC_fYA>tB$wXhVpiw`6Hi(&K+lvh99TsJ zE(OTsRv>Z#cHs57-JAIKa&bJ$B`!((k}vDL|FVrH`~Mo-3N&HAV3 gcM=>4ilqF=?(xpwN$!spvU (thGHba8jUrX=PV#r^%`SGSfDm&HjF8IOwvXqyCr~}1 zaxPrxp#Hw6`7d*U1tGD5FwAgwrvgln9B))X-X*?0tKgIGK)dOpC8YYrv#{;)KqhCN zt9*jD{}B5^B1+H-{Glf>gXJUSEo1yenxqi<>Ja?7qV9p4eXh 7yHBEGyN}sM(qi{o|=0PSB7vbCCg!=ZZtZ#iLYlFS8OAUMHe5z?01H zu7HgcO#jrSZ9N#h?0BH1kI2Kt8n^de{qK!GX=gYX{Cb!X#c}q+;7`R~%Y}%sM5GDt z-^|d}ohLxD%p%p(U96+PnghBnw{#J?-@j?VY|TO*YyN9TApy>s-@iGeD2}s3qaGNE zU9jb_a~S1UcSo{jpM=8%Tm!k{MySpH6kS0IYCJGQ5vD7_x^nVhz7~@9z5R3AJ8lkX zNH$pAMw^QIdbDxyy{W&R5-xOHkI`kIzvY#c@P~~6y7~N8m* W1Du3F%%HOv3hcW*HDu3GiKM?hYG5-T9f7<*%5cP*K{{t$2+Wg-T^(O}Y z11f()<=+tXCkFllDt|!bKM?gN2L1yoe?a9w5cMYp{*A?dLgoKw+n BsuItknMOX5&^|em;tJO7IV7#@b!I zXHz&nKIK2_RyXI>59P}AUwr61V^U%k5?%=2PzH+hoqYHuiQ?8%gEbHvS=Cp~P UWOG{P zp4Qf8 m+^Agill6A58oG;I3U0IS;k4< zLs@w%7;g}kBJlL!yYp726nIdX!`Vy=%B9) yxxDi zNk3?_es@eSh2>e(>5shSh?~66R%Di+Z1Q}0?D%-OZ+B24#k7R`i@*I*!_Pib>${s9 zQ0s@PN4x#~DR)gi94_u2t)vXglm||lFN+LuX9c(%p%eRlt)#q?DGS^iUFL}69!@iq z+Z*vRH9cw}=zsHO`RQ+-t$N4DukQ3Ea;0!-b8j_yKYshBk3%gff*dL#Ue>x~bF=|J zV#MrLLPn^-FdlUXmg+ n5K;bn*t9o)U~&%&l;I}qc60UqgsGt-OgVg{B1zL|QJd*sqF648dMSW7Z)ZVG zWR|2zfMIE`gAKv?ZiPRXA;VcfH20h@UIc*!!(_HTpC5j+*dfmFes%HY{nvJ9v%VtR zs9MZ(Kcwta+%2UXFKLqdm9~6^dZDtLK@p_bdBn@)23voK3qFll6TwSSm)A=b+VGpJ z+5d3TCw4%;2(78bRwUWBQ@O#?)@P=iE;kESCE8ViHQ25$C8k`=eMvssN>F?2>Wa3F zs&?2Zyk~$58hI(o@#}LSa}}a4MkiniS5=!$P~*PYe4hGPMUtCQt{cz1TvUz0Wz2?s ztKjaWDZ$U|J+S+rj3;6mS{5kmL;;4OF?)B8Tq$v3BlysimF4mdYH_X~Pj^er767%^uUs0?aZ4b#M^Q62{)&b7bn>YQ9=UPLZ&Df#K?|v?r y8$-6$s3 AA8_s(Vds#4oVUHCcGbr#l+pZBVxGV!N1z&PfkpxOIsM36b#^m3+ zfdXPr|G!y%0(N+F`9Ov3#;+BRunDfrx!GFLAXzX>N)gzp>dWxXRotUrX?mnDZ_<2V z6|`QtoO<9Q@(|D^39q_$%a&XMmJ;osFPR+@!x!&-sR)CE8{Xet&wAARqSnK|V9}bQ z{L9@HDzoq|87Xl 5Fy%QNO!Yz*~d~DCDdO!`y1=iZUUShxyD6?%Tx42lDOmV zUhWo3Qa7Ah>HFnrzw^}WEWl=3fXzwBq3A)}gPi#akDM=A$nY+(FUd>mQ2_sPuf66_ zSP(2~U%w>v^0;_nB4I5+RSI)*o}M0-Qr}7%tME2{f0{$(%mcndJA0Wo&}zU#Vz2;B zH>7=zbY+qat0Y86?0G!KJkc1=C)|@dxMxD~&C!?IWTWuJ``6_6`;sPHAFtg|d4*xh z{a<_WUt-dmC!6()a3s?0$4HK;_0xT~*}A+}ayN7amj{eSb)$n|nvdWmuW=;4$4|?H z+%tpgBWJGZ#Kt gZ8aAMHpjh8~WFbZbdF0|O{=yb^i9Bw~^LWi2& zmU^B(n)B`Ih+;eFweNb5x=r$Cg8`?z^=w>NIPwk6&-}{-gtJWHyVGhR+_~PKMZ|Lf zt(h3-J$q}Ts(%>+xBkKW4fEhgGO}FP_rZh=ATm`T_+Gq2%lHp>Tt|_7ym*;dP1x;~ zFj_Brc5om&z#AE!zj _o;Zc z#9P`^_OI@QC!%)k?s7mO)0&m;I6PSdqtj3s8KU-GF%Q3WF~`TbogVJct0=1Wqo4#( zHmhJyY-RV&C-aY2Hr@@(p)p3&5pAO3|2-T4#Ms0** Z5oP~qy zxy%wZU{MD~uDH~hRg(y-3?t@Z;}-A9tE{BFXhS6)62C(g-yzN5tQDX~y-19cKR-0! zP!}hs->$p5r1KHO$>RPObF=YLG#Ug@h78V|V=WxozC=?Cx=WvDW@ia#FphZD48Po? z6UPU#7tx8t hzxIXf56}!aS79{@8 z7!}HuQP!sAYXnQ?`){>b#6FK6#ksqQ+0nf}<|@4*THrP%c(s@efe?>R+r@zXO8^hz zc>Jv#t@jj~ue^y$ENGd}y7gmobMu<@)_os8zgMG9y|b?v@4pM IO}%PcH3>)?XXOi z-~8rP9dt%H+B^&w0#;3CPk(E|&cFCsSo8YU)Yir_&&s)5`aR%tb*>KyZ_B*$UosUD zRbh$=D1uok%M{Ka_}zziCgeB9=Vuxg60_Df*9k>R*+lM{1NJE1C{de!DNh^CkV9wE zUxw2N)l1eIO2M@4L**W*YAE>T*~qFU~Zcyh$D`5_2BjiL hdr0I7k?+x8XLPZ$0ZHz0k^3N+p&Bd+WRif=JQh;_oFwc z2+Jb>qea2hH2#EO6eYE{rwzgf@Orhb(@l>> ua!zI!sKFB-k#-CES;!=N=7w@HFrGG8*Ej3NQB) z;PfmVDkIg(N~OM!2x 7e4UeFgoMU8WV
LAum7FH@n z?zvh*wbqV|q--iO=&C3|`>QHw?^3!X?5lM$TwgP;xL0nDJ&c%}b&T4kCrO<3wibmX zS$(-OVSkP?rGB>k>EXn|{DaRb#U`ax_h%>?a^pAn{U7~r_0;UT+j@fnIZ(qR&-L_? z_9)Wx8n&NYo0215$e4@pTSk @|MWRVqe3eH=~ zn@m?-T`ev)xUq()_k!Sq{Vnwb4OiS7AEwO*_|~RoRy!1av=zEE)DTx*3T7xNv6P=J zb08UYT%3%gK%%9~BkiYT@Ya02tlsMMM3iSo1(jyV^LrCcnylJ7?S qix`W59MVzh s}K!m z&A~UlBoArv-$Wi<6I2>d#b Dl$}{ zi7#n9X;&1R*8Edt{N?*`ROo~rzF&S5YKu?|c5TDkE%^0ve~Nu8^~(b=Dx;m|X3A=f zl2Q #GD4F@=w4jDzG+zE`fMLc1kNs5BL3|^wgvZK3Du73l@&}_ZX;Vsjx6- zJI}U{0d#3m%34cEVhuWUt7*elf~Z0rVl|fXTVgQHqkA{Ux@UCGyxmgy+bw6G+s769 zm6gsnlJFJSq*)1$@y?{N12tr$t-; c?hAYij7uSg+VWTq)O?*g zugy`e)GynwuMO~^G0(pq`&GDE?zYq2UJcm(e7rWUj@y%rpOz2No-lqnwjo5v{!&t8 zqOqUPw`%x-Q_GbGhhD0ZT@;cL|NI-7t}JCKzTm_Y7ws*e)XM{rkb13%3lP Z7%mwZz`4cB%v=V^rJ)=)` z3JK*O2vW}*zTAkmn+FR)cMz7|_8hsE&u8CLc=Y_#n1#Fg-R8^1sf8XM7MW~7H}Ha9 z;|d)Gk4S4|jl+&zM?r@ckJ;@owv-Y}8Tqi0+N9>PSm<9K+^9tW`jzO33fps23M=U` zKR#H|zS}h|9B>dRW0u8Bv z{u!PCRbKGD=H#LuIzhs@#x9-KXp%u29SK2d*=YPP)SfrHEg5ee0z$<~e)_(mq>>U| zO>?MwUk&F1Zqig}z<8_kL_`z#1?