shorewall_code/Shorewall-docs2/upgrade_issues.xml
2004-02-15 17:29:58 +00:00

636 lines
29 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd">
<!-- $Id$ -->
<article id="upgrade_issues">
<articleinfo>
<title>Upgrade Issues</title>
<author>
<firstname>Tom</firstname>
<surname>Eastep</surname>
</author>
<pubdate><?dbtimestamp format="Y/m/d"?></pubdate>
<copyright>
<year>2002</year>
<year>2003</year>
<year>2004</year>
<holder>Thomas M. Eastep</holder>
</copyright>
<legalnotice>
<para>Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version
1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with
no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover, and with no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
<quote><ulink type="" url="copyright.htm">GNU Free Documentation License</ulink></quote>.</para>
</legalnotice>
</articleinfo>
<section>
<title>Important</title>
<para>It is important that you read all of the sections on this page where
the version number mentioned in the section title is later than what you
are currently running.</para>
<para>In the descriptions that follows, the term <emphasis>group</emphasis>
refers to a particular network or subnetwork (which may be
<literal>0.0.0.0/0</literal> or it may be a host address) accessed through
a particular interface.</para>
<para>Examples:</para>
<simplelist columns="1" type="vert">
<member><literal>eth0:0.0.0.0/0</literal></member>
<member><literal>eth2:192.168.1.0/24</literal></member>
<member><literal>eth3:192.0.2.123</literal></member>
</simplelist>
<para>You can use the <command moreinfo="none">shorewall check</command>
command to see the groups associated with each of your zones.</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>VERSION &#62;= 2.0.0-Beta1</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>The &#39;dropunclean&#39; and &#39;logunclean&#39; interface
options are no longer supported. If either option is specified in
<filename>/etc/shorewall/interfaces</filename>, a threatening message
will be generated.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The NAT_BEFORE_RULES option has been removed from
<filename>shorewall.conf</filename>. The behavior of Shorewall 2.0 is
as if NAT_BEFORE_RULES=No had been specified. In other words, DNAT
rules now always take precidence over one-to-one NAT specifications.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The default value for the ALL INTERFACES column in
<filename>/etc/shorewall/nat</filename> has changed. In Shorewall 1.*,
if the column was left empty, a value of &#34;Yes&#34; was assumed.
This has been changed so that a value of &#34;No&#34; is now assumed.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The following files don&#39;t exist in Shorewall 2.0:</para>
<simplelist>
<member><filename>/etc/shorewall/common.def</filename></member>
<member><filename>/etc/shorewall/common</filename></member>
<member><filename>/etc/shorewall/icmpdef</filename></member>
<member><filename>/etc/shorewall/action.template</filename> (moved
to <filename>/usr/share/shorewall/action.template</filename>)</member>
</simplelist>
<para>The <filename>/etc/shorewall/action</filename> file now allows
an action to be designated as the &#34;common&#34; action for a
particular policy type by following the action name with &#34;:&#34;
and the policy (DROP, REJECT or ACCEPT).</para>
<para>The file /usr/share/shorewall/actions.std has been added to
define those actions that are released as part of Shorewall 2.0 In
that file are two actions as follows:</para>
<simplelist>
<member>Drop:DROP</member>
<member>Reject:REJECT</member>
</simplelist>
<para>The <quote>Drop</quote> action is the common action for DROP
policies while the <quote>Reject</quote> action is the default action
for REJECT policies. These actions will be performed on packets prior
to applying the DROP or REJECT policy respectively. In the first
release, the difference between &#34;Reject&#34; and &#34;Drop&#34; is
that &#34;Reject&#34; REJECTs SMB traffic while &#34;Drop&#34;
silently drops such traffic.</para>
<para>As described above, Shorewall allows a common action for ACCEPT
policies but does not specify such an action in the default
configuration.</para>
<para>For more information see the <ulink
url="User_defined_Actions.html">User-defined Action Page</ulink>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The <filename>/etc/shorewall</filename> directory no longer
contains <filename>users</filename> file or a <filename>usersets</filename>
file. Similar functionality is now available using user-defined
actions.</para>
<para>Now, action files created by copying <filename>/usr/share/shorewall/action.template</filename>
may now specify a USER and or GROUP name/id in the final column just
like in the rules file (see below). It is thus possible to create
actions that control traffic from a list of users and/or groups.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The last column in <filename>/etc/shorewall/rules</filename> is
now labeled USER/GROUP and may contain:</para>
<simplelist>
<member>[!]&#60;<emphasis>user number</emphasis>&#62;[:]</member>
<member>[!]&#60;<emphasis>user name</emphasis>&#62;[:]</member>
<member>[!]:&#60;<emphasis>group number</emphasis>&#62;</member>
<member>[!]:&#60;<emphasis>group name</emphasis>&#62;</member>
<member>[!]&#60;<emphasis>user number</emphasis>&#62;:&#60;<emphasis>group
number</emphasis>&#62;</member>
<member>[!]&#60;<emphasis>user name</emphasis>&#62;:&#60;<emphasis>group
number</emphasis>&#62;</member>
<member>[!]&#60;<emphasis>user inumber</emphasis>&#62;:&#60;<emphasis>group
name</emphasis>&#62;</member>
<member>[!]&#60;<emphasis>user name</emphasis>&#62;:&#60;<emphasis>group
name</emphasis>&#62;</member>
</simplelist>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.4.8</title>
<itemizedlist mark="bullet">
<listitem>
<para>The meaning of <varname>ROUTE_FILTER=Yes</varname> has changed.
