Moving to the attic to make way for XML version.

git-svn-id: https://shorewall.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/shorewall/trunk@925 fbd18981-670d-0410-9b5c-8dc0c1a9a2bb
This commit is contained in:
pauls 2003-12-23 22:29:09 +00:00
parent b131a79b8b
commit ca82e62d2c

View File

@ -1,378 +0,0 @@
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<title>Upgrade Issues</title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0">
<meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<meta name="Microsoft Theme" content="none">
</head>
<body>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">Upgrade Issues<br>
</h1>
<p>For upgrade instructions see the <a href="Install.htm">Install/Upgrade
page</a>.<br>
</p>
<p>It is important that you read all of the sections on this page where
the version number mentioned in the section title is later than what
you are currently running.<br>
</p>
<p> In the descriptions that follows, the term <b><i>group </i></b>refers
to a particular network or subnetwork (which may be 0.0.0.0/0 or it may
be a host address) accessed through a particular interface.<br>
</p>
<p>Examples:<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; eth0:0.0.0.0/0<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; eth2:192.168.1.0/24<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; eth3:192.0.2.123<br>
</p>
<p> You can use the "shorewall check" command to see the groups
associated with each of your zones.<br>
</p>
<h3> </h3>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.4.8</h3>
<ul>
<li>The meaning of ROUTE_FILTER=Yes has changed. Previously this
setting was documented as causing route filtering to occur on all
network interfaces; this didn't work. Beginning with this release,
ROUTE_FILTER=Yes causes route filtering to occur on all interfaces
brought up while Shorewall is running. This means that it may be
appropriate to set ROUTE_FILTER=Yes <span
style="text-decoration: underline;">and</span> use the routefilter
option in <a href="Documentation.htm#Interfaces">/etc/shorewall/interfaces</a>
entries.<br>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.4.6</h3>
<ul>
<li> The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have been
removed from shorewall.conf. These capabilities are now automatically
detected by Shorewall.</li>
<li>An undocumented <i>feature</i> previously allowed entries in the
host file as follows:<br>
<br>
<i>zone</i> &nbsp; &nbsp;eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24<br>
<br>
This capability was never documented and has been removed in 1.4.6 to
allow entries of the following format:<br>
<br>
<i>zone</i> &nbsp; eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24<br>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.4.4</h3>
If you are upgrading from 1.4.3 and have set the LOGMARKER variable
in <a href="Documentation.htm#Conf">/etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf</a>,
then you must set the new LOGFORMAT variable appropriately and remove
your setting of LOGMARKER<br>
<br>
<h3>Version 1.4.4<br>
</h3>
If you have zone names that are 5 characters long, you may experience
problems starting Shorewall because the --log-prefix in a logging rule
is too long. Upgrade to Version 1.4.4a to fix this problem..<br>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.4.2</h3>
There are some cases where you may want to handle traffic from a
particular group to itself. While I personally think that such a setups
are ridiculous, there are two cases covered in this documentation where
it can occur:<br>
<ol>
<li><a href="FAQ.htm#faq2">In FAQ #2</a>.</li>
<li><a href="Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html">When running Squid as a
transparent proxy in your local zone.</a></li>
</ol>
If you have either of these cases, you will want to review the current
documentation and change your configuration accordingly.<br>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.4.1</h3>
<ul>
<li>Beginning with Version 1.4.1, traffic between groups in
the same zone is accepted by default. Previously, traffic from a zone
to itself was treated just like any other traffic; any matching rules
were applied followed by enforcement of the appropriate policy. With
1.4.1
and later versions, unless you have explicit rules for traffic from Z
to Z or you have an explicit Z to Z policy (where "Z" is some zone)
then
traffic between the groups in zone Z will be accepted. If you do have
one
or more explicit rules for Z to Z or if you have an explicit Z to Z
policy
