mirror of
https://github.com/jzillmann/pdf-to-markdown.git
synced 2024-11-30 03:34:22 +01:00
78db114632
- Convert the `example PDFs` with the old `pdf-to-markdown` and write them to text files - Compare the text files with the conversion of the current code - Next: - Improve the current code to match good conversions of the old code - Adapt the text files in case the current conversion is better than the old - Current tests are breaking
2428 lines
80 KiB
Markdown
2428 lines
80 KiB
Markdown
Quality Improvement Clinic Ltd.
|
||
August 2015
|
||
|
||
# Safe Communication
|
||
|
||
## Design, implement and measure: A guide to
|
||
|
||
## improving transfers of care and handover
|
||
|
||
#### Authors:
|
||
|
||
#### Nicola Davey & Ali Cole
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## Contents:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Acknowledgements page 3
|
||
References page 3
|
||
Distribution & reproduction page 3
|
||
Executive summary page 4
|
||
Introduction page 5
|
||
Where can things go wrong? page 6
|
||
How do you achieve it? (The six step improvement process) page 8
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Useful resources & references page 40
|
||
Appendices page 42
|
||
```
|
||
##### 1 • Startout page^10
|
||
|
||
##### 2 • Defineandscope page^13
|
||
|
||
##### 3 • Measureandunderstand page^19
|
||
|
||
##### 4 • Designandplan(includingSBAR) page^24
|
||
|
||
##### 5 • Pilotandimplement page^34
|
||
|
||
##### 6 • Sustainandshare page^38
|
||
|
||
###### “I got so used to the system being
|
||
|
||
###### broken I prepared and copied my
|
||
|
||
###### own handover sheet about my
|
||
|
||
###### husband’s condition – All the things
|
||
|
||
###### I knew they needed to know and
|
||
|
||
###### asked every time he was admitted.
|
||
|
||
###### I handed them to paramedics, A&E
|
||
|
||
###### AND ward staff as the sheets had
|
||
|
||
###### often disappeared by the time he
|
||
|
||
###### had a bed. I do wonder where they
|
||
|
||
###### all went!”
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Acknowledgements
|
||
|
||
This guide was originally conceived and drafted by the Authors in their own time whilst they worked at the NHS Institute for
|
||
Innovation and Improvement. Some of the examples and many of the ideas emerged as a result of the lead author’s field work
|
||
whilst completing the NHS Institute’s Patient Safety Leader Programme, and through extensive discussions with the second author.
|
||
Since the closure of the NHS Institute, additional material has been added by the second Author based on her experience of
|
||
working as a QI practitioner. The guide is a working document and it is our intention to refresh it periodically as new learning
|
||
emerges. A timeline for its production can be found on the back page.
|
||
|
||
Both Authors would like to thank the following for their contributions:
|
||
Louise Jacox, Rebecca Bartholomew and the staff of the George Eliot Hospital
|
||
Staff at the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement
|
||
Staff at the Heart of England NHS Trust
|
||
Fellows of the Improvement Faculty
|
||
Sandra McNerney, script writer
|
||
Georgette Houlbrook, Patient Representative, Wessex AHSN
|
||
|
||
#### References
|
||
|
||
This guide references some key documents that the Authors believe will help inform good practice: It is only a proportion of the good
|
||
literature available! The topic of handovers and transfer of care continue to be researched and were a subject theme for The Health
|
||
Foundation’s Clinical Systems Improvement Programme (www.health.org) in 2012- 2014. Despite research in this area, our
|
||
experience in practice suggests that very few places have used a robust method to implement small scale or systems wide
|
||
approaches to improve the many aspects of transfers of care that must be addressed in order to deliver a reliable service to
|
||
patients.
|
||
|
||
If you have achieved this goal the Authors would love to hear from you and help spread the learning so that others can understand
|
||
how they might adapt and adopt your learning to achieve reliable transfers of care in their own service. Please email
|
||
nicola@qualityimprovementclinic.com
|
||
|
||
#### Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial
|
||
|
||
Licensed to the public under a creative commons attribution 4.0 license. Also please note and respect:
|
||
© Copyright on diagrams shown
|
||
All Shutterstock images purchased by Quality Improvement Clinic Ltd.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## Executive summary
|
||
|
||
There are many reasons why teams, departments or even whole organisations will want to improve the way handover or transfers of
|
||
care happens for their patients and service users. Studies have identified clinical handover as a ‘high risk scenario for patient safety
|
||
(Clinical Handover Literature Review, 2008). They describe the dangers and consequences of poor handovers, highlighting
|
||
‘discontinuity of care, adverse events and legal claims of malpractice. But the task of passing on important information happens in
|
||
every care setting and between care settings (transfers of care) every day in patient’s homes, backs of ambulances, community
|
||
clinics, surgeries to name some. Although many of the examples we have been able to find easily are from hospitals, the
|
||
information in this guide has been written for use in all settings.
|
||
|
||
There is also the human cost; the distress, anxiety and loss of confidence that we know poor handovers can lead to for patients,
|
||
clients and their families and for staff too (see case study, Appendix A).
|
||
|
||
This guide is not about the justification for improving handovers; that is covered in detail in other documents such as the OSSIE
|
||
Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement and the Royal College of Physicians’ Acute Care Toolkit: 1 Handover. Nor is this guide a
|
||
detailed manual for improving every aspect of your handover process.
|
||
|
||
Focusing mainly on good communication – one of the most important factors for safe and timely transfers of care – this guide, and
|
||
the six step process at the heart of it, offers teams a practical improvement methodology that we know has worked well in many
|
||
care settings.
|
||
|
||
It draws on some tried and tested tools that will help you, as a manager or clinician, to:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
link your improvements to the wider strategic aims of your organisation
|
||
test, measure and understand the impact your changes are having
|
||
use the sort of structured communication tools that are delivering significant improvements in safety and quality for care
|
||
organisations and other safety critical industries across the world (e.g. SBAR, ISOBAR and IDEAL).
|
||
```
|
||
Many of the detailed tools and examples that you might want to use are included as appendices towards the end of the guide. This
|
||
means you can move through the guide more swiftly, but have a wealth of examples and ideas at your fingertips if you need them.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## Introduction
|
||
|
||
Welcome to this guide. It has been developed to help care teams and organisations make measurable improvements in the safety
|
||
and quality of patient care by ensuring that, with every handover and transfer, the right information is given to the right people at
|
||
|
||
##### the right time and in the right way.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Handover [or transfer of care] is ‘ the handover of professional responsibility and accountability for some or all
|
||
aspects of care for a patient, or group of patients, to another person or professional group, on a temporary or
|
||
permanent basis ’ (Bhabra G et al. 2007)
|
||
```
|
||
We have used the word transfers of care in most, but not all, places in this guide. Transfers can include a regular handover of
|
||
care at the end of a shift, or the transfer of a **person’** s care to another ward, team, department, or service. This includes for
|
||
example when a patient is transferred from a care home to a hospital or from a community team to a hospice. Transfers of care
|
||
happen every day. They can be verbal or written; they can take place in a group or one-to-one; in person, or over the phone. But
|
||
they all share the same purpose; to communicate vital information about a person in your care.
|
||
|
||
#### Why use this guide?
|
||
|
||
Many good resources already exist to help teams deliver safe and efficient transfers of care in
|
||
different care environments (see Useful Resources, page 40 ). But, by working with frontline
|
||
care teams, we have identified a gap when it comes to giving staff the detailed steps they
|
||
need to design, implement and measure their improvements.
|
||
|
||
This guide aims to bridge that gap:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
It offers teams in all care environments a tried and tested methodology for
|
||
transforming ideas and aspirations into sound improvement projects that link clearly
|
||
with their organisation’s wider aims and priorities.
|
||
It introduces and explains some of the most useful transfer of care tools, including
|
||
standardised communication tools such as SBAR (Situation, Background,
|
||
Assessment, Recommendation), and directs you to some resources on form
|
||
design that makes it easier to do the right thing.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Good communication is one of
|
||
the factors which ensures safe
|
||
and timely transfers of care.
|
||
Advice on improving other
|
||
factors is in National Leadership
|
||
and Innovation Agency for
|
||
Healthcare, Passing the Baton -
|
||
A Practical Guide to Effective
|
||
Discharge Planning (2008).