Previously this setting was documented as causing route filtering to
occur on all network interfaces; this didn&#39;t work. Beginning with
this release, <varname>ROUTE_FILTER=Yes</varname> causes route
filtering to occur on all interfaces brought up while Shorewall is
running. This means that it may be appropriate to set
<varname>ROUTE_FILTER=Yes</varname> and use the routefilter option in
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>interfaces</filename>
entries.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.4.6</title>
<itemizedlist mark="bullet">
<listitem>
<para>The <varname>NAT_ENABLED</varname>, <varname>MANGLE_ENABLED</varname>
and <varname>MULTIPORT</varname> options have been removed from
<filename>shorewall.conf</filename>. These capabilities are now
automatically detected by Shorewall.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>An undocumented feature previously allowed entries in the host
file as follows: <synopsis>
zone eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
</synopsis> This capability was never documented and has been removed in
1.4.6 to allow entries of the following format: <synopsis>
zone eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
</synopsis></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.4.4</title>
<para>If you are upgrading from 1.4.3 and have set the <varname>LOGMARKER</varname>
variable in <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>shorewall.conf</filename>,
then you must set the new <varname>LOGFORMAT</varname> variable
appropriately and remove your setting of <varname>LOGMARKER</varname>.</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version 1.4.4</title>
<para>If you have zone names that are 5 characters long, you may
experience problems starting Shorewall because the <option>--log-prefix</option>
in a logging rule is too long. Upgrade to Version 1.4.4a to fix this
problem.</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.4.2</title>
<para>There are some cases where you may want to handle traffic from a
particular group to itself. While I personally think that such a setups
are ridiculous, there are two cases covered in this documentation where it
can occur: <itemizedlist><listitem><para><ulink url="FAQ.htm#faq2">In FAQ
#2</ulink></para></listitem><listitem><para><ulink
url="Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html">When running <application>Squid</application>
as a transparent proxy in your local zone.</ulink></para></listitem></itemizedlist>
If you have either of these cases, you will want to review the current
documentation and change your configuration accordingly.</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.4.1</title>
<itemizedlist mark="bullet">
<listitem>
<para>Beginning with Version 1.4.1, traffic between groups in the same
zone is accepted by default. Previously, traffic from a zone to itself
was treated just like any other traffic; any matching rules were
applied followed by enforcement of the appropriate policy. With 1.4.1
and later versions, unless you have explicit rules for traffic from Z
to Z or you have an explicit Z to Z policy (where &#34;Z&#34; is some
zone) then traffic between the groups in zone Z will be accepted. If
you do have one or more explicit rules for Z to Z or if you have an
explicit Z to Z policy then the behavior is as it was in prior
versions.</para>
<orderedlist numeration="arabic">
<listitem>
<para>If you have a Z Z ACCEPT policy for a zone to allow traffic
between two interfaces to the same zone, that policy can be
removed and traffic between the interfaces will traverse fewer
rules than previously.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>If you have a Z Z DROP or Z Z REJECT policy or you have
Z-&#62;Z rules then your configuration should not require any
change.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>If you are currently relying on a implicit policy (one that
has &#34;all&#34; in either the SOURCE or DESTINATION column) to
prevent traffic between two interfaces to a zone Z and you have no
rules for Z-&#62;Z then you should add an explicit DROP or REJECT
policy for Z to Z.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Sometimes, you want two separate zones on one interface but you
don&#39;t want Shorewall to set up any infrastructure to handle
traffic between them. <example><title>The <filename>zones</filename>,
<filename>interfaces</filename> and, <filename>hosts</filename> file
contents</title><programlisting>
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>zones</filename>
z1 Zone1 The first Zone
z2 Zone2 The second Zone
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>interfaces</filename>
z2 eth1 192.168.1.255
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>hosts</filename>