then the behavior is as it was in prior versions.</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>If you have a Z Z ACCEPT policy for a zone to allow traffic
between two interfaces to the same zone, that policy can be removed
and traffic between the interfaces will traverse fewer rules than
previously.</li>
<li>If you have a Z Z DROP or Z Z REJECT policy or you have Z-&gt;Z
rules then your configuration should not require any change.</li>
<li>If you are currently relying on a implicit policy (one
that has "all" in either the SOURCE or DESTINATION column) to prevent
traffic between two interfaces to a zone Z and you have no rules for
Z-&gt;Z then you should add an explicit DROP or REJECT policy for Z to
Z.<br>
</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<ul>
<li> Sometimes, you want two separate zones on one interface but you
don't want Shorewall to set up any infrastructure to handle traffic
between them. </li>
</ul>
<blockquote>Example:<br>
<blockquote>
<pre>/etc/shorewall/zones<br><br>z1 Zone1 The first Zone<br>z2 Zone2 The secont Zone<br><br>/etc/shorewall/interfaces<br><br>z2 eth1 192.168.1.255<br><br>/etc/shorewall/hosts<br><br>z1 eth1:192.168.1.3<br></pre>
</blockquote>
Here, zone z1 is nested in zone z2 and the firewall is not going to be
involved in any traffic between these two zones. Beginning with
Shorewall 1.4.1, you can prevent Shorewall from setting up any
infrastructure
to handle traffic between z1 and z2 by using the new NONE policy:<br>
<blockquote>
<pre>/etc/shorewall/policy<br><pre>z1 z2 NONE<br>z2 z1 NONE</pre></pre>
</blockquote>
Note that NONE policies are generally used in pairs unless there is
asymetric routing where only the traffic on one direction flows through
the firewall and you are using a NONE polciy in the other
direction.&nbsp;</blockquote>
<h3>Version 1.4.1<br>
</h3>
<ul>
<li>In Version 1.4.1, Shorewall will never create rules to deal with
traffic from a given group back to itself. The <i>multi</i> interface
option is no longer available so if you want to route traffic between
two subnetworks on the same interface then I recommend that you upgrade
to Version 1.4.2 and use the 'routeback' interface or host option.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.4.0</h3>
<b>IMPORTANT: Shorewall &gt;=1.4.0 </b><b>requires</b> <b>the iproute
package ('ip' utility).</b><br>
<br>
<b>Note: </b>Unfortunately, some distributions call this package
iproute2 which will cause the upgrade of Shorewall to fail with the
diagnostic:<br>
<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;error: failed dependencies:iproute is needed by
shorewall-1.4.0-1 <br>
<br>
This may be worked around by using the --nodeps option of rpm (rpm -Uvh
--nodeps &lt;shorewall rpm&gt;).<br>
<br>
If you are upgrading from a version &lt; 1.4.0, then:<br>
<ul>
<li>The <b>noping </b>and <b>forwardping</b> interface options are
no longer supported nor is the <b>FORWARDPING </b>option in
shorewall.conf. ICMP echo-request (ping) packets are treated just like
any other connection request and are subject to rules and policies.</li>
<li>Interface names of the form &lt;device&gt;:&lt;integer&gt; in
/etc/shorewall/interfaces now generate a Shorewall error at startup
(they always have produced warnings in iptables).</li>
<li>The MERGE_HOSTS variable has been removed from shorewall.conf.
Shorewall 1.4 behaves like 1.3 did when MERGE_HOSTS=Yes; that is zone
contents are determined by BOTH the interfaces and hosts files when
there are entries for the zone in both files.</li>
<li>The <b>routestopped</b> option in the interfaces
and hosts file has been eliminated; use entries in the routestopped
file instead.</li>
<li>The Shorewall 1.2 syntax for DNAT and REDIRECT rules is no longer
accepted; you must convert to using the new syntax.</li>
<li value="6">The ALLOWRELATED variable in shorewall.conf is no
longer supported. Shorewall 1.4 behavior is the same as 1.3 with
ALLOWRELATED=Yes.</li>
<li value="6">Late-arriving DNS replies are now dropped by default;
there is no need for your own /etc/shorewall/common file simply to
avoid logging these packets.</li>
<li value="6">The 'firewall', 'functions' and 'version' file have
been moved to /usr/share/shorewall.</li>
<li value="6">The icmp.def file has been removed. If you include it
from /etc/shorewall/icmpdef, you will need to modify that file.</li>
<ul>
</ul>
<li>If you followed the advice in FAQ #2 and call
find_interface_address in /etc/shorewall/params, that code should be
moved to /etc/shorewall/init.<br>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
</ul>
<h3>Version 1.4.0</h3>
<ul>
<li value="8">The 'multi' interface option is no longer supported.