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## Where can things go wrong?
|
||
|
||
Poor transfer of care or handover communication is widely recognised as a major
|
||
preventable cause of harmi.
|
||
|
||
Good transfers of care rely on consistently good communication and there are many stages
|
||
in a person’s care journey where this can go wrong, including:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
shift to shift (continuity of care and ongoing assessment)
|
||
across different professions (different staff groups often have different ways of
|
||
communicating and their own hierarchies to navigate)
|
||
between departments (e.g. in a hospital where patients might pass through many
|
||
different departments)
|
||
between different care settings (e.g. hospital and community where staff can have
|
||
different communication styles and cultures).
|
||
```
|
||
The risks can be even higher when **...**
|
||
|
||
- people have complex needs (requiring more information to be handed over and
|
||
remembered on a day-to-day basis)
|
||
- at weekends or holidays
|
||
- if junior staff are reluctant to ask for clarification from more senior staff or other professions
|
||
- where there is no written documentation, or what is written is unclear (e.g. too many abbreviations).
|
||
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
The trouble with handovers is a useful video for understanding
|
||
what happens to patients, families and staff when handovers are
|
||
poor between different teams and care settings. It is a good
|
||
resource to watch with your team to encourage involvement and
|
||
stimulate discussion
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
‘...only 2.5% of information
|
||
from the first handover is
|
||
retained at the final handover if
|
||
there is no written record. If
|
||
notes are taken, 85.5% of
|
||
information is retained, but
|
||
this rises to 99% when a
|
||
standardised proforma is
|
||
used*’
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Bhabra G, Mackeith S, Monteiro P,
|
||
Pothier DD, An experimental
|
||
comparison of handover methods
|
||
(2007)^
|
||
* Data taken over the course of five
|
||
simulated handover cycles
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### ‘Passing the baton’
|
||
|
||
In a relay race, how the baton is passed between the runners is pivotal to success or failure and it’s a useful
|
||
analogy here; missed or misunderstood information can have a direct and even dangerous impact on the care
|
||
of a patient.
|
||
|
||
##### Problem Impact Solution
|
||
|
||
There are two important techniques to ensure that the ‘baton’ is always passed correctly in
|
||
the transfer of care:
|
||
|
||
- Standardisation: each participant follows the same procedure and communicates the
|
||
same agreed content. This will have a positive impact on both the quality of care for
|
||
patients and the productivity of the organisation.
|
||
- Streamlining: unnecessary steps in the process are identified and removed. Making
|
||
transfers of care simple will reduce the risk (improve quality) and release time to care
|
||
(improve productivity).
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
‘Healthcare organisations
|
||
[should] implement a
|
||
standardised approach to
|
||
handover communication
|
||
between staff, change of shift
|
||
and between different patient
|
||
care units in the course of a
|
||
patient transfer’
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
World Health Organisation Collaborating
|
||
Centre for Patient Safety Solutions (2007)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Variation in the
|
||
information given at
|
||
transfer of care
|
||
Important information is
|
||
not always communicated
|
||
Unreliable action taken on
|
||
the information
|
||
transferred
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Poor patient
|
||
care
|
||
Safety risks
|
||
Poor use of
|
||
valuable staff
|
||
resources
|
||
Complaints
|
||
Litigation
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Planned, structured
|
||
transfers of care
|
||
Right Information
|
||
Right people
|
||
Right commitment
|
||
Right space
|
||
Right time
|
||
RIGHT ACTION
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## Planned, structured transfer of care: what does
|
||
|
||
## it look like?
|
||
|
||
All of these checklist elements need to be in place to ensure the ‘baton’ is passed successfully and that the right information is given
|
||
to the right people at the right time, in the right way...every time.
|
||
|
||
Good practice checklist*
|
||
|
||
##### What do we need? What does it mean? Do we have it?
|
||
|
||
1. Leadership
|
||
There is a nominated leader for each transfer of
|
||
care/handover.
|
||
2. Values
|
||
Transfers and handovers are valued as an essential
|
||
part of care and preparation for handover is a priority.
|
||
3. Right people
|
||
The appropriate people are involved.
|
||
4. Specified time
|
||
and place
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
A specific setting or place has been agreed where
|
||
transfers of care can take place without interruption or
|
||
distraction.
|
||
```
|
||
5. Standardised
|
||
process
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
There is an agreed process for transfers of care. This
|
||
includes an agreed set of information to be covered in
|
||
transfers (minimum data set). This is communicated in
|
||
a structured way, is action-focused, assigns
|
||
responsibility for actions and is supported by clear
|
||
documentation.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
We will build on the
|
||
checklist later in the guide,
|
||
adding more detail and
|
||
suggested measures for
|
||
each of the five good
|
||
practice elements.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
* Checklist adapted from page 1 of
|
||
the NSW [New South Wales] Health
|
||
Implementation Toolkit, Standard Key
|
||
Principles for Clinical Handover
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## How do you achieve it?
|
||
|
||
The second part of this guide shows you how to identify, plan and implement changes in a way that is most likely to deliver the
|
||
planned, structured transfers of care you want to achieve. It is based on the six step improvement process:
|
||
|
||
For those who are familiar with running improvement projects, a summary of this guide for each of the six steps is included at
|
||
Appendix M.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
### Start out
|
||
|
||
Start by finding out about any existing policies or protocols for transfer of care in your organisation. You may not know exactly
|
||
what part of the transfer process you want to improve yet, or even how wide your focus will be (e.g. team, department or
|
||
organisation). This is fine. The purpose of this first step is to get a clear idea of what is happening in your current transfer processes
|
||
and start to understand where the problems and solutions might be found.
|
||
|
||
Observe a transfer of care and record the findings, but ensure that staff know they are not being tested. Transfers of care can be
|
||
varied, depending on the time of day and who is doing it, so it’s a good idea to observe several transfers.
|
||
|
||
You can use:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
observation techniques (consider using photos and/or videos)
|
||
staff, patient/client questionnaires
|
||
group discussion and/or interviews.
|
||
```
|
||
Think about what happens before and after the transfer of care.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
How is information prepared for the transfer of care?
|
||
Is information easy to find?
|
||
What happens to documentation after the transfer of care?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
You might start using observation and
|
||
process mapping techniques to help
|
||
you understand where the problems in
|
||
your transfer of care processes might
|
||
be, but they will be valuable tools later
|
||
in the improvement process too, when
|
||
you are gathering and generating
|
||
ideas for improvement.
|
||
Royal College of Physicians, Acute
|
||
Care Toolkit: 1 Handover (2011)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Measure the processes you are observing. You will need to do more detailed
|
||
measurement later in your improvement project, but gathering some initial data
|
||
here as part of your observations is a good idea.
|
||
|
||
You could:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Time the transfer of information.
|
||
Count the number of interruptions during the transfer of
|
||
information.
|
||
Count the number of times transfer of care documentation is
|
||
completed.
|
||
List the type information included in transfers of care and record
|
||
how often this information is included in each communication.
|
||
Measure how often the information is repeated.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
A flipchart is a simple but good way to record your^
|
||
observation data.
|
||
```
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
For further ideas of how to map and measure current practice see
|
||
resources section for links to:
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
The Quality and Value Toolkit (process mapping, patient
|
||
perspectives)
|
||
The Productive Ward (acute), Productive Mental Health
|
||
Ward, Productive Community Hospital and Productive
|
||
Theatre Handover
|
||
The Productive General Practice for general practice
|
||
The Care Homes Wellbeing Programme for the care home
|
||
sector
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Some of these resources are still available on the NHS Institute’s
|
||
website at: http://www.institute.nhs.uk
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
For alternatives contact us at http://www.qualityimprovementclinic.com
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### What does ‘good’ look like?
|
||
|
||
At this stage, it is useful to consider what ‘good’ would look like for the people in your care. One way of thinking about this is to
|
||
consider what processes and behaviours you would want to see happen for yourself or a member of your family whose care is being
|
||
transferred to another person or team. If you don’t usually include patients in your improvement work, we’d encourage you to ask
|
||
their opinion, and if you want to do more see the link below on experienced-based design.
|
||
|
||
Use what you have learnt from your observations, measurements and process mapping and compare your current processes with
|
||
the elements in the good practice checklist. (see Appendix B for examples of questions you can use to prompt discussion and
|
||
generate ideas with staff, patients or clients.)
|
||
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Find out more about how to use:
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Experienced based design
|
||
Process mapping
|
||
Root cause analysis (including the ‘Five whys’)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
You could use process mapping
|
||
to map communication of
|
||
information between shifts, teams
|
||
or departments.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
### Define and scope
|
||
|
||
Once you have identified and captured what ‘good’ looks like in your transfer of care
|
||
processes, and started to identify what you need to improve in your own systems, the next key
|
||
step is to define a clear aim for your project.
|
||
|
||
This is where the Model for Improvement published in The Improvement Guide (Langley et
|
||
al. 1996) can help you. Whatever your project and however big or small, the Model for
|
||
Improvement will give you a simple, adaptable and thorough framework for developing, testing
|
||
and implementing changes. Using the Model for Improvement means your changes are more
|
||
likely to lead to the improvement you set out to make. (For more information on the Model for
|
||
Improvement, see Appendix C.)
|
||
|
||
#### What are we trying to accomplish?
|
||
|
||
This is the first question in the Model for Improvement. Being clear about the aim of the work
|
||
will improve your chances of success. Using a SMART aim is one way to focus your project.
|
||
(For more on SMART aims see Appendix D.)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Example – project aim: ‘By December 2015, reduce the time the team spends on
|
||
transfer of care (productivity) AND make the information handed over or transferred
|
||
```
|
||
##### appropriate, easy to remember, easy to understand and easy to act upon (quality)’.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Link your improvement project to your organisation ’s strategic aims
|
||
|
||
A project that meets the practical, day-to-day needs of your team and your patients or clients, as well as the priorities of the
|
||
organisation you work for, will be much more likely to succeed.
|
||
|
||
Your organisation, health community or commissioning group will have a number of key issues identified as priorities. We know that
|
||
matching your improvement programme to your organisation’s ‘big issues’ will help its success.