z1 eth1:192.168.1.3
</programlisting></example> Here, zone z1 is nested in zone z2 and the
firewall is not going to be involved in any traffic between these two
zones. Beginning with Shorewall 1.4.1, you can prevent Shorewall from
setting up any infrastructure to handle traffic between z1 and z2 by
using the new NONE policy: <example><title>The contents of
<filename>policy</filename></title><programlisting>
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>policy</filename>
z1 z2 NONE
z2 z1 NONE
</programlisting></example> Note that NONE policies are generally used in
pairs unless there is asymetric routing where only the traffic on one
direction flows through the firewall and you are using a NONE polciy
in the other direction.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version 1.4.1</title>
<itemizedlist mark="bullet">
<listitem>
<para>In Version 1.4.1, Shorewall will never create rules to deal with
traffic from a given group back to itself. The <varname>multi</varname>
interface option is no longer available so if you want to route
traffic between two subnetworks on the same interface then I recommend
that you upgrade to Version 1.4.2 and use the <varname>routeback</varname>
interface or host option.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.4.0</title>
<important>
<para>Shorewall &#62;=1.4.0 requires the <command>iproute</command>
package (&#39;<literal>ip</literal>&#39; utility).</para>
</important>
<note>
<para>Unfortunately, some distributions call this package
<command>iproute2</command> which will cause the upgrade of Shorewall to
fail with the diagnostic: <synopsis>
error: failed dependencies:iproute is needed by shorewall-1.4.0-1
</synopsis> This may be worked around by using the <option>--nodeps</option>
option of <command>rpm</command> (<command>rpm -Uvh --nodeps
<filename>your_shorewall_rpm.rpm</filename></command>).</para>
</note>
<para>If you are upgrading from a version &#60; 1.4.0, then: <itemizedlist
mark="bullet"><listitem><para>The <varname>noping</varname> and
<varname>forwardping</varname> interface options are no longer supported
nor is the <varname>FORWARDPING</varname> option in <filename>shorewall.conf</filename>.
ICMP echo-request (ping) packets are treated just like any other
connection request and are subject to rules and policies.</para></listitem><listitem><para>Interface
names of the form <varname>&#60;device&#62;:&#60;integer&#62;</varname> in
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>interfaces</filename>
now generate a Shorewall error at startup (they always have produced
warnings in <application class="software">iptables</application>).</para></listitem><listitem><para>The
<varname>MERGE_HOSTS</varname> variable has been removed from
<filename>shorewall.conf</filename>. Shorewall 1.4 behaves like 1.3 did
when <varname>MERGE_HOSTS=Yes</varname>; that is zone contents are
determined by <emphasis>BOTH</emphasis> the interfaces and hosts files
when there are entries for the zone in both files.</para></listitem><listitem><para>The
<varname>routestopped</varname> option in the interfaces and hosts file
has been eliminated; use entries in the <filename>routestopped</filename>
file instead.</para></listitem><listitem><para>The Shorewall 1.2 syntax
for <varname>DNAT</varname> and <varname>REDIRECT</varname> rules is no
longer accepted; you must convert to using the new syntax.</para></listitem><listitem><para>The
<varname>ALLOWRELATED</varname> variable in <filename>shorewall.conf</filename>
is no longer supported. Shorewall 1.4 behavior is the same as 1.3 with
<varname>ALLOWRELATED=Yes</varname>.</para></listitem><listitem><para>Late-arriving
DNS replies are now dropped by default; there is no need for your own
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>common</filename>
file simply to avoid logging these packets.</para></listitem><listitem><para>The
<filename>firewall</filename>, <filename>functions</filename> and
<filename>version</filename> files have been moved to <filename
class="directory">/usr/share/shorewall</filename>.</para></listitem><listitem><para>The
<filename>icmp.def</filename> file has been removed. If you include it
from <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>icmpdef</filename>,
you will need to modify that file.</para></listitem><listitem><para>If you
followed the advice in FAQ #2 and call <varname>find_interface_address</varname>
in <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>params</filename>,
that code should be moved to <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>init</filename>.</para></listitem></itemizedlist></para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version 1.4.0</title>
<itemizedlist mark="bullet">
<listitem>
<para>The <varname>multi</varname> interface option is no longer