`$Xe!oFByU#44xvB*#Fk&ccana!5OS3U8PA^at zZ6Wh1;@(OyGcH1gq%9b{xT0-F{plk1d426XUm3`mjSlpEX0pRwC5l{9_^z;X@5P;g zB%I1I@!GsZ?O{H rP;Y4 zy)4O6?ibj6Ib@Z&^~s2hTT9HiMk`etqIPuH=Ue;G@R{~4LF%ijsfNXm2yDyTzA`xW zSXy}4bF9o@!%ff_rr%FxA(z(+en#XvN(E9fc==O1 f7YvWtX00CAY#P}SBs)GzgHWlg%;1*~zl>xNgqxaNWa6ZM(XM=eKo8*!wPhUfk^ z$U}Yc3~klE^EQLs+l?>Lzr6I>e$x#L4bMX3K=}xC5Et}l3!aMWk;E$l1Ry_TTuCK( zT@gudvu8X(6WK!_CBIK9yhLg$_pXa_hSw%EEMymmU@ 8EwooxhG0r-=~|4 zs3|UWno2W9jcVw`*3)f9pkj!#r{OQhYSAYeM-1pXAwyVyuJ PFndrToHggP{og1p2b+V+F`BYvFIV@;M$} z!(Y}Aa8SqJu~5QyRWj=9)zs*msC{8~Z&7c88^iM~&n4_rMig}}l{G}v4C9AIZn|zh zd(pMdIO+4i!@1R1!QcI}tmi?Tlbrx(M*-vP>>zh0;*`&o58}+@eTR`z`x2Wf3W1Zc z)}Kf|NZ!p%epy{L$W4*Jrn9cB#2I{TuI@&6=Oavn7?wmSu=v@f@BhWkB(|o4IUNbZ zCP^gE3-aicm cf|Gu&4@=8UO?^is }=ENTt$%rTv_qvcZ{z4iP_= zY5?|?;86qv7THH8lQ_VLnEvEyo$q&cyq}u-lU|0-V}M9Niam~!EYZbSwuX?7El};h z$EqUQQeSA`Ej}^IU|z9s3lfaEVv}EXelGw|+uyz{4+8
^8wmv61=lZ^wgNgJQcI)IK*RF SkZ ziK?d2^Xow1(k&jK!b`&gRo% %986p=>3!{0R1! zt-X$u#;=dGbD7zbbvWjpQ`SV?vs }q1I9g {T~6*L4PA z!Yoag!H*1Y^LMk)DwlC|_|pJwD4IQx`8dM$Fy`)pS{JV($vy)M4NOxwhb8clS}RJ` z^WI(YPKCpmZ^y^)mE;dUfjA0{JYtGeBiM}JBU*IROY>gKZQg+W;-wcxDF}_|L{W57 zl%>=Y4UA7sjf_wXyCvE{qncRM5n9{P?||Md(1YFukHcUtQKCW{SN0Y}*7>5v6}Th? zXmT}F7t|^=HDGd$x<;Chm{nc``BW)Bs{CPO;j6L}kGQ65j@&cepmF^=>vD6tinjs} z-t(gb;p*BZG}2*HSdhl^B^*P@1+?dS{fu4la0;PFw1$Cvy=tc4amsNuho8F*(n7Ql z7C32IMmuT1ko>Txm!c z+`+6~C8B^-GufKZs4Y=x7XEyWs2GQOG)9;GzXjz{V!8H~Jb%>zkv8RHM~2aas|=kt z^PY+OD{aHp)%r3x%3yuYnpKf(B)t`j(bQUKrcUhu#;c6Up2(jiY1v4;J4pIejOm)F zSQI%L^7EC+X^YA%a{pxyJ}!SWhqHp9q}f*#dK|SAd2WqB6}m*z2J%S}y^dneME11X z8ejtr&KGE^P+7uYv^4tqHa>4uJq*4^$CEZXX0Fb!*>&|s6}>nwQv!mpr$xJpqcJI% zaE-MHMHR2gO!KjLO25#~OVPJ;N(0vUen=LEla&k26$O}!xXzD`?S0C;1mPw6cg`9m z>k7vwcHD-2t#tt*NGmI=MBz>c2!C#g%pzHs$GuHGq3GgH4Kwu>`Vhf66He+#ul!?y z?$}Ux;X?{zKIRgUM3uLqwd0=+ABuL|4e8mgR^YzTJz>v`Q_2z^ieOa9tFuwsf?+Bx zXa&J4b)Xl;!1Z^`+}k{45Qhzcmxax<9Z|t)+yUAt@e}%Z0HN4I1uJLG0VQJkR(!PH zMPbxOmrT8ov|G6`OPuo83}}A&pds>oB4C_S)Pa|hQ5}`No*iB2Od%4kM87iKMM_G& z1-mG%a~7qaEh>oJ+j54usROS9g*ay(!4$M0he6@I &B)v *PLx`LHLku0p0b$nj+|Zl4wlzrhribE4m`bGOz|RJ;T;v2OK|E^EMy zs?jdiJP0LxBd*6`C|NB-=SZy`*%v0kKnKEKfbK!gWzdW^!t+2-xsNz&f>fuS34H{& zf8uf8tD)cmOTrBK1~uQp^JMO9J%3S&H;QTHedoNGq0(CmCn*tP(^b^%wNOdxu(7 zk`_PSbQ&{#>Kdz{Ij>}chJA{M;6xi;7Ayh9v+e-pxxzr#@5FOZUFrLg=%i#c^!1B* zI(=?DoQ`%BsvI33-*PnbF*|uw+;l;q$|cddp|y8`k@-;e!>%TbSZ>W>)z+4scRE0_ zoq*a6R$E5YkE7lJ9+EEd&`!pn+95t(+m}K4L$`K@LArKz;gRsuL29YEXU)t{_iCkj z+biy_l3snTsHz~rl*9}*h}}8t3q=(rhx1E5u&<}TfntB^uK`Qw>u 2GQzf35ZU`8ZwBmM{5zQh`q%;Q zp)} he@05ctATcA^%X{YY3-)$s|exm=Na#UCb+w~Klenw8%gL4^(Yxb zN?d5lXu=+4b;Y-I{Iosrsu0D2Mc1W2>F{JXw3qhmVLa*EQm4H7L%mty?e|ij4+h`4 zbJ%z2Oi4PeF#Hl?urX@-Nsds|)mtwUQ7uVgP){_Z@fwwLZ&@aP>}54hpP%S-gev^e zS(sQh)fHlYJSBK}+v-lNkK?U0^D)g%Zm{*&D_Y6|bMl(Z<6QMFsC=&YRi$fu*LjWI zyip~>0f7+b5u v`i$ykL7qUxLwi7J8h{e{g$ z@a% YTG{o@0J<`x6?(>7|tI>0#jFfp7zc0KoOA`UH2u3v99&$!5oQM z>&LbF7RPG53oU%ttq&)ggA!k298&woSXkJ210mDPdYo!nu7@_V4~81ziK?spcNTvv z@L%PPVl %nSEC~5zlUF!X_d2LU0$u=K(H;FEL3L z6^qiR98mJ={zh<4V~>=h=DLbTlJ50%q;Udqx`f+Tw&ki)k$Ah?h2+n8*P;V%#Z?<+ z>&Cv-!iC~MBHAnc!;D8z9D%*_AuQTKTKg^Jt^IqmS4P55-F01IYidLqA<>qGWp^7* z1`OKF5{{t>s1iSB{&<|eu>#4r$wF5EThs_rA5hA1?X;=b@%swNvf{)CJq}sImJASX zbuTPDM4CC17YF6uK)hKJ8kdZ3s0y=V!B=IlxLeJcsaK&SMV8~n<9$Z_SC#;1+TS8E z8l{p&`IvIbvZX#4J45aHO&3k07RbXA+tyzPv}`jhb9- sLF7*&W z^&XEaYOJoQ=a!t>qK6R>LFP3{bLr}GoA`mc9nC7(qgg4i&QX+v!s9uWg*eV?05xax zkk{Pcs4J;4SMVEB>hu$o=s{EGupn@Y^4FY^b&%XYb#~GR9W=b|<1- zd3wEY0Wi^J089ihRfHV@_Redsb?7{`$532wDIs>tY5#JO1;H;bujfFm%Ep7n#K &W2y*nIUDRR zExQYpZfKJ1E4A?rQ`N`8Ky#AjJJsLr^BTZ&exwc!P?Bwvy^qESt_k7%YB1Q<@RHcY zDQIE~&HBTdFs*7R(O6bJ?jlFPke5S>D?4v&i_sQ`BV{sBqKY2=t1i|A=wEcCN6B@V z&F;nev?>IPe72nSR~D}a&_7vus{x->JLsm;Phe Gx5&4%wiz z!Wn{koeX$y!!FI8;Ww wyZQsL|1u828)E%eFzNu+X>?03Qxmc&7B7OkA>)?GBJO z3a%7Nv7|smf2rt5d*9GVdmqQZC2fF#1KQNizN#P~C>d&C%_PSuECFy9duK{285dNQ zQ_^u!cqFAV3a2VRfOAwuKio2Q{Sd-K*-quSnEUgYnJ{h@Bd`kDmL9nVfvU3cyTPV^ z3{CyjkXHeIlS^-z2o))BNlLmLOo)_bp@Uu8V^0jw$8hMq6+Ppv2_wC1<%-NPFyc%# zQsYv-O-TQ=BLaXtl{=u9xRRZI$PBO_71!&?8}VE=T6D=y7DaQf1c`7&e7Pk3d2+|g z*a(ze0py_((DZM-wlt0NV=llvn- v688s-vo z&e9KkwUtzV7ft uCC(hvW $)=$L Ay`AxY;ZL);j;b_N!>(9AcxNN(d)q_>O oU>_e+)GOBJxpo{Qx88gfdC{ zY_@~|$8%gB53tJ{VAs+8^vEIir-kD}4p*Fba(Bl}0L_rvB6%Eud&mQL#F;U5>`Nx3 zJv`*52{{AuJb%W8%{hvh=Te@yQDawdfhxD7ec|}T%*@Q^t9}^vjB;u9KgO_t@^yiM z{6Mb&i!l1}NOs($iJ)PsS5<1te@2nbnVRg~e|?8L3-D`&lK9oty7S!RRdoB$J~Sea z9m*OeD!4A&hPG{Olam8t^CqExjJ5&*@jzkFT1t>(KZZ%lZ?a^F#}K?cw$YUIpSeh$ zXG!+UF_Ua+Ek8zKbhkHW-0E_Vd=gPpLO8@OXdwqwprk_ed02@+^7=6q+YF~2;Q-KV z@tt+ME3;*(kmZi0dV-r!x}0)eUP%@>r22YC>}4&>i#O{`VlL($Tf5~!zMBOGkEHk& z^RJqVIWA6l{4)dX24m|UMOTH|Z->wHy>?&QT(4Gz^{2mXJeYQD4+oQ7=QkV2BF76c z6;}Vbe^Ogz{ryB<19rdp`ttH?5*4%vWJMxO;Di6K?}OggWGfcr<}#w}yEQItHyb}A zs{gk(6Tjwm)BO8~d6qrfO^q%i*+ZI%ljYX0gk`w2EAAB*^#(F%Da=xx=-^Z~hxUs6 z {)S|YaQG9?lsUq #*IME H5D3=++rXeInR3a+qFImu2^QIHO9dHZBD zRcL$l(R>MB8LL(?z{9oYv0xL(vCpURtUm^`t_V&}G9gl1%J4l~H<@Hi0vp=LsO$(? z*E#KYa=1sRo;I9W0`)Q6y!<15kVglT@3;ZWP+RT&!5dah+kj9{ucAov%_aN=0~;jV zW{frvCm)|vJ*q0sBX}jHrHlq0` II_33`3H5SPS;fww_(g`FK1#>bK4eSS$P%ClgoguuRSlJz~0TuWK^+ zcJ}e;4(r}zF66} e9=Usql z5%9(XVzAe-Py4hJP`o#4{81+IkoKq1vnkExUz~Dt{%iuqE3cEg03ZKbia#3cpcfJY z_>SJiQZ }x* zE LuD3vtOdD-KmfgRWS5$=8YbhsB9V$i z;c}CYYX58klwHRD*`)0nh7HzIVt$Y+RP0`_de@|aJd)&dXt};*FezQW%k`%dMaFm9 zBVfWESK=!Yt480-EMW|$HDPooOmwP5!g&gl2A6|$CLGY|8~UNi?{egI>%2O;k~^;= z?%mY!7MwBSt$D@pO%X;G4o<8{o oj}A}^Y}EIIyKwOa_9Jlh;P zpBx)YEUM1hZgwXdE zKk}4#93*ltpgk`$M{EJ4EGAJFX!r9mptw>~jB<0H;%yeLSLQe7h~=vRB`Th~wYw dmqo!K|Z zlG(M`w0!cRN&R4W)3IugE+X13xV&REQ`*>Fw*_ov+y2s3?(M+#X~5^$z16s5_V3ZC zhDMo_V^8^q!%g__ ?D}S~J%)Hd!xTvWW zudTcG>7$z)^K%)kFSPf2Nt)i3wxe!N--aC6`V0b**qsrrqkgp*g$#G|89KHE3Xbfu z>yxrhfFy-16|wN|t?Vg2K$0pc8g09Jw34MK#Xsl!=`IONU +J zg@WVJ?(&&;J{Mk;w2U9M(b}ea=LaW)v0PP57#Xa&8I#Nhd*4{`?cImrHx` #A7dNV z?Sed-z^EZm1^{Rp`94tLkd3U<#}~qflhH8|EUx~be`Qr(UvJRj)QeOT99x^94VtMg zTzeN>{-V;s`d!xx=$mRF`}tWBrsX@O1oN3v`gL`x%76ci21pA;A}0qL>%Y8xvfq5L zh%jo?jbkp3cvF&g7vhP%gze(%azIZewj>_rZE%-M6|pPQbEIiFR 1J2#>(8#1a$uNm4l+WH{yw38MGFd_hdzFUt+rO2^f+>v)Mg0`4{~3RW%LV%wxqdF zK40w*hT4Zy<_j~|(h0~aN0cV>netA7zn20u$tRic;mOV2{np)nYHl8amS5*w;4$+h zh5|;P8WRGTD-iwwFElMhyf{S{I-B8tND6w^O>%Z1FTme?bbm$pTA|!B?|{vQzr&I9 z+pikV-_o%sI Fgjt(IwY3eOGfz!BlF9&Q$G)|Cdb;Ou zLm7wzgN26EF!{Et34ZfD&HFB^7rL{=cP=~vmxm?3d=_*|-@E?0>y<~4Zv@Bd?wAA) z%!Q r`)EgtPh?yNXv9%Ym+h)td4wOQ@!az_%5|gHHD;l zqV5LTYizoHHjKuD(WyX$Z#}GfObWbg)(eJCi1OoEYkl-Dw6j2-ebOU%2vVN&`^@&_ zWb8X7eLOEcp)9=K#$iV2Q>~~*t$jMz#ok++aExd+k|iGT?tW}=l6J;dRoP&g`JvFS z>IyE?Rc@>`zQxO%PV-F$4<==q)@yUzfT)x^%N^%rw<;3Pi`{{FF450Vrtf*uA29f| zJo~C`ZiolW3m%xW@q|oYj(%3y4)+itX1s^*JTrUx+Ur{^rnoHH&3fnXTbWy$@V#jD zh2XtB h_%K>@g+GNPda3N{%dn{3eg8g+^c{Wq)B>p zFWyv3niC_| y+JCt@%2<&;BceugUTf4%*{Jh~K=S?sx;)Rzp+?zsJ8v@wV|Gnvdd {d(bM>y%)n&4{?eK-X63e9R;=o_kcfHSzr%NHu;)QHpx|Oo7A7b z_ISj@Lb8+0kKLVrB9oMtvbxS4t2L3utpZUK(Fclh$;>P ;_jCb z#j}9l>E9vOy7MJJVw+RIaax|fZDj6Z)`b@DD}0yxUblVW1 WW*~#&aL8tSFQPc z`W;_mV3* 7qKzP9g3)uIFg6~ ndNnE0-||F9I|Fzp?`d&jqCuWZa+TC-DLeG>wXC$?yC}oZ1Gt67 zY!AOH%h?ZgLtT*sagT|j*?<7GfIN7rLQ+}mFgKKx_m1bm9FMiYjQcNfkD0x>`FYaW z(C^nXY!+pKK?ofL)noz#Uk;|`!C +wEIK!Uhc+5U0scJq #GlR`hIja&{XygXg}!=kbzq8c(gefJ^|IQ?%qZZ9@k`5MI2t1< zrMboqokl}inT2kULcfM?O1&_bswA$*B0=$+Re(=*2-0!nNINv#MmvsMK&sILHo`0` zXoy*6#)tVzo%T_W-bIC;+^SsA`m;!);7HK?HAIg>(oqGJmLb`_aYGynKLvtTaHQ6R zr@DNZ6RAU9e)G~Du}|y5FITz~Z}cqtxWXsuAJu?|XrR3+nW6&|{TA?|xm3NF^o&DY zOOr1D+A$Qq_sY#C_c@y_E;7>i0h8FG4A*HCpyp_diarp>rlAOBI!Z0Rk`V_ji=#gm zgJ+Tcj~LGv%Fgn?PM2b@DAl*oUDYk}RE6~veE%j%-JK@+lR%KH1cp~)L8ZsqS2Bx= z1d<6X{O;42PwYxQEUmq#4rA-^ UXMTKh$s81&nF)3|ohx{w}6)luU zzky18yD2zz&tZsKy;9@$#iB)E%SK4_Uee)MBSoH>v*SVplVikK>qj*a{OhTiF>(Y3 zYy35jy*nKr&NWa?E_TMnf0?qdc u^R&ZHqA zn^md6dL7-ymXdP#pp2yqHam7sDE?s;iAV7KV%DEdfi~g-q=jFqIioBiN)6)SnH! z4eL09loo3ikl$Ppd&Y92tuTwsT2XZB6}(l*K|IL6`GxbL4)9Wm6r8N8WrlNlM^PIg z4Z^#pV9FbdrqNH_yBP)aKklR!#$Ua~S82MMwZjEg7g2a(x7j!NU4#NN{FbacD7{?lmHWI@R-|Mj3RH7BW%MH<> z%M+DMZ^ 2G)R@W4Y;g@Cr%4MQqF>))=hTpvfqYYZ`CH zQ qakExm9+Xi#{>)K!@Ej-m$X#tadW6{=>JzY7>4Ez_aQ-?1)+k*k zDcrBT%`hwOG*UZhbmXzU(E6@=qw0JkLH*{@phu9sgs?