related to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9404
# Description
to support our cratification effort and moving non-1.0 commands outside
of the main focus, this PR
- creates a new `nu-cmd-base` crate to hold the common structs, traits
and functions used by all command-related crates
- to start the transition, moves the `input_handler` module from
`nu-command` to `nu-cmd-base`
# User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
The issue template to report a build failure in our nightly-build CI was
also appearing among the options for a user to pick from.
Moved over to a separate folder `.github/AUTO_ISSUE_TEMPLATE`
# Description
This splits off `scope` from `$nu`, creating a set of `scope` commands
for the various types of scope you might be interested in.
This also simplifies the `$nu` variable a bit.
# User-Facing Changes
This changes `$nu` to be a bit simpler and introduces a set of `scope`
subcommands.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
related to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8544
cc/ @jntrnr @ahkrr
# Description
some of the tests in the `dots.rs` file are a bit hard to read because
some of the paths look like command calls 🤔
in an attempt to making them easier to read, in the tests of `dots.rs`,
this PR
- replaces `file .../` with `not_a_cmd.../` because it's not a call to
the `file` command
- removes the space in `not_a_cmd .../` to see it's not a command call
- adds a bit more `not a cmd` to the last tests, to be consistent with
the other tests
# User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
In my view we should revert nushell/nushell#8395 for now
## Potentially inconsistent application of semantic change
#8395 (1d5e7b441b) was loosening the type
coercion rules significantly, to let missing data / void returns that
were either expressed by `PipelineData::Empty` or the `Value::nothing`
be accept by specifically those commands/operations that made use of
`PipelineData::into_iter_strict()`. This could apply the new rules
inconsistently.
## Turning explicit failures into silent continuations
Furthermore the effect of this breaking change to the missing data
semantics could make previous errors into silent failures.
This could either just reduce the effectiveness of teaching error
messages in interactive use:
### Contrived example before
```bash
> cd . | where blah
Error: nu:🐚:only_supports_this_input_type
× Input type not supported.
╭─[entry #13:1:1]
1 │ cd . | where blah
· ──┬──┬
· │ ╰── input type: null
· ╰── only list, binary, raw data or range input data is supported
╰────
```
### ...after, with #8395
```bash
> cd . | where blah
╭────────────╮
│ empty list │
╰────────────╯
```
In rare cases people could already try to rely on catching an error of a
downstream command to actually deal with the missing data, so it would
be a breaking change for their existing code.
## Problem with `PipelineData::into_iter_strict()`
Maybe this makes `_strict` a bit of a misnomer for this particular
iterator construction.
Further we did not actively test the `PipelineData::empty` branch before
## Parsimonious solution exists
For the motivating issue https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8393
there already exists a fix that makes `ls` more consistent with the type
system by returning an empty `Value::List`
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8439
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
This PR fixes the following nightly clippy warnings.
```
warning: you should consider adding a `Default` implementation for `HjsonFormatter<'a>`
--> crates/nu-json/src/ser.rs:700:5
|
700 | / pub fn new() -> Self {
701 | | HjsonFormatter::with_indent(b" ")
702 | | }
| |_____^
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#new_without_default
= note: `#[warn(clippy::new_without_default)]` on by default
help: try adding this
|
698 + impl<'a> Default for HjsonFormatter<'a> {
699 + fn default() -> Self {
700 + Self::new()
701 + }
702 + }
|
warning: `nu-json` (lib) generated 1 warning
warning: private item shadows public glob re-export
--> crates/nu-command/src/strings/mod.rs:8:1
|
8 | mod str_;
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the name `str_` in the type namespace is supposed to be publicly re-exported here
--> crates/nu-command/src/strings/mod.rs:17:9
|
17 | pub use str_::*;
| ^^^^^^^
note: but the private item here shadows it
--> crates/nu-command/src/strings/mod.rs:8:1
|
8 | mod str_;
| ^^^^^^^^^
= note: `#[warn(hidden_glob_reexports)]` on by default
warning: incorrect NaN comparison, NaN cannot be directly compared to itself
--> crates/nu-command/src/formats/to/nuon.rs:186:20
|
186 | && val != &f64::NAN
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(invalid_nan_comparisons)]` on by default
help: use `f32::is_nan()` or `f64::is_nan()` instead
|
186 - && val != &f64::NAN
186 + && !val.is_nan()
|
warning: `nu-command` (lib) generated 2 warnings (run `cargo clippy --fix --lib -p nu-command` to apply 1 suggestion)
Compiling nu v0.81.1 (/data/source/nushell)
warning: this expression creates a reference which is immediately dereferenced by the compiler
--> crates/nu-command/tests/commands/rm.rs:392:27
|
392 | dir_to_clean: &test_dir,
| ^^^^^^^^^ help: change this to: `test_dir`
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#needless_borrow
= note: `#[warn(clippy::needless_borrow)]` on by default
warning: `nu-command` (test "main") generated 1 warning (run `cargo clippy --fix --test "main"` to apply 1 suggestion)
warning: `nu-command` (lib test) generated 2 warnings (2 duplicates)
warning: `nu-json` (lib test) generated 1 warning (1 duplicate)
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 3.89s
```
# User-Facing Changes
N/A
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
Recently someone submitted a PR that included a crate that used the GPL
license.
To avoid this happening in the future we updated the Contributing.md
document stating
this specifically so people will not be confused about our policy.
this PR should close#9018
# Description
This PR aims to fix the `input` command with `--suppress-output` on
Windows
This fixes two separates issues :
- Keypresses being duplicated in output due to "Release" event not being
ignored
- "Return" event from entering the `input -s "blah :"` still being in
the event buffer (need to be cleared before reading keypresses)
# Tests + Formatting
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` ✔️
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` ✔️
- `cargo test --workspace` ✔️
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` ✔️
I would personally propose to remove the progress board table from our
README.
At the stage where we are at right now with most items in a pre-stable
stage I don't think it is a good use of README real estate anymore. It
hasn't been updated in over 7 months for a single item and older than a
year for most boxes.
For upcoming users the list doesn't present detailed enough explanations
of potential pitfalls and may be more confusing by mentioning features
that are not really present (e.g. paging). Generally I have the
impression that the community generally helps raise awareness about the
limitations of the pre-1.0 state together with our release notes that
try to highlight the pace of breaking or evolving changes.
Potential users are probably best served by additional links to learn
more about our features and generally improved documentation and
community tutorials
For contributors that want to look for areas to help out, this view is
both not granular enough for real guidance and is maybe even actively
harmful in highlighting areas we don't prioritize for 1.0 stability
(e.g. notebook integration)
Contributors are probably better served by our planned write-ups around
the 1.0 roadmap and updating GitHub Kanban/project boards.
related to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9357
# Description
with the new `extra` feature introduce in the `toolkit.nu` module in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9357, the `--dataframe` option
does not make sense anymore...
this PR changes that and replaces it with `--features: list<string>`.
this has the benefit of simplifying the commands because we can just
pass `--features ($features | str join ",")` to the `cargo` commands
regardless of whether the `$features` list is empty of not 👌
i've also refactored a bit the module:
- break the long `error make -u` lines
- break the long `cargo clippy` command
# User-Facing Changes
devs can now choose which feature to test with the `toolkit` commands.
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
In cases that a path contained 3 or more `.` in succession followed by a
path-separator, the dots would be expanded.
This logic didn't take into account the cases where characters other
than a separator could appear before the `...`, which would lead to
`...` in filenames being expanded.
This PR changes the behavior so that path-segments consisting of 3 or
more dots only will be expanded.
This PR fixes issue #8386
# User-Facing Changes
Paths with filenames like `.../folder.../file.txt` will be correctly
expanded.
# Tests + Formatting
I added tests that cover a number of cases.
# Description
This allows empty pipelines to pass their emptiness through a filter.
This helps fix issues like trying to run a filter on an `ls` in an empty
directory. It also feels a bit more reasonable that a filter filters
what is *there* but doesn't require something to be there.
fixes#8393
# User-Facing Changes
No breaking changes (that I know of). Should allow filtering to be a
little less surprising with emptiness.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: amtoine <stevan.antoine@gmail.com>
# Description
Fixes a small bug with `rm` where names of files which couldn't be
deleted due to error were not printed.
Fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9004
# User-Facing Changes
Slightly different error message than previously. Nothing significant,
though.
The new error message looks like this
```
~/Projects/rust/nushell> rm /proc/1/mem 05/06/2023 01:13:23 PM
Error: nu:🐚:remove_not_possible
× Remove not possible
╭─[entry #3:1:1]
1 │ rm /proc/1/mem
· ─────┬─────
· ╰── Could not delete /proc/1/mem: Operation not permitted (os error 1)
╰────
```
or when using a glob (only showing a single entry for brevity)
```
Error: nu:🐚:remove_not_possible
× Remove not possible
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ rm --recursive --force --verbose /proc/1/*
· ────┬────
· ╰── Could not delete /proc/1/comm: Operation not permitted (os error 1)
╰────
```
# Tests + Formatting
No new unit tests were added for this change as it is pretty difficult
to test this particular case. However, manual testing was run with the
following commands
```
rm /proc/1/mem
rm --recursive --force --verbose /proc/1/*
```
# After Submitting
N/A
This PR reverts https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9391
We try not to revert PRs like this, though after discussion with the
Nushell team, we decided to revert this one.