supported. Shorewall will generate rules for sending packets back out
the same interface that they arrived on in two cases: <itemizedlist
mark="hollow"><listitem><para>There is an <emphasis>explicit</emphasis>
policy for the source zone to or from the destination zone. An
explicit policy names both zones and does not use the
<varname>all</varname> reserved word.</para></listitem><listitem><para>There
are one or more rules for traffic for the source zone to or from the
destination zone including rules that use the <varname>all</varname>
reserved word. Exception: if the source zone and destination zone are
the same then the rule must be explicit - it must name the zone in
both the <varname>SOURCE</varname> and <varname>DESTINATION</varname>
columns.</para></listitem></itemizedlist></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.3.14</title>
<para>Beginning in version 1.3.14, Shorewall treats entries in <filename
class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>masq</filename>
differently. The change involves entries with an <emphasis role="bold">interface
name</emphasis> in the <varname>SUBNET</varname> (second) <emphasis
role="bold">column</emphasis>: <itemizedlist mark="bullet"><listitem><para>Prior
to 1.3.14, Shorewall would detect the FIRST subnet on the interface (as
shown by <quote>ip addr show interface</quote>) and would masquerade
traffic from that subnet. Any other subnets that routed through
<literal>eth1</literal> needed their own entry in <filename
class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>masq</filename> to
be masqueraded or to have <acronym>SNAT</acronym> applied.</para></listitem><listitem><para>Beginning
with Shorewall 1.3.14, Shorewall uses the firewall&#39;s routing table to
determine ALL subnets routed through the named interface. Traffic
originating in ANY of those subnets is masqueraded or has SNAT applied.</para></listitem></itemizedlist>
You will need to make a change to your configuration if: <orderedlist
numeration="arabic"><listitem><para>You have one or more entries in
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>masq</filename>
with an interface name in the <varname>SUBNET</varname> (second) column;
and</para></listitem><listitem><para>That interface connects to more than
one subnetwork.</para></listitem></orderedlist> Two examples: <example
label="1"><title>Suppose that your current config is as follows:</title><programlisting>
<!-- I added a space below the end of the config file for clarity -->
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
eth0 192.168.10.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
</programlisting></example> In this case, the second entry in <filename
class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>masq</filename> is
no longer required. <example label="2"><title>What if your current
configuration is like this?</title><programlisting>
[root@gateway test]# cat /etc/shorewall/masq
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 eth2 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
[root@gateway test]# ip route show dev eth2
192.168.1.0/24 scope link
192.168.10.0/24 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.254
[root@gateway test]#
</programlisting></example> In this case, you would want to change the
entry in /etc/shorewall/masq to: <programlisting>
#INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS
eth0 192.168.1.0/24 206.124.146.176
#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE
</programlisting> Version 1.3.14 also introduced simplified ICMP
echo-request (ping) handling. The option <varname>OLD_PING_HANDLING=Yes</varname>
in <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>shorewall.conf</filename>
is used to specify that the old (pre-1.3.14) ping handling is to be used
(If the option is not set in your <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename>shorewall.conf
then <varname>OLD_PING_HANDLING=Yes</varname> is assumed). I don&#39;t
plan on supporting the old handling indefinitely so I urge current users
to migrate to using the new handling as soon as possible. See the
&#39;Ping&#39; handling documentation for details.</para>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version 1.3.10</title>
<itemizedlist mark="bullet">
<listitem>
<para>If you have installed the 1.3.10 Beta 1 RPM and are now
upgrading to version 1.3.10, you will need to use the
<option>--force</option> option: <programlisting>
rpm -Uvh --force shorewall-1.3.10-1.noarch.rpm
</programlisting></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.3.9</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>The <filename>functions</filename> file has moved to <filename
class="directory">/usr/lib/shorewall/</filename><filename>functions</filename>.