*}c7(W^a6^&xX>-E7;|mYH zjZJY@&GV-HNsHU{OUO4C2yh$ss+0~E9-h! E8y+bv{ zbA##^-x?b0Xx!s7GU;Pm>#8)Z?mVm+4kGL|Ne45ENBSkq*f4)On4DxgPMsOWTiJ|O z)c8$AhVa26Y6o6G`G#wP$NQ3L;}QO9VYv;`wPHoZ`vmcbiED7iT)e_AJc2Ty$Z}a{ zSt~9-U%dX&zmwMVbmPnU1{MR``gn1^6?D*OlMrz;;L6LZi$kqfIpCQ=$E#WAdv6_w zGNb|zw^zsB5*U8CINKrty%99e4BYJnLbU5-s(D~1()7Kw;Xq fgYdFUtKa zL5H@YLHlbHUyg?SwnLXPpKO}fxJ )0Eht_o%cTg6Uw1@*rt3?YFwvn1g-%Fbz(ms;x0b+K656sC`jJ33nPt zj%mS;HFS+buN^_{)t{=4D;mtT0RiDZD~N7l2N7bQ_K2d{V(|+z6M0!D>St@EZR6TL z6cpMeP{q&C oo{~DIR2xU24_&w_(zt!~1Q!no3o#PmhAqA<0R6+WsgzJ#JQ$t-T zRf8K9#BQMCJ16V!oM>ml>2lvVxq%Q=MoLoF7ssC%`elMtIG~sW+LBZ50UtJC`a-!d z5!GQz`ndCshF=M}9!!`aLT5_jEktaPE7ASXWWLSNG3N$HVt^M@ROe1c_0o!0gf@X8 zirk{YmV0XL^OG%(aFau|jS5DF*V@B{%+!yhU2W;~BA~YA%l&-LglOq5)4tG@B%?}n zB|g0PEChHx^ZJMFu(RK<_q!OEO|5v^XE*l7Onv?QKA|BQyRU-w@=~k B{bO zFo@hwN{3OGr3(HUNE5v1sb;=vnk{g_h=r+9(0~8bl_mB;wEV@guYsJlHR#58WPm{< z6ag %VZU^?E|Zi zx9ewSBep=s1a-q53 *6%! mJSfbXq6#w?9T$6FqWv{=V7BSLdD<9BLf3gKGO6!S>7RR$L3t zvRlLNe9y(lqlruh@&fo3FIKC0zb{V@nh)m5R@@I&+TF;`M}a>o 53}%0Rdib#u?7Pf1q~JpG|Z(-wS=ktz5_C1P@}lAgSsc^3M5ep zw8Cz5RapOjH-ziLHmJFRzA=7z4-}9oBCq^<=>Pf} BgA|Ag{rCP)yc}Yj38Ku8?5`He@8yxr@Gh~iozP?rn~^ErY==|J?d4> z;uzxH%J6mE^SPvs%AFPqkCUy&^37tj-R(EtYlT@i#QCTEhb?V^j^qEj1 }pUgb~ z-idv8u~+i7uG)4ioaMtW<#rF!`9 3Uwyoe@>65q`N?SO3IzEDws`rRd)f(sX!Rg zQq7r@94wQ~lynstN(q~YJj5>$HRJbq%oS&Xu>l(O0$BKs|FKpg`d_JGU_!&om)lRE zYyyyi9|s>V?yz%3Rg%1%vr}8|yl&k=$e?W^NQ8&3u!`o_cn(&t_^NlrN)n=?LBQEY zxuj&}ni@{vp;^hz(#16}n9~(s+2o7JHRb^y7uIQGf!=Q{P*Qphelnm+gwGxS1c5z6 zRp4LE)#`I)ULY3Yy4O`Y53bk8&o#ks)4$P2C~h9JT a7L>@C@QWRHt0EA!f!7iEM{2yta(Z=qyn6#ZVe_xm&6pWpW%e_i*! z<~iqe&hz;^PA>yEFiQHdB!L9f@c&&sHF)SbYB5v)Tkfk}QFkRYo+gzU?f dG-`xbIif#sO!lhb2-0Wbo z^&8+V)tt4z@y;OjY9K+H=KqcX?4W;!MmQV|sKpi@8Vk?F#p$=dE`J0egfB1~-*$H7 zKn~ZXWs^IiJR+ggrVahY2~Hw&Iu0xo&R74KdNf))=e;mzcc9fBMZXa#AF3hBz(5fH zWsou#*aEToFq#9+k}K@6e{b#@CSvb9rljP>3l`3c T&yC?+3FqmN zg1ewxCB)Rl@8okI7Uctv?t$=+_TR{x{rvfs-AH~@Qxgc2SiNW6OLLzxWZ{eI4mB(i znm*~FDzX0mc9;}F5D;=}YtCZy)|dQn?)xuhKYhZXoT%>0QpDAC%|GhdziMHknCzlS zWOdnj>1`w~8o?)K!V~EZX&KX!>5?E+%o2B`b*O3XQXS6hCVeFYwh2@;|BqvPj=_}c zZ$a9FoAjld^tS}kpMJ|DV>IUjhc(yz9X*}7&yq5o*^|9qy5OHP3-7EvuiZWz>Aof} zprvDE<~5GaFmJINExhHq9`NNZ>$GD{yEPvq5|g1pjMDJbKvQX;Md4_;Vl(;1E7>2t zRz=-$IqCo3hJpu*PJC-N9R22kIiyhA$-Mki`^p=;pUvB6RIY48)CM3C$6(wQ>&rbB znT#Tc_Z?Iu3gguVMgFkP2R4bI4*Wls5Kvi?_GHCPz_r2lK{6$-7~9MK$2Mh_puOSf zNjUV^wx_m|RUU6 sc;MwPM zrAXI=uPkEu8D9lD1mhoQ%6*9ZzmH52=E>9Y2(!>Da{Lwq3tuF-0*EY-X 4N0p>mI*0 zmdkO9=!wN>Uwr^^d)k1aQ=Ol=C~b3o=Fa?j OMT~;jAXWRZK$yhR^ zXvlCM0TEgkzCuG%a!19Ul!SmB-&)Eng$zM(ZS%nUI&-L@RM<) q>;WXa7MzXC7OfUFRGWIr)R8Hm1zhT1^$Li@S7ACDl6>43azfoyZ(U!yB&8B{ zf6qX-RVY@j{w*pz+zO&7n686XFz-H9{~SbCuOK4K36eDc04HJ~YLQDBLbV>}`N`I- z3%E2~%=
DP3N*}Vd*DH<} zL&KMZ&I;WyBc=QXwZbo6JN+jO`Y-!m52AsgFN8&!8Y29*gFOa}Hx+d5KmkqCK0Z_G zSGnu}q!Xm8EXC8xXHY#oP(tq3DR45HLb$Qud1h}NshJ&FCH4YCZ83O|x&}g&gVaHp zp&8eXT%_V#$#CeMP@uDL-RsbMnM}}KT6FU+Z<+Gixad|BNLPLCHBvWiP*8+?63TeC zV%4fk`XoHnT*{+dMA-L6vJxVe+FgKF>u+<1j9*?ver~Y+m?zKr`vt%=dh8xeKFkPz zpvRoIwm9ABINtT BbS+>=^7e)mZ0)Tn57o?CnEZLlhjod*i!Pt11^^@UgA;mQL9ydV-UbO zWldIy$3{+u dyA}Oo^2|#%Rqz&=vs6S!^I$9lXa)7T%`(2Cp+HupUHCa zr*$eSfjfsBblwave09;OU-azYhlD`+*FJ-xN|1tki(hugW0*v-ILNQ(Z%2wOPos2h zL!i~xw+v}EJ3qd?1RoWxSDOkMfDdy_ mx9d^G)tAbCb4|rr38DtRjxQ(_-WL*lE=1$4FaeK=!!P{D zko4O#5vYggKk-LSg}Nz8UC!&>U2&kLq}0U}577M*i8o*obyvC6sh-cD8`Kj9o!|^G zaMqs8ypLU^PSY9Kpf~1<;-LFe1*?yk1z@DVM=j@b$?j8{p*TV}U}ejw_^Zlg*e3Lf z{}PGZNio#DQqd2L)z5<8BR3}X9Z1Be7C*(8k+;>i?y2+HDMrsG9m;n7Jx;?x(M-Vz zOz}HKe2TU6M}wBUGe|j^bwUawgop-h9($d9jB(!)ku>w9P$~C|6%pSXJSC~9O7Rcr zDD76c%;@-_;XV#w>eoD2-IIbe=&CsoqWUWcvEHQ>6P|Y${e`kf5)O#@HG*ugrY;P~ z2DN8$)%q`(V#x;qFHIGC?23215)b7*mi0wH+M88}zh>R^4O_wyk^UV_BjY0}sqZMn zTTqb`(lRe5?tJ02VZX&QuXu-k?eZ!H_8L`n* QeAjiwTpEG)Cq2QlBdC_b)Z*RPkv;I?I&v?^)8;U#Au6USD+x6B&+ *KJCHex(^rPTJ?$|P~{@nP-wqXBzCGnpuZ(d zpq&^?u*SgLd8GMxQ@W8+f!v`9c3g`*Aw}ZO(ck++J^HH8sysw5RBVJ&QJlbvOGW3Q zyqMZAuEq%18%2VE$Z$#%T^~it)~jd&C|`gCHlMJOFQ-nbx~C=WWLgfMYR#i+7?3J| zMCGo`lq71vKX&VphHo>>9m%73>0btVIbVy&N{ 7^wUS@s!7>6CDCMmL4%i-Y?LN$0rYpdi>Qc_N_Dk}m$i&ZJRv{EBeBPxDKXVq}yj z7p!