|
||
|
||
You can find your ‘big issues’:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
in the organisation’s business plan or annual report
|
||
on the trust or commissioning group website or intranet
|
||
by asking your project sponsor
|
||
```
|
||
Examples of ‘big issues’ include:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
delays in discharge
|
||
safeguarding
|
||
patient experience
|
||
patient harm
|
||
workforce efficiency.
|
||
```
|
||
Capturing and tracking the link
|
||
|
||
You can track the links and test your ideas using simple ‘driver diagrams’.
|
||
|
||
This type of diagram can be useful to generate interest and commitment from your
|
||
sponsor, your project team and others you are working with. It will also help you
|
||
understand the impact of improvement work undertaken at the front line and its
|
||
contribution to the organisation’s high-level performance targets.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Find a good sponsor
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
It is important that your project is supported
|
||
by an enthusiastic and empowered sponsor.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
The right sponsor will:
|
||
provide high-level support for your
|
||
project
|
||
offer advice
|
||
help to engage other team members
|
||
link your improvement project aim to
|
||
your organisation’s big issues/
|
||
strategic aims
|
||
help remove obstacles to progress.
|
||
This might be:
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Director of Nursing or Matron
|
||
Medical or Clinical Director
|
||
Practice or Care Home Manager
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Example driver diagram linking a transfer of care improvement aim to the organisational aim of reducing mortality.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Throughout the guide you will
|
||
see how you can build on this
|
||
basic diagram, adding on your
|
||
improvement project
|
||
measures and your change
|
||
interventions as you develop
|
||
them.
|
||
```
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Click here for more information about
|
||
using driver diagrams in your
|
||
improvement work
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
© Alison Cole and Nicola Davey, 2013
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### What is the scale of your improvement project?
|
||
|
||
You may be using this guide to make a small change in the way you manage transfers of care, or you might be trying to make a
|
||
change across your whole organisation, or even across the local care community. Whatever level you are working at, you need to
|
||
set the scope of your project at the start to ensure it is manageable and achievable. Go where you think there is most need or where
|
||
there is most enthusiasm. A success early in the project is vital to help stimulate enthusiasm and spread the good work.
|
||
|
||
#### Engage staff, patients and users and set up your project team
|
||
|
||
##### Engaging stakeholders
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Think about different ways to engage
|
||
stakeholders (staff, patients and service
|
||
users) and convince them of the
|
||
importance of improving transfers of care.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
As well as patient stories, you can use
|
||
evidence and recommendations from the
|
||
transfer of care ‘Useful resources’ at the
|
||
back of this guide. The ‘Clinical
|
||
engagement’ page of the NHS Institute’s
|
||
Quality and Service Improvement Tools
|
||
has further suggestions.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Everyone wants to deliver good care; using
|
||
patient stories (like the one at Appendix A)
|
||
or staff experiences can help teams commit
|
||
to change and improvement. The film: The
|
||
trouble with handovers is a powerful
|
||
reminder about why it is so important to
|
||
transfer the right information to the right
|
||
person at the right time.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Who to include in your team?
|
||
|
||
Finding the right people to champion the project and drive it forward with insight and enthusiasm is crucial. Consider what each
|
||
team member can offer; do they have expert knowledge and/or are they empowered to make decisions? This simple grid tool can
|
||
help you identify what each team member will be able to bring to the project. Examples of the team selection grid for different
|
||
settings are at Appendix E
|
||
|
||
**Project team ‘knowledge and empowerment’ grid**
|
||
|
||
(^) © Profound Knowledge Products Inc.
|
||
Senior leadership is essential. Identify a clinical or
|
||
service champion who will be a visible and active
|
||
supporter of your improvement project.
|
||
Include staff who are actually involved in the transfers
|
||
of care on a day-to-day basis - both those who deliver
|
||
and receive the communication.
|
||
Consider who else might use the transfer of care
|
||
information. For example, might the physiotherapists
|
||
use or update information about falls risk on the
|
||
nursing shift handover document?
|
||
Have you included someone from the IT team?
|
||
Include people who can relate their experience of the
|
||
transfer of care, e.g. the patient, resident or client. As a
|
||
minimum, consider how you will get their input to the
|
||
transfer of care process. Videoing people talking about
|
||
their experiences can be a particularly powerful tool
|
||
and is not difficult to set up. The experience based
|
||
design toolkit provides further guidance on interviewing
|
||
and filming individuals.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Putting it all together
|
||
|
||
By this stage, you and your team will have agreed the aim and scope of the improvement and how it fits with
|
||
your organisation’s wider strategic aims and targets. It is a good idea to capture this in one place, using a
|
||
simple template such as the one shown in Appendix F. It will be a useful focus for further discussions with
|
||
sponsors and others.
|
||
|
||
Sustainability
|
||
|
||
Sustaining your improvements should never be an afterthought. Sustainability is a crucial
|
||
and integral part of any successful improvement project. It is something you need to be
|
||
planning for from the start and will run through every aspect of your improvement work; from
|
||
how you engage leaders, staff, patients and clients in developing, testing and implementing
|
||
changes, to celebrating success at the end of your project.
|
||
|
||
See Step 6: Sustain and share (page 38) for more information about sustainability.
|
||
|
||
Further reading
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
The OSSIE Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement and the
|
||
associated implementation toolkit are highly recommended for
|
||
anyone involved in improving handover or transfer of care in
|
||
any care setting.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
### Measure and understand
|
||
|
||
Measurement for improvement does not have to be onerous; it is about using a few specific
|
||
measures, linked to your project aim to answer the question: ‘How will I know that my changes
|
||
have made an improvement?’
|
||
|
||
You will want to use some process measures for your change ideas and also your improvement
|
||
focus, and you will want to at least one outcome measure for your improvement project aim.
|
||
|
||
For your overarching improvement aim you might want to choose a process measure and an
|
||
outcome measure from the list below:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
No. of transfers right each time– based on your definition of ‘right’ (Process measure)
|
||
No. of staff who know which patients are at risk of fall (Outcome measure)
|
||
No of patients who get diagnostic tests when requested (Outcome measure)
|
||
No. of staff who know who is in charge of handover and get the information they require
|
||
for their job (Outcome measure)
|
||
No. of times when number of staff involved in handover and time taken is within agreed limit (Outcome measure)
|
||
```
|
||
You will find some more on measures for the smaller pieces – after we have described the 7 steps to measurement.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Whatever you choose to measure, there are seven basic steps to follow:
|
||
|
||
The 7 steps to measurement
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
1: Decide project
|
||
aims
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
You will have already done this.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2: Choose your
|
||
measures
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
You may have a long list of possible measures, so you need to narrow
|
||
these down to the most appropriate.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
3: Define your
|
||
measures
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Be clear about exactly what you are measuring.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
4: Collect data Think about what, who, how^ and when^ to measure and establish a
|
||
baseline.
|
||
5: Analyse and
|
||
present results
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
There are many tools to help you do this, including:
|
||
bar charts to understand common problems
|
||
run charts or statistical process control (SPC) charts to
|
||
demonstrate your progress
|
||
photos, videos and stories.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
6: Review
|
||
measures
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Look at the data regularly. What does it tell you? What should you do
|
||
next?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
7: Keep going Repeat steps 4 – 6.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
More online...
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
7 steps to measurement video
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Measuring for improvement (Improvement Leaders’ Guide)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Handover and transfers of Care – Step-by-step measurement guide
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Choose your measures and start collecting your baseline data
|
||
|
||
You should not be spending lots of time collecting data! From your long list of things you could measure, just pick a few.
|
||
|
||
For your improvement project aim pick a process or outcome measure that will
|
||
tell you whether you have achieved your aim. It should be something that is
|
||
meaningful to you and your team. Outcome measures are often more meaningful
|
||
to patients, but are more frequently affected by changes that are beyond your
|
||
control. Process measures can appeal to patients and carers too e.g. the number
|
||
of transfers of care in your weekly sample that are judged to be right – particularly
|
||
if patients have been involved in creating the definition of ‘right’ e.g. the community
|
||
rehabilitation therapists meet in the team office at 4.30pm and handover all
|
||
planned actions for patients by completing the agreed online template.
|
||
|
||
So the choice on data collection is a balance between ease and reliability of collection and
|
||
whether it can inform your next action. Whatever you decide you should pick at least
|
||
one and start collecting this data now. This will give you your baseline for the
|
||
improvement project. If you don’t collect your baseline data now, it will be difficult to prove
|
||
your changes have made an improvement later.
|
||
|
||
There are often lots of things that need fixing, and your next piece of work will help you
|
||
decide where to start (your first improvement focus). From all your change ideas you
|
||
will then need to select the first change intervention. In the box below and on the next page we have given some examples of
|
||
process and outcome measures that focus on frontline care. We have also included process measures with a management focus so
|
||
that you can see the connection between your work and your organisation’s strategic objectives.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Remember, you may not see
|
||
changes in these measures
|
||
until you have made and
|
||
sustained several smaller
|
||
changes, or even carried out
|
||
several improvement
|
||
projects.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Driver diagram showing process and outcome measures from management and frontline care perspectives
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
You may not be able to collect
|
||
data for all your project outcome
|
||
measures yet, but you need to
|
||
start planning how and when you
|
||
will.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
© Nicola Davey. 2015
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
© Nicola Davey. 2015
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Capture and display the data
|
||
|
||
Plotting your data in a run chart is a simple way to see the variation in the system and if any improvements have been made. You
|
||
need 25 data points before doing any analysis, so using more frequent data (weekly or daily, in favour of monthly or quarterly) is
|
||
better. You can look for a ‘run’ of seven points or more - all up, all down, or all above or below the median value. The run will tell you
|
||
if an improvement has been made.