The main reason is that Nushell, as a codebase, isn't ready for these
kinds of optimisations. It's in the part of the development cycle where
our main focus should be on improving the algorithms inside of Nushell
itself. Once we have matured our algorithms, then we can look for
opportunities to switch out technologies we're using for alternate
forms.
Much of Nushell still has lots of opportunities for tuning the codebase,
paying down technical debt, and making the codebase generally cleaner
and more robust. This should be the focus. Performance improvements
should flow out of that work.
Said another, optimisation that isn't part of tuning the codebase is
premature at this stage. We need to focus on doing the hard work of
making the engine, parser, etc better.
# User-Facing Changes
Reverts the HashMap -> ahash change.
cc @FilipAndersson245
a recent addition must have removed the `create_default_context` command
from `nu_command`, which breaks the benchmarks 😮
## before this PR
```bash
cargo check --all-targets --workspace
```
gives a bunch of
```bash
error[E0425]: cannot find function `create_default_context` in crate `nu_command`
--> benches/benchmarks.rs:93:48
|
93 | let mut engine_state = nu_command::create_default_context();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in `nu_command`
|
help: consider importing this function
|
1 | use nu_cmd_lang::create_default_context;
|
help: if you import `create_default_context`, refer to it directly
|
93 - let mut engine_state = nu_command::create_default_context();
93 + let mut engine_state = create_default_context();
|
```
and `cargo bench` does not run...
## with this PR
```bash
cargo check --all-targets --workspace
```
is not happy and the benchmarks run again with `cargo bench`
---------
Co-authored-by: sholderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
closes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9437
cc/ @Sygmei 😉
# Description
the syntax of *captures* used in `str replace` can be confusing for
people not used to the `regex` syntax.
there is already a capture example in `help str replace`
```bash
Find and replace with fancy-regex
> 'a successful b' | str replace '\b([sS])uc(?:cs|s?)e(ed(?:ed|ing|s?)|ss(?:es|ful(?:ly)?|i(?:ons?|ve(?:ly)?)|ors?)?)\b' '${1}ucce$2'
a successful b
```
but it's really not trivial to understand the *capture* syntax...
this PR adds a simpler example only focused on *captures*
🥳
```bash
Use captures to manipulate the input text
> "abc-def" | str replace "(.+)-(.+)" "${2}_${1}"
def_abc
```
# User-Facing Changes
an example in `help str replace` to understand the syntax of *captures*.
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
Fixes#9448
# Description
Attempts to fix a bug from the linked issue.
# User-Facing Changes
- The editor doesn't crash on wrong commands
# Tests + Formatting
Tests cover my changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Added comments to support API docs for the `nu-plugin` crate. Removed a
few items that I'd expect should only be used internally to Nushell from
the documentation and reduced the visibility of some items that did not
need to be public.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
There should be no user facing impact.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
Standard tests run. Additionally numerous doctests were added to the
`nu-plugin` crate.
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
No changes to the website necessary.
# Description
When the directory stack contains only two directories, then std dirs
drop
used to misbehave and (essentially) drop the other directory, instead of
dropping the current directory.
This is fixed by always cd'ing for std dirs drop.
Before:
/tmp〉enter ..
/〉dexit
/〉
After:
/tmp〉enter ..
/〉dexit
/tmp〉
Additionally, I propose to explain the relevant environment variables a
bit
more thoroughly.
# User-Facing Changes
- Fix bug in dexit (std dirs drop) when two directories are remaining
# Tests + Formatting
Added a regression test. Made the existing test easier to understand.
Parse the data from string to json if the `--content-type
"application/json"` flag is used for the request.
Fixes: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9408
In the issue, the actual data is a string `'{ "query": "{ greeting }"
}'` representing json, and it would match the case `Value::String { val,
.. }`
-------------------------
The example in the issue does set the `content-type` to
`application/json` but sends the body as a string note the `'`.
```
(
::: http post
::: -fer
::: # -H [ "Content-Type" "application/json" ]
::: --content-type "application/json"
::: 'http://127.0.0.1:3000/greetings/hello'
::: '{ "query": "{ greeting }" }'
::: )
```
```
╭─────────┬───────────────────────╮
│ headers │ {record 14 fields} │
│ body │ {"content_type":null} │
│ status │ 200 │
╰─────────┴───────────────────────╯
```
If we send the same request but using actual json as the body, the
Header is set correctly.