&nbsp;Shorewall will generate rules for sending packets back out the
same interface that they arrived on in two cases:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>There is an <u>explicit</u> policy for the source zone to or
from the destination zone. An explicit policy names both zones and does
not use the 'all' reserved word.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>There are one or more rules for traffic for the source zone to
or from the destination zone including rules that use the 'all'
reserved word. Exception: if the source zone and destination zone are
the same then the rule must be explicit - it must name the zone in both
the SOURCE and DESTINATION columns.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.3.14</h3>
<img src="images/BD21298_3.gif" alt="" width="13" height="13">
&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; Beginning in version 1.3.14, Shorewall treats
entries in <a href="Documentation.htm#Masq">/etc/shorewall/masq </a>differently.
The change involves entries with an <b>interface name</b> in the <b>SUBNET</b>
(second) <b>column</b>:<br>
<ul>
<li>Prior to 1.3.14, Shorewall would detect the FIRST subnet on the
interface (as shown by "ip addr show <i>interface</i>") and would
masquerade traffic from that subnet. Any other subnets that routed
through eth1 needed their own entry in /etc/shorewall/masq to be
masqueraded or to have SNAT applied.</li>
<li>Beginning with Shorewall 1.3.14, Shorewall uses the firewall's
routing table to determine ALL subnets routed through the named
interface. Traffic originating in ANY of those subnets is
masqueraded or has SNAT applied.</li>
</ul>
You will need to make a change to your configuration
if:<br>
<ol>
<li>You have one or more entries in /etc/shorewall/masq with an
interface name in the SUBNET (second) column; and</li>
<li>That interface connects to more than one subnetwork.</li>
</ol>
Two examples:<br>
<br>
&nbsp;<b>Example 1</b> -- Suppose that your current config is as
follows:<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp; <br>
<pre> [root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq<br> #INTERFACE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; SUBNET&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ADDRESS<br> eth0&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; eth2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 206.124.146.176<br> eth0&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 192.168.10.0/24&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 206.124.146.176<br> #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE<br> [root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2<br> 192.168.1.0/24&nbsp; scope link<br> 192.168.10.0/24&nbsp; proto kernel&nbsp; scope link&nbsp; src 192.168.10.254<br> [root@gateway test]#</pre>
<blockquote>In this case, the second entry in /etc/shorewall/masq is no
longer required.<br>
</blockquote>
<b>Example 2</b>-- What if your current configuration is like this?<br>
<pre> [root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq <br> #INTERFACE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; SUBNET&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ADDRESS <br> eth0&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; eth2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 206.124.146.176<br> #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE <br> [root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2 <br> 192.168.1.0/24&nbsp; scope link<br> 192.168.10.0/24&nbsp; proto kernel&nbsp; scope link&nbsp; src 192.168.10.254 <br> [root@gateway test]#</pre>
<blockquote>In this case, you would want to change the entry in
/etc/shorewall/masq to:<br>
</blockquote>
<pre> #INTERFACE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; SUBNET&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ADDRESS <br> eth0&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 192.168.1.0/24&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 206.124.146.176<br> #LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE</pre>
<img src="images/BD21298_3.gif" alt="" width="13" height="13">
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Version 1.3.14 also introduced simplified ICMP
echo-request (ping) handling. The option OLD_PING_HANDLING=Yes in
/etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf is used to specify that the old
(pre-1.3.14) ping handling is to be used (If the option is not set in
your /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf then OLD_PING_HANDLING=Yes is
assumed). I don't plan on supporting the old handling indefinitely so I
urge current users to migrate to using the new handling as soon as
possible. See the <a href="ping.html">'Ping' handling documentation</a>
for details.<br>
<h3>Version 1.3.10</h3>
If you have installed the 1.3.10 Beta 1 RPM and are
now upgrading to version 1.3.10, you will need to use the '--force'
option:<br>
<br>
<blockquote>
<pre>rpm -Uvh --force shorewall-1.3.10-1.noarch.rpm&nbsp;</pre>
</blockquote>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.3.9</h3>
The 'functions' file has moved to /usr/lib/shorewall/functions. If you
have an application that uses functions from that file, your
application will need to be changed to reflect this change of location.<br>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.3.8</h3>
<p>If you have a pair of firewall systems configured for failover or if
you have asymmetric routing, you will need to modify your firewall
setup slightly under Shorewall versions &gt;= 1.3.8. Beginning with
version 1.3.8, you must set NEWNOTSYN=Yes in your
/etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf file.</p>
<h3>Version &gt;= 1.3.7</h3>
<p>Users specifying ALLOWRELATED=No in /etc/shorewall.conf will need to
include the following rules in their /etc/shorewall/icmpdef file
(creating this file if necessary):</p>
<pre> run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type echo-reply -j ACCEPT<br> run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type source-quench -j ACCEPT<br> run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type destination-unreachable -j ACCEPT<br> run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type time-exceeded -j ACCEPT<br> run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type parameter-problem -j ACCEPT</pre>
<p>Users having an /etc/shorewall/icmpdef file may remove the ".