|
||
|
||
Example run charts capturing project outcome data
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
0
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
4
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
6
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
8
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
10
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
12
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
1
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
3
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
7
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
9
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
11
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
13
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
15
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
17
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
19
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
21
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
23
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
25
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
27
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Day
|
||
29
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Number of times standard format followed
|
||
Number of times standard format followed Median
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
0
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
0.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
1
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
1.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
3
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
3.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
4
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
4.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Staff survey -Level of preparedness to deliver care
|
||
(1 = not prepared, 5 = prepared)
|
||
Staff Survey Results Median
|
||
```
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Click here for more about using run charts and
|
||
simple statistical measures
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
### Design and plan
|
||
|
||
Once you have mapped your current process and compared data about your transfers
|
||
of care with best practice, you need to decide where to start – this will be your initial
|
||
improvement focus. You may want to dig deeper into your current transfer of care
|
||
processes using process mapping and root cause analysis techniques such as the
|
||
‘Five whys’ to help you understand how your transfer fits into the bigger picture.
|
||
|
||
Revisit the driver diagram on page 15. The suggested improvement focuses are drawn from the good practice checklist
|
||
mentioned earlier in the guide (for full list see pages 45 - 46 ).
|
||
|
||
Focus your improvement effort on something in this list that you believe will help achieve your improvement project aim. For
|
||
example, you predict that finding a quiet place to communicate without interruptions will help speed up the handover or transfer of
|
||
care process. Working with your project team, choose one area as your first improvement focus. There are different ways of
|
||
doing this and you might choose to generate change ideas first before finally deciding where to focus.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
All the good practice elements are interlinked and they may all need to be worked on at some point. Some changes may be
|
||
developed very quickly (e.g. moving the location of handover); others may take a longer (e.g. changing the culture to place a higher
|
||
value on transfers of care and give them priority over other tasks).
|
||
|
||
#### Where to start?
|
||
|
||
Look at your current process map and data. Which aspects of the process need improving first? You could use a bar chart to display
|
||
the results from a staff survey and then focus your initial improvement on the most commonly-reported problems.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Pareto analysis is a simple technique that helps
|
||
you to focus efforts on the problems that offer the
|
||
greatest potential for improvement by showing
|
||
their relative frequency or size in a descending
|
||
bar graph.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Pareto's principle, the ‘80/20’ rule, asserts that
|
||
for many events, roughly 80% of the effects come
|
||
from 20% of the causes. For example, if
|
||
documentation is not completed, the process
|
||
takes longer and information may be missed or
|
||
mistakes made.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
4 4 4
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2 2
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
1 1 1 1 1
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
0
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
0.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
1
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
1.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
3
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
3.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
4
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
4.5
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Number of staff who highlighted problem
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Problems with handover identfied by staff
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
You could use a priority matrix to categorise your improvement ideas. Quick wins can be tested and implemented immediately.
|
||
High-priority changes may take more planning and resources to achieve.
|
||
|
||
Example priority matrix
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Likely impact on project aim
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Ease of testing and implementation
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Quick wins
|
||
Just do it!
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Record the idea – but
|
||
consider carefully
|
||
whether it is worth
|
||
the input
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
LOW
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
LOW
|
||
(hard)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
HIGH
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
HIGH
|
||
(easy) Nice to have Test and implement
|
||
once higher priorities
|
||
have been achieved
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
High priority
|
||
Plan with your team
|
||
how you will test and
|
||
implement these
|
||
ideas
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Royal College of Physicians,
|
||
Acute Care Toolkit: 1
|
||
Handover (2011)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Generate improvement ideas
|
||
|
||
Working with your team and using all the data and observations you already have, you can now focus more fully on generating
|
||
ideas for changes. These help you select your ‘change interventions’. There are lots of examples of change interventions in the
|
||
many handover resources that already exist (see Useful resources on Page 40). Use these to stimulate discussion about what is
|
||
possible in your setting. Remember improvement is context specific, so solutions that work for one team in one place don’t easily
|
||
transplant to another team in another place. Some adaption is often required in order for adoption to follow. The approach described
|
||
in this guide can be used to ‘check out’ of test a proven intervention and optimise its effect in a different place.
|
||
|
||
As an example, we have used the development of a standardised process to illustrate how you could develop and test some
|
||
change interventions.
|
||
|
||
(^) Is the right information shared at transfer
|
||
of care? Identify the pieces of information that
|
||
should be included in transfers of care. This is
|
||
the information you need to include in your
|
||
standard information template (see
|
||
examples below and in Appendix K).
|
||
Is communication structured in a
|
||
standardised way? You will need to agree
|
||
the way in which you want to standardise the
|
||
transfer of your information.
|
||
Work with your team to design a structured
|
||
Documented process: How will your new
|
||
standardised process be documented and
|
||
shared with new members of the team and the
|
||
wider organisation.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Design your change intervention(s)
|
||
|
||
Design your own **‘** standard transfer of care **’** template
|
||
|
||
Let’s take one of these change interventions - standard transfer of care template – and look at how you might go about
|
||
developing, testing and implementing it. Below is an example of an information template sheet that could be used in a hospital ward
|
||
for a transfer of care. You may want to trial this one, but it is better if your transfer of care template includes information which is
|
||
specific and relevant to your own care environment. A similar approach may be used in general practice for referral letters.
|
||
|
||
Example information template for nursing shift handover (more examples in Appendix K)
|
||
|
||
(^) Example from the George Eliot Hospital
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Make it your own
|
||
|
||
Now create your own standard information template.
|
||
|
||
The quality of care you give is reflected in the quality of communication
|
||
you use every day. The documentation needs to reflect this by including
|
||
the right information. This information is called the minimum data set.
|
||
|
||
During the planning stage of your project you will have chosen your
|
||
SMART aim. But whatever priorities you have chosen, transfers of care
|
||
should always:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
communicate the right information
|
||
focus on the goals of the patient/client
|
||
clarify any significant changes easily
|
||
be action focused – what needs to be done, by when and by
|
||
whom
|
||
prioritise patients/clients with the most time-critical needs
|
||
Include only information which is essential and adds value; try to
|
||
stay focused on the information that is essential to be transferred
|
||
at that point.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Consider including:
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
your identity and role
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
patient/client identifying information (at least 2
|
||
pieces is recommended, e.g. name, date of birth,
|
||
patient ID, location)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
immediate clinical situation of the patient
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
most recent observations/MEWS score (status of
|
||
referral to critical care outreach team where
|
||
appropriate)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
reason for admission/referral/discharge
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
relevant medical history, results of investigations,
|
||
treatment to date, current medications
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
current safety/risk factors and associated care plans
|
||
(diabetes, allergies, falls, pressure areas, nutrition,
|
||
catheter, urine and bowel, infection control, cannula)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
recommended actions, timeframes and who is
|
||
responsible (tests/investigations, specialist referrals,
|
||
discharge etc). This is really important: What do
|
||
you need the person receiving the transfer of
|
||
care to do?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Remember to clarify/confirm understanding and transfer
|
||
of responsibility.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Further guidance on the minimum data set is available in
|
||
A Clinician’s Guide to Record Standards
|
||
```
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
The emishealth eHandover electronic handover system has been
|
||
development at Barking, Havering and Redbridge University
|
||
Hospitals NHS Trust Community Services. Based on standard
|
||
Microsoft tools that are readily available in most trusts, initial
|
||
studies have demonstrated that eHandover is delivering an
|
||
improvement in safety, productivity and staff satisfaction.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Use ‘d ot voting ’ to define your ‘ minimum data set ’
|
||
|
||
Dot voting is one simple way to collect the opinions of those
|
||
involved in the transfer of care about which pieces of information
|
||
should be included in a standard template. For more information
|
||
on dot voting, see Appendix G.
|
||
|
||
Now think about where else this information is found. Does it
|
||
need to be included in the transfer of care template, or is it
|
||
readily available elsewhere, e.g. on a patient whiteboard which
|
||
could be used as part of the transfer of care?
|
||
|
||
You should now have a complete list of all the information you
|
||
will include in your new standard template. The next step is to
|
||
organise this information using a structured communication tool
|
||
such as SBAR (see page 31 ).