*(^7EVItKX$+0W&~J1Bi6Jx-VM%I1WQSqt*{F@eFqAtXI>W)lm?ghfA+U$S!Ee z-V%4lvh MuV@UHjykw>nto4gwFN>!z2yrh 1JbR;Wd1l!RO|u5o>^WsiIB#ucHcy(j638ho!v_IMgz0Vh9VbX} zEXrC%Q|hkV_EQFBIPx-S1iT_)V%(1OwRV{1FZ_GOgn*&BpMa&FxDHtHmgY$86UOJG zYUi4dU3B7gPmGc)tD9&-jgYqij4t4M3JKp_&`+4CjV2c?lHSMfXR{C#;Aqtv2sR6# z_#|sX-xT1|k!)86wW{xy^MlhkY+YX?h``!jf*^E7-QV7+hKLS-QoBTCjU|WvbTX+2 zbD36$3y edpI<;yhADSaiUl^&=pQu+&` zKEP24GV&oMay}lpx04;DJ^xsA+R0j{>jsqV)f;slEm8wEe4)GM3O2`vY)}lB1kKzg z@uONT#(^=CS4H @qjS3)*kCdw3Nk%!V+YDJ}m}0pC@JP$|_ewnr zM|?}(O}BWIDC*127!sPR|6o#wyN~FG;c6lBy4-;8T!<9V;kda}DTMF$%dzoYGzGOu z?i+!CO1u6>YxVdVzV9b(7cF|yVs}u5o`p%V&0O#rwvmuG1i3HFhn17GVp^ 5pDnOP+*d(xj48P=#o84=w=_WT%;oI(!#*R5mT` zeuowmFQr|f6Il+GO}wpXRpD{LX7=i@-bb%N((ujbE4LsEJcsV>gjxv2gTqbP%<$C0 zPa?j!wNrcPOnN8(yTg+nO jT_q)P!Ck6(-i&vwY4J(eyBMSXHg!{=usWlHgKv#bqO zS7}Qz{WzVDI`kE^PV2vEgg}ZMUFK;Ku~R2As--Mo;*4l^c%BOARURDm1kAt&JAc(t zWN?BjvqbssWNHIg0SydIh})QFnLS`*t{W6V1D_6ltZ3ngGZ%?gs!|G*8^=?24H0k+ z Ke4H{7Fd7G3-ibbC6lo`G2@l 0oM-oxMU7I|$d-9Hgx2woH1%C5$ zbURnIPE>_T8x${9%;eq%dmPJ6jf#;gU3n_cd5)gGIH=s6OoIZbG_#+v|2l}8KNq9z z#~8A+F0)duNVv`~MNdGu_NT7rimZ-2r-ns3Ni^u;=Rtt-!t0c5Na8~ nX?^RlJrP?opPGD0`dQ z2wS=*9K)8MSH&c@%)WGgLxD5n&%IXv&S0-jv&QfWYgf=P^sX0sMTeboH5`Gcwqf6! z#d}?Y-bmAvj=K8I#d!^<6D|JdM=0CcljP36xIUPxZrdLKI3@u4FER?laK$}SBjlvn zLRjexRJg_7TD|Y ZlU0nsSAjV149~ zuMFH!v*hMkNoB&yR8CzR5r~+r(~%CTc4bCk;WGB>TKArRe7!Ycf~-571f-{***r zQVv{ow&C5S?(PW7u%A>90D=6IXEqzGT#xo=f_Aiv9R-5Gr0mN)%a!GpYWGSF+PK8$ zPvgDRo~$KYW@~3l(}LT@SJG(Qe6J1{`Oa-mHbd!THeao;KF3&<0n~Mtc|a+Z*`q=Q zzHq+dZAp%(vr_I=t-648v#VXf9D?(zu5)M-d%6S&U)C)5O5RnBBEzmRo01jeV2U#Y zE>w`cH(>0oBk2lohZL%fup1TXpxSI*IB$`;PZcasUBP&8`{NdXbGrdFP;5AA_hR~) z+#!2B2ftCZQouJEP~HKhtCVs`AdnRGH+qTi`uVLHmm_(zhBCpGjut8GHme$j{Z7|1 z)ZsC*o&8v(@Xd8;svFfK<9C#pCGGlojAa`mb?zLUOpfOitz>Z-8e4Bl=3-1=8bkUH zE6XRA#lJpy8(poX6*Eg#l?LYg_OGFYDCo)G_L}A$t5BwSE*E$<@BjVf8<2%!kRrwD z#kpg3>#x~@gG{BnmEhM)AC=LZsIA4B03sB)3T*3MP|~JsE{e+rUxK- Yth|?Qe!}wWCb9hSvgb#+pI^_ #CaBC82yL$?chzj)d#9@w=;isN;rJt8T`Cd87J7H z_EnQam2`$ODgk7d--C 3mq?f);pH-^*R*5!=&(yI?Aq^k{mOBosQg8&0d|+{*ci_W~-oggYb{E)g zY#0Hq4(lW#@F!HZ-}KocA(-ao@!w5kp4y?c5Pg?6YPoA&S!r*-r1^YXa2tC1R(pt3 z5xzZH6a2OAJt$l}b&co;@4+IL16}-9h{Z@Hzl#u+9zH+BZH>zDnt3A$fzJm&P+?}T zdpcUE449sQ)xWW7@QX$(4L)*!hl27ylD|@J1Z?OkCPGTxZ6s=v!foTmQWGdYj5JYu zJ^YG8DRr!a;p4oh{&%5|hlXGhy$bMavb%V*t`zd5U8peUnjfx7@)uHIp>(+JW2|2x zh^fW~7#$2Dq!U5w12{eU|Nfy&sj7hbhtZITC!6RDBnr8;Oa)?0#)pO!DP^ChR+)pC zJ}tCll+Ai*2h-o9yZ7+>1PBrZD6(^E-u5@2WpP!w1?EaIrA^`cWhXe=5;A4TqxZI; zQsrt*#e%oD?-hWwn%^_ulIB9-r#%q$%WHu^`4AMLdbBX}+7>eE3Bpa%Q5)gHiYfjqBznT1Cuc zSnZ*!mVjlwjT_EzmEhQB>2-OLpMbyS tc3*p6!EKx4e%a=;HO`VJ-CBQMlql_hD?bCVWn8ux ziw(0#2S-xo3y6htUy)x@Lr+( 7-)1QSV74 zq0~+F_;+!zd-?a)#;I=ji`M?=0lveS{-?28I~d$@5!865xY~JtRb3Ijk?YNJnQIzF zxmiwC3dKvv!UA&~>uP!)n>MF5)YDJVZk n1*sKbx09%#Dapq>F3F`Gf4vFZX4ciNc4hP?ByAeX+XY5ME7 zPd$dqhH>rZ*PQOR6vm>}CD3 qst0FVfog?Wa&9E-W9?=7H%j9I!qTl$a9Wk}I27Ikq`7Hs1nTf|Tuu6R zq+Y_4{XF3%yXRxb7RUov4RF=QWd=ptX+Yc|Jc^B#G&*b>^BlTaQ~r9Gl(I9VnEPvp zUOxI`(2oXCjJ<4_Qsm5gAt Gn z0Vhk!j&u*T`ncJGQMN|`&M4vJ141nj?|DzCk5Y2KrM}Tm{Mee3Qsm@P@RmD%@|0Q# zr*4>PKgZ22-7&W_+kQvtN{D{O ?5c9^5 ?0T-9jivlOXD z|BBW|Anl)~1JUe~yYo!nh!8*B2f+C|`LMbiMFjS|&%fg3+mDr;wk-kgO;bg?&X@I1 z6UW7$Cku*2!;=d_tj`_*FWc_z=vYa(|7JbQG2Xg)-j6@=rs=EQm(BB(yShQkB!VMz zfg{e1P4uGNKaPxLhWx(QT5OIk?(7VwkzE4SH#)@vN~?+P(bnmwzt4|39r#;71dW#x zml=tnuF`v4os65kWzS!cHeVXWvmLsJ0XlZ1LSpt jScpCuo{H?n`_;2~`ss z0^FHJU^wx$cfYcJLqy# Pm%h*IZ&voC8zLEP5L33Q zXU lQbNdeX}uo}FpWgoxd>J-3rvh1ODOBiRH zg+Kh@XPp6%r}vq!PM$%qy7z{*mC?#{55*q+8h)}<%_~491uQ5L Ca$Orl&GhWhtVPB?@5 zf0jfPg8}Nq8+pN?juGsAA5l@_+g=ty`sy<=>){si%7W~6#EkrfCBVT-dR}z^$uFj( z%-hew etsl$eb4;$n~cm?cZk!wCi37a_N4Z_v+h+U?33v+d#|m3LtLz zBWTzDJT?t?6W5qMxUcRd1|MWE{8}WI&j%K6C%Xw+y56NtO6BG%dpZ?WDd@kFLhSPW zR_4D)d_n9}g25p*JP=49_)&`&<7USp`er-WIv{il?(oG9P~5a*xt=bBPmJ(eIkm;t z1VR6AtzlJwfsP~WEc}II`{tm?UHfeb@lV{lZ;|TjI|IdL>|8i%(Jl#n>y-jfat!cT z?uq## yx5V(he-2ED z>X{Eb2zC2&$3PQs^=zwq0B v-3l-=a|*t z5L=Bna8o!