VPN
Tom
Eastep
2005-03-08
2002
2004
2005
Thomas M. Eastep
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version
1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with
no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover, and with no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
GNU Free Documentation
License
.
Virtual Private Networking (VPN)
It is often the case that a system behind the firewall needs to be
able to access a remote network through Virtual Private Networking (VPN).
The two most common means for doing this are IPSEC and PPTP. The basic
setup is shown in the following diagram:
A system with an RFC 1918 address needs to access a remote network
through a remote gateway. For this example, we will assume that the local
system has IP address 192.168.1.12 and that the remote gateway has IP
address 192.0.2.224.
If PPTP is being used, there are no firewall requirements beyond the
default loc->net ACCEPT policy. There is one restriction however: Only
one local system at a time can be connected to a single remote gateway
unless you patch your kernel from the Patch-o-matic
patches
available at http://www.netfilter.org.
If IPSEC is being used, you should configure IPSEC to use
NAT Traversal -- Under NAT traversal the IPSEC
packets (protocol 50 or 51) are encapsulated in UDP packets with
destination port 4500. Additionally, keep-alive
messages are sent frequently so that NATing gateways between
the end-points will retain their connection-tracking entries. This is the
way that I connect to the HP Intranet and it works flawlessly without
anything in Shorewall other than my ACCEPT loc->net policy. NAT
traversal is available as a patch for Windows 2K and is a standard feature
of Windows XP -- simply select "L2TP IPSec VPN" from the "Type of VPN"
pulldown.
Alternatively, if IPSEC is being used then you can try the
following: only one system may connect to the remote gateway and there are
firewall configuration requirements as follows:
/etc/shorewall/rules
ACTION
SOURCE
DESTINATION
PROTOCOL
PORT
CLIENT PORT
ORIGINAL DEST
DNAT
net:192.0.2.224
loc:192.168.1.12
50
DNAT
net:192.0.2.224
loc:192.168.1.12
udp
500
The above may or may not work — your milage may vary. NAT Traversal
is definitely a better solution.
If you want to be able to give access to all of your local systems
to the remote network, you should consider running a VPN client on your
firewall. As starting points, see http://www.shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Tunnels
or http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm.