Didn't notice it because vendor/ was already populated on my dev machine, but did notice it in Docker build. Docker build now consumes devsetup like regular user, so this should catch future problems. Remove remaining curl|shit functionality from lazy.sh (no checkout logic needed anymore). refs #35
4.0 KiB
zrepl
zrepl is a ZFS filesystem backup & replication solution written in Go.
User Documentation
User Documentation can be found at zrepl.github.io.
Bug Reports
- If the issue is reproducible, enable debug logging, reproduce and capture the log.
- Open an issue on GitHub, with logs pasted as GitHub gists / inline.
Feature Requests
- Does you feature request require default values / some kind of configuration? If so, think of an expressive configuration example.
- Think of at least one use case that generalizes from your concrete application.
- Open an issue on GitHub with example conf & use case attached.
The above does not apply if you already implemented everything. Check out the Coding Workflow section below for details.
Package Maintainer Information
- Follow the steps in
docs/installation.rst -> Compiling from Source
and read the Makefile / shell scripts used in this process. - Make sure your distro is compatible with the paths in
docs/installation.rst
. - Ship a default config that adheres to your distro's
hier
and logging system. - Ship a service manager file and please try to upstream it to this repository.
- Use
make release ZREPL_VERSION='mydistro-1.2.3_1'
- Your distro's name and any versioning supplemental to zrepl's (e.g. package revision) should be in this string
- Make sure you are informed about new zrepl versions, e.g. by subscribing to GitHub's release RSS feed.
Developer Documentation
First, use ./lazy.sh devsetup
to install build dependencies and read docs/installation.rst -> Compiling from Source
.
Overall Architecture
The application architecture is documented as part of the user docs in the Implementation section (docs/content/impl
).
Make sure to develop an understanding how zrepl is typically used by studying the user docs first.
Project Structure
├── cmd
│ ├── sampleconf # example configuration
├── docs # sphinx-based documentation
│ ├── **/*.rst # documentation in reStructuredText
│ ├── sphinxconf
│ │ └── conf.py # sphinx config (see commit 445a280 why its not in docs/)
│ ├── requirements.txt # pip3 requirements to build documentation
│ ├── publish.sh # shell script for automated rendering & deploy to zrepl.github.io repo
│ ├── public_git # checkout of zrepl.github.io managed by above shell script
├── logger # logger package used by zrepl
├── rpc # rpc protocol implementation
├── sshbytestream # io.ReadWriteCloser over SSH
├── util
└── zfs # ZFS wrappers, filesystemm diffing
Coding Workflow
- Open an issue when starting to hack on a new feature
- Commits should reference the issue they are related to
- Docs improvements not documenting new features do not require an issue.
Breaking Changes
Backward-incompatible changes must be documented in the git commit message and are listed in docs/changelog.rst
.
- Config-breaking changes must contain a line
BREAK CONFIG
in the commit message - Other breaking changes must contain a line
BREAK
in the commit message
Glossary & Naming Inconsistencies
In ZFS, dataset refers to the objects filesystem, ZVOL and snapshot.
However, we need a word for filesystem & ZVOL but not a snapshot, bookmark, etc.
Toward the user, the following terminology is used:
- filesystem: a ZFS filesystem or a ZVOL
- filesystem version: a ZFS snapshot or a bookmark
Sadly, the zrepl implementation is inconsistent in its use of these words: variables and types are often named dataset when they in fact refer to a filesystem.
There will not be a big refactoring (an attempt was made, but it's destroying too much history without much gain).
However, new contributions & patches should fix naming without further notice in the commit message.