```
(
::: http post
::: -fer
::: # -H [ "Content-Type" "application/json" ]
::: --content-type "application/json"
::: 'http://127.0.0.1:3000/greetings/hello'
::: { "query": "{ greeting }" }
::: )
```
```
╭─────────┬─────────────────────────────────────╮
│ headers │ {record 14 fields} │
│ body │ {"content_type":"application/json"} │
│ status │ 200 │
╰─────────┴─────────────────────────────────────╯
```
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
- fixes: #5517
- fixes: #9250
For the following commands:
```
ls
# | le
| length
```
I found that it generates a bad lite parsing result:
```
LiteBlock {
block: [
LitePipeline {
commands: [
Command(None, LiteCommand { comments: [], parts: [Span { start: 138600, end: 138602 }] })
]
},
LitePipeline {
commands: [
Command(Some(Span { start: 138610, end: 138611 }),
LiteCommand { comments: [Span { start: 138603, end: 138609 }], parts: [Span { start: 138612, end: 138618 }] })
]
}
]
}
```
Which should contains only one `LitePipeline`, and the second
`LitePipeline` is generated because of `Eol` lex token:
```
[
Token { contents: Item, span: Span { start: 138600, end: 138602 } },
Token { contents: Eol, span: Span { start: 138602, end: 138603 } }, // it generates the second LitePipeline
Token { contents: Comment, span: Span { start: 138603, end: 138609 } },
Token { contents: Pipe, span: Span { start: 138610, end: 138611 } },
Token { contents: Item, span: Span { start: 138612, end: 138618 } }
]
```
To fix the issue, I remove the `Eol` token when we meet `Comment` right
after `Eol`, then it will generate a good LiteBlock, and everything will
work fine.
### After the fix:
Token:
```
[
Token { contents: Item, span: Span { start: 138618, end: 138620 } },
Token { contents: Comment, span: Span { start: 138622, end: 138628 } },
Token { contents: Pipe, span: Span { start: 138629, end: 138630 } },
Token { contents: Item, span: Span { start: 138631, end: 138637 } }
]
```
LiteBlock:
```
LiteBlock {
block: [
LitePipeline {
commands: [
Command(
None,
LiteCommand {
comments: [Span { start: 138622, end: 138628 }],
parts: [Span { start: 138618, end: 138620 }]
}
),
Command(
Some(Span { start: 138629, end: 138630 }),
LiteCommand { comments: [], parts: [Span { start: 138631, end: 138637 }] })] }] }
```
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
this PR makes nushell use mimalloc as the default allocator, this has
the benefit of reducing startup time on my machine. `17%` on linux and
`22%` on windows, when testing using hyperfine.
the overhead to compile seem to be quite small, aswell as the increase
of binary size quite small
on linux the binary went from `33.1mb` to `33.2mb`
linux
windows
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Make sure that our different crates that contain commands can be
compiled in parallel.
This can under certain circumstances accelerate the compilation with
sufficient multithreading available.
## Details
- Move `help` commands from `nu-cmd-lang` back to `nu-command`
- This also makes sense as the commands are implemented in an
ANSI-terminal specific way
- Make `nu-cmd-lang` only a dev dependency for `nu-command`
- Change context creation helpers for `nu-cmd-extra` and
`nu-cmd-dataframe` to have a consistent api used in
`src/main.rs`:`get_engine_state()`
- `nu-command` now indepedent from `nu-cmd-extra` and `nu-cmd-dataframe`
that are now dependencies of `nu` directly. (change to internal
features)
- Fix tests that previously used `nu-command::create_default_context()`
with replacement functions
## From scratch compilation times:
just debug (dev) build and default features
```
cargo clean --profile dev && cargo build --timings
```
### before
### after
# User-Facing Changes
None direct, only change to compilation on multithreaded jobs expected.
# Tests + Formatting
Tests that previously chose to use `nu-command` for their scope will
still use `nu-cmd-lang` + `nu-command` (command list in the granularity
at the time)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
This PR removes ZB and ZiB from file size type, as they
were showing incorrect values due to an integer overflow.
Fixes: #9337
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This PR updates the ini dependency.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Update the polars dependency for dataframes to stay on-version.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
related to
closes#9342
complete the install command to install plugins
[
](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9288)
the issue
toolkit build only builds in debug mode
toolkit install only installs Nushell
toolkit register plugins will install any plugins in the path, in debug
or release
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
