Made dependency lists a bit more consistent and reverted some of the
Arch Linux wording since it felt a bit off. Even the official website
refers to Arch Linux as Arch from time to time.
Instead of having a separate repository for each rice, I can instead put
them in this repository (prefixed with ., so that they're not indexed by
the stow Makefile).
Realistically, you won't need my wal config if you are not using my
bspwm setup, since wal does a good job at otherwise changing most other
color schemes that you may find in, e.g., a GNOME or Plasma setup.
Realistically, you'll be using neither termite nor urxvt if you have
access to a desktop environment since those usually include their own
terminal emulator that works out of the box anyway.
Additionally, many of the benefits from termite and urxvt are not a
necessity in other desktop environments.
Now that all the READMEs have been added, all that's left is to polish
them as time goes on. It may be useful to add images to each of the
package directories to show visually what each contain.
Also, after some testing, it turns out that my previous assumption about
systemd was wrong. Placing a service in default.target.wants directly
will cause the service to instead not be recognized by systemd.
Note that systemd usage information needs to be revised since systemd
user units appear to be enabled by default, and may be started by
default when placed in the default.target.wants directory.
Since I'd like other people to try my dotfiles, I will be writing
READMEs for each package directory, which should hopefully cover
anything a user needs to do in order to use the package.
"Desktop" was a really generic package name that didn't describe the
contents of what it contained. Since we already have a catch-all
directory (extras), I separated "desktop" into what it actually was:
settings for urxvt/termite and settings for xmodmap.
Some other programs may also use xrdb. The only reason the term files
are not in the bspwm directory instead is because it may be useful to
use urxvt or termite in non-bspwm environments.
It is now possible to install only a specific set of dotfiles instead
of everything at once. To do this, simply run make and set the "package"
variable from the shell. For example, to only stow my vim config, use
`make package=vim`.
The desktop directory is used for desktop-related things that may be
useful outside of bspwm (such as caps lock functioning as ctrl +
escape). Whether or not this is needed is questionable, but it is an
option for now.
It may be better to further split these directories and avoid the
generic word "desktop" altogether.
Previously I wanted to stow everything at once, but now that I know how
to use Makefiles a bit more, I can still stow everything at once with
multiple directories. Additionally, this allows people (myself included)
to only stow the dotfiles they want, such as only vim or only fish.
Instead of separating *every* file into its own directory, I've opted
instead to group common configs together and only use separate
directories where they make sense (e.g. a vim config).
Since padding-left and padding-right will always be the same in this
case, I've gone ahead and made it simply "padding".
Since keys can use the values from other keys, some duplication in the
module sections can be avoided.
Having a monocle-like layout on a tiled desktop layout is more
confusing than it needs to be. If single_monocle is ever needed,
it can be manually set on-demand instead.
Setting the file type of a file is different than simply changing its
syntax. In this case, the rofi config was treated as a real .java file.
By setting syntax explicitly, we avoid re-declaring the filetype.
Since urxvt and termite now look very similar to each other (except for
transparency), and since images do not play nicely in tmux / transparent
windows, it makes sense to separate tasks between the two.
Sometimes you may want to use an editor that is Not Vim. Although such
an editor may be feasible for the majority of users, an editor that is
Not Vim will not behave exactly like Vim, even with plugins.
Existing Vim users should not try to use Code as an editor. It is
instead a useful editor for when someone needs to use a Non Vim editor
on your machine (although you certainly should *not* condone this).
Code does, however, feature a useful file explorer that requires no
configuration nor maintenance to use. It just works.
Since launch.sh calculates all the bar values for us (as well as bspwm
settings), we can simply store the top_padding value in the user's cache
directory, then reference that number within sxhkd.
This way, if the top_padding value is changed through launch.sh, editing
sxhkdrc manually isn't needed, and the config file doesn't need to be
reloaded.
Although width can also be found through xrandr, it felt a bit messy to
parse output that wasn't meant to be parsed by other programs.
Since I can guarantee that the user will have bspwm (and not xrandr)
installed, I decided to use bspc instead. The current setup only works
for one monitor, but it should be relatively painless to setup multiple
monitors in the future (assuming they share the same dpi).
Since polybar supports include files, we can generate part of the bar
config with launch.sh and store it in $HOME/.cache. Since launch.sh is
a shell script, and since bspc is an interface to bspwm, we can also
change the necessary window manager settings required for different
bars, or even configure the settings for no bar at all.
A future implementation of launch.sh may allow us to change polybar
dimensions based on current resolution and whether the screen is HiDPI
or not, although it probably won't be *too* fancy since I don't need to
support every potential DPI a user may have.
Alternatively, someone could submit a patch for polybar to make it
DPI-aware. This is the ideal solution since the bar would be scaled
naturally based on dpi, instead of having to manually halve things
ourselves.
I used to not know much about shell scripting, but now that I do,
polybar-specific bspc commands can be handled through the launch.sh
shell script instead of directly from bspwmrc.
This lets us launch different bar styles with different bspc options, or
even set styles for no bar at all.
Maybe this is a new feature of polybar, or maybe I've never read the
documentation thoroughly enough. This commit adds inheritance for my
floating bar and top bar, so that duplication isn't necessary.
This makes things a lot easier to see and understand. There is also a
way to include other files, which may be useful for automatically
generating key value pairs for polybar based on screen resolution.
It may also be used to set different variables (i.e. colors) based on
which bar is used. Pretty handy.
Now that I understand the difference between the monocle desktop
layout and the fullscreen state of a node, it became clear that I
would probably use both.
Since I use the single_monocle config option, desktops with the
tiled layout may contain a monocle node, so I needed a way to tell
which layout a desktop was running.
I initially thought about using sxhkd to send a notification with
the layout portion of bspc query -T -d, however polybar supports
showing the layout natively, so I don't need to use a keybind.
The layout portion of the polybar config may not be needed if, for
example, you decide to disable single_monocle and there is no ambiguity
between fullscreen nodes and monocle desktops.
I don't think I've ever used these keybinds after I learned about
holding the left mouse button to move windows and holding the right
mouse button to resize them.
If you don't have access to a mouse, you probably don't need to resize
windows anyway, and certainly not float them. tmux is still an option,
and the preselect ratio option of bspc is still there.
Ultimately, since sxhkd just runs shell commands, you can resize windows
through a terminal or shell script as well.
This commit also removes the "switch to previous node" keybind, since
an option like that changes often and may behave unexpectedly if
another node is focused with the cursor.
I tried to do this before, but couldn't figure it out. Now that I
understand more about how windows in X11 work, and now that I know more
about shell scripting, writing this functionality became trivial to do.
There is a shorthand syntax offered by sxhkd that helps us make our
config files more compact. I avoided this syntax at first since I was
new to the software, but now that I've used bspc, sxhkd, and the shell
enough, the shorthand syntax is more concise and easier to read.