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
A simple flip chart and
|
||
some coloured pens are all
|
||
you need to carry out a dot
|
||
voting exercise.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Improvement projects
|
||
should aim to reduce, not
|
||
increase work. Changes
|
||
should avoid duplication
|
||
of task wherever this is
|
||
safe to do.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Using ‘structured communication t ools
|
||
|
||
Structured communication tools are easy-to-remember
|
||
mechanisms that you can use to frame conversations, especially
|
||
critical ones, requiring someone’s (e.g. a clinician’s) immediate
|
||
attention and action. These tools enable you to clarify what
|
||
information should be communicated between members of the
|
||
team, and how. They can also help develop teamwork and foster
|
||
|
||
#### a culture of patient safety.
|
||
|
||
SBAR is one example. It stands for: Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation.
|
||
The tool consists of standardised prompt questions within four key sections, helping to ensure
|
||
that staff are sharing concise and focused information.
|
||
|
||
SBAR:
|
||
encourages staff to communicate assertively and effectively, reducing the need for
|
||
repetition
|
||
helps staff anticipate the information needed by colleagues
|
||
prompts staff to formulate information with the right level of detail.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
‘ HAND ME AN ISOBAR ’ is another example of a
|
||
structured communication tool. Developed by the
|
||
Royal Hobart Hospital in Tasmania, it is one of
|
||
several examples featured in the OSSIE Guide to
|
||
Clinical Handover Improvement (Australian
|
||
Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare).
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Once you have chosen the structured communication approach you want to use,
|
||
you need to arrange your minimum data set accordingly.
|
||
|
||
You could:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
put all the pieces of information you want to communicate onto sticky notes
|
||
put up flipcharts on the wall – one for each letter of the tool you have
|
||
chosen, e.g. SBAR, ISOBAR, RSVP etc.
|
||
in the case of shift handovers, include a flipchart for a safety briefing at the
|
||
beginning or end
|
||
ask the team to move the sticky notes to the flipchart they think is most
|
||
appropriate.
|
||
```
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
For prompt cards and other resources to
|
||
help you use SBAR in several different
|
||
settings (including acute, primary care and
|
||
community mental health) see:
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
There are lots of good examples of standard
|
||
protocols in the OSSIE Guide to Clinical
|
||
Handover Improvement.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
The ABC of handover is another model
|
||
which prompts the communication of clinical
|
||
and operational issues between shifts
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
RSVP is a similar structured communication
|
||
tool developed by Portsmouth Hospitals.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Use a flipchart to capture data for
|
||
each letter of the tool you have
|
||
chosen, e.g. Situation,
|
||
Background, Assessment,
|
||
Recommendation.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
The next step is to design your template based on these information groups.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Decide how you will indicate which patients are priorities and add this to your template.
|
||
Prompt the person receiving the transfer of care to clarify and read back the information and confirm they are taking over
|
||
responsibility for care from this point.
|
||
```
|
||
Don’t worry about getting too technical with document function and layout for your initial testing of the template. Try finding
|
||
someone in your team or organisation with some spreadsheet or word processing skills to mock one up for you. Or simply draw
|
||
one by hand for your initial testing.
|
||
|
||
#### Document your standard process
|
||
|
||
As well as standardising the information you are going to communicate, you need to also standardise the process for
|
||
communication. You will develop this process and test your change interventions for the other areas of good practice. You will
|
||
also need to test the best way to document your standard process and communicate it to everyone involved. An example of a
|
||
documented process is attached at Appendix K.
|
||
|
||
#### Choose and review your measures
|
||
|
||
Once you have developed your change interventions, you will need to decide
|
||
which measures will be most helpful. Choose just a couple of measures that you
|
||
think give the best feedback about the impact of your change intervention.
|
||
Whatever you choose, make sure the data can be collected quickly and easily, e.g.
|
||
if you choose to measure whether or not something happens in a particular way,
|
||
the answer can be simply ‘yes’ or ‘no’.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix H uses the ‘good practice checklist’ and shows
|
||
some suggested measures that you might want to
|
||
consider for each improvement intervention. You will
|
||
notice that these often overlap.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Developing your measures for improvement is an
|
||
iterative process. In some cases, you will only be able
|
||
to refine your measures once you have designed your
|
||
test of change. For example, you can’t measure
|
||
whether the new process is followed until you have
|
||
defined what the new process is.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Think of measurement of
|
||
change interventions as
|
||
providing a ‘before’ and ‘after’
|
||
snapshot of each test.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
### Pilot and implement
|
||
|
||
This is where you use the ‘plan, do, study, act’ (PDSA) cycles in the Model for Improvement.
|
||
The tests are repeated until a reliable change has been established (see Appendix I & J for worked
|
||
examples)
|
||
|
||
Plan: Plan which change intervention you will test (e.g. structured transfer of care sheets), where
|
||
you will test them, who will support you and how you will train and inform all staff.
|
||
|
||
Do: Train your test team and start using the tools. Experience has shown that implementation
|
||
works best when staff are fully involved and encouraged to develop or modify their own version of
|
||
your change intervention (see ‘Flexible standardisation’ on page 37).
|
||
|
||
Study: Assess the impact of the intervention using the measures you have agreed and refined. One
|
||
of the most useful measures of success will come from staff feedback.
|
||
|
||
Act: Is your intervention ready to be implemented? If not you will need to run the PDSA test cycle
|
||
again. If it is ready for implementation, you will need to plan how you will roll it out to the wider
|
||
department or organisation and, crucially, how you will sustain the improvement in the long term.
|
||
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Click here for more on the Model for
|
||
Improvement and PDSA:
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Example: PDSA cycle to test a standard transfer of care template (form)
|
||
|
||
#### Plan: (what, where, when, who, how)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Keep your initial testing small. Test on:
|
||
one patient, resident or client
|
||
one bay or unit
|
||
half a ward, or a floor
|
||
one shift
|
||
variety of transfers of care (early / late shift / nights).
|
||
TIP: Use the test documentation for handover or transfer of
|
||
care alongside the old format during testing to minimise risk
|
||
and ensure continuity of care.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Do:
|
||
Continue the testing for as long as you need; it may
|
||
be a few days, weeks or even longer, depending on
|
||
your service.
|
||
You may find that the same information might not be
|
||
relevant for all types of transfers.
|
||
TIP: You may need to repeat the test cycle a few
|
||
times to find the transfer of care documentation
|
||
and processes that work best for your team.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Study:
|
||
During each test, capture what happens using your chosen
|
||
measures and record them. This will allow you to study the
|
||
results and feedback. From this data, you can then work out your
|
||
next action and plan your next test. Consider these questions:
|
||
Are the fields on the documentation all adding value for
|
||
your patients/residents/clients?
|
||
Has everyone been involved?
|
||
How will information be updated in the template and
|
||
whose responsibility will it be?
|
||
Do those people have the appropriate technical skills to
|
||
do this?
|
||
What training is needed to roll this out further?
|
||
Does the layout help staff find information easily?
|
||
Do we print the transfer of care documentation as a
|
||
record and if so how?
|
||
TIP: When observing tests it is important to note the factors
|
||
that may lead to variability (eg what information gets
|
||
```
|
||
##### included or left out when it’s ‘busy’ and when it’s ‘quiet’).
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Act:
|
||
Increase the size of your test as you gain confidence
|
||
in the new transfer of care design. Keep going until
|
||
you are happy that the format is suitable to be tested
|
||
for a longer period on its own and not alongside the
|
||
```
|
||
##### old process.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
See Appendix I for a detailed
|
||
example of how one team
|
||
used PDSA to test a new
|
||
handover template.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Plan for implementation
|
||
|
||
Once you are confident that your design is about right, start to plan your tests for implementation.
|
||
|
||
We have used the development of a standard information template as our change intervention example. But, of course, this is just
|
||
one change that could help you to meet your improvement project aim. You may now want to look at other change interventions
|
||
before rolling out to whole teams or your wider organisation. Consider what works best for your project:
|
||
|
||
Either way, before you implement your new transfer of care process, you will need to plan tests to manage any risks associated
|
||
with stopping the old process. You will also need to engage and educate the teams involved.
|
||
|
||
As you plan your tests for implementation, think about:
|
||
|
||
Training – Training will be required for initial implementation and will be
|
||
ongoing to ensure new team members understand the transfer of care process.
|
||
Documentation – What documentation, policies and procedures are required
|
||
and who will be responsible for updating documentation over time?
|
||
Resourcing – What resources are required to implement the change (e.g.
|
||
printers, electronic devices)?
|
||
Measurement – Plan which measures will be used during and after
|
||
implementation and make sure these are visible to stakeholders.
|
||
Engaging stakeholders – Continue to engage stakeholders and communicate
|
||
the rationale for change (see page 16 ).
|
||
(Adapted from Langley, Moen et al, The Improvement Guide 2nd Edition (2009))
|
||
|
||
To reduce risk and increase user acceptance you might
|
||
want to use a Simulation – this could involve staff trying
|
||
out the new system using a case study?
|
||
See Appendix J for a detailed
|
||
example of how one team used
|
||
PDSA to test the
|
||
implementation of a new
|
||
transfer of care process.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
**‘** Flexible **’** standardisation
|
||
|
||
You may need to run small tests with each team so that they can make small adjustments that work for them. Instead of a rigid
|
||
approach, consider ‘flexible’ standardisation. This allows teams or departments to make small changes of their own that are shown
|
||
(by measurement) to improve things in their setting. But there still need to be a control in place to avoid ad-hoc changes and many
|
||
different versions being used across your organisation.
|
||
|
||
One method is to implement a control group to decide what can be changed and what has to stay. This decision may be linked to
|
||
the priorities outlined in your project plan which reflect the organisation’s big issues. For example, if you have linked the transfer of
|
||
care project to length of stay, you may want to ensure that expected date of discharge stays in all documents.
|
||
|
||
Spreading Good Practice
|
||
|
||
As you achieve improvements in your transfer of care process it is really important to spread your good practice throughout the
|
||
system in which you work.
|
||
|
||
Think about which teams, departments or communication processes you could target next. For example, if you started by improving
|
||
communication when transferring patients between wards or departments within your organisation, could you adapt the same
|
||
communication tool for discharging patients from hospital to care homes, rehabilitation and primary care services?
