holm/shorewall_code
1
0
Fork 0
forked from extern/shorewall_code
Code Pull Requests Activity

Documentation updates

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://shorewall.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/shorewall/trunk@1762 fbd18981-670d-0410-9b5c-8dc0c1a9a2bb
This commit is contained in:
teastep 2004-11-23 04:29:16 +00:00
parent 9a309a7115
commit bacb79fe52
2 changed files with 34 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
Shorewall-docs2/Documentation.xml
View File

@ -1224,6 +1224,29 @@ loc loc REJECT info</programlisting>
traffic within the zone is handled just like traffic between zones
is.</para>
<para>The idea is this:</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>A zone should be homogenous with respect to security
requirements.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Traffic within a zone should not require rules or
policies.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Shorewall will not restrict traffic within a zone.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
<para>UNLESS the user defines the zone badly so that intra-zone rules
are required. In that case, Shorewall will not try to guess what the
user's intentions are and will treat traffic within the affected zone(s)
just like any other traffic. </para>
<para>Any time that you have multiple interfaces associated with a
single zone, you should ask yourself if you really want traffic routed
between those interfaces. Cases where you might not want that behavior
@ -3969,4 +3992,4 @@ eth1 -</programlisting>
</revision>
</revhistory></para>
</appendix>
</article>
</article>

19
Shorewall-docs2/myfiles.xml
View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
</author>
</authorgroup>
<pubdate>2004-10-20</pubdate>
<pubdate>2004-11-22</pubdate>
<copyright>
<year>2001-2004</year>
@ -53,13 +53,14 @@
</caution>
<para>I have DSL service and have 5 static IP addresses
(206.124.146.176-180). My DSL <quote>modem</quote> (Westell 2200) is
connected to eth1 and has IP address 192.168.1.1 (factory default). The
modem is configured in <quote>bridge</quote> mode so PPPoE is not
involved. I have a local network connected to eth0 (subnet 192.168.1.0/24)
and a DMZ connected to eth2 (206.124.146.176/32). Note that I configure
the same IP address on both <filename class="devicefile">eth1</filename>
and <filename class="devicefile">eth2</filename>.</para>
(206.124.146.176-180). My DSL <quote>modem</quote> (Westell 2200 running
in Bridge mode) is connected to eth1 and has IP address 192.168.1.1
(factory default). The modem is configured in <quote>bridge</quote> mode
so PPPoE is not involved. I have a local network connected to eth0 (subnet
192.168.1.0/24) and a DMZ connected to eth2 (206.124.146.176/32). Note
that I configure the same IP address on both <filename
class="devicefile">eth1</filename> and <filename
class="devicefile">eth2</filename>.</para>
<para>In this configuration:</para>
@ -119,7 +120,7 @@
<para>The single system in the DMZ (address 206.124.146.177) runs postfix,
Courier IMAP (imaps and pop3), DNS, a Web server (Apache) and an FTP
server (Pure-ftpd) under Fedora Core 2. The system also runs fetchmail to
server (Pure-ftpd) under Fedora Core 3. The system also runs fetchmail to
fetch our email from our old and current ISPs. That server is managed
through Proxy ARP.</para>