+q5OL&!8a#XSY5xfZGxs^7kxz%4Z WqWp%zv+ zXZaiNV;U{)nIDD1!GV5#QI!Xx{Ld1e(~yK|JP$GPu!KIqn{8qB&EH>|k=!gJ{0@Bw z-d@t{CDK@=GJ%E81^8zm7s0#uyQwl$#9)-yQ*@9}DkY@s$+|m5{ zjIMg5sxosQcNDGHQj@`+0kM97SJ+s~c*qTdj;qp@&bR20x~Kn`9^-s~r(IsZsQ#PK zw09-D3B5e4Ns+^A&s&5^IkHLpd(VLd1m`J#<#9?0!BL?unEf&z?DcNA1^!HtS7pW` zx!fXzkV5L1s$MH+1pDo9e|?S)Cmb+Q$6564#-EJ@p|oZDt!Wg2SMA^`Jd~{r^WGYu zeel$4LqNP`t6~aWn}EHKL?u6`APg|0 vn*>#~A_vIkI>*^4~o4WZ?E0 z;j{UUeXIBYL~pe18DU2^Y@Q69+;o=%*2DO#y>VJFZU-L}APDgXf&RKU 30AB)}+V7u0#x@mIk1e$=%LRSN=75UJC|!=* zThb)`1spge;}tl${y*$#1n!LL5~aJfEf{THBIbq(+w G0PLe{nZ*PSzw)(+rg>+piy#8US9bWTq4rj0SuqhP znXYZp#vYi0$J*bP3_$ 4?I&Z zh3?@Sar3B@#vh!mR|x{{=?j$dDafx`C(u-!!i+Jn^VJ*jOPZ#`Ef-=ri6gqIs>HIZ zwSYA~IR5^sJzp2Wu&j$oZ3y$G>Y!RaG^SGD_=ZcXbAJplB4Vb;@lEWP5z{S=5w;wx zt-%Zy8aTlLKpKHO2$-@niS^_HDJxGsJw5czFAGmyU4M^+5(m@ F Uht1cIIe?p7ARalN&=_pw6r_%w+8Nlv1_q3U%hfcsmz z7q2;)=dt>|Mpo||2!E=zQ}B|n$MUhh2^_oXqCS)H;VAR@9*XjHf{sU4WtWTMTV= zpRo;`X*+!e`p#&&y1tVR=I2zS2H26RIgsS>Z4G&Fio&FYSIZleYG sM9G)2d<4~Pmc#K2c6H}bL3cD%u55yr$|>u|i~1R6V&dY^|#6eaz*tX==^ zCqvwdY3uyPy2|tzU;{eMs8au)1Ozbv1-WRD$L5K}P_x74{I*|4^Z6dnd4qm23%($2 zH(6zT(EdH}`)Av{z@ X%fR?~#tK)0mJ4EE70=R*3@rd!%F84wV z@PjW^gB#=>gMgH9E;F|YD&>c}dmUR9mDL>=XE+cjz=GpmzIi^&F(5p6!wtKA^hxi5 z$Qll%{n}$KL2}*)v}Oqgc&=Zw8*-(##S6MuTQ2l-6~z%EiqL*d)5l$@7Z&*S+B*`& z+^VK%hZuEudCMWaL%bPcK={u9G7HdIYFwl&-xhGAdt7Gn(Nr%I< cAq~@zi^zM_Fy||@Bj2Ym-90%bR(`&=J3rLa!(mw6H(*_Xb*F*#Z~uYo#WIc^N1hVrrC#);mBnKk!YzK`^*a&hMYwoCeN~5rNskxYW zA%qI(wMqpVm`zTu>07CgtC0p+SJTtl+wZRyJUkts%L~5PtNIQijYVKQmdUv9-gJ%Y z1R^{n=cr$UJxdqw2;Ag a?#8X7iZ@AA(%Olbb CeGQi@7HUKfHwAx&y ki`DKA zNy7>{Zw3?`W8wZc+iH(zJ^eq*HXN^}`fm(v1NIo*=C;SgjQphLHR?;nT?LA6kl)Lq za*I;y&|UnRlN{jxPTW8a0W#cA%+zCa5@M};#h%we--;05v5b(H9`Llz2S^A~5+%nW z$Fa?XXTBH4joL1al8ZPitIuCIf+f9?Gx8w;@~H^Vg|Vl!slJFO|MErP!BG8I`Ez?9 z)q!iY1Uf7M21zyt8cH2Bz#A8Jjn(`X=PQjg4NesdQ}C}sog$TlY_aP0(m>D|=I2h+ zOdBax?V`c);pSX-)Kd3*If-k}_6)r5ACIWt?LAWl9PKlG{@5m{Bak|*_vt{Qbd})) zFkrH6O`(}F2bs??`q$Wnz7a!|6yW#ej3 ^7r0o5rwHby78!-3T{A3?Z4rH~W_( z*xjWAmH4s|(D6nQ4$MpfDj8UK_mOgAYI|NF61B2sHiUq8K+j;k*EFq6Jl;^ +yo=n`imte=o6iZnB%yF z8F`=xezVhOk<1Vr*CYPgJ`ECNj65;0aYAN(QlNpDC+S5`FoRmmJ&p^Wp6TSqVLmSE zUOKd)gPL8GL0rZ+cX3a&nv#35iP&;q>lb$Oz2?kgCciwd?TOyttSaF#2np;cJFol4 zydoR`9aS4M7Iy$ZDr-m8UTsmD>RIa6SErd;_9_iSZBF99jB%(vY1tF|*N6KbZchIE zbQ<5Rbo0Ar62x8N&5w!}650_~qjE};#Tm(O PyFZ$mH?iX-1|1BeH6~6${pyGB6<3qD4Gehc$$&d(^!+z@yN{>8L0FlrJ+P0T zQ*;=^jyXcBkqDk<1bGPr_8R&lNyD|{yeYlm!`@MS;r(?;-G!Fv1pv`nGpC6IRL;HQsfU_3|i<$GIMP#2aod6dIi9Nl;hPMc2f0va7zC#sGQ+^g)Og zyc)bfFso``S<{tNyri3|=>+pk1p<=a2AbbImve98E8nKs_plX{vG0%ZZgGw&qxPBI z8&;b^id#TrsW#3&L 6I|H+-0KbFY9Gls!q$UD#pSl|Gp!n{b zn1jzNAEL`@FGUn51$Z!Fo*WEGZZBF0%vZ_ z*pS+Fc#fV8i>RqI%rd_>?;R6;$R*W?M>zuMD8V{11IGSO&0(e@zQxT{`B7pb*X-P- zs#M_1m6-7R$IY%4RhC#*<2$qiN6`Y>3g{o|LE7r_bm*j)+t8;9ugzcG(ap%)hD!f@ zohAJ6W?Y8cU7)>|gLyJ2tV)^wHBn(03j%}7n!}k=XE35Sft+Y48Ck74iCf=lmK^zV z192EYs-!I|#d}zzR5hY_6-}*8iP -+@z84&%76BxL$xbPO+)JGuWVepv1#bd6Fi@H**&ZAvB-;}d%5P0mNZD`c(JR{Nd z?R55@x+#4uG8F|BJ$4hXYIPbj4w S87iXc5+>+$q;PSuF2a*XMKab>Nl_PgAS?s#bG{8N#% pz(R z;=FkyDWm$VE4i46E*fIUh70IHY*H7bPT)>Pmx^?v7{wlyGM)b9|EMp6*rqTdeQ02( z9tJb>%G82i%(a*iO{QZ!+7CalzuF9JcU#u_Ezw>c^ROmh q_ObT%^_nl+ z7%nZoKAy{bzBE@^t+}=GxbFhRek`1f;IlRD#}$))f`-_sYU&)`yGF7>@K}^-IFUZn z^B2K}Hrt@4uLRA>2Yo0u{1kYIGPF$cea=>_`WtC&j$WDLSKACuR+ x4x^qPmo)oC3oq0JReu+adQ~~sdl8O9~HvNok45(>TN~w8Ss7ri4sv4 zndezT_|L*;0@EW )fsx^D}GD&mmZz3y>gg@cVx8;Z@xA^&Cm1u_*NQp z^_i$gRpGKUKqG3fL>W`zQli7lfv9NK6SVNF@d4IkBhR36%h3PQRg5)JI)q2={^wHg zDEs?Gt-%XBWq;|ghpGqMYG@wl)@W_80(16;11m*uL`o9*a{~C~?F8FUBA{ZJrZe5= z*PssfEkfgjfOyL-Yo=w~DUH-|*SAu?j_+P}l-wF1^QG|$Z8TYSM->kz9 `<;lkfS_0EIH#j zz;+*`v@{&lD(}JX*QCGFa4?wjTL3oz>gDdK=L(c@uM<4&>mv^9vJD}6rIdKREsRsk zQ>!stmjF+Vo#Hx?L7%%mVU-S0=P9{t@rlEtcqMHFDW_Jn7wfMr^2Q5GsX@LgA|hQ7 zi$|>jlt8Mw^f)kwOV?P#@*Qs71(Z46OD2DwUzEVYA%iQCIUr~%kIT;X+eSl2;yFk| zBJom_BeaA%>4ctrRl7;c+{Nsrosul~MI+Ng>4vCv+J59<&nN3C3>W@I`U*f;UD6k% zPE?6qQ!f=f9m|In)CswDwqd|*FF_UI(JwRP0pbWMUhAt&{v|I&&mElcEg*NPt7{~2 z|7ZdZSEN+r+Q Bn=Jw+!?