If you have an application that uses functions from that file, your
application will need to be changed to reflect this change of
location.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.3.8</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>If you have a pair of firewall systems configured for failover
or if you have asymmetric routing, you will need to modify your
firewall setup slightly under Shorewall versions &#62;= 1.3.8.
Beginning with version 1.3.8, you must set <varname>NEWNOTSYN=Yes</varname>
in your <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>shorewall.conf</filename>
file.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.3.7</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Users specifying <varname>ALLOWRELATED=No</varname> in <filename
class="directory">/etc/</filename><filename>shorewall.conf</filename>
will need to include the following rules in their <filename
class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>icmpdef</filename>
file (creating this file if necessary):
<programlisting>
run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type echo-reply -j ACCEPT
run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type source-quench -j ACCEPT
run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type destination-unreachable -j ACCEPT
run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type time-exceeded -j ACCEPT
run_iptables -A icmpdef -p ICMP --icmp-type parameter-problem -j ACCEPT
</programlisting> Users having an <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>icmpdef</filename>
file may remove the <command>./etc/shorewall/icmp.def</command>
command from that file since the <filename>icmp.def</filename> file is
now empty.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Upgrading Bering to Shorewall &#62;= 1.3.3</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>To properly upgrade with Shorewall version 1.3.3 and later:
<orderedlist numeration="arabic"><listitem><para>Be sure you have a
backup -- you will need to transcribe any Shorewall configuration
changes that you have made to the new configuration.</para></listitem><listitem><para>Replace
the <filename>shorwall.lrp</filename> package provided on the Bering
floppy with the later one. If you did not obtain the later version
from Jacques&#39;s site, see additional instructions below.</para></listitem><listitem><para>Edit
the <filename class="directory">/var/lib/lrpkg/</filename><filename>root.exclude.list</filename>
file and remove the <filename>/var/lib/shorewall</filename> entry if
present. Then do not forget to backup <filename>root.lrp</filename>!</para></listitem></orderedlist>
The .lrp that I release isn&#39;t set up for a two-interface firewall
like Jacques&#39;s. You need to follow the instructions for setting up
a two-interface firewall plus you also need to add the following two
Bering-specific rules to <filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>rules</filename>:
<programlisting>
# Bering specific rules:
# allow loc to fw udp/53 for dnscache to work
# allow loc to fw tcp/80 for weblet to work
#
ACCEPT loc fw udp 53
ACCEPT loc fw tcp 80
</programlisting></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version 1.3.6 and 1.3.7</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>If you have a pair of firewall systems configured for failover
or if you have asymmetric routing, you will need to modify your
firewall setup slightly under Shorewall versions 1.3.6 and 1.3.7
<orderedlist><listitem><para>Create the file <filename
class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>newnotsyn</filename>
and in it add the following rule: <!-- The following code wraps off of the document. I have added the comment above the command. -->
<programlisting>
# So that the connection tracking table can be rebuilt
# from non-SYN packets after takeover.
run_iptables -A newnotsyn -j RETURN
</programlisting></para></listitem><listitem><para>Create <filename
class="directory">/etc/shorewall/</filename><filename>common</filename>
(if you don&#39;t already have that file) and include the following:
<programlisting>
#Accept Acks to rebuild connection tracking table.
run_iptables -A common -p tcp --tcp-flags ACK,FIN,RST ACK -j ACCEPT
./etc/shorewall/common.def
</programlisting></para></listitem></orderedlist></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Versions &#62;= 1.3.5</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Some forms of pre-1.3.0 rules file syntax are no longer
supported. <example label="1"><title></title><programlisting>
ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.12:22 tcp 11111 - all
</programlisting></example> Must be replaced with:
<programlisting>
DNAT net loc:192.168.1.12:22 tcp 11111
</programlisting> <example label="2"><title></title><programlisting>
ACCEPT loc fw::3128 tcp 80 - all
</programlisting></example> Must be replaced with:
<programlisting>
REDIRECT loc 3128 tcp 80
</programlisting></para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Version &#62;= 1.3.2</title>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>The functions and versions files together with the <filename
class="symlink">firewall</filename> symbolic link have moved from
<filename class="directory">/etc/shorewall</filename> to <filename
class="directory">/var/lib/shorewall</filename>. If you have
applications that access these files, those applications should be
modified accordingly.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
</article>