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
For more information on how to do this, see Sarah W Fraser, Accelerating the Spread of Good Practice: A Workbook for
|
||
Healthcare (2002).
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
### Sustain and share
|
||
|
||
##### ‘The most successful organisations are those that can implement and sustain effective improvement
|
||
|
||
##### initiatives leading to increased quality and patient experience at lower cost.’
|
||
|
||
Sustainability Model and Guide
|
||
|
||
We have already said at the start of this guide that sustaining your improvements should
|
||
never be an afterthought, but something to consider at the very beginning of your
|
||
improvement work. Naturally, however, sustainability is something you will want to
|
||
consider as you roll out and share the new processes you have developed and refined.
|
||
|
||
The Sustainability Model and Sustainability Guide are valuable resources which will
|
||
help you build sustainability into the fabric of your improvement work.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
The Sustainability Model is a diagnostic tool that will help you identify strengths
|
||
and weaknesses in your implementation plan and predict the likelihood of
|
||
sustainability for the improvement initiative.
|
||
The Sustainability Guide provides practical advice on how you might increase
|
||
the likelihood of sustainability for your improvement initiative.
|
||
```
|
||
Click here to access the Sustainability Model and Guide
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
‘ Senior leadership engagement
|
||
and clinical leadership
|
||
engagement in your project are
|
||
two of the key factors in
|
||
sustaining project
|
||
improvements’
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
NHS Sustainability Guide
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Share and celebrate success
|
||
|
||
Tell people how well the new handover or transfer of care is working. Not only do those doing it need
|
||
to know, but tell other wards, teams, departments, directors and the whole organisation to spread the
|
||
good practice and gain recognition for the hard work the team and all the staff have done. Consider
|
||
how you can spread the word using:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
team meetings and existing transfer of care meetings
|
||
one-to-one conversations
|
||
posters (see Appendix L)
|
||
newsletters
|
||
individual letters/emails.
|
||
```
|
||
#### Keep measuring....
|
||
|
||
Agree to measure processes and outcomes periodically to ensure you are sustaining
|
||
improvements and that staff aren’t tempted to return to old ways of working.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## Useful resources
|
||
|
||
Reports and standards
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
OSSIE Guide to Clinical Handover Improvement http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/clinical-communications/clinical-handover/ossie-
|
||
guide/
|
||
Implementation Toolkit for Clinical Handover Improvement http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-
|
||
content/uploads/2012/02/ImplementationToolkitforClinicalHandoverImprovement.pdf
|
||
Communication During Patient Hand-Overs, World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Patient Safety Solutions (2007)
|
||
http://www.who.int/patientsafety/solutions/patientsafety/PS-Solution3.pdf
|
||
Safe handover: safe patients - Guidance on clinical handover for clinicians and managers, BMA Junior Doctors Committee, http://www.bma.org.uk
|
||
Acute Care Toolkit: 1 Handover, Royal College of Physicians (2011) http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/resources/acute-care-toolkit- 1 - handover
|
||
A Clinician’s Guide to Record Standards – Part 2: Standards for the structure and content of medical records and communications when
|
||
patients are admitted to hospital, Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (2008) https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/FPM-clinicians-
|
||
guide2.pdf
|
||
'Passing the Baton - A Practical Guide to Effective Discharge Planning', National Leadership and Innovation Agency for Healthcare
|
||
http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/829/page/36467
|
||
Clinical Handover Literature Review, The eHealth Services Research Group, University of Tasmania for the: Australian Commission on Safety
|
||
and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) 2008. MC Wong, KC Yee, P Turner. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-
|
||
content/uploads/2008/01/Clinical-Handover-Literature-Review-for-release.pdf
|
||
Safe Clinical Handover. A resource for transferring care from General Practice to Hospitals and Hospitals to General Practice
|
||
http://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/acute-care/safe_clinical_handover/Safe_Clinical_Handover.pdf
|
||
An experimental comparison of handover methods Bhabra G, Mackeith S, Monteiro P, Pothier DD, Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Apr;89(3):298-
|
||
300 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17394718
|
||
```
|
||
Tools and guides
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
The Improvement Guide, Langley, Moen et al. Jossey-Bass, 1996 , 2nd Edition 2009
|
||
The trouble with handovers video http://www.focusbiz.co.uk/the-trouble-with-handovers/
|
||
NSW [New South Wales] Health Implementation Toolkit, Standard Key Principles for Clinical Handover
|
||
http://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/acute-care/safe_clinical_handover/implementation-toolkit.pdf
|
||
Quality and service improvement tools (process mapping, patient perspectives) http://www.institute.nhs.uk/qualitytools
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
The Productive Series: http://www.institute.nhs.uk/productives
|
||
o The Productive Ward (shift handovers module)
|
||
o The Productive Mental Health Ward (shift handovers module)
|
||
o The Productive Operating Theatre (handover and teamworking modules)
|
||
o The Productive Community Hospital (handover module)
|
||
The Care Homes Wellbeing Programme http://www.institute.nhs.uk/carehomes
|
||
Experience Based Design Toolkit http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/ebcd
|
||
Model for Improvement (including PDSA) http://www.institute.nhs.uk/pdsa
|
||
Improvement Leaders’ Guides:
|
||
o Process Mapping, Analysis and Redesign http://www.nhsiq.nhs.uk/media/2594717/ilg_-_process_mapping__analysis_and_redesign.pdf
|
||
o Measuring for improvement http://www.nhsiq.nhs.uk/media/2541082/improvement_leaders_guide_-
|
||
_measurement_for_improvement.pdf
|
||
The 7 steps to measurement video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za1o77jAnbw
|
||
Run charts and simple statistical measures (including a video guide) http://www.institute.nhs.uk/spc
|
||
Root cause analysis (including the ‘Five whys’) http://www.institute.nhs.uk/rca
|
||
eHandover https://www.emishealth.com/products/ehandover/
|
||
Structured communications tools
|
||
o SBAR http://www.institute.nhs.uk/sbar
|
||
o The ABC of handover http://emj.bmj.com/content/early/2012/01/03/emermed- 2011 - 200199.full
|
||
o HAND ME AN ISOBAR http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/clinical-communications/clinical-handover/ossie-guide/
|
||
o RSVP http://www.workforce.southcentral.nhs.uk/pdf/NESC_RSVP_0209.pdf
|
||
Sustainability Model and Guide http://www.evidenceintopractice.scot.nhs.uk/media/135265/sustainability_model.pdf
|
||
Accelerating the Spread of Good Practice: A Workbook for Healthcare Sarah W Fraser, (2002). Via Amazon.
|
||
```
|
||
Case studies and presentations
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Using a communication framework at handover to boost patient outcomes, Christie, P and Robinson, R, Nursing Times, 1 December, 2009 , Vol
|
||
105 , No 47 http://www.nursingtimes.net
|
||
Improving hospital weekend handover: a user-centered, standardised approach Mehra A and Henein C. BMJ Qual Improv
|
||
Report 2014; 2 : doi:10.1136/bmjquality.u202861.w1655 http://qir.bmj.com/content/2/2/u202861.w1655.full
|
||
Improving the safety of patient transfer from AMU using a written checklist, Hindmarsh D, Lees L, Acute Med. 2012;11(1):13-7.
|
||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423341
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
## Appendices
|
||
|
||
Appendix A: Ollie’s story ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43
|
||
|
||
Appendix B: Good practice checklist – examples of questions to prompt discussion and generate ideas ...................................................................... 45
|
||
|
||
Appendix C: The Model for Improvement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 47
|
||
|
||
Appendix D: SMART aims ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 48
|
||
|
||
Appendix E: Team Selection Grid Examples .................................................................................................................................................................. 49
|
||
|
||
Appendix F: Example project template ........................................................................................................................................................................... 50
|
||
|
||
Appendix G: Dot voting .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 51
|
||
|
||
Appendix H: Good practice checklist – suggested measures ......................................................................................................................................... 52
|
||
|
||
Appendix I: Example PDSA for testing a new handover template .................................................................................................................................. 53
|
||
|
||
Appendix J: Example PDSA for testing new transfer of care process ............................................................................................................................. 54
|
||
|
||
Appendix K: Examples of standardised communication templates ................................................................................................................................. 55
|
||
|
||
Appendix L: Example of how a poster can be used to spread the word about new processes ....................................................................................... 58
|
||
|
||
Appendix M: Summary of the six step improvement process for transfer of care ........................................................................................................... 59
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix A: **Ollie’s** story
|
||
|
||
This case study tells the story of a real NHS patient. The patient did not die as a result of
|
||
a series of errors and was thankfully **not ‘clinically harmed’. But** he could have been, as
|
||
his care was compromised more than once through poor handover practices.