` zb%`$0&7?jGQP2b2Z1?rKBYTCy`#wZCcX0oEn;yeR$Cr^R#Fd|Ut9c|>-s>8Qa=kDud9nj)@N*8X?GaX^= zZ~>S6wrCPq_%cgeZIP5dGL$-Vb1Yb-lpFdbPe)uL0R6P|etIxM(Q!QDk&mGT=^yzB z$uav<@uS1Tp4!!s)cfW?Qj!J-p}0 m3L~zg@{D;WOY~ HtK>AiS`M}I=66m8b=9aaiAew8WX(f|!*kWN3(g$PWGab(T z;~)6$pHLpW23l-mx`UH9YsOQ+3!SZfA*NFDLC7{Qkm`J0?^_{u9o7|8v`nJbOlm!P zmwu_C4RYf>ksa^{PRe{`$kFX(6V5kK-7VFgdh~2}f*)FJFJDpPQgP00S&gTVQhRIt z3teAk&Sm+V|H5cf($BX6vJ0cza09?8cz{*17eYWJUNHp0t0Rk3;fJp-cMa#hCIcBC zduyWk5|G=DlDvkf57W@ 8yNL=1 zDU5|r<$CT+zqfdgJXIO2byO#+&En*tSF}_Ui#T}c-&bx%xjqa&_u6Q#Fi_hC&4oGe zW0jX2#v1aUG9@izYc F!%~mrAnTp@ z9wSDrhKTj+bB6^3Ni|SDt9k;Fad~*YW#rtbdb~ejudaPpA*qWAM81%h5!Ke%dt{&o zsJ2w%2cvPV;%UtsjU>W>W$1xlnesh`!o8DtP(*5SNq1NSbchjUx>^Ws?(9p$t4BJI zrXTdqB%^~@O+s%NUn9XQ_ECck@sx4Zyr_`0aMxB0DRwBC-RZuI8;*L#F9!_Q@Ewb* z!bF>c>?+Jgr5rht0EeY`FEfox<|2&~@8+cEaS1dO)=y$Xnc 9lbB(iA^yoxU#*|!125CO>2P{=f{at&^6}ry$-_Xi^twu} zQbm~x+>WgFG8=(~2=}Dv?O6R42tp*_c`{iP)D2lY3761X0Kl+xMX0SH#@NZ|1n&U( z?5-b2*hUT30z Z}mM)+V+%9UIRKJk*L;(c6d`djJ0N_A&n}QcH10}G$WIT z*hf`py(4*KOq29OjR~Ilw6i+oe&JmMepqgMpdpYxuh)d1MZPzyB#ub8sIUL9oqLjB z {gx`Myi!j8 zXZn=^otm@l+Z_z5+F_3V@hcUUkna)Q^#mN5b~o(%r_ZggC%c^*T=x%m)z>y!(V>3E z6=>{q?yC~Ij0QD|0#zFt3f{%rRK)wqW%wbKzP*}G67~JR=q!}4)mq~v`_L`1iNxxq zoXEy>G%2!fd~k1Z2GT_4v#FO!Bx1_dD} *YLxYOg5yLBoZWHQL8(j zf{Du-Dc6jVr6kR7L~ wG>q2?`8HHrMH}x|`OkPxh=W2MkLfL-Sd%v|%LIg# z$D36y=_^wjchbk>L8TU6H}H$VuiSx)TxR62+PwX;?rn9kQR=1YyRXc%YBL6B`>Sg_ z3rhwo3PO}Fc|%1f`yotehax>?@$XDuNcEOv%GZxefNnzBq|GI>J!em{E!)Op22Onz zCnT+ED{g2*Co&p_C+5~W8V^k%w|L%W5pY5@nH^FIAfHH#<5J9w4P`Y2Oiz2N*NFs% zXkq2YDe0x DD4qLyJ9%uQ44$&L} zB#d9zgz utRUp=sd3BJ(V}Iq!)hkSkNWt8i@&@@sCYvJpM%#^f5u zE-3GxXleIcT3fc_$@46AIC~94!%rR1Qj7lkd)^xmH)NjjgzWlJ8eN)#{Ml^YldrWB z2A;A;w>uhczY}p=26UyCY!H7+?$UU=kp@hF5|=ImFtw-j5^eVCv+34)H#>oQVDjdw zZ%X5KPuf*z3*J>Q*QD~cp%E}S#@9_rQ2WnsmN(L_J{H5jQX9v1HAuTpFr5ERPxLcu z@b29xASV@M8=l-^ljD~(Y!{1>VS{eJ(W_{2_?DuE-v?EISW{{b8tFEgn_0+NsNl5R z8H_`Zd4R-4?b1DX%K|b>Ko3*=ESQ= -;}m^J>$ zmu{4bm={_Tsy2F$-wOa}|GfnL;wO!)2;CQp`?~E9(yfQJ=D)qq18K!zd|iig1Xj1N z^4-@UY7$MjVbov? VgR6v(sd1|Zn-b&G*t*qPL5q5xvuM&w-m0# zK`x8!zOoslbE1I-z>mKM9%W}gUV#lGf)pnN@Mvp;9KC(_rK`cq`3K)bCwtzlc}tI} zKNp!aqD-Fh7oT;g_8p&I54^dBE;lSU_O*{W8+-op{+1w4NkhVE6#2^O(sQn$A`g$Z zri{`gp*Pss*S24Bh`l9`ToJjiih%fzKc7n?pf7|TK4NB0P(LcHnye;>EQ0REbjR03 z)M$rluQd|fDpT!Ec2o6WV)3os`T%i}zFzKO%`nsVSksAdK^mS)i1jeIa*^f@wf@n< zU_p;ow`zpPll$Tu$n&^9;Cht` ??W=kSoJ%v6LO7BwNw@K$B5+^KmSx2DTEL z! }Hi?RJDsLF_- THth&(*FQx+*1$sl@vReq)(K za&03RYhG-vwW6X3DN%Q8dXr8|5%xUV!S;r(A%2w-5<(s?qXGYGipo $z*wt4^7Q0nZXb(R0K6+D1i|g= zh8(2}NF`PAUnp7ANT3&@R^@-Q;7+;G`cYfyM=}Ifbh!aDl#g!tYF-_*fK|*pzV``q z4HZthQ)i$G8glAxG!{CIf`UN0!qe_3%#)Wo-gCDEJKQi_L2ASN6^kl;>UjlJHEw}j ziW|k*!;)uKx2u~IK{m-O%RJ0Hj!+@l^$1<+h~jo_NBc5ptwUN{We%q2=uX?z;L2~# z42N%nVY`?;P9_pvyUq#mZ~(W3#y~AFnID#FY;`i~thlTWn_w3AUdIfDm{FJXNk^Z# z^jvWhG -4>;KrD0A6AeA@Ne#rq0Tk1zX+e5wNx9!JwO$zx zRKhNQR*uU;e$z4b_rV>~dF1P;c@^4gtVO$%Y?`F?t6tA3v6&f|w3qmU!H%HAH2_5$ z5rKc*eeiZ-d^~IT1?uHKAcgWiD_i=#Un&8#ZfiJke~cuW4hCpp1xe11j1blDpPn{3 zJ--j$M1S$xW1YXoyygIm5D?3?432`b|C7TX>Rk3(KuDXDzxXsUrqub*ag1k6o^)h5 z@O_+!0vajK=IvRJ?ll3w@%ZOiZ@1vyBxpS0OBnl7dKzVwDqTbK=VRqBUnV5Z? 6kZRc$uQ_haDU-@Z$*1{^fx^cr*uxGo7RM{q8-Is{s>G6!dx$@9N6hU{Ccd zn+!)z+U;$43*8imz)&BMP@8yxPJrBA=KKTT*H l8dqTL71EZ>!BP4fIfCnyr8QVR{-N;i~m07|yZ}+7ZSayWrgQnpYX;-`35z7#d-U zc(qF=?e{Yj`Kg2*M?Ti|Z|#{7`kz%y0b6IkGg}P>9SKa{QQW8m$f|n3HLFV*N_+sp z;hJ2uple=ZKe&;uj6f#C9Ve ;*O}`JM)Cp_|ZlNn09zO~I-f}r18>f3# zmvCFy2*lCGyT1%FbP!u#nO<9VU-r4#^{jtmchI^Vv{CC}l*CEI>`V5Iy7Jacime|E z@W8qrkp{uzXmdLPd>LA2_1)E_8Snn 6FdlXrb7xUBw@po-`D zeQ-;F53qcch2xC%RqVlWTSAVG$`swb{+C*YoyoxV9W}(jc6!3MHW3Xt-zv7kpwiFp zdXY%N%GLI^25$qA*m>IQdq9W$zpgVV8$_7Cjk-qb52vL`A^ =@r%G|!9z!cZ`XF+Ihx~TvGgkD*KUPESQc%6FgWNbYgPU%59NwhQXb~bFcVLAmc zT0S32aO%PTwZ~?-lSA&X^j6fcTJzC+lLwUhp3BA1`Ffnr^* XIa%7BmQw;p4zKNnj$)a0*#Cub=AwXvSZxxY$>@S!M Pn*$%jo`B 9|{Ox$hFqojg^2*A))Y(AtGukL~ zJ?Odf7_cCFHus7^b>X>c{!|6P;Y*YsAaqLX?LmVS6O%a8tj8ZvFypsnaC@c@Q{fa$ zS|;3pXAl=v{oC$ X>_#SeMQBzYA9Q>xe)@>fB#}L75bOqa|W01^k3%o|Iu~UQBg&2zb91&7OixM zGz{HHC`t|83|-35NOyyvGz_8=3PYpB&>bQn3PTA<3eqVp;N9czz3;v6TKD>gOBc+X zbN1e6$MZbj&vz0*bi!