/etc/shorewall/icmp.def" command from that file since the icmp.def file
is now empty.</p>
<h3><b><a name="Bering">Upgrading </a>Bering to Shorewall &gt;= 1.3.3</b></h3>
<p>To properly upgrade with Shorewall version 1.3.3 and later:</p>
<ol>
<li>Be sure you have a backup -- you will need to transcribe any
Shorewall configuration changes that you have made to the new
configuration.</li>
<li>Replace the shorwall.lrp package provided on the Bering floppy
with the later one. If you did not obtain the later version from
Jacques's site, see additional instructions below.</li>
<li>Edit the /var/lib/lrpkg/root.exclude.list file and remove the
/var/lib/shorewall entry if present. Then do not forget to backup
root.lrp !</li>
</ol>
<p>The .lrp that I release isn't set up for a two-interface firewall
like Jacques's. You need to follow the <a href="two-interface.htm">instructions
for setting up a two-interface firewall</a> plus you also need to add
the following two Bering-specific rules to /etc/shorewall/rules:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre># Bering specific rules:<br># allow loc to fw udp/53 for dnscache to work<br># allow loc to fw tcp/80 for weblet to work<br>#<br>ACCEPT loc fw udp 53<br>ACCEPT loc fw tcp 80</pre>
</blockquote>
<h3 align="left">Version 1.3.6 and 1.3.7</h3>
<p align="left">If you have a pair of firewall systems configured for
failover or if you have asymmetric routing, you will need to modify
your firewall setup slightly under Shorewall versions
1.3.6 and 1.3.7</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p align="left">Create the file /etc/shorewall/newnotsyn and in it
add the following rule<br>
<br>
<font face="Courier">run_iptables -A
newnotsyn -j RETURN # So that the connection tracking
table can be rebuilt<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
# from non-SYN packets after takeover.<br>
&nbsp;</font> </p>
</li>
<li>
<p align="left">Create /etc/shorewall/common (if you don't already
have that file) and include the following:<br>
<br>
<font face="Courier">run_iptables -A
common -p tcp --tcp-flags ACK,FIN,RST ACK -j ACCEPT
#Accept Acks to rebuild connection<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
#tracking table. <br>
. /etc/shorewall/common.def</font> </p>
</li>
</ol>
<h3 align="left">Versions &gt;= 1.3.5</h3>
<p align="left">Some forms of pre-1.3.0 rules file syntax are no longer
supported. </p>
<p align="left">Example 1:</p>
<div align="left">
<pre> ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.12:22 tcp 11111 - all</pre>
</div>
<p align="left">Must be replaced with:</p>
<div align="left">
<pre> DNAT net loc:192.168.1.12:22 tcp 11111</pre>
</div>
<div align="left">
<p align="left">Example 2:</p>
</div>
<div align="left">
<pre> ACCEPT loc fw::3128 tcp 80 - all</pre>
</div>
<div align="left">
<p align="left">Must be replaced with:</p>
</div>
<div align="left">
<pre> REDIRECT loc 3128 tcp 80</pre>
</div>
<h3 align="left">Version &gt;= 1.3.2</h3>
<p align="left">The functions and versions files together with the
'firewall' symbolic link have moved from /etc/shorewall to
/var/lib/shorewall. If you have applications that access these files,
those applications should be modified accordingly.</p>
<p><font size="2"> Last updated 10/30/2003 - <a href="support.htm">Tom
Eastep</a></font> </p>
<p><font face="Trebuchet MS"><a href="copyright.htm"><font size="2">Copyright</font>
© <font size="2">2001, 2002, 2003 Thomas M. Eastep</font></a></font><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>