|
||
|
||
Overview of situation:
|
||
|
||
Over a one year period Ollie, as he was known to his friends, was admitted to hospital at least 3
|
||
times. As well as the condition he was admitted for, Ollie had epilepsy which was well controlled
|
||
with medicine. After the first admission, he and his wife, Georgette, got to know the routine.
|
||
Georgette would hand a copy of Ollie’s current prescription record to the Ambulance Crew, they
|
||
would take notes and hand it back to her. By the time she met up with Ollie in A&E, his
|
||
prescription record would have disappeared, and so she went armed with another copy to hand
|
||
in. Within 24 hours he would have passed through the Medical Admissions Unit and be on a
|
||
ward, and his prescription record would once again be incomplete. So Georgette would provide
|
||
a further copy of his current prescription.
|
||
|
||
On one occasion, the prescription was written, but Georgette and Ollie knew that the dose of his epilepsy medication was wrong. They pointed this out
|
||
twice on the first day, and again on the second day. It was eventually corrected.
|
||
|
||
Georgette is clear that these poor practices were not the result of bad clinicians, but on gaps
|
||
in information transfer and lack of clarity and/feasibility for task completion amongst team
|
||
members. Georgette continues to share this story and hopes that one day there will be no
|
||
gaps.
|
||
|
||
##### Snapshot:
|
||
|
||
##### In the last year of his life Ollie was
|
||
|
||
##### admitted to hospital several times.
|
||
|
||
##### Even though his wife, Georgette,
|
||
|
||
##### developed an ‘A&E survival pack’ to
|
||
|
||
##### keep him safe, her planned
|
||
|
||
##### ‘information handovers’ failed to
|
||
|
||
##### result in an accurate prescription
|
||
|
||
##### for his regular epilepsy medicine.
|
||
|
||
##### When his prescription was wrong,
|
||
|
||
##### no one seemed to take
|
||
|
||
##### responsibility to get it put right.
|
||
|
||
##### Even
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Although Ollie understood that going one day
|
||
without his epilepsy medicine was unlikely to
|
||
trigger a seizure, he still got anxious – and he
|
||
knew that this anxiety COULD make a seizure
|
||
more likely. This worried Georgette too!
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
The patient perspective
|
||
|
||
Both Ollie and Georgette were reassured by staff that they had been heard and that the error would be corrected. But when it remained unchanged for
|
||
a second day Georgette felt she had to stay, all day as it turned out, until it was put right. Whilst they both knew and understood that a small delay
|
||
would not trigger a seizure, their confidence was dented, and they remained anxious throughout the hospital stay.
|
||
|
||
Staff perspective
|
||
|
||
For many staff this story will not be unusual. It may even be common place. But it is unlikely
|
||
that many instances will be reported or counted as service failures as the outcome is
|
||
classified as ‘patient received medicine and no adverse event’. Negative impacts on patients
|
||
such as ‘anxiety’ are rarely captured, and it is usually only when a catastrophe occurs that the
|
||
effect of serial failures become visible to the staff who have been involved along the way.
|
||
|
||
We can become accustomed to the way things are, and frequently accommodate shortcomings by ‘working around’ the barriers to deliver what is most
|
||
urgently needed. Although evidence shows that the human brain has a limited memory capacity, meaning that an existing task must be dropped to
|
||
make way for a new one when the ‘list is full’, the way we work doesn’t reflect this knowledge.
|
||
|
||
If you haven’t already done so, you could start thinking about what you might change and how you will know if this results in an improvement!
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over
|
||
again and expecting different results.
|
||
Albert Einstein
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix B: Good practice checklist **–** examples of questions to prompt discussion and generate ideas
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
What do we need? What does it mean? Think about...
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Leadership
|
||
There is a nominated leader
|
||
for each transfer of
|
||
care/handover.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Who should have overall responsibility for the transfer of care? This would
|
||
involve ensuring participants attend; introducing and orientating new team
|
||
members; prioritising urgent elements of transfer of care.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Values
|
||
Transfer and handovers are
|
||
valued as an essential part of
|
||
care and preparation for
|
||
handover is a priority.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
How can we ensure information transfer is confidential and non-judgemental?
|
||
How is the importance of transfer of care reinforced in the team, department
|
||
or organisation? (culture)
|
||
What training is required to ensure staff understand their accountability in
|
||
relation to giving and receiving information? Who will design and deliver this
|
||
training? How will staff be released from clinical duties to attend training?
|
||
How will patients or clients understand their role in transfer of care?
|
||
Do staff and patients or clients have guidelines on transfer of care?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Right people
|
||
The appropriate people are
|
||
involved.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Who needs to attend the transfer of care (think about multidisciplinary
|
||
handover)? Do they need to be present for whole transfer or just part of it?
|
||
At what points do patients, clients and carers want to be involved in the
|
||
transfer of care process?
|
||
How will students and junior staff get the most learning opportunities from
|
||
handover?
|
||
Who will cover the unit while transfer of care occurs?
|
||
What happens in emergencies?
|
||
How can interruptions be prevented?
|
||
Who will be involved in regular review and audit of transfer of care
|
||
processes?
|
||
Who will prepare information and documentation for transfer of care?
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
What do we need? What does it mean? **Think about...**
|
||
|
||
Specified time and
|
||
place
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
A specific setting or place
|
||
has been agreed where
|
||
transfers of care can take
|
||
place without interruption or
|
||
distraction.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
When should the transfer of care happen?
|
||
How does this relate to time of shift change?
|
||
How long should the transfer of care take?
|
||
How can we ensure it starts on time?
|
||
Does the transfer of care process need to be different depending on the time
|
||
of day?
|
||
Where should the transfer of care happen?
|
||
Is the environment quiet with no interruptions? If not, how can interruptions
|
||
be reduced?
|
||
Does any part of transfer of care happen with the patient or in a public area?
|
||
How and where is confidential information transferred?
|
||
```
|
||
Standardised
|
||
process
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
There is an agreed process
|
||
for transfers of care
|
||
This includes an agreed set
|
||
of information to be covered
|
||
in transfers (minimum data
|
||
set). This is communicated in
|
||
a structured way, is action-
|
||
focused, assigns
|
||
responsibility for actions and
|
||
supported by clear
|
||
documentation.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
What information would be included in a standard transfer of care template or
|
||
electronic handover record? (The minimum data set.)
|
||
How much of this information overlaps with other disciplines? How could
|
||
multidisciplinary transfer of care be most effective?
|
||
How and when in the process will the person receiving the transfer of care
|
||
ask questions, confirm understanding and accept responsibility for the
|
||
patient/client?
|
||
Do you want to use structured communication tools (eg SBAR, ISOBAR,
|
||
RSVP etc.) or develop your own?
|
||
What happens to documentation following the transfer of care? How could it
|
||
be designed to go directly into patient notes?
|
||
How is the agreed transfer of care process documented? How do new staff
|
||
and patients/clients find out about the process?
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix C: The Model for Improvement
|
||
|
||
The Model for Improvement gives you a simple, adaptable and thorough framework for developing, testing and implementing changes. Using the
|
||
Model for Improvement means your changes are more likely to lead to the improvement you set out to make.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
The first thing you need to do when using the model is answer
|
||
these three key questions
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Then you carry out the ‘plan, do, study, act’ (PDSA) cycles.
|
||
These cycles are used to test an idea by trialling a change and
|
||
assessing its impact. The key to PDSA cycles is to repeat them;
|
||
keep testing small changes until they deliver the sustainable
|
||
improvement you are looking for.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Plan the change and how you will test it.
|
||
Do the change and tests.
|
||
Study the data before and after the change and learn
|
||
from it.
|
||
Act on the learning by refining the change and planning
|
||
another PDSA cycle to test it.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
For more
|
||
```
|
||
Langley GL, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP, The
|
||
Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing
|
||
Organizational Performance (2nd Edition). Jossey Bass, San
|
||
Francisco (2009)^ v
|
||
|
||
##### More online...
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
For more on the Model for Improvement see:
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Quality and service improvement tools
|
||
Improvement Leaders’ Guides – Process Mapping, Analysis and
|
||
Redesign
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix D: SMART aims
|
||
|
||
SMART aims are a good way to ensure your project aim is clearly defined.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Set a SMART improvement project aim:
|
||
Specific: Have a clear and specific improvement aim, e.g.
|
||
‘structured transfer of care, right each time’.
|
||
Measurable: Ensure data is available to measure the scale of the
|
||
problem and your success in addressing it.
|
||
Achievable: Set a suitable challenge and don’t be afraid to set
|
||
your aim high. Resist setting your aim too low just to improve your
|
||
chances of succeeding.
|
||
Realistic: Consider the factors beyond your control which may limit
|
||
the impact of the project, e.g. closure of a unit for refurbishment;
|
||
major staff changes; availability of sponsor.
