[client] Account different policiy rules for routes firewall rules (#2939)

* Account different policies rules for routes firewall rules

This change ensures that route firewall rules will consider source group peers in the rules generation for access control policies.

This fixes the behavior where multiple policies with different levels of access was being applied to all peers in a distribution group

* split function

* avoid unnecessary allocation

Co-authored-by: Viktor Liu <17948409+lixmal@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Viktor Liu <17948409+lixmal@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Maycon Santos 2024-11-29 17:50:35 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8efad1d170
commit f9723c9266
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
2 changed files with 199 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@ -417,27 +417,84 @@ func (a *Account) getPeerRoutesFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peerID string,
continue
}
policies := getAllRoutePoliciesFromGroups(a, route.AccessControlGroups)
for _, policy := range policies {
if !policy.Enabled {
continue
}
distributionPeers := a.getDistributionGroupsPeers(route)
for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
if !rule.Enabled {
continue
}
distributionGroupPeers, _ := a.getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx, route.Groups, peerID, nil, validatedPeersMap)
rules := generateRouteFirewallRules(ctx, route, rule, distributionGroupPeers, firewallRuleDirectionIN)
routesFirewallRules = append(routesFirewallRules, rules...)
}
for _, accessGroup := range route.AccessControlGroups {
policies := getAllRoutePoliciesFromGroups(a, []string{accessGroup})
rules := a.getRouteFirewallRules(ctx, peerID, policies, route, validatedPeersMap, distributionPeers)
routesFirewallRules = append(routesFirewallRules, rules...)
}
}
return routesFirewallRules
}
func (a *Account) getRouteFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peerID string, policies []*Policy, route *route.Route, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}, distributionPeers map[string]struct{}) []*RouteFirewallRule {
var fwRules []*RouteFirewallRule
for _, policy := range policies {
if !policy.Enabled {
continue
}
for _, rule := range policy.Rules {
if !rule.Enabled {
continue
}
rulePeers := a.getRulePeers(rule, peerID, distributionPeers, validatedPeersMap)
rules := generateRouteFirewallRules(ctx, route, rule, rulePeers, firewallRuleDirectionIN)
fwRules = append(fwRules, rules...)
}
}
return fwRules
}
func (a *Account) getRulePeers(rule *PolicyRule, peerID string, distributionPeers map[string]struct{}, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) []*nbpeer.Peer {
distPeersWithPolicy := make(map[string]struct{})
for _, id := range rule.Sources {
group := a.Groups[id]
if group == nil {
continue
}
for _, pID := range group.Peers {
if pID == peerID {
continue
}
_, distPeer := distributionPeers[pID]
_, valid := validatedPeersMap[pID]
if distPeer && valid {
distPeersWithPolicy[pID] = struct{}{}
}
}
}
distributionGroupPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(distPeersWithPolicy))
for pID := range distPeersWithPolicy {
peer := a.Peers[pID]
if peer == nil {
continue
}
distributionGroupPeers = append(distributionGroupPeers, peer)
}
return distributionGroupPeers
}
func (a *Account) getDistributionGroupsPeers(route *route.Route) map[string]struct{} {
distPeers := make(map[string]struct{})
for _, id := range route.Groups {
group := a.Groups[id]
if group == nil {
continue
}
for _, pID := range group.Peers {
distPeers[pID] = struct{}{}
}
}
return distPeers
}
func getDefaultPermit(route *route.Route) []*RouteFirewallRule {
var rules []*RouteFirewallRule