_u`AFc)ppBcr7>VxNJ}}OT|BbW%u_ojo?+7q9KU-CA5&*4A z{-5TjYmQ)Z;>C8++qYn5{?9@q1BIFy!E5ZR`zL0D9=i)Nwbcqk))J7vhGlF1i~9e> z ZN2(SkJE?Ew3tI~ z1yiK?24LrAnZ`}wSfit~z!g)$+uZL#+p<~ul&`(@fn$^e9=rmRq*=Ya9WO5%WI(;T zkfZ#YFmVA;cmX{QrF%*W#6Aaklmbh!1@p7d7AVNXD!&c~9DISAaufX9AkIW%vq+KD z5xfiC=TNw}JaT3@Aq3UG!w#)h0&cae^56wJK;(?Q2F3z`{ium@V?mSfI-Oe@2vAO! zF~%HI{FqP=TPU8H#Q{qk#D#9$%_5&-C<5L}7ubco^o_MysUkM)=5Ph!oWEuq!L~sl z=+&!|=sTdGE9_(%hgSz{fJWH-ee|spxEHb}g4E__8FC|5s$QKH zNy9 z34g0-1J;}13}+rm4|<3o8l2eVo4#O`sZ8L }n?NWeTj^ zsB&||=B0YaCP$1Ba1&BBU`>Y{0h_!h9?q_=Z7XRok?;Ggn)5XdFwVV7Z%LULG}=a~ zv?)L*C pn+7NWRwqp2~J$_}(~)@ K)+aiLOBZ@2_|t zRAMRu%&NgxC}F=MU~A9BNCq)*3u68D`r>$NZTOFBknFbhtYuD5TyAc 1%9@jLMDkXG2W%!%H%tSo4mSV -2166+?xAQ~gSFf$T^fs1u z2oyY93S?omSRGn(+-nYfTv-Tt=0EEg*@kvA9`Mv8UoM>8n2VE**X}@N8Y*4=gZ@a# z(J{5{bSEBzIOl&|QU_e}G4_&;$K}+ia5%gw-vMw}<+T~B8v&mv#knie4*1?33+EEf zfK9~8@A)SpyeZ*$k5E|C7@p>0jykk`MW)$DyrC>XD|E@g ix;nRA?Pgq9~iq>PUJ1ks>-}fBs~H z;(8XD7`;k>oj=d|o+$H@$Af$Lm&i?fTF@~fHb%+jcaPCw(Mv^x^WJlZD$ksz_t**J z-!EHRfv=ax!nglUf48)KjVNtssBSog`0N5)?DqPrXosKVS_8?fV1_rViPp{1lc7@q zI9W1aeEVDpeAEqmlzI+7{RuqM;nvArpWRz3(~}bRqwj58UGD`334WAT17*g|O ^ZOje$849Eyc6nqbaLIP alJ1(rqA(_)oWYK&(A>Ha8zSwx~3s^dgL{LXJWGWv9bo$8fgjXOoQiy}3^BTu5Oy zQi%O$n?&ne(N~;(g6On&fm@Sc=IAV4s#37Ak(#P?adw_=l}7bt?sukcP^!YVvr81a zAy^JE{!P*!VSlg4R**)7$}eew$sjv88@*rS1;D#fF^!T^ug|s~At9Vs*4?De>&tw_ zFe#=seV9QZ>UpjsaH_lH-3LNzaWS#W6tjfeiYkB-9i*i4Rsek5|Ht#eO0iCn=5nK^ z*#t#h|2R@zeCsF!w?z-ixN?7|_;>w~d(g+1_O<@JIxw)nBnTtS##CW-yUS 9ZJs92p zs5poqI>HCxEvD~@!0Cnvr(GR}?1Z%Xfa%M_r7Sy_Xc &b} zCb%NCyPKPVsIyPyb*%9kQqX;Slb%umQq}hw%p=cc3ii=8*n gKyY&l2g$63G*Ox_kB5_ILx z+!YAO2%9i82D;J)cqFDsZ{whBI(10<+}})KpD4Ci_yUSryQ`@HrAwOMaQEP}<~RUr z2xg3^ii6NFpA#D4bKem$l*X}|%S;A;=<5zY6zF&;njAEW0j$1g%2r3B={Ceb?Il1j z<_D9(%K{>SWuhE>BaW< V #X_c2Vj8;UoRdT5Ys9yN<=-aU=DR<*_v8EYc^l}I(UxF# z#dDy2ONh&AI3>Cf%bp2#eYsD$sL*JSr4e9ili+w3uApzrY9oq=J*jJRkq5wll`)L5 zB=R*nTJmdaYpZd^ekd2|bX!|h+fd%0o+cDaU_gMC-<*&5e7uscyP*5G!w7Zmg`T07 zUw{y`(pTupv#)CE-nTl0J-`Xp*iB3EGaI`TY2-;@r_{a%mnQ%k_PZGX?^@k{9rV%Z zboNxS=P%~8JvqgPBgT>VX`BzdB z@_X5n$5^Kj^)(!NHE_C5?Wb=Zc?}pfRZofT-Y)Uu+`Y$g-oMkZz dbVz&oxV@0RM}&=3}`rXw*g!5sVQv)$b2o4Z-I zcN7vpm|}xb@gCwff``&niKYx_gA_sz{5r0L{a!%sSD)kps;+eB^-ts6j3 i&djii{E=I1EBR^XB#i--3A)K5rREyu9=9yMfvR0>td~7S)T>a_&k^sm+ z>vQu_4rif%hA&6rNIy8o@#kHPUp71Puo-kS5ievB65lat@==3PBo=)5 myJbtH`OeHp` zqI-jM+1o>}jNolWL{xqQgInW+kKNy%THI8qN3H7&>@vaN366}FMlL~rJWO9DgB~)H z$M%qKOMyWah^Vct9u%RT*13YRWpT%i{(H&eR8okInjrywqE3hw98+5$7KPL)$h8K= z;y}R$Ag-s}EFNBaZKq`fs(=LzIg)z7J~^bKs|D{?E2Z?PxdH9E5D&W!Zi6V~9gkJ0 z!A!9wBaek61GA*v=lcN{;dw;L-K^!Q1-HaPls9R9DjJ;4;w#<}9~W`78Wq%oy5-q? z4u0h#E)NW*JBHXW5(Ucww&35AFeLDYiGh*TcAx3dNAcRh-37s&!`S+QOq_TK{9yz$ z*Yn=MbM8Skm=up8p4MbOhX$u@z>~Iw*LjI>P?+&=3n}Y+!BhF4-3Rx#6j +3>}2p}O0#N&eIczu=T#l55Ng-Oe0LeZh4>5mEQ`d$h< z5|Q>Zuj0G8wH_${|L=gl+h=3a%zeW7;M#?H`2h@=U;%Mw)WK_URKRa}wmDKIflnVh z=0JM?|9)vUHDTa1aF%|>pnL#I;Wp6d;PVOD9W<~%d$GR*kkSbmnwn9N4iqqEyUkpr z8Xktlc9VrQ!nB3__pJfgnEedsj+6g2+0)#BBC*A2DlNsp;~LsQ+~JoDlDp+rSG?_? z#HP`RF%tUOkkf(vV66Nk6{o!E?!ofVS7Qi{|GQ40U{)Jcd0evFLbmXMl2y2dwcssl zf`}tgag;j1uxPQL^+~ozq#MppmytILSa^QAtrwFAiCkwhC_sIA2NXNI-#3cI9u*R> ztC4kq)~1Ge{g2kZ@2EDf9)t=56wj;07`s-B>k;`ekh}h^wS)lJMCCH z$wBvPw}6Lum+?_&W$<% G=OiFKQArCSzV(PO(XtH}7DQ|CMoAwReL-l6$Q=z%0Z5oGaJ($87Z zuTni#Evk4p1TQ&2r{vTcsD_*OzaV(!J?6@r#?&Zk+j|QUE @{*eE7D4NV ydhmfK4W$DaL#2E$iq11!6U@m?LNkCpc`8x{az)x+HTJNpbV9;WV z?bz)0(>M~r7Cq{Wq$%V1^&LLIANRsZEHo@csoFy Ak0`-}ofC4qAqXby;3{h#$@xvcqaR%_y2S((9#0NQs-LpUGQr*4T{?vOERFr#R9F0D{z93}~2~jnh zXjBB&@j>gb91q-=tF8{?6%8qqlSR-g2Kn(fSsP hn}BQ zwzXZYq-!giIJxoY; (_8{e7uD0tnoCtFOVuxh51MOoUVL~ z0YC%xni&D_$qLi_=-EaTFuBy|ER_Yq@6dh{oo*1^J>!WkADM2NjfH@^S+G~Gk()#{ z-UoYb!LK(pfzt$jI&Wn^6)%V$ v7)DkxgWW zPLB#N>nXxOy<88Y`B&_b= B2+X!vuExPgR?)H=4AD$)IE&|Q zi=$t|@Z(GMifWCkYU>GOqYr~5-P7eXyrN&fl=&-OoJ)Nf 3-WcYQ!Z{-^T(RAtHVg~uUY2dFHOuGhZu%#my!VQ#V z_Uv@WC{YZ74M7@aK^<_AGftd!#Q>% j|Aljwv?el 2Bb(w?*$ zAmfZK_aLw$f~wsGB;M EKtu!UGGp}7aySKMBc>rC2;@QneAVC);??r% z63PPtqN1(sDP8c`BYbe=zVAN}QoSl4OY2Pk5OHYM?Kx+kDV`%T38>_eJ +GmsJz#G%D