The option of 'other' seems to be gone from the
https://console.developers.google.com/apis/credentials/oauthclient
page. It only lists these now:
- Web application
- Android
- Chrome app
- iOS
- TVs and Limited Input devices
- Desktop app
- Universal Windows Platform (UWP)
If your filenames contain two near-identical Unicode characters,
rclone will normalize these, making them identical. This flag
gives you the ability to keep them unique. This might
create unintended side effects, such as duplicating files that
contain certain Unicode characters, when downloading them from
certain cloud providers to a macOS filesystem.
Fixes#4228
Before this code we were settig the headers on the PUT request. However this isn't where GCS needs them.
After this fix we set the headers in the object upload request itself.
This means that we only support a limited range of headers
- Cache-Control
- Content-Disposition
- Content-Encoding
- Content-Language
- Content-Type
- X-Goog-Meta-
Note for the last of those are for setting custom metadata in the form
"X-Goog-Meta-Key: value".
Before this change rclone would skip all shortcuts with a message
Ignoring unknown document type "application/vnd.google-apps.shortcut"
After this message rclone resolves the shortcuts by default to the
actual files that they point to. See the docs for more info.
The --drive-skip-shortcuts flag can be used to skip shortcuts.
This allows rclone to exit with a non-zero return code if no files are
transferred. This is useful when calling rclone as part of a workflow/script
pipeline as it allows the end user to stop processing if no files have been
transferred.
NB: Enabling this option will return in rclone exiting non-zero if there are no
transfers. Depending on how your're currently using rclone in your scripts,
this may break existing setups!
--files-from parses input files by ignoring comments starting with # and ;
and stripping whitespace from start and end of strings.
The --files-from-raw flag was added that reads every line from the file ignoring
comment characters and not stripping whitespace while maintaining
backwards compatibility.
Fixes#3762
Without explaining exactly how this is generated, it can be confusing
and worrying to not know how the password that encrypts your data is
stored.
This also brings peace of mind to the user that even though
the same password is obscured differently each time, all the data to
get back to the original password remains. Explaining how it works
is much better than the reader of the documentation having to trust
a blackboxy/magical mechanism.