View File

@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import (
"fmt"
"net"
"net/netip"
"sort"
"testing"
"time"
@ -1486,6 +1487,8 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
peerBIp = "100.65.80.39"
peerCIp = "100.65.254.139"
peerHIp = "100.65.29.55"
peerJIp = "100.65.29.65"
peerKIp = "100.65.29.66"
)
account := &Account{
@ -1541,6 +1544,16 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
IP: net.ParseIP(peerHIp),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerJ": {
ID: "peerJ",
IP: net.ParseIP(peerJIp),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerK": {
ID: "peerK",
IP: net.ParseIP(peerKIp),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
},
Groups: map[string]*nbgroup.Group{
"routingPeer1": {
@ -1567,6 +1580,11 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
Name: "Route2",
Peers: []string{},
},
"route4": {
ID: "route4",
Name: "route4",
Peers: []string{},
},
"finance": {
ID: "finance",
Name: "Finance",
@ -1584,6 +1602,28 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
"peerB",
},
},
"qa": {
ID: "qa",
Name: "QA",
Peers: []string{
"peerJ",
"peerK",
},
},
"restrictQA": {
ID: "restrictQA",
Name: "restrictQA",
Peers: []string{
"peerJ",
},
},
"unrestrictedQA": {
ID: "unrestrictedQA",
Name: "unrestrictedQA",
Peers: []string{
"peerK",
},
},
"contractors": {
ID: "contractors",
Name: "Contractors",
@ -1631,6 +1671,19 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
Groups: []string{"contractors"},
AccessControlGroups: []string{},
},
"route4": {
ID: "route4",
Network: netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.10.0/16"),
NetID: "route4",
NetworkType: route.IPv4Network,
PeerGroups: []string{"routingPeer1"},
Description: "Route4",
Masquerade: false,
Metric: 9999,
Enabled: true,
Groups: []string{"qa"},
AccessControlGroups: []string{"route4"},
},
},
Policies: []*Policy{
{
@ -1685,6 +1738,49 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
{
ID: "RuleRoute4",
Name: "RuleRoute4",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: "RuleRoute4",
Name: "RuleRoute4",
Bidirectional: true,
Enabled: true,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Ports: []string{"80"},
Sources: []string{
"restrictQA",
},
Destinations: []string{
"route4",
},
},
},
},
{
ID: "RuleRoute5",
Name: "RuleRoute5",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: "RuleRoute5",
Name: "RuleRoute5",
Bidirectional: true,
Enabled: true,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Sources: []string{
"unrestrictedQA",
},
Destinations: []string{
"route4",
},
},
},
},
},
}
@ -1709,7 +1805,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("check peer routes firewall rules", func(t *testing.T) {
routesFirewallRules := account.getPeerRoutesFirewallRules(context.Background(), "peerA", validatedPeers)
assert.Len(t, routesFirewallRules, 2)
assert.Len(t, routesFirewallRules, 4)
expectedRoutesFirewallRules := []*RouteFirewallRule{
{
@ -1735,12 +1831,32 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
Port: 320,
},
}
assert.ElementsMatch(t, routesFirewallRules, expectedRoutesFirewallRules)
additionalFirewallRule := []*RouteFirewallRule{
{
SourceRanges: []string{
fmt.Sprintf(AllowedIPsFormat, peerJIp),
},
Action: "accept",
Destination: "192.168.10.0/16",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: 80,
},
{
SourceRanges: []string{
fmt.Sprintf(AllowedIPsFormat, peerKIp),
},
Action: "accept",
Destination: "192.168.10.0/16",
Protocol: "all",
},
}
assert.ElementsMatch(t, orderRuleSourceRanges(routesFirewallRules), orderRuleSourceRanges(append(expectedRoutesFirewallRules, additionalFirewallRule...)))
// peerD is also the routing peer for route1, should contain same routes firewall rules as peerA
routesFirewallRules = account.getPeerRoutesFirewallRules(context.Background(), "peerD", validatedPeers)
assert.Len(t, routesFirewallRules, 2)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, routesFirewallRules, expectedRoutesFirewallRules)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, orderRuleSourceRanges(routesFirewallRules), orderRuleSourceRanges(expectedRoutesFirewallRules))
// peerE is a single routing peer for route 2 and route 3
routesFirewallRules = account.getPeerRoutesFirewallRules(context.Background(), "peerE", validatedPeers)
@ -1769,7 +1885,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
IsDynamic: true,
},
}
assert.ElementsMatch(t, routesFirewallRules, expectedRoutesFirewallRules)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, orderRuleSourceRanges(routesFirewallRules), orderRuleSourceRanges(expectedRoutesFirewallRules))
// peerC is part of route1 distribution groups but should not receive the routes firewall rules
routesFirewallRules = account.getPeerRoutesFirewallRules(context.Background(), "peerC", validatedPeers)
@ -1778,6 +1894,14 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersRoutesFirewall(t *testing.T) {
}
// orderList is a helper function to sort a list of strings
func orderRuleSourceRanges(ruleList []*RouteFirewallRule) []*RouteFirewallRule {
for _, rule := range ruleList {
sort.Strings(rule.SourceRanges)
}
return ruleList
}
func TestRouteAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
manager, err := createRouterManager(t)
require.NoError(t, err, "failed to create account manager")