atuin/.gitignore

.DS_Store
/target
*/target
.env
.idea/
.vscode/
result
publish.sh

ui/backend/target
ui/backend/gen
feat: rework record sync for improved reliability (#1478) * feat: rework record sync for improved reliability So, to tell a story 1. We introduced the record sync, intended to be the new algorithm to sync history. 2. On top of this, I added the KV store. This was intended as a simple test of the record sync, and to see if people wanted that sort of functionality 3. History remained syncing via the old means, as while it had issues it worked more-or-less OK. And we are aware of its flaws 4. If KV syncing worked ok, history would be moved across KV syncing ran ok for 6mo or so, so I started to move across history. For several weeks, I ran a local fork of Atuin + the server that synced via records instead. The record store maintained ordering via a linked list, which was a mistake. It performed well in testing, but was really difficult to debug and reason about. So when a few small sync issues occured, they took an extremely long time to debug. This PR is huge, which I regret. It involves replacing the "parent" relationship that records once had (pointing to the previous record) with a simple index (generally referred to as idx). This also means we had to change the recordindex, which referenced "tails". Tails were the last item in the chain. Now that we use an "array" vs linked list, that logic was also replaced. And is much simpler :D Same for the queries that act on this data. ---- This isn't final - we still need to add 1. Proper server/client error handling, which has been lacking for a while 2. The actual history implementation on top This exists in a branch, just without deletions. Won't be much to add that, I just don't want to make this any larger than it already is The _only_ caveat here is that we basically lose data synced via the old record store. This is the KV data from before. It hasn't been deleted or anything, just no longer hooked up. So it's totally possible to write a migration script. I just need to do that. * update .gitignore * use correct endpoint * fix for stores with length of 1 * use create/delete enum for history store * lint, remove unneeded host_id * remove prints * add command to import old history * add enable/disable switch for record sync * add record sync to auto sync * satisfy the almighty clippy * remove file that I did not mean to commit * feedback 2024-01-05 18:57:49 +01:00			`.DS_Store`
Initial commit Currently writing shell history to a sqlite db :) Could do with: 1) store exit code 2) store duration 3) tidy up main 4) ...remote stuff 2020-10-05 01:59:28 +02:00			`/target`
Use cargo workspaces (#37) * Switch to Cargo workspaces Breaking things into "client", "server" and "common" makes managing the codebase much easier! client - anything running on a user's machine for adding history server - handles storing/syncing history and running a HTTP server common - request/response API definitions, common utils, etc * Update dockerfile 2021-04-20 22:53:07 +02:00			`*/target`
Ignore env file 2021-04-09 13:42:43 +02:00			`.env`
ignore JetBrains IDEs, tidy-up imports (#348) * ignore JB IDEs * tidy-up imports * add rustfmt config 2022-04-28 19:53:59 +02:00			`.idea/`
Adds stats summary (#384) * stat command parsing is handled without subcommands * Updates match clause based on PR review Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <oon@conradludgate.com> * updates value returned by match based on PR review * adds vscode to gitignore * use an if statement instead of match Co-authored-by: Satyarth <satyarth.sampath@gojek.com> Co-authored-by: Conrad Ludgate <oon@conradludgate.com> 2022-05-03 16:49:27 +02:00			`.vscode/`
Add nix files and install instructions (#477) 2023-02-15 10:04:07 +01:00			`result`
feat: rework record sync for improved reliability (#1478) * feat: rework record sync for improved reliability So, to tell a story 1. We introduced the record sync, intended to be the new algorithm to sync history. 2. On top of this, I added the KV store. This was intended as a simple test of the record sync, and to see if people wanted that sort of functionality 3. History remained syncing via the old means, as while it had issues it worked more-or-less OK. And we are aware of its flaws 4. If KV syncing worked ok, history would be moved across KV syncing ran ok for 6mo or so, so I started to move across history. For several weeks, I ran a local fork of Atuin + the server that synced via records instead. The record store maintained ordering via a linked list, which was a mistake. It performed well in testing, but was really difficult to debug and reason about. So when a few small sync issues occured, they took an extremely long time to debug. This PR is huge, which I regret. It involves replacing the "parent" relationship that records once had (pointing to the previous record) with a simple index (generally referred to as idx). This also means we had to change the recordindex, which referenced "tails". Tails were the last item in the chain. Now that we use an "array" vs linked list, that logic was also replaced. And is much simpler :D Same for the queries that act on this data. ---- This isn't final - we still need to add 1. Proper server/client error handling, which has been lacking for a while 2. The actual history implementation on top This exists in a branch, just without deletions. Won't be much to add that, I just don't want to make this any larger than it already is The _only_ caveat here is that we basically lose data synced via the old record store. This is the KV data from before. It hasn't been deleted or anything, just no longer hooked up. So it's totally possible to write a migration script. I just need to do that. * update .gitignore * use correct endpoint * fix for stores with length of 1 * use create/delete enum for history store * lint, remove unneeded host_id * remove prints * add command to import old history * add enable/disable switch for record sync * add record sync to auto sync * satisfy the almighty clippy * remove file that I did not mean to commit * feedback 2024-01-05 18:57:49 +01:00			`publish.sh`
feat: add background daemon (#2006) * init daemon crate * wip * minimal functioning daemon, needs cleanup for sure * better errors * add signal cleanup * logging * things * add sync worker * move daemon crate * 30s -> 5mins * make clippy happy * fix stuff maybe? * fmt * trim packages * rate limit fix * more protoc huh * this makes no sense, why linux why * can it install literally just curl * windows in ci is slow, and all the newer things will not work there. disable the daemon feature and it will build * add daemon feature * maybe this * ok wut where is protoc * try setting protoc * hm * try copying protoc * remove optional * add cross config * idk nix * does nix want this? * some random pkg I found does this * uh oh * hack, be gone! * update contributing 2024-05-08 13:09:04 +02:00
			`ui/backend/target`
			`ui/backend/gen`