|
||
Time: Set a deadline and stick to it, e.g. by December 2015.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix E: Team Selection Grid Examples
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Authority to make changes
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
YES
|
||
```
|
||
##### Acute example
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
YES NO
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
NO
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
© Profound Knowledge Products Inc.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Senior Sister
|
||
Therapy Lead
|
||
Registrar
|
||
Lead paramedic
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Junior Staff
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Directors
|
||
Consultants
|
||
Matron/ Senior Nurse
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Receptionist ward clerk/
|
||
Patient / CarerClient /
|
||
Improvement Specialist
|
||
IT expert
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Detailed
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Knowledge [of the process]
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Authority to make changes
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Detailed Knowledge
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
YES
|
||
```
|
||
##### Residential home example
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
YES NO
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
NO
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
© Profound Knowledge Products Inc.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Floor Supervisor
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Care home staff
|
||
GP
|
||
Reception Staff
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Home Manager RelativesResident
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix F: Example project template
|
||
|
||
(^) Adapted from outline in the (^) OSSIE Guide to Clinical
|
||
Handover Improvement. Available on Slide Share at
|
||
[http://www.qualityimprovementclinic.com](http://www.qualityimprovementclinic.com)
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix G: Dot voting
|
||
|
||
Dot voting is a simple way to collect input from the whole team about the information that should be included
|
||
in your communication tool.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Using your observation of the current transfer of care process, create a list of all the information which
|
||
is currently discussed.
|
||
Add any additional information that should perhaps be included; either because it is recommended
|
||
best practice or because staff/patients/clients want to see it included.
|
||
Let all staff have the opportunity to vote by sticking or drawing a dot next to the information they feel is
|
||
most important in enabling them to provide good quality care.
|
||
Remember to include both the staff who are delivering and receiving the transfer of care. This might
|
||
mean involving individuals from outside your immediate team if you are transferring patients between
|
||
units/departments.
|
||
Use different colour pens to identify different roles, e.g. different colours for trained and untrained
|
||
staff.
|
||
```
|
||
After everyone has voted, the information with the most dots is the information you need to focus on.
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
##### Appendix H: Good practice checklist – suggested measures
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
What do we
|
||
need?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
What does it mean? Suggested measures
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Leadership
|
||
There is a nominated leader for each
|
||
transfer of care/handover.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Staff survey – is leadership clear and does leader fulfil role?
|
||
Do new team members understand the process?
|
||
Is leader indicated on transfer of care process checklist (if used)?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Valued
|
||
Transfer and handovers are valued
|
||
as an essential part of care.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Number of interruptions
|
||
Staff/patient/client survey - do individuals value & understand the transfer of care process?
|
||
How many patients/clients know who is in charge of their care?
|
||
Do transfer of care guidelines exist and are they visible?
|
||
Number of staff trained in transfer of care process
|
||
Is documentation completed?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Right people
|
||
The appropriate people are involved. ^ Staff time invested in transfer of care (including Staff/patient/client satisfaction with transfer of care processpreparation time)
|
||
Number of incidents in unit/on floor during transfer of care
|
||
Is documentation completed?
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Specified
|
||
time and
|
||
place
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
A specific setting or place has been
|
||
agreed where transfers of care can
|
||
take place without interruption or
|
||
distraction.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Number of interruptions
|
||
Staff /patient/client survey – are timing and location appropriate?
|
||
Time transfer of care - does it start on time and how long does it take?
|
||
Staff time invested in transfer of care
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Standardised
|
||
process
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
There is an agreed process for
|
||
transfers of care. This includes an
|
||
agreed set of information to be
|
||
covered in transfers (minimum data
|
||
set). This is communicated in a
|
||
structured way, is action-focused,
|
||
assigns responsibility for actions and
|
||
supported by clear documentation.
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
Is documentation complete? y/n
|
||
Length of time for transfer of care
|
||
Staff/patient/client survey – is appropriate information included in transfer of care? Is
|
||
anything missing or not required?
|
||
Audit of transfer of care – is standard communication process followed each time?
|
||
Number of pieces of information in minimum data set which are communicated
|
||
Number of pieces of documentation filed in patient notes (or wherever process says they
|
||
should be)
|
||
Number of outstanding actions not completed at end of shift.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix I: Example PDSA for testing a new handover template
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Plan We plan to.... in order to (aim)
|
||
AimGet staff input to improve the design of the new handover template.
|
||
Plan
|
||
Use the new ISOBAR handover template for 1 bay of patients at afternoon shift handover.
|
||
Feedback will be gathered during the test and via a flipchart in the nurses office.
|
||
Risk Management
|
||
All staff will have copies of both the old and new handover templates for the chosen bay.
|
||
Measurement Plan
|
||
Handover will be timed and number of patients used to calculate handover time per patient.
|
||
The following questions will be asked:
|
||
Suggestions to improve the template? Content, layout, design?
|
||
Any other information needed during the shift? Or not needed?
|
||
What support would you like to help you use the template?
|
||
Do: What we did was..... (brief description of actions)
|
||
Bay 3 was handed over by Staff Nurse KS to Staff Nurse YB.
|
||
Time to handover Bay 3 –5:45 minutes
|
||
Feedback:
|
||
o Addition of mobility and dietary needs is good
|
||
o Expected Date of Discharge is not required
|
||
o Include patient age as well as date of birth
|
||
o Increase font size for recommended actions column
|
||
o With suggested changes it will be better than current template
|
||
o Guidelines for completing the template on the computer are required
|
||
o More practice using SBAR and readbackis required for it to feel comfortable
|
||
Study Looking at what happened, what we learned from this was..... ( lessons learned)
|
||
Handover per patient using the new template is quicker than the current process. This may be because it
|
||
eliminates the need for questions until all information has been communicated about that patient.
|
||
The template is popular, with some changes to be made.
|
||
Although the team asked to remove expected date of discharge, Senior Sister wants to keep to encourage
|
||
discharge planning.
|
||
Act What we plan to do next is .... (state next plan)
|
||
Make agreed changes and test template again with night staff for 2 bays.
|
||
Deliver more training and practice opportunities using SBAR with readback
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix J: Example PDSA for testing new transfer of care process
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix K: Examples of standardised communication templates
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Reproduced with permission of
|
||
Dr Sebastian Yuen
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Reproduced with permission of the
|
||
Heart of England NHS Foundation
|
||
Trust
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Standard Nursing Handover
|
||
Procedure - HAND ME AN
|
||
ISOBAR - Example
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix L: Example of how a poster can be used to spread the word about new processes
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
Appendix M: Summary of the six step improvement process for transfer of care
|
||
|
||
#### ^1
|
||
|
||
- **Start out (page 10)**
|
||
- Refer to existing policies and procedures for transfers of care in your organisation
|
||
- Observe, measure and process map the current communication process
|
||
- What does good look like? Compare your policy and communication process with the good practice checklist.
|
||
(Appendix B)
|
||
|
||
##### 2
|
||
|
||
- **Define and scope (page 13)**
|
||
- Begin to answer the three questions of the model for improvement (Appendix C)
|
||
- Set your project aim and scope and link this to your organisational big issues on a driver diagram (page 22)
|
||
- Engage staff, patients, clients and residents using patient stories and evidence from useful resources
|
||
- Choose your project team, include senior and frontline staff and patients/clients/residents
|
||
- Document your project plan (Appendix F) and use the sustainaiblity guide to think about long term impact of change
|
||
|
||
##### 3
|
||
|
||
- **Measure and understand (page 19)**
|
||
- Choose and define your outcomes and process measures, collect baseline data and display on run or SPC charts
|
||
|
||
##### 4
|
||
|
||
- **Design and plan (page 24)**
|
||
- Design your standard transfer of care template and test using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles (Appendix I & J)
|
||
- Use dot voting to define your minimum data set (Appendix G)
|
||
- Select a standardised communication tool (e.g. SBAR) to organise your minimum data set
|
||
- Generate and test other change ideas using the good practice checklist (Appendix B) and examples (Appendix K)
|
||
- Choose process measures (Appendix H) collect data and display on run or SPC charts
|
||
|
||
##### 5
|
||
|
||
- **Pilot and implement (page 34)**
|
||
- Document your new standardised transfer of care process
|
||
- Plan your tests for implementation using PDSA cycles. Plan training, measurement, resources & stakeholder
|
||
engagement. (Appendix I & J)
|
||
- Consider 'flexible standardisation' and spread good practice to other teams, departments and organisations
|
||
|
||
##### 6
|
||
|
||
- **Sustain and share (page 38)**
|
||
- Use the sustainability guide to ensure your changes will be sustained
|
||
- Celebrate and spread your success through conferences, posters, journal articles etc. (Appendix L)
|
||
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
August 2015
|
||
```
|
||
#### Product timeline
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
2011 - 2012 - First learning phase
|
||
QI project, Patient Safety Leaders Programme, NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement
|
||
Ali Cole, Quality Improvement Project Lead. Nicola Davey, Topic Expert
|
||
Staff at George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust (see acknowledgements on page 3)
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2012, First deisgn and testing phase
|
||
Sandra McNerney, Freelance Writer
|
||
Focus Groups x 2, NHS Institute Associates, Fellows and Critical Friends
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2013 - 2014 - Second learning phase
|
||
Nicola Davey, Quality Improvement Practitioner, Quality Improvement Clinic Ltd
|
||
Ali Cole, QI Practitioner and Topic Expert
|
||
```
|
||
```
|
||
2014 - 2015 - Second design and testing phase
|
||
Nicola Davey, Quality Improvement Practitioner, Quality Improvement Clinic Ltd
|
||
Rachel Hammel, Learning Expert, Quality Improvement Clinic Ltd
|
||
```
|
||
|